Questions About The Clintons’ Indian Money Man
From a very understanding Washington Post:
![]()
Sant Singh Chatwal (left) and his son with Hillary Clinton at a June 25, 2007 fundraiser in New York City that raised more than a million dollars for her campaign.
When Controversy Follows Cash
Some Fundraisers With Legal Issues Slip Through Campaigns’ Vetting
By John Solomon and Matthew Mosk
Monday, September 3, 2007; A01Sant S. Chatwal, an Indian American businessman, has helped raise hundreds of thousands of dollars for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaigns, even as he battled governments on two continents to escape bankruptcy and millions of dollars in tax liens.
The founder of the Bombay Palace restaurant chain, Chatwal is one of a growing number of fundraisers in the 2008 presidential campaign whose backgrounds have prompted questions about how much screening the candidates devote to their “bundlers” while they press to raise record amounts.
Chatwal’s case reached from his native India to New York City. The IRS pursued him for approximately $4 million in unpaid business taxes, while New York state placed a lien seeking more than $5 million in taxes. He forfeited a building to New York City on which he was delinquent on property taxes and was sued by federal regulators seeking to recoup millions of dollars in loans from a failed bank where he served as a director.
Across the ocean, three Indian banks forced him into U.S. bankruptcy, and he was charged with bank fraud. He was out on bond when he showed up in India in 2001 during a visit by his longtime friend Bill Clinton.
Yet none of the legal and financial woes — occasionally touched on in American or Indian newspapers or highlighted by political opponents — raised red flags inside Hillary Clinton’s fundraising operation. Chatwal recently said he plans to help raise $5 million from Indian Americans for Clinton’s presidential bid.
Asked whether anything in Chatwal’s background caused concerns about his activities on behalf of the campaign, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer answered, “No.” He declined last week to be more specific, saying only that major fundraisers are routinely vetted “through publicly available records.” …
Chatwal, after making his millions in the restaurant business, saw his fortunes sour when he began dabbling in New York real estate just as the market softened.
He was forced into bankruptcy in 1995 by three Indian banks that claimed he owed them millions from business loans.
During the 1990s, the IRS and New York City and state tax authorities also pursued liens, and Chatwal worked out deals to pay them back. When the rents from one apartment building he bought no longer covered the real estate taxes, Chatwal turned over the building to New York City to resolve a reported $2 million tax lien, his lawyer said.
In 1997, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. sued Chatwal over his role as a director and a guarantor of unpaid loans at the failed First New York Bank for Business. The government alleged that his loans had “resulted in losses to the bank in excess of $12 million,” and it questioned his claims that he could not repay the debts.
The regulators also questioned why Chatwal continued to rent a spacious penthouse apartment in New York in the midst of his financial turmoil. “The debtor has managed to continue living in luxurious style in the same penthouse apartment he resided in at a time he claimed a net worth of tens of millions of dollars without adequate explanation of how his family’s limited income is able to support such a lifestyle,” the government said in a 1997 filing.
In September 2000, Chatwal hosted a half-million dollar fundraiser at that Upper East Side penthouse for Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign.
A few months later the FDIC abruptly settled the case, agreeing on Dec. 18, 2000, to let Chatwal pay $125,000 for the loans that it had said caused at least $12 million in losses.
Greene, Chatwal’s lawyer, said he believed that the actual losses caused by the loans were smaller but agreed that the bankruptcy resulted in a much smaller settlement. “He fully intended to pay the bank until the Indian banks involuntarily forced him into bankruptcy,” Greene said…
Just as Chatwal’s U.S. cases were being resolved, Indian authorities in December 2000 charged him with bank fraud. On April 30, 2001, he appeared in a Mumbai court and posted a $32,000 bond, according to court officials there. Chatwal was not under travel restrictions, though, and he went back to New York.
He returned to India a month later and made headlines in Indian newspapers by appearing with Bill Clinton during a visit with earthquake victims. The trip was underwritten by the American India Foundation, where Chatwal’s son was a board member. Aides to the former president said Chatwal was one of about 100 members of the Clinton delegation.
Eventually, Indian authorities “discharged” Chatwal from the bank case and closed the matter, Greene said.
Chatwal’s allegiance to the Clintons never wavered. Earlier this year, he promised to raise $5 million for Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential bid, creating a group called Indian Americans for Hillary 2008. Donors who gathered at least $25,000 were promised a “private VIP meeting” with the candidate, fundraising letters show.
The Clintons just have bad luck when it comes to their fundraisers, it would seem.
Surely they check everyone out very thoroughly. But as the article stresses, some mistakes are just going to “slip through” their intense “vetting.”
And who are we to judge?
A few months later the FDIC abruptly settled the case, agreeing on Dec. 18, 2000, to let Chatwal pay $125,000 for the loans that it had said caused at least $12 million in losses
Certainly the Clintons’ influence had no bearing on this. Government debt collectors are famous for accepting pennies on the dollar.
But isn’t it funny how the only people the Washington Post could find to ask about this were a Clintons’ spokesman and Mr. Chatwal’s attorney.
Is this hard-hitting investigative journalism or a preemptive strike to get the Clintons’ defense out before anyone else brought up the obvious subject?
Indeed, even Wikipedia has some very interesting details which were carefully omitted by the Post’s crack reporters:
![]()
Sant Chatwal and his wife are greeted by Hillary Clinton at another fundraiser Chatwal hosted for her.
Sant Singh Chatwal
Sant Singh Chatwal is a Sikh Indian-American businessman. According to The Indian Express, “he is a former Indian Air Force pilot who migrated to the United States in the 1980s and started the Bombay Palace chain of restaurants.” …
Chatwal is a Trustee of the William J. Clinton Foundation, a Charitable foundation organized by President Clinton focusing on global issues of health security, economic empowerment (HIV/AIDS Initiative; Clinton Global Initiative, Urban Enterprise Initiative, Healthier Generation, etc.)…
Chatwal has devoted resources to political causes, working very closely with the Democratic Party, in particular with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, Senator John Kerry, Senator Charles Schumer, Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi and Congressman Joseph Crowley.
In February 2006, Chatwal hosted an extravagant wedding in India for his son Vikram Chatwal. The wedding including a week of festivities spread out over a week and three Indian cities and a veritable fleet of chartered planes. Guests included Bill Clinton, Lakshmi Mittal, Deepak Chopra and the Prime Minister of India.Ironically, Sant Chatwal had earlier filed for personal bankruptcy in New York to discharge millions in debt owed to various people and entities including the US government. In court filings in the late 1990s he stated he had just ‘$100’ while living in a penthouse in New York’s expensive upper-Eastside. Among the many banks that saw their loans turn bad were Lincoln Savings Bank, First New York Bank, Bank of Baroda, Bank of India and State Bank of India.
He is now on “Hillary Clinton for President Exploratory Committee”.
Apparently the Post didn’t think its readers needed to know such trivialities.
Related Articles:
- Justice Dept Probing Hsu's Democrat Fundraising
- Top Hillary Fundraiser Hsu Turns Himself In
- The NYT Whitewashes Democrats' Hsu Scandal
- Indicted Hillary Fundraiser Fled US In March
- Hillary Fundraiser Hsu Wanted For Grand Theft
- Shocker: Castro 'Endorses' Clinton-Obama
- WSJ Uncovers Chinese Money Funnel To DNC
14 Responses to “Questions About The Clintons’ Indian Money Man”
Leave a Reply
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.



September 3rd, 2007 at 12:34 pm
SG changed the picture now, but the original showed bjbillary and Michael Douglas standing with some attractive Indian woman between them. She was much more pleasant to look at than the shill. Might she be the real fund raiser? As to the bjbillary and shillary show, anyone who actually believes a vote for her isn’t a vote for him is really on the high octane koolaid. Take him out of the picture and she isn’t even in the chase.
I wish someone would explain to me how you can go around the world borrowing millions of dollars with no accountability. I would really like to retire and think a $12 million dollar loan with a $125K payback would be a perfect way to buy that compound I want in Hawaii.
September 3rd, 2007 at 12:41 pm
The photo you mention, WI, is the one the WP supplied with their article:
http://tinyurl.com/yvc3he
Their caption reads:
“From left, Sant Chatwal, Bill Clinton, Renu Mehta and Michael Douglas at an event in London in 2006. Chatwal, a longtime friend of Bill and Hillary Clinton, raised money for their campaigns and causes even as he faced legal and financial difficulties. Mehta, a philanthropist, founded Fortune Forum.”
September 3rd, 2007 at 12:45 pm
She’s much easier to look at than the shill.
September 3rd, 2007 at 2:11 pm
Bill probably has his hand on her ass in that pic. Amazing though, the depths these two scammers went to, and are as we speak, to raise campaign funds. How else can Hillary sustain such a long campaign, litterally six months more than her rivals, with obama osama struggling to even stay close to her.
September 3rd, 2007 at 2:20 pm
DGA…So……are you saying she’s pimping out old bj the gigaloo?
September 3rd, 2007 at 2:33 pm
Wow! For a man with so many money problems, it hasn’t seem to slow down his two sons who are donating lots of money to Hillary this year.
http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/by.....st=Chatwal
And check out this spread on Little Chatwal’s wedding that was held shortly after his dad filed bankruptcy:
http://nymag.com/relationships/features/16368
Do you really think Justice is going to persue this? Teflon Bill and T-Fal Hill have managed to skate on thin ice for years and still hasn’t fallen in. Why should they? With the help of the MSM to cover up and excuse their illegal campaign activities, they think they are untouchable.
But the rules of the game are changing. The MSM is no longer the only source of news and blogs like S & L are going to persue this until the MSM has no choice but to report the facts, not the spin. MacsMind is on this like stink on shite and he is not going to let it go. We shouldn’t either.
September 3rd, 2007 at 3:22 pm
I wish I could be so broke. Interesting story in the S.F. Chronicle about Hsu. Turns out he (his attorneys) made a deal with the prosecutors that he would be freed after turning himself in last week on $1M bail. When they went before the judge, after he turned himself in, the judge said no deal, bail is $2M cash. They locked him up for an hour until someone showed up with the extra million in cash. How the hell do you do that?
September 3rd, 2007 at 3:36 pm
They locked him up for an hour until someone showed up with the extra million in cash. How the hell do you do that?
The Chinse embassy must be fairly close to the courthouse.
September 3rd, 2007 at 3:51 pm
Well the consulate in S.F. probably. I agree. It was a rhetorical question.
September 3rd, 2007 at 5:19 pm
So we got a bankrupt Indian who is being sought for tax - oh let’s just call it what it is evasion - who manages to make a 12 m loan with a 1% payback - promising 5m in donations, while claiming to have only a $100. to his name.
A Chinese felon who was on the lam manages somehow manages to donate in excess of $100K.
And wasn’t there a trial and fine over the Bill farewell do in LaLaLand that somehow became a Hillary fundraiser? Lawsuits and trials abounding as the fingers pointed at everyone else?
And those are just the ones I’m aware of - I know that there have to be so many deals, connections and such buried deeply with these two - it could take years to investigate fully who they have been bought by and for what cost to America.
And this person is #1 for the DNC to put forth as POTUS material?!? How can anyone other than the Maffia, Union thugs and voting felons endorse this lying, cheating, soulless Senator?
September 3rd, 2007 at 5:30 pm
And let us not forget that most corrupt of Indians, Vinod Gupta of InfoUSA…a firm best known for selling information about people and businesses to telemarketeers. Gupta practically owns Klintoon, based upon the amount of money that’s been fed to the Machine by him.
Says something about how corrupt that continent and its environs are when you look at where Klintoon has gotten money from: China, India, Indonesia…probably Malaysia, as well…
Oh well, Asian slime pays for access to American slime (and nothing pains me more than for BJ Billy and the Queen B**ch to both be from the US)…
September 3rd, 2007 at 7:42 pm
Don’t forget, Bill gave pardons to people at the end of his presidency to people who had donated large sums of money to his past campaigns. These people probably think that since he did it, she probably will too so they are possibly thinking that they can get pardons for what they have done in the past.
Typical for the Bill/Hillary team.
September 3rd, 2007 at 7:54 pm
The Clinton crime family and dirty money go hand in hand.
September 4th, 2007 at 6:38 pm
“Norman is entitled to the presumption of innocence like everyone else,” Hsu’s Washington attorney, E. Lawrence Barcella Jr., said Tuesday. “His issue is over 15 years old.”
In 1991, Hsu pleaded no contest to a single felony count of grand theft in California, admitting he’d defrauded investors of $1 million in a bogus investment scam.
http://www.breitbart.com/artic.....p;catnum=0
Uh, I do believe when you plead guilty, the “presumption of innocence” is no longer in play.