Comments on: Obama Was Against Mirandizing Terrorists http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-was-against-mirandizing-terrorists Sat, 26 May 2012 14:48:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: proreason http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-was-against-mirandizing-terrorists#comment-172570 proreason Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:07:24 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-was-against-mirandizing-terrorists#comment-172570 "if someone were to go over all of Obama’s speeches, there would be nothing but contradictions throughout" exactly. It's deliberate. He has said everything and anything at some point, which when needed, he can reach into his grab bag to pull ou. Those 5,000 people on the WH staff are there for a purpose, and it isn't to make policy. The policy is simple: surrender, marxism, destroy America. One person could do the policy part before lunch. “if someone were to go over all of Obama’s speeches, there would be nothing but contradictions throughout”

exactly.

It’s deliberate.

He has said everything and anything at some point, which when needed, he can reach into his grab bag to pull ou.

Those 5,000 people on the WH staff are there for a purpose, and it isn’t to make policy. The policy is simple: surrender, marxism, destroy America. One person could do the policy part before lunch.

]]> By: ptat http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-was-against-mirandizing-terrorists#comment-172569 ptat Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:50:28 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-was-against-mirandizing-terrorists#comment-172569 I would bet that if someone were to go over all of Obama's speeches, there would be nothing but contradictions throughout. They would probably cancel each other out to the point of---he said nothing! He was "for it" then against it", "knew it" then didn't, beilieved in it, then didn't, promised it, then didn't deliver, and on and on, for as long as people will listen. I would bet that if someone were to go over all of Obama’s speeches, there would be nothing but contradictions throughout. They would probably cancel each other out to the point of—he said nothing! He was “for it” then against it”, “knew it” then didn’t, beilieved in it, then didn’t, promised it, then didn’t deliver, and on and on, for as long as people will listen.

]]> By: JohnnyT http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-was-against-mirandizing-terrorists#comment-172555 JohnnyT Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:16:04 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-was-against-mirandizing-terrorists#comment-172555 Barack the Bomb thrower, thats a good one! Here he is on the record showing how little he understands the nature of our enemy. But then again Mohammad is really a cab driver. Barack the Bomb thrower, thats a good one! Here he is on the record showing how little he understands the nature of our enemy. But then again Mohammad is really a cab driver.

]]> By: ptat http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-was-against-mirandizing-terrorists#comment-172551 ptat Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:07:12 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-was-against-mirandizing-terrorists#comment-172551 Our President is nothing more than an empty vessel desperately seeking the "right" thing to say for the moment, preferably scripted and on the TOTUS. At his essence, all he really is is a mediocre teleprompter reader. Our President is nothing more than an empty vessel desperately seeking the “right” thing to say for the moment, preferably scripted and on the TOTUS. At his essence, all he really is is a mediocre teleprompter reader.

]]>