<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harry Reid Trots Out Ted Kennedy&#8217;s Ghost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: U NO HOO</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167192</link>
		<dc:creator>U NO HOO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167192</guid>
		<description>http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/thomasson.insurance.health.us

&quot;Growth in Demand: Government Policies that Encouraged Health Insurance

Offering insurance policies to employee groups not only benefited insurers, but also benefited employers. During World War II, wage and price controls prevented employers from using wages to compete for scarce labor. Under the 1942 Stabilization Act, Congress limited the wage increases that could be offered by firms, but permitted the adoption of employee insurance plans. In this way, health benefit packages offered one means of securing workers. In the 1940s, two major rulings also reinforced the foundation of the employer-provided health insurance system. First, in 1945 the War Labor Board ruled that employers could not modify or cancel group insurance plans during the contract period. Then, in 1949, the National Labor Relations Board ruled in a dispute between the Inland Steel Co. and the United Steelworkers Union that the term &quot;wages&quot; included pension and insurance benefits. Therefore, when negotiating for wages, the union was allowed to negotiate benefit packages on behalf of workers as well. This ruling, affirmed later by the U.S. Supreme Court, further reinforced the employment-based system.5

Perhaps the most influential aspect of government intervention that shaped the employer-based system of health insurance was the tax treatment of employer-provided contributions to employee health insurance plans. First, employers did not have to pay payroll tax on their contributions to employee health plans. Further, under certain circumstances, employees did not have to pay income tax on their employer&#039;s contributions to their health insurance plans. The first such exclusion occurred under an administrative ruling handed down in 1943 which stated that payments made by the employer directly to commercial insurance companies for group medical and hospitalization premiums of employees were not taxable as employee income (Yale Law Journal, 1954, pp. 222-247). While this particular ruling was highly restrictive and limited in its applicability, it was codified and extended in 1954. Under the 1954 Internal Revenue Code (IRC), employer contributions to employee health plans were exempt from employee taxable income. As a result of this tax-advantaged form of compensation, the demand for health insurance further increased throughout the 1950s (Thomasson 2003).&quot;

So, the government wage and price controls created the portability and employer associated problems of medical insurance.  It always comes back to the fact that the government caused the &quot;problem&quot; at hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/thomasson.insurance.health.us" rel="nofollow">http://eh.net/encyclopedia/art......health.us</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Growth in Demand: Government Policies that Encouraged Health Insurance</p>
<p>Offering insurance policies to employee groups not only benefited insurers, but also benefited employers. During World War II, wage and price controls prevented employers from using wages to compete for scarce labor. Under the 1942 Stabilization Act, Congress limited the wage increases that could be offered by firms, but permitted the adoption of employee insurance plans. In this way, health benefit packages offered one means of securing workers. In the 1940s, two major rulings also reinforced the foundation of the employer-provided health insurance system. First, in 1945 the War Labor Board ruled that employers could not modify or cancel group insurance plans during the contract period. Then, in 1949, the National Labor Relations Board ruled in a dispute between the Inland Steel Co. and the United Steelworkers Union that the term &#8220;wages&#8221; included pension and insurance benefits. Therefore, when negotiating for wages, the union was allowed to negotiate benefit packages on behalf of workers as well. This ruling, affirmed later by the U.S. Supreme Court, further reinforced the employment-based system.5</p>
<p>Perhaps the most influential aspect of government intervention that shaped the employer-based system of health insurance was the tax treatment of employer-provided contributions to employee health insurance plans. First, employers did not have to pay payroll tax on their contributions to employee health plans. Further, under certain circumstances, employees did not have to pay income tax on their employer&#8217;s contributions to their health insurance plans. The first such exclusion occurred under an administrative ruling handed down in 1943 which stated that payments made by the employer directly to commercial insurance companies for group medical and hospitalization premiums of employees were not taxable as employee income (Yale Law Journal, 1954, pp. 222-247). While this particular ruling was highly restrictive and limited in its applicability, it was codified and extended in 1954. Under the 1954 Internal Revenue Code (IRC), employer contributions to employee health plans were exempt from employee taxable income. As a result of this tax-advantaged form of compensation, the demand for health insurance further increased throughout the 1950s (Thomasson 2003).&#8221;</p>
<p>So, the government wage and price controls created the portability and employer associated problems of medical insurance.  It always comes back to the fact that the government caused the &#8220;problem&#8221; at hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ptat</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167090</link>
		<dc:creator>ptat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167090</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ted is watching.&quot; &quot;This bill will free Americans from fear of illness and death.&quot; This man is insane and powerful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ted is watching.&#8221; &#8220;This bill will free Americans from fear of illness and death.&#8221; This man is insane and powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retiredairforce</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167085</link>
		<dc:creator>retiredairforce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167085</guid>
		<description>How did her call get thru? What happened to the switchboard overload? Sounds fishy to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did her call get thru? What happened to the switchboard overload? Sounds fishy to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wirenut</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167076</link>
		<dc:creator>wirenut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167076</guid>
		<description>Uncle Ted is watching alright, with a really big pair of scotch goggles. Kennedy and Reid are all wet. Literally and figuratively. Kennedy and his clan have done enough to send people into hospitals and morgues. Ted is a bad example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uncle Ted is watching alright, with a really big pair of scotch goggles. Kennedy and Reid are all wet. Literally and figuratively. Kennedy and his clan have done enough to send people into hospitals and morgues. Ted is a bad example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167058</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167058</guid>
		<description>&quot;Put another log on the fire Ted.&quot;

There&#039;s the answer to that question!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Put another log on the fire Ted.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s the answer to that question!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167053</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167053</guid>
		<description>bulls-eye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bulls-eye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catie</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167051</link>
		<dc:creator>catie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167051</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s watching from Hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s watching from Hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GL0120</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167044</link>
		<dc:creator>GL0120</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167044</guid>
		<description>WTF does it matter if Ted&#039;s watching; no one in congress is stupid enough to allow themselves to be covered by this disaster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF does it matter if Ted&#8217;s watching; no one in congress is stupid enough to allow themselves to be covered by this disaster!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulajay</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167036</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167036</guid>
		<description>I hope Teddy is &quot;watching&quot; on January 19th when Massachusetts elects his replacement. With any luck, he&#039;ll be rolling over in his grave. If independent voters that are fleeing Obama in droves will show up at the polls, there&#039;s a very good chance that Republican Scott Brown will win. More than 50% of Massachusetts voters are independent or un-enrolled. And even in this state, people are starting to come out of their 46 year long &quot;Kennedy coma&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Teddy is &#8220;watching&#8221; on January 19th when Massachusetts elects his replacement. With any luck, he&#8217;ll be rolling over in his grave. If independent voters that are fleeing Obama in droves will show up at the polls, there&#8217;s a very good chance that Republican Scott Brown will win. More than 50% of Massachusetts voters are independent or un-enrolled. And even in this state, people are starting to come out of their 46 year long &#8220;Kennedy coma&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167032</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reid-trots-out-ted-kennedys-ghost#comment-167032</guid>
		<description>In those extremely rare moments when I begin to think a libwit argument for Universal Health Care might make a little bit of sense, I remind myself.

Ted Kennedy was for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In those extremely rare moments when I begin to think a libwit argument for Universal Health Care might make a little bit of sense, I remind myself.</p>
<p>Ted Kennedy was for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

