« Iranian Dissident Dies In Actual Hunger Strike | Home | Castro Gets Surgery, Gives Power To Brother Raul »

Prisoners Attacked Gitmo Guards 440 Times

From the DNC’s Associated Press:

Gitmo guards often attacked by detainees

By JOHN SOLOMON, Associated Press
Monday, July 31, 2006

WASHINGTON — The prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay during the war on terror have attacked their military guards hundreds of times, turning broken toilet parts, utensils, radios and even a bloody lizard tail into makeshift weapons, Pentagon reports say.

Incident reports reviewed by The Associated Press indicate Military Police guards are routinely head-butted, spat upon and doused by "cocktails" of feces, urine, vomit and sperm collected in meal cups by the prisoners.

They’ve been repeatedly grabbed, punched or assaulted by prisoners who reach through the small "bean holes" used to deliver food and blankets through cell doors, the reports say. Serious assaults requiring medical attention, however, are rare, the reports indicate.

The detainee "reached under the face mask of an IRF (Initial Reaction Force) team member’s helmet and scratched his face, attempting to gouge his eyes," states a May 27, 2005, report on an effort to remove a recalcitrant prisoner from his cell.

"The IRF team member received scratches to his face and eye socket area," the report said.

Since its creation in early 2002, the U.S. detention camp on Cuba’s coast has been a controversial symbol of the Bush administration’s war on terror, bringing allegations of prisoner mistreatment, debates over civil rights and a landmark legal battle to win rights for the detainees.

At one point, more than 600 foreign men captured in the war on terror were kept there. Many have been released to their home countries, reducing the current population to about 450. Ten detainees have been accused of war crimes, but no one has been tried.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the men are entitled to lawyers and access to the courts and that the administration’s original plan to give them justice through military tribunals was illegal.

Guards currently stationed at Guantanamo describe a tense atmosphere in which prisoners often orchestrate violence in hopes of unnerving their captors, especially with attacks using bodily fluids.

"I mean, seeing a human being act that way, it’s terrifying. … You are constantly watching before you take your next step to see if something is about to happen," Navy Senior Chief Petty Officer Mack D. Keen told AP in an interview from Guantanamo.

"You see little signs. They kind of show their hand every once in a while. They’ll take their Quran and they’ll cover it up," he said. "When you see a group of detainees taking their Quran and putting it away, you know something is about to happen."

Moazamm Begg, 38, a prisoner for more than two years at Guantanamo before being released to Great Britain, said he was suspicious of the Pentagon’s description of incidents, especially allegations that Muslim men tore their Qurans or used sperm in attacks. The Pentagon continues to publicly question Begg’s claim of innocence.

"This just doesn’t make sense — especially since for Muslims this would be something that was disgusting, something that just wouldn’t be done," he said. He added that some detainees told him they had mixed toothpaste and spit in the cocktails to make it look like semen.

Begg, who has written a book and spoken frequently about his experience, said most incidents he witnessed were spontaneous reactions "when word spread" among prisoners that a guard had done something wrong.

"I rarely saw lone prisoners acting out on their own for no reason except if they had some sort of mental illness or if they were on medication," he said.

Nonetheless, the incident reports released under the Freedom of Information Act and reviewed by AP, provide a rare chronicle of events inside the prison from the guards’ perspective.

Entire wings of prisoners were reported to become riotous after complaints emerged that guards mishandled a Quran or mistreated prisoners. On two occasions, however, prisoners themselves were reported to have destroyed their Muslim holy books, the reports state.

"Detainee residing in cell (redacted) block tore his Quran into small pieces," a guard reported in May 2003. A month later, a prisoner "did intentionally destroy his Quran and throw (it) out of his cell," another report stated.

The reports detail more than 440 incidents between guards and prisoners from December 2002 through summer 2005 that resulted in recommendations of discipline, an average of about three per week. The names of guards and prisoners as well as the final discipline were blacked out by the Pentagon.

Often, guards went weeks without reporting problems; other times incidents were bunched together during times of frustration and tension.

For instance, nearly a quarter of the incidents occurred in July 2005, the month dozens of detainees started an extended hunger strike.

Tensions likewise flared during Christmas week 2004, with inmates frequently spitting on guards. On Christmas Eve, a prisoner who was angry that he couldn’t finish his meal was said to have used a plastic fork-spoon utensil — called a spork — to attack a guard collecting his tray.

"Detainee stabbed the MP guard … in the hand with his spork from chow meal," the report said, adding the prisoner later "made a slicing motion across his neck" and vowed to kill the guard.

With many nearing five years in U.S. captivity, the prisoners "have a Ph.D. in being a detainee" and "know our procedures and they try to turn them against us and try to make us question what we are doing," said Army Lt. Col. Michael J. Nicolucci, the prison’s executive officer.

"They’ll take the smallest things, be it a piece of rust," he said. "They told us they are going to take that piece of rust and they are going for the jugular, they are going for the eye. They know what our vulnerabilities are, anatomically speaking."

Meal plates, shower flip-flops, cleaning brushes and other items deemed harmless in civilian life also are commonly turned into weapons, the reports said. For instance:

–"Detainee in cell (redacted) grabbed the radio from an MP and then threw the radio at the MP. The detainee then threw rocks at the MP," a Dec. 23, 2003, incident report stated.

–A detainee "reached out of his bean hole and attacked MP (name redacted) with a piece of metal foot pad from toilet striking him on the left hip area," a July 15, 2005, report said.

–"Detainee broke off the top of his sink, subsequently broke out the window then began throwing the sink and pieces of pipes at the Block Guard," a March 25, 2005, report said.

One of the most unusual incidents detailed in the four-inch stack of incident reports occurred when a detainee in the prison recreation yard assaulted a guard with a bloody tail torn from a lizard.

The detainee "caught the iguana by the tail at which time the tail detached," the May 2005 report described. When the guard turned to talk to a commanding officer, "he felt something strike him in the lower right back" and then "saw the tail on the ground at his feet and blood was in the same area of his uniform." The detainee said he was "just playing."

Nicolucci said one of the most serious incidents occurred this May, too recent to be recorded in the Pentagon’s released reports. A prisoner staged an apparent suicide attempt while his inmates slicked the floors with human waste, seeking to overpower guards when they slipped, he said.

"We provide fans in order to keep them cool," Nicolucci recalled. "And they were using the basket, or the grate of the fan as a shield, the blades as machetes, the pole as a battering ram."

That disturbance was turned back in a few minutes with some guards and prisoners sustaining minor injuries, he said.

The Landmark Legal Foundation, a conservative legal group that fought to force the Pentagon to release the reports under the Freedom of Information Act, said it hopes the information brings balance to the Guantanamo debate.

"Lawyers for the detainees have done a great job painting their clients as innocent victims of U.S. abuse when the fact is that these detainees, as a group, are barbaric and extremely dangerous," Landmark President Mark Levin said. "They are using their terrorist training on the battlefield to abuse our guards and manipulate our Congress and our court system."

Though all detainees are foreigners, many are clearly Americanized when it comes to their insults and gestures. Male guards are frequently derided as "donkeys" while female guards are routinely called "bitches" or harassed by references to their breasts or genitalia, the reports said.

In all, nearly a quarter of incidents involved female guards, the reports show.

"They absolutely target female guards," Nicolucci said. "They have a lot of cultural biases about females, and we let them know in our culture that females do everything males do in a professional job environment, and we just hold firm."

James A. Gondles Jr., executive director of the American Correctional Association that sets standards for U.S. prisons, said much behavior inside Guantanamo mirrors that of civilian prisons though the attacks with bodily fluids seem more numerous.

"It happens from time to time at facilities here, but it seems the majority of … assaults at Gitmo were either spitting, or bodily fluids being thrown on the guards," said Gondles, who has visited Guantanamo twice at the Pentagon’s invitation and reviewed the reports at AP’s request.

The bodily fluid attacks are so numerous that guards now frequently wear specialized shields to protect their faces.

The incident reports show waves of orchestrated behavior.

For instance, prisoners repeatedly grabbed their guards’ whistles over a five-day period in June 2004. In July 2005, guards reported several instances of rock throwing, spitting and flip-flop hitting. Rocks were hidden under shower mats, the reports said.

The incident reports also are noteworthy for information that is missing. With redacted names, it is impossible to tell whether bad behavior is widespread or the work of a few repeat offenders. Likewise, the documents don’t tell whether certain guards are prone to confrontation.

Prisoners’ hunger strikes, suicide attempts and threats to injure themselves aren’t considered disciplinary matters and thus aren’t recorded in the incident reports. Yet the Pentagon acknowledges there have been scores of such incidents.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., a prisoner of war during Vietnam, said the treatment of the guards has been overshadowed by the legal and political debates surrounding the detainees, but he has been impressed with the guards’ professionalism.

"Our personnel there have perhaps the most difficult task you can have in the military outside of being in a combat zone. … These are bad guys and some of the most hardened of hardened criminals. And some I think will need to be kept permanently," he said.

McCain said the detainees’ behavior and the likelihood of permanent confinement only hastens the need for the administration and Congress to finalize detention and trial policies consistent with the Supreme Court’s direction.

While Washington addresses those questions, the guards look to stay one step ahead of the detainees.

"Yes, you do get upset but you get somebody to take your place," Keen said in explaining how he survives the tensions of the cell block. "You go outside. You walk it off and you come back and (say) I want to be back in the fight."

Looks like the Associated Press thought this was a safe time to bring out a report like this, when everyone’s attention is focused on Lebanon.

That’s what they mean by balance.

(Thanks to 1sttofight for the heads up.)

Related Articles:

  Print Email

30 Responses to “Prisoners Attacked Gitmo Guards 440 Times”

  1. 1sttofight

    If they would just start shooting these SOB’s on the spot, the problems would stop.

    From the father of one of the female guards. And no , I do not know why we even have female guards there.

    I just watched you on FOX. My daughter was in Gitmo for a year as a Master-at- Arms, E4. (10/04-10/05) She was injured several times by the inmates assaulting her physically. In addition, she knew that when she was doing her job by enforcing the rules, she was threatened by the prisoners if she had to touch them. They would get her. They mixed a cocktail of urine, feces, and semen, and let it fester for days until the right moment. They warned her that she was a target and then they got her, she was assaulted several times by loads of crap thrown at her.

    She had to undergo shots to prevent what diseases that she was exposed to. I don’t know why we have women guarding men, especially these animals, but that is the policy. My daughter is a tough cookie and can handle herself. In her year there she did not dishonor herself or our country. When she returned home she had a DVD of Gitmo. They made fresh bread every day!! Part of it showed how the chef’s prepared special meals for the prisoners. If a prisoner refused food the guards were happy to sample the Chicken, rice pilaf, yogurt and fresh baked pita bread, while our guys had crap food from the mess or had to buy it from Burger King.

    As part of her duties, in the last month she was there, she was assigned to the hospital ward. She had to force feed those a..holes who offed themselves the other day. They were the meanest of the bunch and had to be tied down to get their food. My daughter and other personnel voluntarily submitted themselves to the force feeding procedure also so that they could do it with the least pain for the captives. It was very unpleasant for her but it helped her and others to understand how to participate in it with the least stress for the recipients. The goal was to keep them alive. She feels that the suicides would not have happened on her watch, but it was going to happen eventually. These guys are warriors. By their death they have achieved a military success in the political world. The media marches on.

  2. doingwhatican

    “But, but, and yet”….the left wails.

    And the so-called torture goes on and on.

    These are those the left want to release.

  3. Exeter

    “When she returned home she had a DVD of Gitmo.”

    That DVD needs to get some airtime - and maybe some footage of what’s REALLY going on down there. This ‘Auschwitz’ image the media has been creating could so easily be dispelled.

  4. buzzhead

    Put em back into the dog runs that they had in the beginning (remember those and the outcry from the libs?)

  5. artboyusa

    Well, the prisoners consider themselves to be POWs, so they resist…until they get released, when they all morph overnight into innocent victims of mistaken identity who were only in Afghanistan to go to a wedding or to do charity work or take a computer course or to meet their arranged bride (they prefer their women illiterate, much less threatening) and who were falsely imprisoned and tortured and now their gonna sue for millions because they deserve it on account of them being such innocent victims of American brutality.

    At least that’s how it always plays out in the UK. There was actually a really sympathetic, hand wringing TV movie about four of these jamokes and their Kabul to Cuba round trip that ran over here and got high ratings and critical raves, I’m sorry to say.

  6. esthier

    “From the father of one of the female guards. And no , I do not know why we even have female guards there.”

    I imagine that’s done for psycological reasons seeing as many at Gitmo are threatened by women in power. Clearly it didn’t work in this woman’s case, but if I had to find a way to mess with Muslim terrorists, I’d find a woman dominatrix-type to interrogate.

  7. CKO1986

    ONLY 440 times? Guess the hot Cuban sun is makin’ the inmates lazy. ;)

  8. Stashiu3

    1st… I’m fairly certain you are mistaken about her having a DVD since all electronic media must be scanned prior to leaving Cuba and something like that would have been confiscated. Anyone who was able to somehow get it past the IMD folks would get into a LOT of trouble if they were found to have anything like that in their possession. So, I’m VERY glad that you were mistaken about that. Depending on how long she has been back, I probably worked with her and those kids are the greatest. Be that as it may, I just got back from there in May and can tell you that the article understates the situation tremendously. Not sure where those numbers came from, but they’re low by a ton.

    Your daughter is right that it was going to happen eventually, everybody there knew it. Make enough coordinated tries and one is bound to be successful. We told the group after us that when we got there, the detainees tried to take advantage of our inexperience early on. Fortunately, the learning curve was pretty steep and we were able to keep everyone alive during my time there (sometimes just barely). I can’t say why (for obvious reasons), but there is no doubt in my mind that the ones who killed themselves were ordered to by the al-Qaida leaders there.

    As one of the hospital staff, I can also tell you from personal experience the MA’s (guard force) kept us safe and were professionals all the way. She and her shipmates were the ones who reminded us that these were detainees when we started to think of them as patients. And they were also the ones who stepped to the front when the fur started to fly. You are right to be proud of her. The provocations they endured are far more than the article describes and they always performed in a manner that did our country proud. My retirement packet went in as soon as I got back, but I would consider pulling it and returning to GITMO if the MA’s I worked with asked me to.

    The reason there are female guards is not for psychological reasons though, at least not in the threatening or mindgame sense. It’s more of a limit-setting standard, by which I mean we are not going to let the jihadist bastards dictate who does the job. If we cave on this and only have a male guard force, then they’ll insist that the doctors, nurses, techs, food service, etc… not be female. Then, they’d try to insist that none could be black, or Jewish, or left-handed, or some other nonsense. Our military has males and females doing the jobs and if they don’t want to come into contact with our females, then they shouldn’t take up arms and try to kill us. Where were their objections to females when our convoys were attacked and female soldiers killed?

    Bottom line is there are some nasty, dangerous, evil men there who are still in the fight and following the Manchester Document (al-Qaida Handbook) every waking minute. There are many reasons to keep them locked up (still getting Intel, would take up arms if released, etc…), but there are more than a few who I wouldn’t mind returning to the battlefield in the middle of a few USMC snipers. Please give your daughter a warm thank-you from this Army dogface soldier.

  9. esthier

    “The reason there are female guards is not for psychological reasons though, at least not in the threatening or mindgame sense. It’s more of a limit-setting standard, by which I mean we are not going to let the jihadist bastards dictate who does the job.”

    OK, I can understand that, but aren’t guards at male prisons all male? Maybe I’m wrong, but I’ve been led to believe that guards were gender specific to their prison.

  10. Stashiu3

    Nope, there are female guards at men’s prisons (some at least), along with male guards over female prisoners. I don’t know of any facility that has gender-specific staff, but there may be some.

  11. buzzhead

    It would be considered discrimination to limit job assignments to a specific sex. Can’t do that.

    Have you seen the news articles about male prison guards taking ‘advantage’ of the female inmates under their care?

  12. Warmonger Infidel

    I believe that is an old standard esthier. In most of our state prisons, there are male and female guards in both the male and female prisons. This was a disaster in Atlanta last year when a prisoner going to court overcame a female jail/court guard and would up killing a lot of people. Persoanlly, I think it’s a bad idea but if you were to try and change it the equal employment rights moonbats would raise hell.

    As to the MAs in the Navy, the tough assignments are a big weight factor when it comes to advancement. I’m sure assignment to GITMO as a MA/guard goes a long way toward future advancement, especially when it comes to the E7 thru E9 selection boards. If you restrict women from the assignment, you hinder their chances of advancement. That was one of the main reasons for assigning women to shipboard billets and combat aircraft billets. And (ok you can all jump on sexist retired Master Chief now) the main reason I retired from the Navy at 27 years instead of 30. I’m not a women hater and believe in equal opportunity. I just don’t believe in assigning people to jobs they aren’t capable of doing. That doesn’t include all women in all assignments, as 1st’s daughter has proven. Now I’ll shut up before I can’t climb out of this hole I just dug.

  13. 1sttofight

    Uh, Stashiu3 , The lady is not my daughter.
    I posted a letter from her father. Sorry for the confusion and for your service to our country.

  14. groovygrl

    I agree with WI. As a woman in a man’s industry I love the differences between the sexes. Almost all the time there are differences, although we all know women that have mustaches and can fix your car and men who can chose a color palette to die for.

    Either way, I don’t know why this information had to be sued for. Why did the military not want to release it?

  15. esthier

    Wow, I didn’t know that. That just seems like a horrible idea to me.

    Unless a woman is as strong as, or stronger than the average man, she shouldn’t be put in a position of keeping criminals in line.

    I’m for equal rights, not giving women special treatment for jobs they cannot do.

    Thanks for the info. Guess I’ve been in a cave.

  16. Stashiu3

    A quick Google search shows some male prisons have over half women staff.

    “Experienced corrections officials told The Advertiser that for a men’s prison, it’s best to have a staff that is at least 75 percent male, but Cooke said he didn’t see his majority female staff as a problem.”

    http://the.honoluluadvertiser......30313.html

    Interesting, eh? I believe it’s a Title X issue or somesuch, equal hiring practices anyway. Some male or female complained that they were being discriminated against. Besides, the females at GITMO definitely held their own and didn’t back down (even the ones that were girly-girl the rest of the time, no offense intended).

  17. Stashiu3

    1sttofight said:
    “Uh, Stashiu3 , The lady is not my daughter.
    I posted a letter from her father. Sorry for the confusion and for your service to our country.”

    No problem 1st, my mistake… but did you really mean that you’re sorry for my service to our country? *wink*

  18. 1sttofight

    Sorry for the confusion and for your service to our country.

    Should be,

    Sorry for the confusion and THANK YOU for your service to our country.

  19. Stashiu3

    I know sir, been lurking here for quite a while and was teasing you a bit. Knew what you meant and thanks right back at’cha for your service before mine.

  20. 1sttofight

    Well it is 5 oclock somewhere. ;)

    BTW, I aint a Sir, I worked for a living.

  21. Warmonger Infidel

    1st, in the Navy the saying is: I ain’t a sir, my parents were married. Just thought you really needed to know that over whatever you are drinking right now. My 5 o’clock doesn’t come for 6 1/2 hours (bwaahhhh).

  22. 1sttofight

    Well see you Navy pukes never had to work, all yall did was ride around on a big boat. ;)

  23. Warmonger Infidel

    HaHa 1st. Not this Navy puke. Seabees don’t do boats.

  24. 1sttofight

    LOL, I thought that would get you stirred up. One of the guys who graduated high school with my youngest son joined the Navy and is in the CB’s.

    For Navy, yall aint bad. ;)

  25. Stashiu3

    1st, I was enlisted, an NCO, a cadet, and now a field-grade… I’ll call a tree sir until I know what rank they are or if it gets the job done. *grin*

    WI, Seabees are awesome!!! They can build, fix, or tune up anything made by man. Didn’t know they were Navy tho ;c)

  26. 1sttofight

    I never got past a lowly Sgt. in 4 years. My youngest son, a Marine like me who I am very proud of made Sgt in a little over 3 years.

  27. Stashiu3

    Heh, not to brag… what’m I sayin? Of course it’s bragging… made SGT (E-5) in 23 months. Of course, that was after the E-7 took me out back for ‘counseling’ and I decided I better straighten up. Otherwise, I would have probably been one of the wiseguys who got “kicked out of the stupid Army because it’s stupid and has stupid people who are so stupid.. ” (you get the idea).

    Just in case, “Thanks again SFC B, my head is on straight, thank you.” ;c)

  28. 1sttofight

    It aint bragging if you done it.

    My Redneck talking is coming through now.

    Hey yall, watch this. ;)

  29. Exeter

    “I’ll call a tree sir until I know what rank they are”

    Stash - Well, I suppose if it’s wearing oakleaf clusters…

  30. Stashiu3

    Now THAT’s funny…. don’t bark at me if I steal that line, ok? ….


Leave a Reply

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.


« Front Page | To Top
« Iranian Dissident Dies In Actual Hunger Strike | Castro Gets Surgery, Gives Power To Brother Raul »