Comments on: Pelosi: US Must Share Intel With Iraq

By: BatK

BatK — Wed, 13 May 2009 19:18:04 +0000

That is awesome!

By: Liberals Demise

Liberals Demise — Mon, 11 May 2009 20:04:34 +0000

It wasn’t intel that the Clinton Administration gave up for a donation……
…… it was gryos for their missile program. That is why they can now have a space program and their ICBMs’ can hit 3 feet from a quarter it is programmed to hit!!

By: GL0120

GL0120 — Mon, 11 May 2009 16:03:08 +0000

Why not share intelligence with Iraq?
Clinton shared it with China and we’re so much the better for it, right?
Well, at least his campaign coffers were; the rest of us got improved Chinese missiles that could finally reach the United States.
I’m sure that sharing with Iraq would benefit us; the Iranians would then be able to identify everyone in that country that supports us.
We did what we could to liberate Iraq but there are still far too many people there who put their religious beliefs above all else, sharing intelligence could be deadly.

By: Reality Bytes

Reality Bytes — Mon, 11 May 2009 15:41:15 +0000

Talk about a face that could sink a thousand ships! You scared 1/2 to death with that one, SG.

By: Liberals Demise

Liberals Demise — Mon, 11 May 2009 12:01:14 +0000

There is nothing like sharing the “truth”……… ain’t that right Madam Slug?

By: Cincinnatus

Cincinnatus — Mon, 11 May 2009 09:49:44 +0000

This seems like the appropriate thread to share David Feherty’s Nancy Pelosi “joke,” for which he is now being pilloried:

“Despite how the conflict has been portrayed by our glorious media, if you gave any U.S. soldier a gun with two bullets in it, and he found himself in an elevator with Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Osama bin Laden, there’s a good chance that Nancy Pelosi would get shot twice, and Harry Reid and bin Laden would be strangled to death.”

As Dan Quayle would say, “How true that is…..”

By: Weasel

Weasel — Mon, 11 May 2009 04:40:34 +0000

I used to think that Barbara Boxer was easily the dumbest of “Kaaleeforniaa’s” elected officials. But Nancy sure is giving her a run for the title…

By: MinnesotaRush

MinnesotaRush — Mon, 11 May 2009 03:25:35 +0000

Ditto .. ditto .. and ditto. You’re all on absolute target!

” .. despicable fools .. ” fits them all to a “T”!

Thx!!!

By: curvyred

curvyred — Sun, 10 May 2009 21:58:17 +0000

Sure Queen P as soon as you tell us the truth about what you knew and when you knew about waterboarding. Actually as soon as you tell the truth about anything.

By: TwilightZoned

TwilightZoned — Sun, 10 May 2009 21:42:27 +0000

Gutting the military…wasn’t that exactly what Clinton did? Of course it was, as well as intelligence agencies. Look where that put us on 9-11. These fools obviously are so arrogant they don’t believe, “If you don’t study history you’re doomed to repeat it.” We…are…doomed…as long as the dems are in control of this country.

By: proreason

proreason — Sun, 10 May 2009 20:43:21 +0000

TZ: hadn’t thought about that idiotic quote until you highlighted it.

“If we are going to have a diminished physical military presence, we are have to have a strong intelligence presence,”

What a load of crap. To paraphrase the monumentally stupid comment: we intend to gut the military. I’m scared. We have to make up for it with spying.

Well shit, fool, why gut the military in the first place? And anybody who thinks that understanding an enemy trumps military power is an idiot beyond comprehension.

Take it to it’s logical conclusion. If we had no military yet knew EVERYTHING about the Iranians or North Koreans, what would happen? You got it. We’d be dead or slaves.

By: TwilightZoned

TwilightZoned — Sun, 10 May 2009 20:34:36 +0000

“If we are going to have a diminished physical military presence, we are have to have a strong intelligence presence,” Pelosi said.

Strong intelligence presence…Guess that leaves out ALL the dem leaders. In more ways than one.

By: VitoLaw

VitoLaw — Sun, 10 May 2009 20:08:55 +0000

Someone needs to contact the White House quick! Nancy needs a BOTOX Bailout fast.
Looking pretty bad there baby—-maybe
what comes around is going around.

Love ya Nancy! NOT. See if you ever get my
vote again!

By: jrmcdonald

jrmcdonald — Sun, 10 May 2009 19:38:42 +0000

Nancy can tell them everything she knows! No problem!

By: ptat

ptat — Sun, 10 May 2009 19:19:52 +0000

Ouch! That picture! the botox has worn off, the perpetual smile has melted and she finally looks her age and, oops, I guess it doesn’t matter anyway. Just a slim hope that superficial Americans everywhere, of the type that voted for Obama, might judge her on her looks….

By: catie

catie — Sun, 10 May 2009 18:34:40 +0000

Pro & Steve, absolutely correct. I wasn’t a fan of Bill Clinton but I wasn’t fearful for our nation like I am with these fools in power. I don’t know how long we’ll survive with these clowns. Pelosi has a lot of nerve with this nonsense. I wish she would elaborate it would be interesting to see if she’s just talking out of her arse or if she actually has something substantive to say. I doubt she does though.