<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Unveils His $75B &#8216;Housing Bailout&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-135660</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-135660</guid>
		<description>&quot;In a decision in 1937, Helvering v Davis, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of key provisions of the new Social Security Act. Until then, the power of Congress to tax us was limited to paying for those functions of government explicitly laid out in the Constitution. &lt;b&gt;This decision opened the door to government taxing us for anything the Congress could deem in the &quot;general welfare.&quot; In other words, anything they could pass. 
...
In 1938, the very next year, Fannie Mae was created, which got the government -- taxpayers -- into the housing business. 
...
Why would a mortgage originator sell a mortgage that couldn&#039;t get paid back? Only if it could be re-sold to taxpayer backed Fannie or Freddie. 

Both went belly up last year and put under explicit government control. Their five trillion dollars in debt went right onto us taxpayers, doubling the outstanding debt of the US government. 

Now President Obama is &quot;solving&quot; our mortgage crisis by adding another $200 billion of taxpayer guarantees behind these two entities and, for the first time, allowing them to guarantee mortgage refinancing for more than 80 percent of the home value. 

And those who can&#039;t make their mortgage payments will be subsidized by taxpayers to the tune of $75 billion so they can. 

&lt;b&gt;A failure of capitalism?&lt;/b&gt; This could never happen in a country where private property was respected and people were not subsidized by government to buy what they can&#039;t afford. 

&lt;b&gt;Rather than saving the American dream, the Obama team could be bringing it to an end. &lt;/b&gt;

Star Parker
http://townhall.com/columnists/StarParker/2009/02/23/the_end_of_the_american_dream?page=2

she must be racist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In a decision in 1937, Helvering v Davis, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of key provisions of the new Social Security Act. Until then, the power of Congress to tax us was limited to paying for those functions of government explicitly laid out in the Constitution. <b>This decision opened the door to government taxing us for anything the Congress could deem in the &#8220;general welfare.&#8221; In other words, anything they could pass.<br />
&#8230;<br />
In 1938, the very next year, Fannie Mae was created, which got the government &#8212; taxpayers &#8212; into the housing business.<br />
&#8230;<br />
Why would a mortgage originator sell a mortgage that couldn&#8217;t get paid back? Only if it could be re-sold to taxpayer backed Fannie or Freddie. </p>
<p>Both went belly up last year and put under explicit government control. Their five trillion dollars in debt went right onto us taxpayers, doubling the outstanding debt of the US government. </p>
<p>Now President Obama is &#8220;solving&#8221; our mortgage crisis by adding another $200 billion of taxpayer guarantees behind these two entities and, for the first time, allowing them to guarantee mortgage refinancing for more than 80 percent of the home value. </p>
<p>And those who can&#8217;t make their mortgage payments will be subsidized by taxpayers to the tune of $75 billion so they can. </p>
<p></b><b>A failure of capitalism?</b> This could never happen in a country where private property was respected and people were not subsidized by government to buy what they can&#8217;t afford. </p>
<p><b>Rather than saving the American dream, the Obama team could be bringing it to an end. </b></p>
<p>Star Parker<br />
<a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/StarParker/2009/02/23/the_end_of_the_american_dream?page=2" rel="nofollow">http://townhall.com/columnists.....eam?page=2</a></p>
<p>she must be racist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-135659</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-135659</guid>
		<description>&quot;With recent data showing that as much as 55% of those who get foreclosure aid end up defaulting anyway&quot;

investor&#039;s business daily</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With recent data showing that as much as 55% of those who get foreclosure aid end up defaulting anyway&#8221;</p>
<p>investor&#8217;s business daily</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134929</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134929</guid>
		<description>VERY interesting tidbit from Thomas Sowell&#039;s column on the &quot;housing/mortgage&quot; crisis:

&quot;Both HUD and the Department of Justice began bringing lawsuits against mortgage bankers when a higher percentage of minority applicants than white applicants were turned down for mortgage loans.

A substantial majority of both black and white mortgage loan applicants had their loans approved, but a statistical difference was enough to get a bank sued.

&lt;b&gt;It should also be noted that the same statistical sources from which data on blacks and whites were obtained usually contained data on Asian-Americans as well. But those data on Asian-Americans were almost never mentioned. &lt;/b&gt;

Whites were turned down for mortgage loans more often than Asian-Americans. But saying that would undermine the reasoning on which the whole moral melodrama and political crusades were based. &quot;


So, not only did your gov&#039;t force banks to make bad loans, it picked through the available data to make sure that blacks were given preferential treatment.

It&#039;s the greatest financial crime of all time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VERY interesting tidbit from Thomas Sowell&#8217;s column on the &#8220;housing/mortgage&#8221; crisis:</p>
<p>&#8220;Both HUD and the Department of Justice began bringing lawsuits against mortgage bankers when a higher percentage of minority applicants than white applicants were turned down for mortgage loans.</p>
<p>A substantial majority of both black and white mortgage loan applicants had their loans approved, but a statistical difference was enough to get a bank sued.</p>
<p><b>It should also be noted that the same statistical sources from which data on blacks and whites were obtained usually contained data on Asian-Americans as well. But those data on Asian-Americans were almost never mentioned. </b></p>
<p>Whites were turned down for mortgage loans more often than Asian-Americans. But saying that would undermine the reasoning on which the whole moral melodrama and political crusades were based. &#8221;</p>
<p>So, not only did your gov&#8217;t force banks to make bad loans, it picked through the available data to make sure that blacks were given preferential treatment.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the greatest financial crime of all time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Bytes</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134851</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134851</guid>
		<description>Fannie &amp; Freddie?! Where you been? Oh that little thing over the summer, don&#039;t worry about that. You&#039;re in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fannie &amp; Freddie?! Where you been? Oh that little thing over the summer, don&#8217;t worry about that. You&#8217;re in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134844</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134844</guid>
		<description>no nuance in that, BigOil.

but i&#039;m sure soros and The Moron&#039;s other handlers would prefer it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no nuance in that, BigOil.</p>
<p>but i&#8217;m sure soros and The Moron&#8217;s other handlers would prefer it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134825</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134825</guid>
		<description>Actually, when I saw that photo I thought how it inadvertently epitomized exactly the way liberals want us to live.

Cheek-by-jowl in cookie cutter houses, with unwatered yards, and close to public transportation -- the road five feet away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, when I saw that photo I thought how it inadvertently epitomized exactly the way liberals want us to live.</p>
<p>Cheek-by-jowl in cookie cutter houses, with unwatered yards, and close to public transportation &#8212; the road five feet away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artboyusa</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134790</link>
		<dc:creator>artboyusa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134790</guid>
		<description>Gee, what&#039;s with the depressing slum picture? Can&#039;t we please have some more inspirational shots of President LaBamba gazing meaningfully into the future? Or some of those ones where young Barry is modelling men&#039;s fashionware? They give me hope, they do. 

Hope that we&#039;ll someday be rid of him, that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, what&#8217;s with the depressing slum picture? Can&#8217;t we please have some more inspirational shots of President LaBamba gazing meaningfully into the future? Or some of those ones where young Barry is modelling men&#8217;s fashionware? They give me hope, they do. </p>
<p>Hope that we&#8217;ll someday be rid of him, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigOil</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134774</link>
		<dc:creator>BigOil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134774</guid>
		<description>Why even bother with all these complex wealth redistribution bills - when the direct approach would be much more efficient.  Slap a Presidential Seal on a fleet of C-130&#039;s and load em up with cash.  Simply fly over all of the blighted Democrat strongholds - open the rear cargo hatch...and push out the cash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why even bother with all these complex wealth redistribution bills &#8211; when the direct approach would be much more efficient.  Slap a Presidential Seal on a fleet of C-130&#8242;s and load em up with cash.  Simply fly over all of the blighted Democrat strongholds &#8211; open the rear cargo hatch&#8230;and push out the cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yellarcan</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134770</link>
		<dc:creator>yellarcan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134770</guid>
		<description>Oh the ability to point out the obvious. Kinda makes ya feel all fuzzy huh? If this is his best, we have a long 4 years ahead of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh the ability to point out the obvious. Kinda makes ya feel all fuzzy huh? If this is his best, we have a long 4 years ahead of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134769</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134769</guid>
		<description>I just wet my self!!LOL!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wet my self!!LOL!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mybrotherkeeper</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134761</link>
		<dc:creator>mybrotherkeeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134761</guid>
		<description>Well, at least if I carry around a tire gauge the Messiah told me my gas expenses would be virtually nil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least if I carry around a tire gauge the Messiah told me my gas expenses would be virtually nil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retire05</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134759</link>
		<dc:creator>retire05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134759</guid>
		<description>As we watch Americans forced, through taxation that will come, to bail people out of their mortgage problems because they made bad decisions or lost their jobs, have we heard one word from the local tax entities that have continued to raise taxes that are usually built into escrow accounts?  So when a person does buy a home for $100K, and their tax appraisal is raised 10% each year, within three years they are paying taxes on $133,100, a third more than the first tax bill.  Add to that insurance premiums are based on tax appraisals, so their insurance has gone up by more than 1/3rd.

But you will never hear Obama call for tax entities to lower their appraisals to meet the loss in value.  You will never hear Obama demand that insurance rates be lowered (the insurance industry contributed handsomely to his campaign).  Instead, you will hear that we need to bail out people because they are losing their homes.

And can anyone tell me where the $300 billion that was approved in H.R. 3221 last June went?  Nancy Pelosi said it would help over 400,000 home owners, yet there is never any mention of that money or how many it helped.

http://www.speaker.gov/legislation?id=0235

Help 9,000,000, home owners?  How many primary homes are owned in a nation of 303,000,000?  And what percent are at risk of forclosure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we watch Americans forced, through taxation that will come, to bail people out of their mortgage problems because they made bad decisions or lost their jobs, have we heard one word from the local tax entities that have continued to raise taxes that are usually built into escrow accounts?  So when a person does buy a home for $100K, and their tax appraisal is raised 10% each year, within three years they are paying taxes on $133,100, a third more than the first tax bill.  Add to that insurance premiums are based on tax appraisals, so their insurance has gone up by more than 1/3rd.</p>
<p>But you will never hear Obama call for tax entities to lower their appraisals to meet the loss in value.  You will never hear Obama demand that insurance rates be lowered (the insurance industry contributed handsomely to his campaign).  Instead, you will hear that we need to bail out people because they are losing their homes.</p>
<p>And can anyone tell me where the $300 billion that was approved in H.R. 3221 last June went?  Nancy Pelosi said it would help over 400,000 home owners, yet there is never any mention of that money or how many it helped.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.speaker.gov/legislation?id=0235" rel="nofollow">http://www.speaker.gov/legislation?id=0235</a></p>
<p>Help 9,000,000, home owners?  How many primary homes are owned in a nation of 303,000,000?  And what percent are at risk of forclosure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134755</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134755</guid>
		<description>Your link would be hilarious if it didn&#039;t describe the program so accurately...

&quot;“Meanwhile, let’s say a person who makes $20,000 per year wants to buy a million-dollar home. Now in that circumstance, the Guaranteed Interest Payment (GIP) doctrine clause in my plan really comes in handy. Under my cap, that person could only be expected to pay $516.67 per month on his or her mortgage, which means he or she would be looking at a very manageable 572-year mortgage at a 0.6 percent interest rate.

“The real message of my plan is that the government is here to help no matter what. If it’s not happening with the denominator, I say let’s fix the numerator.

“Sometimes, stretching your payments out to a point well beyond your lifetime just isn’t enough, though, thanks to the laws of mathematics, although we’re looking into changing them, too.  That’s why the GIP doctrine is so important, because it allows us to set individual interest rates at whatever number is required to keep consumers’ payments at 31% of their income.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your link would be hilarious if it didn&#8217;t describe the program so accurately&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;“Meanwhile, let’s say a person who makes $20,000 per year wants to buy a million-dollar home. Now in that circumstance, the Guaranteed Interest Payment (GIP) doctrine clause in my plan really comes in handy. Under my cap, that person could only be expected to pay $516.67 per month on his or her mortgage, which means he or she would be looking at a very manageable 572-year mortgage at a 0.6 percent interest rate.</p>
<p>“The real message of my plan is that the government is here to help no matter what. If it’s not happening with the denominator, I say let’s fix the numerator.</p>
<p>“Sometimes, stretching your payments out to a point well beyond your lifetime just isn’t enough, though, thanks to the laws of mathematics, although we’re looking into changing them, too.  That’s why the GIP doctrine is so important, because it allows us to set individual interest rates at whatever number is required to keep consumers’ payments at 31% of their income.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1sttofight</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134754</link>
		<dc:creator>1sttofight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134754</guid>
		<description>Colonel1961,

If the buggy whip makers had of been smart enough to join the UAW, they would still be making big bucks doing nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colonel1961,</p>
<p>If the buggy whip makers had of been smart enough to join the UAW, they would still be making big bucks doing nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gipper</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134753</link>
		<dc:creator>gipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134753</guid>
		<description>&quot;One of Rush’s best insights is that outcomes don’t matter to liberals, only &#039;intent&#039;.&quot;

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One of Rush’s best insights is that outcomes don’t matter to liberals, only &#8216;intent&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>The road to hell is paved with good intentions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1sttofight</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134751</link>
		<dc:creator>1sttofight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-unveils-75b-housing-bailout#comment-134751</guid>
		<description>The good folks in Mesa, Az. get it.

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/18/more-scenes-from-mesa-i-need-a-beachfront-condo-mr-president/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good folks in Mesa, Az. get it.</p>
<p><a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/18/more-scenes-from-mesa-i-need-a-beachfront-condo-mr-president/" rel="nofollow">http://michellemalkin.com/2009.....president/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

