this might explain what foriegn media is saying Obama’s secret plan may be using copyrighting as an excuse to go through your computers. confusing.
http://www.wimp.com/newlaw/

well, he’s got a back up plan. His promises of a computer in every home. Bizarre.
http://blog.wired.com/defense/.....-bomb.html

I wonder if Barack has read Shakespeare lately. Maybe he should.

I doubt that a bunch of drones spewing the same pre-packaged talking points will have much impact.

With a little undercover work from conservatives, the “bots” can be publically uncovered and shown for what they really are.

I think he employs censors, since he could’t possibly take the time to read the thousand+ posts he gets a day. The censors just couldn’t tolerate someone who didn’t swallow obamy’s lies hook-line-and-sinker.

Since his censors work for ABC, well, go figure.

Obama Organizer Camps – Alinsky Lives! | Sweetness & Light
http://sweetness-light.com/arc.....rted-in-ma

AP Celebrates Obama Camps And ACORN | Sweetness & Light
http://sweetness-light.com/arc.....amps-acorn

Obama Campaign Is Modeled On Alinsky | Sweetness & Light
http://sweetness-light.com/arc.....on-alinsky

I’m sorry to hear that. He is a regular reader of this site. And one of the rare reporters who is not a knee-jerk liberal.

Jake Trappers site is just as bad as the others. You don’t get many chances to deviate from the liberal party line. He must pay an army of little girls to review every comment. One anti-Obama comment is enough to get bounced.

Now, if you love the Annointed One, profanity, violent speech, anti-white racism, bald-faced lies, it’s all ok.

The internet dupes are the rats following the pied piper.

Labor union members, environmentalists, faith-based activists, and those whose good
works are carried out through community groups have organizational vehicles for continuing their work; many of Obama’s young supporters do not. This means that a new organization, likely connected to those who coordinated Obama’s grassroots field campaign, must be created to accommodate this huge influx of potential full-time activists.

This organization would perform two critical tasks. First, it would provide the organizing support for the Obama administration’s main initiatives on alternative energy, health care, labor rights, education, and employment. Second, through the door-to-door canvassing that brought Barack Obama electoral success, these organizers would build support for a new vision for America, one that transcends specific legislation and instead addresses a new set of values based on sharing and compassion rather than the “greed is good” principle that has dominated the national landscape for nearly thirty years.

The organization would be entirely distinct from President Obama, and would not be under his control. Led by those who were energized by Obama’s campaign, the organization would seek societal transformations in line with the agenda that he espoused on the campaign trail. This independent organization would also help keep Obama accountable. Recall that last July, thousands of Obama activists used the campaign’s own social networking tools to protest his reversal on telecom immunity for wiretapping, forcing him to defend his actions to them, even though he did not accede to their wishes. Obama has frequently stated that he welcomes strong pressure from the grass roots to keep his agenda on track, and this new organization would enable activists to counteract pressure on the new president from less progressive constituencies.

A new organization that is spun off from the successful Obama campaign would begin with a large group of activists with demonstrated organizing skills and a commitment to work for the greater good. The advantage of transitioning existing staff to a new organization, rather than starting entirely from scratch, cannot be underestimated. This would be true even absent the series of crises facing the country; in the current climate, advancing the project of social transformation at the start of 2009 is imperative.

The UFW Model

The founders of this new organization may want to model it after the United Farmworkers of America (UFW) of the 1960s and 1970s. Begun by a young Chicano organizer named Cesar Chavez in 1962, the UFW’s capacity to enlist talented young activists in socially meaningful work on a long-term basis remains unmatched. Among the astonishing array of young talent attracted to the UFW was the now legendary Dolores Huerta; Eliseo Medina, who is now executive vice president of SEIU; Stephen Lerner, the founder of Justice for Janitors; Fred Ross Jr., whose Neighbor to Neighbor coffee boycott in the 1980s helped end El Salvador’s civil war; Marshall Ganz, who helped develop the “Camp Obama” organizing model; and Jessica Govea, a key leader in the UFW’s battle against pesticides. These are but a few of the many UFW activists who have spent decades working for justice.