« | »

Pelosi: US Must Share Intel With Iraq

From her awe-struck fans at the Associated Press:

Pelosi wants US to strengthen intelligence in Iraq

By Qassim Abdul-zahra, Associated Press Writer

BAGHDAD – U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called Sunday for greater intelligence cooperation between the U.S. and Iraq as the American military moves to withdraw its forces from the country by 2012.

Pelosi told reporters she had discussed intelligence sharing with Iraqi lawmakers after she arrived for a one-day visit. She was accompanied by Rep. Rush Holt, a New Jersey Democrat who chairs a House committee that oversees U.S. intelligence operations.

"If we are going to have a diminished physical military presence, we are have to have a strong intelligence presence," Pelosi said.

Pelosi, a California Democrat and strong critic of the U.S.-led 2003 invasion, did not elaborate…

Oh, sure. Let’s share all of our intelligence with our great Iraqis allies. They have been so dependable. And they will only be more so once Iran is calling all of the shots.

What an absolute joke is Nancy Pelosi. What an absolute disgrace to our nation.

Ms. Pelosi has (recently) railed against using ‘harsh’ interrogation techniques. She has fought vehemently against every form of monitoring of terrorists around the world.

She has done everything she could to undermine our troops on the ground. She has declared ‘the surge’ an utter failure, and  pronounced the war in Iraq as completely lost.

And now she has the gall to demand ‘more intelligence’ in Iraq?

Of course she thinks this will give her cover after having been caught in a web of Botox-faced lies about what she knew about waterboarding.

But how can our country survive with such despicable fools in positions of power?

This article was posted by Steve on Sunday, May 10th, 2009. Comments are currently closed.

17 Responses to “Pelosi: US Must Share Intel With Iraq”

  1. proreason says:

    SG: “But how can our country survive with such despicable fools in positions of power? ”

    That bears repeating.

    And the answer, of course, is that our country CANNOT survive for long with fools like Pelosi and Obama playing their high-school power-trip games with our future.

    The mind boggles.

    • catie says:

      Pro & Steve, absolutely correct. I wasn’t a fan of Bill Clinton but I wasn’t fearful for our nation like I am with these fools in power. I don’t know how long we’ll survive with these clowns. Pelosi has a lot of nerve with this nonsense. I wish she would elaborate it would be interesting to see if she’s just talking out of her arse or if she actually has something substantive to say. I doubt she does though.

    • MinnesotaRush says:

      Ditto .. ditto .. and ditto. You’re all on absolute target!

      ” .. despicable fools .. ” fits them all to a “T”!


  2. ptat says:

    Ouch! That picture! the botox has worn off, the perpetual smile has melted and she finally looks her age and, oops, I guess it doesn’t matter anyway. Just a slim hope that superficial Americans everywhere, of the type that voted for Obama, might judge her on her looks….

  3. jrmcdonald says:

    Nancy can tell them everything she knows! No problem!

  4. VitoLaw says:

    Someone needs to contact the White House quick! Nancy needs a BOTOX Bailout fast.
    Looking pretty bad there baby—-maybe
    what comes around is going around.

    Love ya Nancy! NOT. See if you ever get my
    vote again!

  5. TwilightZoned says:

    “If we are going to have a diminished physical military presence, we are have to have a strong intelligence presence,” Pelosi said.

    Strong intelligence presence…Guess that leaves out ALL the dem leaders. In more ways than one.

    • proreason says:

      TZ: hadn’t thought about that idiotic quote until you highlighted it.

      “If we are going to have a diminished physical military presence, we are have to have a strong intelligence presence,”

      What a load of crap. To paraphrase the monumentally stupid comment: we intend to gut the military. I’m scared. We have to make up for it with spying.

      Well shit, fool, why gut the military in the first place? And anybody who thinks that understanding an enemy trumps military power is an idiot beyond comprehension.

      Take it to it’s logical conclusion. If we had no military yet knew EVERYTHING about the Iranians or North Koreans, what would happen? You got it. We’d be dead or slaves.

    • TwilightZoned says:

      Gutting the military…wasn’t that exactly what Clinton did? Of course it was, as well as intelligence agencies. Look where that put us on 9-11. These fools obviously are so arrogant they don’t believe, “If you don’t study history you’re doomed to repeat it.” We…are…doomed…as long as the dems are in control of this country.

  6. curvyred says:

    Sure Queen P as soon as you tell us the truth about what you knew and when you knew about waterboarding. Actually as soon as you tell the truth about anything.

  7. Weasel says:

    I used to think that Barbara Boxer was easily the dumbest of “Kaaleeforniaa’s” elected officials. But Nancy sure is giving her a run for the title…

  8. Cincinnatus says:

    This seems like the appropriate thread to share David Feherty’s Nancy Pelosi “joke,” for which he is now being pilloried:

    “Despite how the conflict has been portrayed by our glorious media, if you gave any U.S. soldier a gun with two bullets in it, and he found himself in an elevator with Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Osama bin Laden, there’s a good chance that Nancy Pelosi would get shot twice, and Harry Reid and bin Laden would be strangled to death.”

    As Dan Quayle would say, “How true that is…..”

  9. Liberals Demise says:

    There is nothing like sharing the “truth”……… ain’t that right Madam Slug?

  10. Reality Bytes says:

    Talk about a face that could sink a thousand ships! You scared 1/2 to death with that one, SG.

  11. GL0120 says:

    Why not share intelligence with Iraq?
    Clinton shared it with China and we’re so much the better for it, right?
    Well, at least his campaign coffers were; the rest of us got improved Chinese missiles that could finally reach the United States.
    I’m sure that sharing with Iraq would benefit us; the Iranians would then be able to identify everyone in that country that supports us.
    We did what we could to liberate Iraq but there are still far too many people there who put their religious beliefs above all else, sharing intelligence could be deadly.

    • Liberals Demise says:

      It wasn’t intel that the Clinton Administration gave up for a donation……
      …… it was gryos for their missile program. That is why they can now have a space program and their ICBMs’ can hit 3 feet from a quarter it is programmed to hit!!

« Front Page | To Top
« | »