<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shocker: Obama Got Best Media Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-got-best-media-in-history/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-got-best-media-in-history</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:57:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-got-best-media-in-history#comment-126059</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-got-best-media-in-history#comment-126059</guid>
		<description>&quot;Drink deeply Ezra.&quot;

I believe Ezra was agreeing with the article -- and most of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Drink deeply Ezra.&#8221;</p>
<p>I believe Ezra was agreeing with the article &#8212; and most of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-got-best-media-in-history#comment-126058</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 15:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-got-best-media-in-history#comment-126058</guid>
		<description>Drink deeply Ezra.

Are these the best links you could find to downplay the blatantly obvious extreme bias of the MSM?  Surely Kos, Huffington, etc. have better material with more creative usage of statistics.

The facts are that Obamy voters can&#039;t even identify which party has the majority in congress.  Like Obamy, his voters are idiots.  And who educates them?   The MSM of course.

The most dangerous enemy of this country is Politicians, and the Media is a very close second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drink deeply Ezra.</p>
<p>Are these the best links you could find to downplay the blatantly obvious extreme bias of the MSM?  Surely Kos, Huffington, etc. have better material with more creative usage of statistics.</p>
<p>The facts are that Obamy voters can&#8217;t even identify which party has the majority in congress.  Like Obamy, his voters are idiots.  And who educates them?   The MSM of course.</p>
<p>The most dangerous enemy of this country is Politicians, and the Media is a very close second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ezra</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-got-best-media-in-history#comment-126053</link>
		<dc:creator>ezra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 15:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-got-best-media-in-history#comment-126053</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m new to these parts so I&#039;m not sure if the sarcasm is meant to imply that any of this really matters.

But I do love that the first example of pro-Obama bias quotes Mark Halperin, who is generally reviled by Obamaphiles, and who called press bias during this election &quot;the most disgusting failure of [the press] since the Iraq war.&quot;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAg9aEuLrXw

So when a guy like this says &quot;it&#039;s raining&quot;, maybe you should consider the possibility that it is in fact just raining.

I like Pew on the subject. Same topic, but less fluffy:

Winning the Media Campaign
http://journalism.org/node/13307

And here&#039;s where it gets good:

Public Knowledge of Current Affairs Little Changed by News and Information Revolutions
http://people-press.org/report/319/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions

Winds of Political Change Haven’t Shifted Public’s Ideology Balance
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1042/winds-of-political-change-havent--shifted-publics-ideology-balance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m new to these parts so I&#8217;m not sure if the sarcasm is meant to imply that any of this really matters.</p>
<p>But I do love that the first example of pro-Obama bias quotes Mark Halperin, who is generally reviled by Obamaphiles, and who called press bias during this election &#8220;the most disgusting failure of [the press] since the Iraq war.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAg9aEuLrXw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAg9aEuLrXw</a></p>
<p>So when a guy like this says &#8220;it&#8217;s raining&#8221;, maybe you should consider the possibility that it is in fact just raining.</p>
<p>I like Pew on the subject. Same topic, but less fluffy:</p>
<p>Winning the Media Campaign<br />
<a href="http://journalism.org/node/13307" rel="nofollow">http://journalism.org/node/13307</a></p>
<p>And here&#8217;s where it gets good:</p>
<p>Public Knowledge of Current Affairs Little Changed by News and Information Revolutions<br />
<a href="http://people-press.org/report/319/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions" rel="nofollow">http://people-press.org/report.....evolutions</a></p>
<p>Winds of Political Change Haven’t Shifted Public’s Ideology Balance<br />
<a href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1042/winds-of-political-change-havent--shifted-publics-ideology-balance" rel="nofollow">http://pewresearch.org/pubs/10.....gy-balance</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigOil</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-got-best-media-in-history#comment-126019</link>
		<dc:creator>BigOil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-got-best-media-in-history#comment-126019</guid>
		<description>After delivering 91% positive coverage for BO on ABC, CBS, and NBC newscasts...the networks should be renamed PRAVDA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After delivering 91% positive coverage for BO on ABC, CBS, and NBC newscasts&#8230;the networks should be renamed PRAVDA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: locomotivebreath1901</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-got-best-media-in-history#comment-126017</link>
		<dc:creator>locomotivebreath1901</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-got-best-media-in-history#comment-126017</guid>
		<description>No doubt this headline was meant to read &quot;OBAMA’S COVERAGE WAS &lt;B&gt;HISTRIONIC&lt;/B&gt; TOO.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt this headline was meant to read &#8220;OBAMA’S COVERAGE WAS <b>HISTRIONIC</b> TOO.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-got-best-media-in-history#comment-126016</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-got-best-media-in-history#comment-126016</guid>
		<description>But didn&#039;t Shep Smith derisively tell us that the media was just reflecting the public&#039;s sentiment?

Was the election gap after ALL THE VOTES were counted 60%?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But didn&#8217;t Shep Smith derisively tell us that the media was just reflecting the public&#8217;s sentiment?</p>
<p>Was the election gap after ALL THE VOTES were counted 60%?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
