<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama &#8216;Rethinks&#8217; Business Tax Credits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129514</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129514</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sea Kittens&quot;....... more like Land Sharks.....here kitty kitty!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sea Kittens&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;. more like Land Sharks&#8230;..here kitty kitty!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129509</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129509</guid>
		<description>Kristol is a Washington guy.  He&#039;s pretty conservative, but he&#039;s one of those guys who also wants to stay in the cocktail party circuit, so he&#039;s always finding something to like about the lieing libs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristol is a Washington guy.  He&#8217;s pretty conservative, but he&#8217;s one of those guys who also wants to stay in the cocktail party circuit, so he&#8217;s always finding something to like about the lieing libs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMG</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129508</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129508</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about Kristol, but Brooks voted for &quot;Honest Obe&quot;.  Ain&#039;t that a fine kettle of &#039;Sea Kittens&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about Kristol, but Brooks voted for &#8220;Honest Obe&#8221;.  Ain&#8217;t that a fine kettle of &#8216;Sea Kittens&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129507</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129507</guid>
		<description>Swell.   Brooks and Kristol speaking for conservatives.  Now I can rest easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swell.   Brooks and Kristol speaking for conservatives.  Now I can rest easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lipstick on a PIAPS</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129504</link>
		<dc:creator>Lipstick on a PIAPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129504</guid>
		<description>How can Obama rethink when he didn&#039;t even think in first place? Guess Obama is 
&#039;Rethinking&quot; all of his campaign promises. The financial ones anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can Obama rethink when he didn&#8217;t even think in first place? Guess Obama is<br />
&#8216;Rethinking&#8221; all of his campaign promises. The financial ones anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pinandpuller</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129494</link>
		<dc:creator>pinandpuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129494</guid>
		<description>Rush said he would give his input after all but Drudge says its George Will, David Brooks and Bill Kristol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush said he would give his input after all but Drudge says its George Will, David Brooks and Bill Kristol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMG</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129492</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129492</guid>
		<description>I agree to a point.  Everything is &quot;window dressing&quot; with Obama.  This is probably just a flanking move by him that will play well in the MSM.  And those with the tin-foil hats will buy into the charade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree to a point.  Everything is &#8220;window dressing&#8221; with Obama.  This is probably just a flanking move by him that will play well in the MSM.  And those with the tin-foil hats will buy into the charade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129489</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129489</guid>
		<description>&quot;pre-emptive&quot;?

Maybe.   Obamy is probably positioning himself to be able to say he included all sides in the discussion, so it&#039;s sour grapes to be criticising him.

Can&#039;t see Rush falling for anything like that.  He won&#039;t be climbing on the Hopeychangey bandwagon tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;pre-emptive&#8221;?</p>
<p>Maybe.   Obamy is probably positioning himself to be able to say he included all sides in the discussion, so it&#8217;s sour grapes to be criticising him.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t see Rush falling for anything like that.  He won&#8217;t be climbing on the Hopeychangey bandwagon tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMG</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129477</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129477</guid>
		<description>Pre-emptive strike?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pre-emptive strike?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129473</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129473</guid>
		<description>Hot Air reports Obamy might be meeting with Limbaugh and other conservative leaders tonight.  

Rush had an emergency host today.  The report also says there are hints on Rush&#039;s web-site.

If it&#039;s true, it is interesting indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hot Air reports Obamy might be meeting with Limbaugh and other conservative leaders tonight.  </p>
<p>Rush had an emergency host today.  The report also says there are hints on Rush&#8217;s web-site.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s true, it is interesting indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129404</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129404</guid>
		<description>Got any spare &quot;CHANGE&quot;?  We are bankrupt here....and here....and here.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got any spare &#8220;CHANGE&#8221;?  We are bankrupt here&#8230;.and here&#8230;.and here&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clifcrds</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129392</link>
		<dc:creator>clifcrds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129392</guid>
		<description>This is just a preview . . . NOW the Tiger is really showing his stripes! (emphasis mine)

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;B&gt;Obama seeks Dem votes for $350 billion bailout&lt;/B&gt;
By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent David Espo, Ap Special Correspondent 
January 13, 2009
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/obama_economy
 
WASHINGTON – President-elect Barack Obama has asked Democratic senators &lt;B&gt;not to stand in the way of an additional $350 billion in bailout funds&lt;/B&gt;, calling the money essential to helping the troubled economy.

Obama made his pitch in a meeting in the Capitol, where he attended the Democratic senators&#039; closed-door luncheon.

Lawmakers who emerged from the session said the president-elect pledged to correct what they believe were shortcomings in the way the Bush administration handled the first $350 billion. &lt;B&gt;They added he would veto any attempt to block his own administration&#039;s use of the funds.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And by what I am seeing this tiger is wearing Pink stripes on a Brown coat.

Pink as in socialist and Brown as in Brownshirt Thug. He wants &lt;B&gt;TOTAL CONTROL&lt;/b&gt; of the 350 Billion! He wants to exclude any imput from not just the taxpayers, not just the Republicans, but total exclusion from his own Commiecratic Party!

Even Helen Keller could see exactly just what kind of a Socialist Brownshirt Thug the sheople have given the reigns of power to in exchange for living the life of a confinement hog.

I&#039;m afraid its getting very close to &quot;lock &amp; load&quot; time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just a preview . . . NOW the Tiger is really showing his stripes! (emphasis mine)</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Obama seeks Dem votes for $350 billion bailout</b><br />
By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent David Espo, Ap Special Correspondent<br />
January 13, 2009<br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/obama_economy" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/obama_economy</a></p>
<p>WASHINGTON – President-elect Barack Obama has asked Democratic senators <b>not to stand in the way of an additional $350 billion in bailout funds</b>, calling the money essential to helping the troubled economy.</p>
<p>Obama made his pitch in a meeting in the Capitol, where he attended the Democratic senators&#8217; closed-door luncheon.</p>
<p>Lawmakers who emerged from the session said the president-elect pledged to correct what they believe were shortcomings in the way the Bush administration handled the first $350 billion. <b>They added he would veto any attempt to block his own administration&#8217;s use of the funds.</b></p></blockquote>
<p>And by what I am seeing this tiger is wearing Pink stripes on a Brown coat.</p>
<p>Pink as in socialist and Brown as in Brownshirt Thug. He wants <b>TOTAL CONTROL</b> of the 350 Billion! He wants to exclude any imput from not just the taxpayers, not just the Republicans, but total exclusion from his own Commiecratic Party!</p>
<p>Even Helen Keller could see exactly just what kind of a Socialist Brownshirt Thug the sheople have given the reigns of power to in exchange for living the life of a confinement hog.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid its getting very close to &#8220;lock &amp; load&#8221; time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129378</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129378</guid>
		<description>Every private sector job steals a job from government.

We can&#039;t have that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every private sector job steals a job from government.</p>
<p>We can&#8217;t have that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillK</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129361</link>
		<dc:creator>BillK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-rethinks-business-tax-credits#comment-129361</guid>
		<description>Tax credits for hiring?

Not so fast.

Instead, the Government prefers subsidizing industries that will &lt;b&gt;never&lt;/b&gt; exist without a subsidy, of course.

From the WSJ:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Obama Team Is Reconsidering Proposed Tax Credit for Hiring&lt;/b&gt;

By Greg Hitt and Jonathan Weisman

President-elect Barack Obama&#039;s proposed tax credit for new hiring is likely to be scaled back -- and could be jettisoned from his economic-stimulus plan altogether -- &lt;i&gt;in favor of new and bigger tax breaks for renewable-energy development and production&lt;/i&gt;, said individuals familiar with the situation...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123180807306575741.html&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, to recap, no tax credits for businesses, and no money for taxpayers who have a job.

But handouts for the &quot;without government subsidies we go out of business&quot; &#039;renewable energy&#039; business and of course those who aren&#039;t actually &lt;b&gt;paying&lt;/b&gt; taxes now.

Where again are those folks who thought Obama might pursue a centrist route?

It&#039;s still a possibility, but would he actually have the guts to veto the wide-eyed spending of the leaders of his own party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tax credits for hiring?</p>
<p>Not so fast.</p>
<p>Instead, the Government prefers subsidizing industries that will <b>never</b> exist without a subsidy, of course.</p>
<p>From the WSJ:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Obama Team Is Reconsidering Proposed Tax Credit for Hiring</b></p>
<p>By Greg Hitt and Jonathan Weisman</p>
<p>President-elect Barack Obama&#8217;s proposed tax credit for new hiring is likely to be scaled back &#8212; and could be jettisoned from his economic-stimulus plan altogether &#8212; <i>in favor of new and bigger tax breaks for renewable-energy development and production</i>, said individuals familiar with the situation&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123180807306575741.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/.....75741.html</a></p></blockquote>
<p>So, to recap, no tax credits for businesses, and no money for taxpayers who have a job.</p>
<p>But handouts for the &#8220;without government subsidies we go out of business&#8221; &#8216;renewable energy&#8217; business and of course those who aren&#8217;t actually <b>paying</b> taxes now.</p>
<p>Where again are those folks who thought Obama might pursue a centrist route?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still a possibility, but would he actually have the guts to veto the wide-eyed spending of the leaders of his own party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
