<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPA To Regulate Carbon Dioxide Pollution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BannedbytheTaliban</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143201</link>
		<dc:creator>BannedbytheTaliban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143201</guid>
		<description>Just think of all the CO2 he saves by living in his mom&#039;s basement.  I mean, the wood for a new house, the extra heating and electric.  He is real humanitarian.  Maybe he will try to cut back on CO2 output by holding his breath.  Probably won&#039;t work, but hey, it is better to do something and fail than nothing at all.

And smart, under Obama, we are, or soon will be, caged primates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just think of all the CO2 he saves by living in his mom&#8217;s basement.  I mean, the wood for a new house, the extra heating and electric.  He is real humanitarian.  Maybe he will try to cut back on CO2 output by holding his breath.  Probably won&#8217;t work, but hey, it is better to do something and fail than nothing at all.</p>
<p>And smart, under Obama, we are, or soon will be, caged primates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinger</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143189</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143189</guid>
		<description>You know toosmart,  I really enjoy reading lefty responses to complex problems as they generally fall between three distinct, yet intersecting poles:

A:  Consquences of our actions don&#039;t matter,  it&#039;s the thought that counts.

B:  Republicans are Nazis

And my all time personal favorite:

C: Bu$hitler and Cheney lied and people died for big oil.

My post listed examples of what to expect once Lil Barry runs amok with his Cap and Trade tax scheme.  Since you obviously have no clue about basic economics 101,  your rebuttal is unsuprisingly nothing more than the equilvant of a 5 year old child putting his hands over his ears and humming a tune so as to not hear what is being told to him.

You say....&lt;I&gt;&quot;Better to do something and fail than stand back and do nothing.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

So with technologies that are at best 20 years away from being affordable enough for mass usage,  the solution to do something now is to tax greenhouse gas emitters into oblivion?  Explain how this benefits the society as a whole,  since the consquences of this action will be a ruined economoy and mass unemployment that makes 8.5% look pretty good.  Better to go forward with this plan,  already seeing it will fail miserably?

Oh,  just in case you missed it,  environmentalists are tying up a massive solar power project in the Southwest because of an endagered Pupfish that can only be found in some isolated spring hole of water.  The fish cannot be bred outside the spring hole as other attempts have failed.   Your solution to this is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know toosmart,  I really enjoy reading lefty responses to complex problems as they generally fall between three distinct, yet intersecting poles:</p>
<p>A:  Consquences of our actions don&#8217;t matter,  it&#8217;s the thought that counts.</p>
<p>B:  Republicans are Nazis</p>
<p>And my all time personal favorite:</p>
<p>C: Bu$hitler and Cheney lied and people died for big oil.</p>
<p>My post listed examples of what to expect once Lil Barry runs amok with his Cap and Trade tax scheme.  Since you obviously have no clue about basic economics 101,  your rebuttal is unsuprisingly nothing more than the equilvant of a 5 year old child putting his hands over his ears and humming a tune so as to not hear what is being told to him.</p>
<p>You say&#8230;.<i>&#8220;Better to do something and fail than stand back and do nothing.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>So with technologies that are at best 20 years away from being affordable enough for mass usage,  the solution to do something now is to tax greenhouse gas emitters into oblivion?  Explain how this benefits the society as a whole,  since the consquences of this action will be a ruined economoy and mass unemployment that makes 8.5% look pretty good.  Better to go forward with this plan,  already seeing it will fail miserably?</p>
<p>Oh,  just in case you missed it,  environmentalists are tying up a massive solar power project in the Southwest because of an endagered Pupfish that can only be found in some isolated spring hole of water.  The fish cannot be bred outside the spring hole as other attempts have failed.   Your solution to this is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143182</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143182</guid>
		<description>Sweet moniker - did your Mom help you with that?  I love how you exchanged a number for a word!  Or should I have said &#039;a number 4 a word!&#039;.  Awesome, dude!

But enough ad hominem…  

AGW is allegedly science.  Science requires the application of the scientific method, not consensus.  (Please, stop me if I&#039;m going too fast.)  1. Hypothesis: carbon dioxide is responsible for/related to temperature variations on Earth.  2. Collect data. 3. Examine data using math and gnarly Latin phrases.  4. Confirm or refute your hypothesis.

So, the data is in, the analysis complete and there is no correlation (let alone causation) between carbon dioxide levels and the temperature of the Earth.  QED.  Am I missing something, dude?  The scientific debate is over.  There is no AGW.

Have a nice day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet moniker &#8211; did your Mom help you with that?  I love how you exchanged a number for a word!  Or should I have said &#8216;a number 4 a word!&#8217;.  Awesome, dude!</p>
<p>But enough ad hominem…  </p>
<p>AGW is allegedly science.  Science requires the application of the scientific method, not consensus.  (Please, stop me if I&#8217;m going too fast.)  1. Hypothesis: carbon dioxide is responsible for/related to temperature variations on Earth.  2. Collect data. 3. Examine data using math and gnarly Latin phrases.  4. Confirm or refute your hypothesis.</p>
<p>So, the data is in, the analysis complete and there is no correlation (let alone causation) between carbon dioxide levels and the temperature of the Earth.  QED.  Am I missing something, dude?  The scientific debate is over.  There is no AGW.</p>
<p>Have a nice day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMG</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143176</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143176</guid>
		<description>What an asshat!  You&#039;re too smart by half.  The moron you helped put in power, if left un-checked, will see to it you won&#039;t have an opportunity to vote.  There is a reason people like you were/are referred to as &quot;useful idiots&quot;.  You&#039;re just like toilet paper--necessary at the moment yet expendable once you&#039;ve been used.  If you weren&#039;t such a simpleton you&#039;d have already figured this out.  Instead, you think you&#039;ll be spared the rude awakening you&#039;ve helped call down on us all. 

......&quot;Love Obama…Glad I voted for him….&quot; 

That&#039;s what I call &#039;stupid-proud&#039;....but then, as Larry says, &quot;You can&#039;t fix stupid&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an asshat!  You&#8217;re too smart by half.  The moron you helped put in power, if left un-checked, will see to it you won&#8217;t have an opportunity to vote.  There is a reason people like you were/are referred to as &#8220;useful idiots&#8221;.  You&#8217;re just like toilet paper&#8211;necessary at the moment yet expendable once you&#8217;ve been used.  If you weren&#8217;t such a simpleton you&#8217;d have already figured this out.  Instead, you think you&#8217;ll be spared the rude awakening you&#8217;ve helped call down on us all. </p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;Love Obama…Glad I voted for him….&#8221; </p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I call &#8216;stupid-proud&#8217;&#8230;.but then, as Larry says, &#8220;You can&#8217;t fix stupid&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymoose</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143175</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143175</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say better to do figure out the right thing to do than do the wrong thing and screw it up.  Or to put in current terms, applying an unrealistic and artificial method to &quot;increase&quot; the cost of fossil fuel to make it so expensive we&#039;ll take alternatives, none of which have proven completely capable of the job.  And more than a few countries are going to take the assumption, &quot;hey, we&#039;ll just keep on using fossil fuel.&quot;

Nothing I said mentioned getting together with corporations, but you couldn&#039;t resist the dig, could you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say better to do figure out the right thing to do than do the wrong thing and screw it up.  Or to put in current terms, applying an unrealistic and artificial method to &#8220;increase&#8221; the cost of fossil fuel to make it so expensive we&#8217;ll take alternatives, none of which have proven completely capable of the job.  And more than a few countries are going to take the assumption, &#8220;hey, we&#8217;ll just keep on using fossil fuel.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nothing I said mentioned getting together with corporations, but you couldn&#8217;t resist the dig, could you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: take_no_prisoners</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143168</link>
		<dc:creator>take_no_prisoners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 23:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143168</guid>
		<description>Obama has absolutely no experience in anything but campaigning.  He grew up in Indonesia and Kenya  which is why he doesn&#039;t know the most basic facts of U. S. history and geography--things which are taught in elementary and junior high school.  At least, they used to be.  The flat earth theory, the earth as the center of the universe, evil spirits causing disease and any number of now disproven theories were once the prevailing consensus.  Many things that were once thought to have good scientific support have been proven wrong by people who looked closer and bucked the conventional consensus.  The only way to prove a scientific theory is to duplicate it, computer modeling doesn&#039;t count.  At best, a computer model can lead you to the most promising paths of inquiry.  The problem with computer modeling is you have to make some assumptions and if the assumptions aren&#039;t right the result can&#039;t possibly be right.

He was propped up and promoted by big money interests led by George Soros and his buddies and 52% of the voting population fell for it so he now claims an overwhelming mandate.  Who else do you know who could sell millions of dollars worth of autobiographies based on absolutely no noteworthy accomplishments and a razor thin resume?  Someone knew history and took a page out of post world war I history to put this scam together.

Obama wasn&#039;t around when all the things he thinks are brilliant were tried and failed miserably, and since he didn&#039;t get his basic education in the U.S. he is blissfully unaware of his ignorance.  He doesn&#039;t know history, geography, business, science or economics--and he doesn&#039;t have a lick of common sense.  He&#039;s never had to make executive decisions in any size business or government until now.  As far as I&#039;m concerned he is a slick talking, naive, ignorant fool.  Merely a puppet of the George Soros group of rich international hedge fund managers.  If we are lucky, we will survive and live to repair the damage he is doing in fairly short order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has absolutely no experience in anything but campaigning.  He grew up in Indonesia and Kenya  which is why he doesn&#8217;t know the most basic facts of U. S. history and geography&#8211;things which are taught in elementary and junior high school.  At least, they used to be.  The flat earth theory, the earth as the center of the universe, evil spirits causing disease and any number of now disproven theories were once the prevailing consensus.  Many things that were once thought to have good scientific support have been proven wrong by people who looked closer and bucked the conventional consensus.  The only way to prove a scientific theory is to duplicate it, computer modeling doesn&#8217;t count.  At best, a computer model can lead you to the most promising paths of inquiry.  The problem with computer modeling is you have to make some assumptions and if the assumptions aren&#8217;t right the result can&#8217;t possibly be right.</p>
<p>He was propped up and promoted by big money interests led by George Soros and his buddies and 52% of the voting population fell for it so he now claims an overwhelming mandate.  Who else do you know who could sell millions of dollars worth of autobiographies based on absolutely no noteworthy accomplishments and a razor thin resume?  Someone knew history and took a page out of post world war I history to put this scam together.</p>
<p>Obama wasn&#8217;t around when all the things he thinks are brilliant were tried and failed miserably, and since he didn&#8217;t get his basic education in the U.S. he is blissfully unaware of his ignorance.  He doesn&#8217;t know history, geography, business, science or economics&#8211;and he doesn&#8217;t have a lick of common sense.  He&#8217;s never had to make executive decisions in any size business or government until now.  As far as I&#8217;m concerned he is a slick talking, naive, ignorant fool.  Merely a puppet of the George Soros group of rich international hedge fund managers.  If we are lucky, we will survive and live to repair the damage he is doing in fairly short order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMAN</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143166</link>
		<dc:creator>VMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143166</guid>
		<description>Hi toosmart4you.  I&#039;m just wondering if there is a point that you would be willing to silence people like those on this blog?  I would also like to know if there is a point where you would condone imprisoning these people?  You don&#039;t seem willing to even consider any position but your own and anyone who disagrees with you is just simply wrong.  
Can&#039;t stand Obama and I&#039;m glad I won&#039;t have to vote for him again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi toosmart4you.  I&#8217;m just wondering if there is a point that you would be willing to silence people like those on this blog?  I would also like to know if there is a point where you would condone imprisoning these people?  You don&#8217;t seem willing to even consider any position but your own and anyone who disagrees with you is just simply wrong.<br />
Can&#8217;t stand Obama and I&#8217;m glad I won&#8217;t have to vote for him again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigOil</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143164</link>
		<dc:creator>BigOil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143164</guid>
		<description>&quot;Better to do something and fail than stand back and do nothing.&quot;

Exactly the type of inane statement I&#039;d expect from a liberal.

Banning DDT without data indicating any harmful effects to humans has only led to the death of millions from malaria in Africa.  At least we did something.

Stagnating our economy in an attempt to solve a non-existent problem is beneficial to whom?  Al Gore and the Chinese?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Better to do something and fail than stand back and do nothing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly the type of inane statement I&#8217;d expect from a liberal.</p>
<p>Banning DDT without data indicating any harmful effects to humans has only led to the death of millions from malaria in Africa.  At least we did something.</p>
<p>Stagnating our economy in an attempt to solve a non-existent problem is beneficial to whom?  Al Gore and the Chinese?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143162</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143162</guid>
		<description>The climate models predicted the world would be 1% warmer in 2010, but it&#039;s cooled since the models predicted that toosmart.

Do you read anything besides libwit propaganda?

BTW, the icecaps are expanding, and polar bear populations are growing.

If the globe was warming, it would be a boon to mankind.  Longer growing seasons, more arable land, etc.  Unfortunately, 2008 was the coldest year in a long time.  We are in a period of recurring ice ages you know....oh, I guess you don&#039;t know.

But that&#039;s just common sense, not book learning.   No liberal would ever believe it.

Another fact you may not have heard is that the climate has self adjusting mechanisms, like many natural processes.  But that doesn&#039;t fit the propaganda either, so it must be ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The climate models predicted the world would be 1% warmer in 2010, but it&#8217;s cooled since the models predicted that toosmart.</p>
<p>Do you read anything besides libwit propaganda?</p>
<p>BTW, the icecaps are expanding, and polar bear populations are growing.</p>
<p>If the globe was warming, it would be a boon to mankind.  Longer growing seasons, more arable land, etc.  Unfortunately, 2008 was the coldest year in a long time.  We are in a period of recurring ice ages you know&#8230;.oh, I guess you don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s just common sense, not book learning.   No liberal would ever believe it.</p>
<p>Another fact you may not have heard is that the climate has self adjusting mechanisms, like many natural processes.  But that doesn&#8217;t fit the propaganda either, so it must be ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toosmart4you</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143160</link>
		<dc:creator>toosmart4you</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143160</guid>
		<description>You know Anymoose and  RightWinger, I really enjoy reading Righty responses to exceedingly complex problems as they generally fall between three distinct, yet intersecting poles;

 A: Let’s get together with the corporations and build unrealistic models of what changing a problem could potentially cost us, so that we can delay actually doing anything about it until it’s too late.  
 
B: Well, since its’ an act of God and it’s going to happen anyway, we might as well just sit back and throw feces (like caged primates) at those “stupid enough” to try…

And my all time personal favorite:

C: Cut Taxes.
  
As for the rest?  Well, they’re just an incoherent mishmash of marginally similar situations that, again, propose to real solutions to actually FIX anything.

Better to do something and fail than stand back and do nothing.

Love Obama…Glad I voted for him…Can’t wait to do it again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know Anymoose and  RightWinger, I really enjoy reading Righty responses to exceedingly complex problems as they generally fall between three distinct, yet intersecting poles;</p>
<p> A: Let’s get together with the corporations and build unrealistic models of what changing a problem could potentially cost us, so that we can delay actually doing anything about it until it’s too late.  </p>
<p>B: Well, since its’ an act of God and it’s going to happen anyway, we might as well just sit back and throw feces (like caged primates) at those “stupid enough” to try…</p>
<p>And my all time personal favorite:</p>
<p>C: Cut Taxes.</p>
<p>As for the rest?  Well, they’re just an incoherent mishmash of marginally similar situations that, again, propose to real solutions to actually FIX anything.</p>
<p>Better to do something and fail than stand back and do nothing.</p>
<p>Love Obama…Glad I voted for him…Can’t wait to do it again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143148</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143148</guid>
		<description>Rightwinger:  &quot;the video game industry will go kaput&quot;

Great post, RW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rightwinger:  &#8220;the video game industry will go kaput&#8221;</p>
<p>Great post, RW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enthalpy</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143140</link>
		<dc:creator>Enthalpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143140</guid>
		<description>The Left&#039;s blind zeal is never altered by the truth. In fact, much of what the Left believes isn&#039;t true, but their story gets better and better with the telling. AGW is no exception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Left&#8217;s blind zeal is never altered by the truth. In fact, much of what the Left believes isn&#8217;t true, but their story gets better and better with the telling. AGW is no exception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinger</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143111</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143111</guid>
		<description>Yes a comprehensive strategy.  Think nothing of the consequences,  its the good intentions that only matter to libs.

Let&#039;s look at the examples of what will be affected with this cap and trade nonsense.

1)Travel Industry - this will kill off most of the airline industry because the average person will no longer be able to afford to fly.  There will be no more $200 round trip fares from New York to Orlando as the cap and trade taxes will cause ticket prices to double or triple on the cheap ones.   Business will curtail its flying and that is where airlines make their yield.   Say goodbye to jobs at resorts, cruise ships, hotels, national parks etc.   States that get most of their money from tourism will be in big trouble.   Since gas will be back to $4-5 gallon,  not many people going to do a lot of driving.  Well, so what if we lose millions of jobs and even more in lost revenue,  the environment will be so pristine.

2) Meat and Dairy - Might as well say hello to $5+ gallon for milk.  Forget the .99 simple hamburger from McDonadls,  that price just tripled.  Of course,  since all our kids are getting fat on fast-food,  getting rid of a few chains (which mostly employ high school and college kids) won&#039;t be such a bad thing on our overall health will it?  Another good thing is since steaks will be priced so high,  we won&#039;t be using those environmental killing outdoor bar-b-ques to cook them in as often.

3)Sanitation - Since gas/diesel prices will be through the roof,  watch your payments to have your trash picked up go a lot higher.  Maybe you have a big garage to store your trash in,  so you can afford to have your garbage picked up every 2 weeks instead of twice a week.  Live in a big city?  Then get used to all the trash lying in the streets since the city can no longer afford the cost of a consistant trash removal service.  You can also forget about your road service doing a better job during snow storms since the budgets will be too strained to afford the salt and trucks needed to run 24 hour service with fuel prices so high.

4)Cost of All Goods - Since your cap and trade has put big bad oil in it&#039;s place,  the shipping costs for all goods will head back up.  Your fresh produce that you get at the store?  The clothes you buy in the store?  The shoes for your feet?  

I guess you are not worried about any of that, since you have obviously thought everything through.  Did you stop to think though that with every household struggling to get by, that the video game industry will go kaput.  No average working American or even those on the dole will be able to afford to buy anymore games.  That finishes off the video games.

I guess that last paragraph got your attention, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes a comprehensive strategy.  Think nothing of the consequences,  its the good intentions that only matter to libs.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at the examples of what will be affected with this cap and trade nonsense.</p>
<p>1)Travel Industry &#8211; this will kill off most of the airline industry because the average person will no longer be able to afford to fly.  There will be no more $200 round trip fares from New York to Orlando as the cap and trade taxes will cause ticket prices to double or triple on the cheap ones.   Business will curtail its flying and that is where airlines make their yield.   Say goodbye to jobs at resorts, cruise ships, hotels, national parks etc.   States that get most of their money from tourism will be in big trouble.   Since gas will be back to $4-5 gallon,  not many people going to do a lot of driving.  Well, so what if we lose millions of jobs and even more in lost revenue,  the environment will be so pristine.</p>
<p>2) Meat and Dairy &#8211; Might as well say hello to $5+ gallon for milk.  Forget the .99 simple hamburger from McDonadls,  that price just tripled.  Of course,  since all our kids are getting fat on fast-food,  getting rid of a few chains (which mostly employ high school and college kids) won&#8217;t be such a bad thing on our overall health will it?  Another good thing is since steaks will be priced so high,  we won&#8217;t be using those environmental killing outdoor bar-b-ques to cook them in as often.</p>
<p>3)Sanitation &#8211; Since gas/diesel prices will be through the roof,  watch your payments to have your trash picked up go a lot higher.  Maybe you have a big garage to store your trash in,  so you can afford to have your garbage picked up every 2 weeks instead of twice a week.  Live in a big city?  Then get used to all the trash lying in the streets since the city can no longer afford the cost of a consistant trash removal service.  You can also forget about your road service doing a better job during snow storms since the budgets will be too strained to afford the salt and trucks needed to run 24 hour service with fuel prices so high.</p>
<p>4)Cost of All Goods &#8211; Since your cap and trade has put big bad oil in it&#8217;s place,  the shipping costs for all goods will head back up.  Your fresh produce that you get at the store?  The clothes you buy in the store?  The shoes for your feet?  </p>
<p>I guess you are not worried about any of that, since you have obviously thought everything through.  Did you stop to think though that with every household struggling to get by, that the video game industry will go kaput.  No average working American or even those on the dole will be able to afford to buy anymore games.  That finishes off the video games.</p>
<p>I guess that last paragraph got your attention, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143110</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143110</guid>
		<description>anon:  &quot;n when the government allocated land to farmers and encouraged them to grow wheat &quot;

I didn&#039;t know that, but it is very interesting.

It&#039;s another example of what happened with the &quot;loans to deadbeat&quot; program dictated by our loving paterfamliasses in Congress.

When a business screws up, people lose perhaps up to a few billion dollars and a few thousand jobs.

When the government screws up, we get Depressions, massive devastation of savings, and millions of people are thrown into unemployment.

And we are told that the ONLY Solution is MORE government!!

And oh yeh, when was the last time the government did something right?

It&#039;s surreal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anon:  &#8220;n when the government allocated land to farmers and encouraged them to grow wheat &#8221;</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know that, but it is very interesting.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s another example of what happened with the &#8220;loans to deadbeat&#8221; program dictated by our loving paterfamliasses in Congress.</p>
<p>When a business screws up, people lose perhaps up to a few billion dollars and a few thousand jobs.</p>
<p>When the government screws up, we get Depressions, massive devastation of savings, and millions of people are thrown into unemployment.</p>
<p>And we are told that the ONLY Solution is MORE government!!</p>
<p>And oh yeh, when was the last time the government did something right?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s surreal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymoose</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143106</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143106</guid>
		<description>Oh goodness, another Obama fan reveling in how smart they think they are.

Back on topic, this whole thing reminds me of the Dust Bowl of the 1930&#039;s.  It began when the government allocated land to farmers and encouraged them to grow wheat during a time of abnormally high rainfall.  The farmers tore up the hardy prairie grasses and made tons of money on wheat.

But then the rainfall patterns changed, and right on cue with the Great Depression the area went into a drought.  The wheat died and with nothing to keep it down the top soil blew off into dust storms.  High temperatures and high winds made it worse, but then the area already had those before the Dust Bowl.

It took one huge storm that reached Washington in 1935 before Congress took action.  (So much for the lightning fast response of the super-intelligent Dems.)  They listened to the experts and planted trees to make windbreaks and told famers to plow along the contours of the land so the wind wouldn&#039;t be as likely to pick up the soil.

All that helped, but the Dust Bowl didn&#039;t end until normal rainfall returned in 1939.  

The point to the story?  We have a hand in things, but nature does it&#039;s own and we can&#039;t control it.  Also, the responses back then (once goaded into action) were rational.  If Obama were president instead of Roosevelt  he&#039;d be fining farmers for the dust blowing off their lands and encouraging people to live off prairie grass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh goodness, another Obama fan reveling in how smart they think they are.</p>
<p>Back on topic, this whole thing reminds me of the Dust Bowl of the 1930&#8242;s.  It began when the government allocated land to farmers and encouraged them to grow wheat during a time of abnormally high rainfall.  The farmers tore up the hardy prairie grasses and made tons of money on wheat.</p>
<p>But then the rainfall patterns changed, and right on cue with the Great Depression the area went into a drought.  The wheat died and with nothing to keep it down the top soil blew off into dust storms.  High temperatures and high winds made it worse, but then the area already had those before the Dust Bowl.</p>
<p>It took one huge storm that reached Washington in 1935 before Congress took action.  (So much for the lightning fast response of the super-intelligent Dems.)  They listened to the experts and planted trees to make windbreaks and told famers to plow along the contours of the land so the wind wouldn&#8217;t be as likely to pick up the soil.</p>
<p>All that helped, but the Dust Bowl didn&#8217;t end until normal rainfall returned in 1939.  </p>
<p>The point to the story?  We have a hand in things, but nature does it&#8217;s own and we can&#8217;t control it.  Also, the responses back then (once goaded into action) were rational.  If Obama were president instead of Roosevelt  he&#8217;d be fining farmers for the dust blowing off their lands and encouraging people to live off prairie grass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: take_no_prisoners</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143103</link>
		<dc:creator>take_no_prisoners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-to-regulate-carbon-dioxide-pollution#comment-143103</guid>
		<description>Yes, we will be so much better off with the cap and trade company dictated policies.  Did you, by any chance, invent the internet?  No matter, the overwhelming majority of the people in all 57 states will gladly pay an extra 5 or 10 dollars per gallon of gas equivalent if it is the will of Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we will be so much better off with the cap and trade company dictated policies.  Did you, by any chance, invent the internet?  No matter, the overwhelming majority of the people in all 57 states will gladly pay an extra 5 or 10 dollars per gallon of gas equivalent if it is the will of Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

