Rangel Has 4 Rent Stabilized Apartments
Amazingly, some actual investigative reporting from the New York Times:
Rangel Rents Apartments at Bargain Rates
By DAVID KOCIENIEWSKI
While aggressive evictions are reducing the number of rent-stabilized apartments in New York, Representative Charles B. Rangel is enjoying four of them, including three adjacent units on the 16th floor overlooking Upper Manhattan in a building owned by one of New York’s premier real estate developers.
Mr. Rangel, the powerful Democrat who is chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, uses his fourth apartment, six floors below, as a campaign office, despite state and city regulations that require rent-stabilized apartments to be used as a primary residence.
Mr. Rangel, who has a net worth of $566,000 to $1.2 million, according to Congressional disclosure records, paid a total rent of $3,894 monthly in 2007 for the four apartments at Lenox Terrace, a 1,700-unit luxury development of six towers, with doormen, that is described in real estate publications as Harlem’s most prestigious address.
The current market-rate rent for similar apartments in Mr. Rangel’s building would total $7,465 to $8,125 a month, according to the Web site of the owner, the Olnick Organization.
The Olnick Organization and other real estate firms have been accused of overzealous tactics as they move to evict tenants from their rent-stabilized apartments and convert the units into market-rate housing.
Tensions are especially inflamed in Harlem, where the rising cost of living and the arrival of more moneyed residents have triggered anxiety over the future of the historically black neighborhood. And Vantage Properties, a company established by Olnick’s former chief operating officer, has attracted billions in private equity financing by promising investors that it can aggressively convert tens of thousands of rent-stabilized apartments, many in Harlem.
Yet Mr. Rangel, a critic of other landlords’ callousness, has been uncharacteristically reticent about Olnick’s actions.
State officials and city housing experts said in interviews that while the law does not bar tenants from having more than one rent-stabilized apartment, they knew of no one else with four of them. Others suggested that the arrangement undermines the purpose of rent regulation.
“There are families who manage to get two, when one tenant marries another, things like that,” said Dov Treiman, a lawyer who publishes The Housing Court Reporter, a legal trade publication. “But I’ve never heard of any tenant managing to get four.”
Mr. Rangel’s use of the fourth apartment as an office, in addition to his 2,500-square-foot residence, was especially troubling to some advocates, given the city’s chronic shortage of housing for low- and moderate-income residents.
“Whether it’s an elected official or not, no one should have four apartments, especially when one is being used as an office,” said Michael McKee, treasurer of the Tenants Political Action Committee, who was not aware of Mr. Rangel’s situation when he was interviewed…
Mr. Rangel, 78, declined to answer questions during a telephone interview, saying that his housing was a private matter that did not affect his representation of his constituents.
“Why should I help you embarrass me?” he said, before abruptly hanging up…
Under state and city rent regulations, tenants can continue renewing the lease in their rent-stabilized apartments for as long as they use it as a primary residence, and landlords can increase rent only by an annual percentage set by a city board…
Luminaries are nothing new at Lenox Terrace, a large development on 135th Street between Fifth and Lenox Avenues. The Olnick Organization built it in 1958 as the first luxury community in Harlem. The family-run company has a broad portfolio of retail, commercial and residential buildings, and holds a contract to lease office space to federal agencies in Morristown, N.J.
According to Federal Election Commission records, Mr. Rangel received $2,000 in campaign contributions from Sylvia Olnick, an owner of the company, in 2004. His separate political action committee received $2,500 donations from her in 2004 and 2006.
In addition, city records show that in 2005, a lobbyist for the Olnick Organization met with Mr. Rangel and Mr. Paterson, who was then the State Senate minority leader, as the company set out to win government approvals of a plan to expand Lenox Terrace and build another apartment complex in the Bronx…
Mr. Rangel’s residence, which has custom moldings and dramatic archways, is decorated with Benin Bronze statues and antique carved walnut Italian chairs, and was featured in the 2003 book “Style and Grace: African Americans at Home,” by Michael Henry Adams (Bulfinch Press). The article called the home a penthouse, although it is on the second floor from the top.
The book does not mention that the units are rent-stabilized, but says that the penthouse had been assembled by combining separate apartments…
The records showed that the congressman paid $1,329 monthly for his two-bedroom apartment, which is about half the $2,600 market-rate rent the development now charges new tenants. For the adjacent one-bedroom, he also paid $1,329. The one-bedrooms are now rented for $1,865 and up.
He paid $606 a month for the adjacent studio apartment, while market rents for studios there are now $1,300. He pays $630 for the 10th-floor office, and federal election records show that he splits the cost between his Congressional re-election fund, which has raised more than $3.6 million this election cycle, and his National Leadership PAC, a committee he controls, which raised more than $1.6 million.
Some Congressional ethics experts, while saying it appears legitimate for Mr. Rangel to have one rent-stabilized apartment, question whether his acceptance of the additional units may violate the House of Representatives’ ban on members’ accepting gifts of more than $100. They suggest that the difference between what Mr. Rangel pays for the second, third and fourth apartments and what a new market-rate tenant would pay — some $30,000 annually — could be considered a gift because it is given at the discretion of the landlord and it is not generally available to the public.
Landlords can — and routinely do — force tenants who have more than one rent-stabilized apartment to give up any additional units.
Meredith McGehee, policy director for the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center in Washington, said she was not familiar with the particulars of Mr. Rangel’s accommodations, but said that under House ethics rules, a gift is defined as any “gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value.”
Mr. Rangel, who earns $169,300 base pay as a congressman, owns a villa in the Dominican Republic that is worth $250,000 to $500,000, his disclosure form states. He has also bought and sold properties in recent years; he bought a condominium in 2004 in Sunny Isles, Fla., for $50,000 to $100,000 and sold it last year for $100,000 to $250,000. In 2004 he also sold a building on 132nd Street, around the corner from Lenox Terrace, for $250,000 to $500,000. He owns mutual funds with a combined value between $266,000 and $765,000.
Mr. Rangel is among New York’s most influential politicians. He is a member of the legendary “gang of four” black Democratic power brokers — along with Mr. Sutton, the former Manhattan borough president; former Mayor David N. Dinkins; and the senior Mr. Paterson, the former secretary of state and the governor’s father — who have dominated Harlem affairs for a generation.
Mr. Rangel is frequently re-elected with more than 80 percent of the vote…
But critics, including some Harlem residents, complain that Mr. Rangel has too often used his public office to help himself and his friends. In 1999, Mr. Rangel was forced out as chairman of the Apollo Theater foundation after the state attorney general’s office charged that the board had failed to collect more than $4 million owed to the theater by a company controlled by his ally Mr. Sutton. Mr. Rangel and Mr. Sutton denied any wrongdoing.
Last year, government watchdog groups criticized Mr. Rangel for pushing through a $1.9 million earmark to build the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at City College of New York, which is to include an office for Mr. Rangel and a presidential-style library for his official papers. The congressman and the college said that by lending his name to the project, he had helped the college raise millions from private donors.
Of course The Times did put this out on a Friday during the height of summer. And they buried it in their "Region" section.
But still, this is shocking. The New York Times — reporting malfeasance on the part of a Democrat. A black Democrat.
Is it the millennium?
Related Articles:
14 Responses to “Rangel Has 4 Rent Stabilized Apartments”
Leave a Reply
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.



July 11th, 2008 at 11:10 am
““Why should I help you embarrass me?” he said, before abruptly hanging up…”
He must be wrong or he couldn’t be embarrassed.
July 11th, 2008 at 11:18 am
Looks like the raspy representative from New York is as adept at real estate as Harry Reid. Apparently the housing bubble has not yet burst on Congress.
For Republicans, it’s labeled the ‘Culture of Corruption’. For Dumbocrats, it’s just the perks of power.
July 11th, 2008 at 2:16 pm
RANGEL is a CASTRO FAN !
Seems Rangel admires Castro, because he shares in the Dictators exploitation of the PEOPLE for the common good, to create a special Elite PARTY class in Government.
Rangel - “Well, I wonder how many people we killed in Guantanamo? We don’t have the human right record.”
Cavuto - “Wait a minute. Are you equating Fidel Castro with what is going on in Guantanamo?”
RANGEL has always tried to aid the oppression of Havana…
‘Rangel Tries To End The Cuban Embargo’
It is no wonder why Rangel was such an enabler of the Clinton Corruption, as he loves to exploit public service in negligent manners for his own personal gain, just as much as Hillary and Bill.
Charles Rangel is not fit to be a US Representative.
“Rep. Charles Rangel has ‘fessed up to having violated congressional ethics rules by taking his son to Cuba in 2002 on a trip paid for by Fidel Castro’s government and New York grocery titan John Castimatidis.
Rangel amended his 2002 travel-disclosure report and repaid Cuba and Castimatidis $1,922 last April for his son Steven’s expenses - but he did so only after inquiries by the nonpartisan Center for Public Integrity.”
How pathetic to see these corrupt Liberal Democrats stealing from the AMERICAN PUBLIC with slimy scams, exploiting their position in Government, while trying to increase taxation on everyone else.
And these mindless partisans in the MSM continue to enable the Democrat Swindle.
What ever happened to Harry Reid’s smelly LAND DEAL anyway?
And these negligent Democrats are always pimping for Oppressive Communists, such as the fools those who favor FARC and HUGO, while blocking sound Treaties with FREE NATIONS like Columbia.
Simply pathetic.
July 11th, 2008 at 3:09 pm
Another example of “Equality for Everyone” with some, the elite class being more equal.
LET’S SEE THE WHITE HOUSE SUBPOENA SOMEBODY IN CONGRESS FOR A CHANGE!
YES I’M YELLING!
July 11th, 2008 at 4:52 pm
How the hell can people afford $8k for an apartment? That’s four times what my husband and I bring home COMBINED a month!
Yet we’re the “wealthy” ones, right, Mr. Obama…
July 11th, 2008 at 6:09 pm
Good ol’ Chuck “What’s in it for me” Rangle (D).
Let’s see, according to the Rent reform Act of 1997, if you make over $175,000 for two consecutive years, and your rent is over $2000, you lose your rent-controlled status. - http://www.housingnyc.com/html.....eform.html
Of course, Charlie “Appropriate taxpayer money to build a library named after me” Rangle (D) got around that by splitting his rent among four ‘primary’ residences - all under $2,000 per unit, per month. So, although no one can legally have four primary residences, good ol’ Chuck “Do as I say, not as I do” Rangle (D) can, since A) he’s old, B) has lived in Harlem all his life, C) needed to move his children and grandchildren out from under his hair, and D) did I mention he’s old? Basically, he’s saying “Hey, I’m entitled!”
So, Charlie “The Weasel” Rangle (D) was able to get around what would otherwise be illegal - by claiming four primary residences illegally. This guy should be brought up on Ethics charges in the House, should have to pay fines for illegally claiming four primary residences (what does that mean for his IRS filings for 20 years? I am sure he made, with total income, over $175,000), and should have his rent-subsidies removed on all but the primary residence, since that one (well, two) appears to actually fall under the definition of a legally rent-controlled apartment.
At a bare minimum, he should:
1) have to combine all four units into one, and thus would lose the rent-stabilization status on the ‘one apartment’, or
2) have to give up the studio and office since it’s not his primary residence. And,
3) be brought before the Ethics Commitee and censured and fined.
This is a joke, right? I mean, c’mon - Charlie ‘Breaking the Law” Rangle (D) would never fleece the citizens he is supposed to represent - right?
July 11th, 2008 at 6:52 pm
Our Founding Fathers knew what to expect from government–any form of government. The Left has argued for socialism with its equality for all, justice, kindness, and safety nets for all. How is it that in every leftist, socialist, communist, and democratic system this always happens? The leadership of these systems have the best food, the best pay, best homes,the best education, best vacations, best medical care, best security, the best retirement, ad nauseam. The connecting theme in all of this is leadership; they all demand and receive privilege. We do not live in their world and they do not live in our world. How can they properly represent or lead us? They don’t like us and they have no respect for us.
July 12th, 2008 at 1:36 am
Off topic somewhat but:
“anxiety over the future of the historically black neighborhood.”
Okay fine then, I want my historically German neighborhood to return to, and stay, that way. Everyone else get the hell out. No one should have a problem with that right? What a double standard.
July 12th, 2008 at 1:45 am
“Basically, he’s saying “Hey, I’m entitled!”
Hey Arctain,
Actually he’s saying “I’m black, liberal & from the cesspool Harlem, so try to do something about it.”
July 12th, 2008 at 8:36 am
You know, FNC is really p*ssing me off lately, on SRwBH the sub teased this story with guess which Congresscritter (ok, he didn’t say critter, I did) lives in a big space in the most crowed area of the country.
You know what, I really don’t care how much space a person decides that they personally ‘need’, if they pay for it properly (i.e. what the going rate is), pay the property tax on it and at least keep it to a minimum of basic health standard (I’m am not one to go on and on about ‘landscaping’ or such.
What bothered me about FNC’s tease on this is that the ’space’ issue isn’t the issue at all - it is the rent-controlled (subsidized), his connection (i.e. the donation from the owner company), his possible violation of the law in calling an office a primary residence and his use of taxpayer money to pay his rent(s). . .
What is called corruption and ethics violations with a Republican is just gettin’ theirs for a Democrat.
What a crock and what a shame.
July 12th, 2008 at 5:34 pm
This is what we will get from the liberal democrat party. There slogan is take from the haves and give to the have nots. His problem is he still thinks he does not have enough. An that is why he is a politician he live off the hard work of others. An thinks he is helping people. What a crock.
July 12th, 2008 at 7:53 pm
What can ya say? Democrats, the working man’s friend! LMAO.
July 12th, 2008 at 7:59 pm
Excellent post, Arctain!
July 12th, 2008 at 8:02 pm
“What bothered me about FNC’s tease on this is that the ’space’ issue isn’t the issue at all - it is the rent-controlled (subsidized), his connection (i.e. the donation from the owner company), his possible violation of the law in calling an office a primary residence and his use of taxpayer money to pay his rent(s). . .”
Sadly, so many of the news writers at Fox are kids who have no idea what they are talking about.