Comments on: Pelosi Will Not Help Fund Afghan ‘Surge’

By: wirenut

wirenut — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:21:46 +0000

A good read on this subject is to fall back to the Philippine Insurrection of roughly 1897 to 1905. Politics,elections, guerrilla warfare and democrats. Take a wild guess which side a majority dems were on in that one? If you said, cut and run, leave our troops out to dry. You would be correct! McKinley won the election against Bryan despite the help of northeastern RINOs. Hhummm, it’s deja vu all over again, only this time we have a “Bryan/Barry” in office.

By: Right of the People

Right of the People — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:54:36 +0000

If it did collapse it would be one of the best things that has ever happened to this country.

By: Rusty Shackleford

Rusty Shackleford — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:21:17 +0000

Remember, the democrats biggest tool (other than the obvious “biggest tool”)is the tool of deception and lies. Everything they say is a lie or a deception and this is just the latest. Steve said it correctly. It’s a ploy to let the boy appear strong and get (what they think is) conservative support, while seeming to hamstring his efforts and thus, he can have a scapegoat, (An obama necessity) and an excuse (another obama regular) for his “best of intentions” to fail in Afghanistan.

A masterful stroke, as far as they’re concerned. Clever, intricate but at the same time, simple. They must be incredibly pleased with themselves.

Steve saw right through it, as will millions of Americans who no longer want to buy the expired stank they try to sell on the shelves of the “let me be clear” aisle.

It is doubtful that Lolla-Pe-loser is saying anything on the gut level. When has she ever, except when it comes to her repulsion towards conservative thinkers/doers? 99.999999% of the time, her agenda is liberalism and she’ll do anything to see things to that end. The Afghan war is of no interest to her at all.

By: beautyofreason

beautyofreason — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:57:29 +0000

She’s a loser. Anything begun under President Bush (tax cuts, better national security, war in Afghanistan / Iraq) must fail so her ego can be satiated. Doesn’t matter who dies in the process.

“”Understand this president has been dealt a very bad hand,” she added. “There was no plan in Afghanistan for years.”

Yeah, and now that enemy death tolls go unpublished, troops defend civilian centers as opposed to going on the offensive, and soldiers are below recommended levels under the Democratic administration- we can enjoy failure to its full extent. Not that I think Afghanistan is winnable under this president – I just see the stupidity of her ideology at play.

By: Liberals Demise

Liberals Demise — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:44:37 +0000

Treasonous, Traitor Beaches!!!

By: eaglewingz08

eaglewingz08 — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:25:12 +0000

Aren’t these the same democraps who say that they must pass a bill (health deform) at any cost otherwise the Obama presidency would collapse. Very suspicious. If Obama Presidency could sustain the loss of Afghanistan funding, then it would sustain the loss of its health deform legislation agenda.

By: locomotivebreath1901

locomotivebreath1901 — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:20:53 +0000

Perhaps. The Left is famous for “eating their own.”