Comments on: Obama To Pay ACORN Despite Congress

By: Liberals Demise

Liberals Demise — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:25:01 +0000

Because the ignorant masses wants dat obamas monies!
(scraping the ebonics off tongue with K-Bar)

By: Chuckk

Chuckk — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:38:31 +0000

Change the name from ACORN, shuffle a few people around, and the problem is solved for the government.

I wonder how many other similar organizations are out there and being funded by my tax money.

By: GL0120

GL0120 — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:58:53 +0000

How can anyone possibly be surprised by this?
I mean, just ask him, he won, right?

By: proreason

proreason — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:23:17 +0000

Well, he’s entitled

By: Gila Monster

Gila Monster — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:02:25 +0000

“Acorn has argued that it is the real victim of such incidents, which its employees have often brought to the attention of the authorities.”

Whew..!! The mind boggles over that one.
ACORN is the “real victim” here? Hmmmm??….., I suppose they are…, just like “Freezer” Jefferson, Chucky Rangel, Al Sharptongue, the Jena Six, Tookie Williams, Crystal Mangum and Michael Jackson were also “victims”.

So, if I have an uncontrollable bout of irony laughter over this, does that make me a bible-clinging, gun-owning, tea-bagging, global-warming-denying, narrow-minded, non-enlightened, racist b*st*rd?
Wait……, don’t answer that……, I believe I know the answer to that one……

By: platypus

platypus — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:28:31 +0000

How long will it be before the bondholders and other contract beneficiaries of the Chrysler debacle seek to join the ACORN lawsuit as co-plaintiffs?

Possibly there is a difference but I sure don’t see it. To me, it just looks like whether a group gets screwed by the government is determined by whether that group is “approved” or not.

Time to bone up on the finer points of the Spanish Inquisition and the Star Chambers.

By: Rip Cord

Rip Cord — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:07:53 +0000

Ya gotta hand it to ObaMAO, he’s the most in your face President in history. I’ve never even seen a second term landslide President so arrogant. It will be interesting to see how the voters respond.

By: joeblough

joeblough — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:48:57 +0000

Just like they do it in Kenya and Indonesia.

By: proreason

proreason — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:42:36 +0000

White’s are now 65% opposed, and that’s climbing.

But the home boys are stickin with him at 97%.

Why’s that I wonder?

By: JohnMG

JohnMG — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:49:45 +0000

How can anyone with a lick of sense read the above article without coming to the conclusion that we are living under an obviously racist administration bent on “stickin’ it to whitey”.

I don’t know about anyone else, but in my mind, these clowns have set race relations back 50 years. If I was black I’d be pissed to think that the first black president was such a horse’s ass and a poster boy for every caricature of black ineptitude ever presented.

My prediction? It’ll be a looooong time before America elects the SECOND black president!! Show me ANY country with black majority rule that isn’t completely FUBAR’d, and I’ll kiss your butt in the middle of main street at high noon. I’ll even give you an hour to draw a crowd of witnesses!

By: Liberals Demise

Liberals Demise — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:23:23 +0000

OOOOOOOoooooooooooooooo my head.
Where’s my booze, cigarettes and gun?
(ATF)

By: U NO HOO

U NO HOO — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:57:52 +0000

“$53 million in federal aid”

That money could be used to help support those who cannot support themselves in the mainstream of life.

Oh, yeah, that is what the money did.

By: proreason

proreason — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:50:58 +0000

Good. More fuel for the bonfires.

By: pdsand

pdsand — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:15:15 +0000

If it’s bad for liberals, it gets interpreted narrowly and its intent gets watered down. If it’s bad for conservatives, it gets interpreted as broadly as possible and its intent gets magnified. It’s all just words to these people.