Comments on: Obama Voted For Sex Ed For Kindergarten

By: carress

carress — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:50:43 +0000

Are you seriously equating sex between two homosexuals, or two straight unmarried people with bestiality and incest?? I gave two prime examples of the TRUTH about sex, but you chose to find two extreme examples that nearly everyone wold find reprehensible and pretend I espouse those activities.

And my line of thinking puts nazi killings and anti-nazi killings on the same level? From WHERE in my post do you draw that correlation?

You, gipper, can tell me that there is No line with the “likes of me”, all you want. That’s another falsehood, again simply not true, and based on nothing that I said.

By: JohnMG

JohnMG — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 03:07:41 +0000

…..”I can tell you that there is NO line with the likes of you…..”

Meet moral equivalence, gipper. By extension, the line of reasoning espoused by caress would find no difference between the atrocities committed at the Nazi death camps, and all of the deaths which resulted from battling Nazism. I mean, after all, killing is killing, right?

By: wirenut

wirenut — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 03:05:38 +0000

The simple truth is, if we let people with NO morals or values teach their version of the facts . Than anything can be “the truth” . I can not pass judgement on others . I can only judge others behaviors as I have been tought . I had some really great teachers in my past ! Have a nice big cup of fructose .

By: gipper

gipper — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:56:54 +0000

carress said: “You will not teach my child that sex is only between a married man and woman- cuz it simply is not truth.”

So, sex between an uncle and a niece is okay? How about sex between a man an a moose? A woman and a wombat? Where does it stop, carress? Where do you draw the line? I can tell you that there is NO line with the likes of you.

By: carress

carress — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:36:31 +0000

Each class or course in comprehensive sex education offered in any of grades K 6 through 12 shall include instruction on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections, including the prevention, transmission and spread of HIV AIDS.

This means *If you teach sex ed, you must include X, Y , and Z*

This is basic semantics. anyone with any sense of logic can discern between the above and a directive to teach sex ed to anyone.
Each cookie you eat between 7am and 11pm must have chocolate chips.
Is that in any way shape or form telling you to eat cookies for breakfast?

Beyond basic mathematical logic, common sense would say that no individual in his right mind would dictate the same instruction to a five year old as a fifteen year old.

Additionally, the ‘other emendations are pretty telling, too’ – it is not the government’s place to legislate its members’ morality and force it upon anyone.

Some people are gay, some people don’t get married, and DO have sex. It is not your place to pass judgment on what adults do with each other. Notice, I said ADULTS because to try to drill an idea into the head of the youth is to affect their behavior as adults. You will not teach my child that sex is only between a married man and woman- cuz it simply is not truth.

By: chardonnay

chardonnay — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:01:21 +0000

I heard Tony Blankly tell alan Colmes that Obama absolutely voted for this, and told him to read section 5. So, curious as to who is telling the truth, as if I don’t know, I did a quick internet search, and landed on one of my most trusted sites.

Democrats beware of your LIES, because the average American, who is not a member of the liberal intelligentsia, can, within nano seconds, fact check every one of your statements. Clearly Obama lied AGAIN!

Geez, maybe Sweetness & Light could post a list of lies, er, misstatements, by Democrats just since Jan 2008. I’d pitch in for the extra bandwidth needed.