<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pakistan Surrenders To Taliban In Swat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:10:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134181</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134181</guid>
		<description>2 million bullet proof vests by nearly a dozen different companies not approved for soldiers.
http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2009/02/ap_body_armor_020409w/

 Another alarming thing I am hearing, is that the military won&#039;t give proper discriptions of the several different assualt weapons, our soldiers are using, to fit scopes, the different lengths and measurements, and many manufacturers of drag bag&#039;s are stuck with too short bags, bags that are &quot;too heavy and cumbersome&quot; &quot;not to heavy but cumbersome&quot;, not camo&#039;ed correctly, camo is going lighter. They&#039;ve got a tanner camo, anothe identical camo, but greener tanner. And the sand really screws up our soldier&#039;s weapons. What the heck is wrong with this country that we can&#039;t help our soldiers better. The econonmy woes just don&#039;t compare to the needy soldiers who are stuck, owned by the government, and worrying about blowing up 24/7 dealing with a bunch of moron&#039;s that won&#039;t respect our soldiers and get rid of their damn veils and robes. Just like the female soldiers during desert storm, could not wear their sleeves rolled up or swim during the heat of the day. 
Damn. That would be a way to idenitify the good ones from the bad ones. The world is wacked. Orignally I figured Ollah favored the Clinton clan, to learn how to profit on trips to China. Now I&#039;m beginning to wonder if it&#039;s not for Sleak Willy&#039;s nose bleed problem If those costly Air Force 1 trips for fast food continue.... just kidding. lol. Thanks for letting me vent.   

http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2009/02/ap_body_armor_020409w/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 million bullet proof vests by nearly a dozen different companies not approved for soldiers.<br />
<a href="http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2009/02/ap_body_armor_020409w/" rel="nofollow">http://www.marinecorpstimes.co.....r_020409w/</a></p>
<p> Another alarming thing I am hearing, is that the military won&#8217;t give proper discriptions of the several different assualt weapons, our soldiers are using, to fit scopes, the different lengths and measurements, and many manufacturers of drag bag&#8217;s are stuck with too short bags, bags that are &#8220;too heavy and cumbersome&#8221; &#8220;not to heavy but cumbersome&#8221;, not camo&#8217;ed correctly, camo is going lighter. They&#8217;ve got a tanner camo, anothe identical camo, but greener tanner. And the sand really screws up our soldier&#8217;s weapons. What the heck is wrong with this country that we can&#8217;t help our soldiers better. The econonmy woes just don&#8217;t compare to the needy soldiers who are stuck, owned by the government, and worrying about blowing up 24/7 dealing with a bunch of moron&#8217;s that won&#8217;t respect our soldiers and get rid of their damn veils and robes. Just like the female soldiers during desert storm, could not wear their sleeves rolled up or swim during the heat of the day.<br />
Damn. That would be a way to idenitify the good ones from the bad ones. The world is wacked. Orignally I figured Ollah favored the Clinton clan, to learn how to profit on trips to China. Now I&#8217;m beginning to wonder if it&#8217;s not for Sleak Willy&#8217;s nose bleed problem If those costly Air Force 1 trips for fast food continue&#8230;. just kidding. lol. Thanks for letting me vent.   </p>
<p><a href="http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2009/02/ap_body_armor_020409w/" rel="nofollow">http://www.marinecorpstimes.co.....r_020409w/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134178</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134178</guid>
		<description>Ammunition Act  2nd amendment right going going gone?

 http://trapshooters.com/cfpages/thread.cfm?threadid=177702&amp;Messages=2

This is just Diayla. Afganistan continues to be the most dangerous for the Army. http://schema-root.org/region/middle_east/iraq/provinces/diyala/

This is the terrorist problem growing in our own country. How do we protect ourselves if we lose our 2nd amendment. 

 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,399842,00.html?sPage=fnc/us/americasfuture http://www.christianaction.org/homegrownjihad.aspx http://www.redcounty.com/sarasota/2009/01/homegrown-jihad-terrorist-camp/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ammunition Act  2nd amendment right going going gone?</p>
<p> <a href="http://trapshooters.com/cfpages/thread.cfm?threadid=177702&amp;Messages=2" rel="nofollow">http://trapshooters.com/cfpage.....Messages=2</a></p>
<p>This is just Diayla. Afganistan continues to be the most dangerous for the Army. <a href="http://schema-root.org/region/middle_east/iraq/provinces/diyala/" rel="nofollow">http://schema-root.org/region/.....es/diyala/</a></p>
<p>This is the terrorist problem growing in our own country. How do we protect ourselves if we lose our 2nd amendment. </p>
<p> <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,399842,00.html?sPage=fnc/us/americasfuture" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/story/0.....icasfuture</a> <a href="http://www.christianaction.org/homegrownjihad.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.christianaction.org/homegrownjihad.aspx</a> <a href="http://www.redcounty.com/sarasota/2009/01/homegrown-jihad-terrorist-camp/" rel="nofollow">http://www.redcounty.com/saras.....rist-camp/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134175</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134175</guid>
		<description>Obama pounded the Republicans to withdraw, quit air raides, because he now wants to be the one to catch Bin Laden. We must be close, because why else are the Pakistans who danced in the streets when 9/11 happened, herd women and children up to the most dangerous war area, more dangerous than Iraq. Since there is a double standard, and it&#039;s okay for Obama to airbomb, while he takes the family on expensive lunches at greasy spoons, and no one is watching, or even realises he is bombing Pakistan, the terrorists in this country know, and are pretty pissed. Stay alert. Look around, because the terrorists hate America more than ever. Obama and Pelosi were gushing and laughing over the prayer breakfast about rebuilding relations, so the stupid public wouldn&#039;t notice what Obama&#039;s doing. They tied Bushes hands. They tied American&#039;s hands in vietnam. All this play fair. All this b.s. and Obama is a bombing with his hand, and saying &quot;love they neighbhor&quot; as he grins and snickers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama pounded the Republicans to withdraw, quit air raides, because he now wants to be the one to catch Bin Laden. We must be close, because why else are the Pakistans who danced in the streets when 9/11 happened, herd women and children up to the most dangerous war area, more dangerous than Iraq. Since there is a double standard, and it&#8217;s okay for Obama to airbomb, while he takes the family on expensive lunches at greasy spoons, and no one is watching, or even realises he is bombing Pakistan, the terrorists in this country know, and are pretty pissed. Stay alert. Look around, because the terrorists hate America more than ever. Obama and Pelosi were gushing and laughing over the prayer breakfast about rebuilding relations, so the stupid public wouldn&#8217;t notice what Obama&#8217;s doing. They tied Bushes hands. They tied American&#8217;s hands in vietnam. All this play fair. All this b.s. and Obama is a bombing with his hand, and saying &#8220;love they neighbhor&#8221; as he grins and snickers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134173</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134173</guid>
		<description>Weasle, I have to agree with Oldswimcoach.  Our soldiers have not gotten anything Obama promised during his run. Extra a few dollar shields, toilet paper is a luxery. This winter they have been freezing at night. Troops in the deadliest area in Diyala are ill equiped, as sucide bombers have escuated there. I also don&#039;t agree with a shortage of planes. Obama complained during his run at Bush for dropping bombs from airplanes as it was killing to many civilians, yet now that he is president, there&#039;s been plenty of airbombing. No shortage of drones. The Airforce and Navy are in much better shape then the military.  Army is doing more tours. Obama has not stopped this.  Obama just sent back &quot;millions&quot; of 
bullet proof vests the marines were recently complaining back, because they were considered too heavy along with all the heavy supplies our military are allready carrying on their backs. They have to be heavy to stop a bullet or shapel.
I wonder if this is not to bankrupt the companies that all vile for the militaries business, in producing the best equipment for the military to choose. Could not Obama&#039;s wishes to change the law regarding ammunition be numbered and lotted be another way to bankrupt gun and weapon manufactures. They will have to destroy ammo on demand, then custom and mark ammo? Government&#039;s way of tracing American&#039;s ammo,  Hitler would love it, yet the financial cost this will cost, will be stifling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weasle, I have to agree with Oldswimcoach.  Our soldiers have not gotten anything Obama promised during his run. Extra a few dollar shields, toilet paper is a luxery. This winter they have been freezing at night. Troops in the deadliest area in Diyala are ill equiped, as sucide bombers have escuated there. I also don&#8217;t agree with a shortage of planes. Obama complained during his run at Bush for dropping bombs from airplanes as it was killing to many civilians, yet now that he is president, there&#8217;s been plenty of airbombing. No shortage of drones. The Airforce and Navy are in much better shape then the military.  Army is doing more tours. Obama has not stopped this.  Obama just sent back &#8220;millions&#8221; of<br />
bullet proof vests the marines were recently complaining back, because they were considered too heavy along with all the heavy supplies our military are allready carrying on their backs. They have to be heavy to stop a bullet or shapel.<br />
I wonder if this is not to bankrupt the companies that all vile for the militaries business, in producing the best equipment for the military to choose. Could not Obama&#8217;s wishes to change the law regarding ammunition be numbered and lotted be another way to bankrupt gun and weapon manufactures. They will have to destroy ammo on demand, then custom and mark ammo? Government&#8217;s way of tracing American&#8217;s ammo,  Hitler would love it, yet the financial cost this will cost, will be stifling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weasel</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134137</link>
		<dc:creator>Weasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134137</guid>
		<description>I agree with &quot;oldswimcoach&quot; - as an old swimmer-water polo player should! - on the background and current problems of the area, except for the part about the US Army being broken.  I think that is a media myth.  Our military, including the Army, is doing OK, stressed, but OK - recruitment and retention numbers actually look great (and did so even before the economy tanked).  The number of forces in Iraq will start to come down - not thanks to Obama, but because their main job is mostly done.  So even that stress will start to ease up.

This is OT, but where our military is hurting is in the number of aircraft and ships that we have.  We have been flying the wings off the planes and have not fully budgeted their replacements.  Requirement&#039;s creep has driven the price of new ships through the roof, so we can&#039;t afford the 300+ ship navy that we need.  (Gosh, if only we had an extra trillion dollars to spend, we could easily fix all that - or blow it on a porkulus bill instead!) 

The Army is actually in better shape than the Air Force or Navy, since the Army has gotten just about all it has asked for recently.  The concern for the Army is will they continue to get the funding they need for the Future Combat System (FCS).  There is actually an internal struggle going on between &quot;big&quot; Army (the traditional large units and systems, like what went into Iraq early on and is there now) and &quot;small&quot; Army (Special Forces, rapid deployment units and systems, like what went into Afghanistan early on) for funding and control of the Army.  The &quot;big&quot; Army crowd agrees that things are broken and only more money can fix it.  &quot;Small&quot; Army says the funding is OK, but we have to spend it smarter and use what we have better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with &#8220;oldswimcoach&#8221; &#8211; as an old swimmer-water polo player should! &#8211; on the background and current problems of the area, except for the part about the US Army being broken.  I think that is a media myth.  Our military, including the Army, is doing OK, stressed, but OK &#8211; recruitment and retention numbers actually look great (and did so even before the economy tanked).  The number of forces in Iraq will start to come down &#8211; not thanks to Obama, but because their main job is mostly done.  So even that stress will start to ease up.</p>
<p>This is OT, but where our military is hurting is in the number of aircraft and ships that we have.  We have been flying the wings off the planes and have not fully budgeted their replacements.  Requirement&#8217;s creep has driven the price of new ships through the roof, so we can&#8217;t afford the 300+ ship navy that we need.  (Gosh, if only we had an extra trillion dollars to spend, we could easily fix all that &#8211; or blow it on a porkulus bill instead!) </p>
<p>The Army is actually in better shape than the Air Force or Navy, since the Army has gotten just about all it has asked for recently.  The concern for the Army is will they continue to get the funding they need for the Future Combat System (FCS).  There is actually an internal struggle going on between &#8220;big&#8221; Army (the traditional large units and systems, like what went into Iraq early on and is there now) and &#8220;small&#8221; Army (Special Forces, rapid deployment units and systems, like what went into Afghanistan early on) for funding and control of the Army.  The &#8220;big&#8221; Army crowd agrees that things are broken and only more money can fix it.  &#8220;Small&#8221; Army says the funding is OK, but we have to spend it smarter and use what we have better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldswimcoach</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134108</link>
		<dc:creator>oldswimcoach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134108</guid>
		<description>Weasel, here&#039;s the other part of the issue.  As we (the US/NATO/Afghanistan) improve border security there is a direct causal connection to Pakistan instability along the border regions since the SOBs are stuck on &quot;their side&quot; of the border, rather than coming across and raising hell in Afghanistan (and neither Afghan nor Paki Pashtuns really recognize the international border).  

Pakistan intel (their version of our CIA) set up, funded and supported the Taliban initially as a method to destabalize Afghanistan, and then as a puppet government favorable to Pakistan interests when they succesfully controlled all but northern Afghanistan.  The beast has now turned on its master.

Pakistan is a nuclear power.  Instability could lead to a fall of the government into Taliban hands, making the Taliban a nuclear power in posibly as little as 1-2 years without intervention of some sort (economic and intel would be my prefered methods - the Army is broken at this point, warn out really, and we have no troops to commit/use without creating additional instability in other areas of the world).  This is a scary situation that a bumper sticker theory won&#039;t fix (Coexist, Give peace a chance, etc., etc.), and we are led by the &quot;change&quot; candidate with no experience, and little understanding of all things military.  

The Chinese curse &quot;may you live in interesting times&quot; could not be more aproprop!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weasel, here&#8217;s the other part of the issue.  As we (the US/NATO/Afghanistan) improve border security there is a direct causal connection to Pakistan instability along the border regions since the SOBs are stuck on &#8220;their side&#8221; of the border, rather than coming across and raising hell in Afghanistan (and neither Afghan nor Paki Pashtuns really recognize the international border).  </p>
<p>Pakistan intel (their version of our CIA) set up, funded and supported the Taliban initially as a method to destabalize Afghanistan, and then as a puppet government favorable to Pakistan interests when they succesfully controlled all but northern Afghanistan.  The beast has now turned on its master.</p>
<p>Pakistan is a nuclear power.  Instability could lead to a fall of the government into Taliban hands, making the Taliban a nuclear power in posibly as little as 1-2 years without intervention of some sort (economic and intel would be my prefered methods &#8211; the Army is broken at this point, warn out really, and we have no troops to commit/use without creating additional instability in other areas of the world).  This is a scary situation that a bumper sticker theory won&#8217;t fix (Coexist, Give peace a chance, etc., etc.), and we are led by the &#8220;change&#8221; candidate with no experience, and little understanding of all things military.  </p>
<p>The Chinese curse &#8220;may you live in interesting times&#8221; could not be more aproprop!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DGA</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134086</link>
		<dc:creator>DGA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134086</guid>
		<description>Well, good luck to them, sorry to say that luck is all but gone for them though, as it has here in the US. Yet another group of leftists force themselves into power with lies about how life will be all good times as long as they are in control. Many good times are ahead for the taliban without the US to stop them in their tracks. They probably know they have four years to get control of as much territory as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, good luck to them, sorry to say that luck is all but gone for them though, as it has here in the US. Yet another group of leftists force themselves into power with lies about how life will be all good times as long as they are in control. Many good times are ahead for the taliban without the US to stop them in their tracks. They probably know they have four years to get control of as much territory as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weasel</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134085</link>
		<dc:creator>Weasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134085</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a big fan of the Pakistan government, but in many ways they are getting a bad rap in the GWOT and their PR department is almost as bad as the GOPs.  For example, the Pakis have lost several thousand soldiers and civilians fighting the bad guys along the border.  The western forces, mainly US ones, in Afghanistan are almost totally dependent on the Pakis for a logistics trail via land and air.  Bottom line - no Paki support, we lose in Afghanistan or we have to fight Pakistan just to get supplies into Afghanistan.  And the Paki government is helping us even though a large part  - possibly even a majority - of their population support or favor the Taliban.  And don&#039;t forget that DiFi recently spilled the beans that the Pakis have been letting us secretly fly our drones from bases in Pakistan, even though they have been publicly denouncing the flights.  There is a real war going on and then there is what we see in the media - rarely are the two the same.

We have to remember that when we see &quot;Taliban&quot;, the Pakis see &quot;Pashtuns&quot;, which just happens to be the second largest ethnic group in Pakistan - and most of them live along the Afghan-Paki border.  The Paki government can only push so far before risking civil war - and given that they have nukes, we don&#039;t want that either.

All that said, this sounds like another bad deal and will only help the bad guys.  But we only know what the media is telling us about the deal.  So do we trust the media with it&#039;s track record or the Paki government which is actively putting troops into the fight and mostly supporting us in the region?

But on the bright side, Campaign Obama - no relation to Malibu Barbie - said he is ready and willing to invade Pakistan.  I&#039;m sure that will make everything better...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of the Pakistan government, but in many ways they are getting a bad rap in the GWOT and their PR department is almost as bad as the GOPs.  For example, the Pakis have lost several thousand soldiers and civilians fighting the bad guys along the border.  The western forces, mainly US ones, in Afghanistan are almost totally dependent on the Pakis for a logistics trail via land and air.  Bottom line &#8211; no Paki support, we lose in Afghanistan or we have to fight Pakistan just to get supplies into Afghanistan.  And the Paki government is helping us even though a large part  &#8211; possibly even a majority &#8211; of their population support or favor the Taliban.  And don&#8217;t forget that DiFi recently spilled the beans that the Pakis have been letting us secretly fly our drones from bases in Pakistan, even though they have been publicly denouncing the flights.  There is a real war going on and then there is what we see in the media &#8211; rarely are the two the same.</p>
<p>We have to remember that when we see &#8220;Taliban&#8221;, the Pakis see &#8220;Pashtuns&#8221;, which just happens to be the second largest ethnic group in Pakistan &#8211; and most of them live along the Afghan-Paki border.  The Paki government can only push so far before risking civil war &#8211; and given that they have nukes, we don&#8217;t want that either.</p>
<p>All that said, this sounds like another bad deal and will only help the bad guys.  But we only know what the media is telling us about the deal.  So do we trust the media with it&#8217;s track record or the Paki government which is actively putting troops into the fight and mostly supporting us in the region?</p>
<p>But on the bright side, Campaign Obama &#8211; no relation to Malibu Barbie &#8211; said he is ready and willing to invade Pakistan.  I&#8217;m sure that will make everything better&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beautyofreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134075</link>
		<dc:creator>beautyofreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134075</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many civilians in the region would likely welcome the move after years of dissatisfaction with the inefficient secular justice system.&quot;

So let me get this straight, the corrupt Pakistani legal system isn&#039;t preferable to Islamic law that tells these primitives to burn down girl&#039;s schools, behead people for buying Western film, suicide bombing buses that play music, shoot up local dancers, hanging dissenters, and marry young children (girls) to old men ? 

I&#039;m not a fan of Pakistan&#039;s government either, particularly the ridiculous bits that encode Shariah law. But the Taliban offer a whole new level of barbarism. I seriously consider we monitor the situation on Pakistan nukes. With enough capitulation the barbarians may soon have them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many civilians in the region would likely welcome the move after years of dissatisfaction with the inefficient secular justice system.&#8221;</p>
<p>So let me get this straight, the corrupt Pakistani legal system isn&#8217;t preferable to Islamic law that tells these primitives to burn down girl&#8217;s schools, behead people for buying Western film, suicide bombing buses that play music, shoot up local dancers, hanging dissenters, and marry young children (girls) to old men ? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of Pakistan&#8217;s government either, particularly the ridiculous bits that encode Shariah law. But the Taliban offer a whole new level of barbarism. I seriously consider we monitor the situation on Pakistan nukes. With enough capitulation the barbarians may soon have them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wardmama4</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134074</link>
		<dc:creator>wardmama4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/pakistan-caves-to-taliban-in-swat#comment-134074</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Once Islamic law is imposed there will be no &lt;del&gt;problems&lt;/del&gt; infidels left alive in Swat,&quot; Khan said. &quot;The Taliban will lay down their arms because they won.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There fixed that for AP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Once Islamic law is imposed there will be no <del>problems</del> infidels left alive in Swat,&#8221; Khan said. &#8220;The Taliban will lay down their arms because they won.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>There fixed that for AP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
