<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Space Weapon Ban May Be Tricky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:42:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Shackleford</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131602</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Shackleford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131602</guid>
		<description>Once again, Oblabby uses words that are not his own.  Although, I know I&#039;ve heard (read?) them someplace before, (Reagan?, Truman? Kennedy...sounds more like Kennedy)...they are not his own.  I know this because were you to take a flashlight and shine them in the boy&#039;s big, honkin&#039; dontchu be talkin bout dem ears, you would find a blank savannah, devoid of vegetation, perhaps the occasional tumbleweed drifting by...a moth....but not a lot of intellectual activity.  Watching him is like watching any actor who hasn&#039;t quite found his &quot;persona&quot;.  He&#039;s got a pose....much like the album covers on a gansta rappa with that chin &quot;all up in it&quot; and &quot;got his &#039;tude on&quot;.  

To me, it&#039;s comical. There&#039;s no way I can look at him and not laugh.  But...there were those who said the same of Hitler.  We can laugh at him NOW...but.....many millions died to get to that phase. 

When he talks about the military, I have to say, I was in the military for some time and there&#039;s no way I could know enough to have all the answers.  But with that said, I can easily say I know more than him.  To him, who&#039;s never fired a weapon, never ridden in a tank, never donned a uniform but simply spent his youth smoking dope and playing &quot;victim&quot;, is an absurd caricature.  Hell, even Jimmy Carter served in the Navy, as did Nixon.  In the past several decades, all our presidents, save TWO, were veterans.  Those two were.....Bill-Jeff and....(drum roll please), Uncle Oblabby.  

Truman
Eisenhower
Kennedy
Johnson
Nixon
Ford
Carter
Reagan
Bush, Sr
Bush, Jr

All had donned a uniform.  All had volunteered of themselves to serve the nation.  

But not Bill-Jeff.  Nope.  His pecker was more important.  But what was more important to Oblabby?  Is it possible that he maybe wanted to but couldn&#039;t produce a birth certificate?  

Or, more likely, he hated the fact that the military &quot;was killin&#039; our black boys by sendin&#039; dem to Vee-ET-nam&quot;?  

Or, even more likely, he had no idea of what country he was from, and also that he had no vested interest, unlike most young men, or vague curiosity about the military at all?

Who knows?  Who cares?  He will diddle the military the way he wants to diddle with everything else.  The real irony is that he may very well reinstate the draft, thereby &quot;creating jobs&quot; for all dem po&#039; folk.  In which case, I really do hope that &quot;skilled, white construction workers DON&#039;T get those jobs&quot;.  

But as for his understanding of weaponry, weapons systems, military logistics, infrastructure, materiel and personnel, his clue bird has flown away.  Or, more accurately, it never landed.  He knows as much about the aforementioned as I do about subterranean mining.  And, he will have a bitch of a time talking to the chiefs of staff on that basis alone.   Every time they mention a technical term, he will either &quot;assume the position&quot;, that being the chin up and &quot;attentive/interested/intrigued&quot; look or...he will have to ask &quot;what does that mean?&quot; and I doubt, with serious conviction, that he will ever ask people who intimidate him (not their fault, mind you) anything that remotely sounds like a plea for help with his ignorance. 

He will not understand our capabilities nor will he comprehend the potential damage he can do with a wave of his magic negro wand.  

&quot;See dis heer?  We be makins all diss go away....jess like dat, see?&quot;  &quot;Sho nuf....it gone.&quot;  &quot;Now, whatchu tink &#039;bout dat?&quot; 

I often wonder how Colin Powell, the replublicrat that he is, would have dealt with his brutha being iggy.

Or, would he bring in Will Smith to explain it to him?

(just kidding, I like Will Smith)

But, here we are, in a new, frightening era with a terrorist collaborator who wants to gut the military, take its pelt and hang it on the oval office wall.   Hurray for our side when &quot;Doctrine won out over having to have real weapons&quot;.

A just cause cannot be heard over the din of gunfire.
&quot;The force&quot; of our example isn&#039;t something you can summon as if from a Star Wars flick
Humility and restraint are the qualities forced upon the minions when all hope is destroyed.  

Again, borrowing from the words of the character Nathan Jessup: &quot;We use words like honor, code, loyalty … we use these words as the backbone to a life spent defending something.  You use ‘em as a punchline.&quot;

Words mean NOTHING to a liberal.  They have never had to back up their words with anything and Oblabby is certainly no exception.  He has never stood for anything.  He&#039;s never had to.  If I were still in the military, there is no way I could take that ass-clown seriously.  I almost vomited the day Clinton put on that flight jacket on board the carrier that day.  And don&#039;t tell me that the troops weren&#039;t ORDERED to be  there.   And the same will happen with this disgraceful example of American-hood.  

He will do his level-best (whatever THAT is) to destroy the US military.  And...the American people will let him.  And on that day, I will weep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, Oblabby uses words that are not his own.  Although, I know I&#8217;ve heard (read?) them someplace before, (Reagan?, Truman? Kennedy&#8230;sounds more like Kennedy)&#8230;they are not his own.  I know this because were you to take a flashlight and shine them in the boy&#8217;s big, honkin&#8217; dontchu be talkin bout dem ears, you would find a blank savannah, devoid of vegetation, perhaps the occasional tumbleweed drifting by&#8230;a moth&#8230;.but not a lot of intellectual activity.  Watching him is like watching any actor who hasn&#8217;t quite found his &#8220;persona&#8221;.  He&#8217;s got a pose&#8230;.much like the album covers on a gansta rappa with that chin &#8220;all up in it&#8221; and &#8220;got his &#8216;tude on&#8221;.  </p>
<p>To me, it&#8217;s comical. There&#8217;s no way I can look at him and not laugh.  But&#8230;there were those who said the same of Hitler.  We can laugh at him NOW&#8230;but&#8230;..many millions died to get to that phase. </p>
<p>When he talks about the military, I have to say, I was in the military for some time and there&#8217;s no way I could know enough to have all the answers.  But with that said, I can easily say I know more than him.  To him, who&#8217;s never fired a weapon, never ridden in a tank, never donned a uniform but simply spent his youth smoking dope and playing &#8220;victim&#8221;, is an absurd caricature.  Hell, even Jimmy Carter served in the Navy, as did Nixon.  In the past several decades, all our presidents, save TWO, were veterans.  Those two were&#8230;..Bill-Jeff and&#8230;.(drum roll please), Uncle Oblabby.  </p>
<p>Truman<br />
Eisenhower<br />
Kennedy<br />
Johnson<br />
Nixon<br />
Ford<br />
Carter<br />
Reagan<br />
Bush, Sr<br />
Bush, Jr</p>
<p>All had donned a uniform.  All had volunteered of themselves to serve the nation.  </p>
<p>But not Bill-Jeff.  Nope.  His pecker was more important.  But what was more important to Oblabby?  Is it possible that he maybe wanted to but couldn&#8217;t produce a birth certificate?  </p>
<p>Or, more likely, he hated the fact that the military &#8220;was killin&#8217; our black boys by sendin&#8217; dem to Vee-ET-nam&#8221;?  </p>
<p>Or, even more likely, he had no idea of what country he was from, and also that he had no vested interest, unlike most young men, or vague curiosity about the military at all?</p>
<p>Who knows?  Who cares?  He will diddle the military the way he wants to diddle with everything else.  The real irony is that he may very well reinstate the draft, thereby &#8220;creating jobs&#8221; for all dem po&#8217; folk.  In which case, I really do hope that &#8220;skilled, white construction workers DON&#8217;T get those jobs&#8221;.  </p>
<p>But as for his understanding of weaponry, weapons systems, military logistics, infrastructure, materiel and personnel, his clue bird has flown away.  Or, more accurately, it never landed.  He knows as much about the aforementioned as I do about subterranean mining.  And, he will have a bitch of a time talking to the chiefs of staff on that basis alone.   Every time they mention a technical term, he will either &#8220;assume the position&#8221;, that being the chin up and &#8220;attentive/interested/intrigued&#8221; look or&#8230;he will have to ask &#8220;what does that mean?&#8221; and I doubt, with serious conviction, that he will ever ask people who intimidate him (not their fault, mind you) anything that remotely sounds like a plea for help with his ignorance. </p>
<p>He will not understand our capabilities nor will he comprehend the potential damage he can do with a wave of his magic negro wand.  </p>
<p>&#8220;See dis heer?  We be makins all diss go away&#8230;.jess like dat, see?&#8221;  &#8220;Sho nuf&#8230;.it gone.&#8221;  &#8220;Now, whatchu tink &#8217;bout dat?&#8221; </p>
<p>I often wonder how Colin Powell, the replublicrat that he is, would have dealt with his brutha being iggy.</p>
<p>Or, would he bring in Will Smith to explain it to him?</p>
<p>(just kidding, I like Will Smith)</p>
<p>But, here we are, in a new, frightening era with a terrorist collaborator who wants to gut the military, take its pelt and hang it on the oval office wall.   Hurray for our side when &#8220;Doctrine won out over having to have real weapons&#8221;.</p>
<p>A just cause cannot be heard over the din of gunfire.<br />
&#8220;The force&#8221; of our example isn&#8217;t something you can summon as if from a Star Wars flick<br />
Humility and restraint are the qualities forced upon the minions when all hope is destroyed.  </p>
<p>Again, borrowing from the words of the character Nathan Jessup: &#8220;We use words like honor, code, loyalty … we use these words as the backbone to a life spent defending something.  You use ‘em as a punchline.&#8221;</p>
<p>Words mean NOTHING to a liberal.  They have never had to back up their words with anything and Oblabby is certainly no exception.  He has never stood for anything.  He&#8217;s never had to.  If I were still in the military, there is no way I could take that ass-clown seriously.  I almost vomited the day Clinton put on that flight jacket on board the carrier that day.  And don&#8217;t tell me that the troops weren&#8217;t ORDERED to be  there.   And the same will happen with this disgraceful example of American-hood.  </p>
<p>He will do his level-best (whatever THAT is) to destroy the US military.  And&#8230;the American people will let him.  And on that day, I will weep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greasywrench</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131365</link>
		<dc:creator>greasywrench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131365</guid>
		<description>Good Lord! The definition of the term &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&quot;Spin&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; just took on an entire new meaning after reading the monstrous rationalization by the Post. No Liberal bias there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Lord! The definition of the term <i><b>&#8220;Spin&#8221;</b></i> just took on an entire new meaning after reading the monstrous rationalization by the Post. No Liberal bias there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Redneck</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131305</link>
		<dc:creator>The Redneck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131305</guid>
		<description>Got to prioritize, y&#039;all.

Teaching kids to put on condoms and funding crappy paintings of the Virgin Mary (and I mean it was crappy before there was actual, literal cap on it) are important.

Defending ourselves, that&#039;s for when we&#039;ve got money to spare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got to prioritize, y&#8217;all.</p>
<p>Teaching kids to put on condoms and funding crappy paintings of the Virgin Mary (and I mean it was crappy before there was actual, literal cap on it) are important.</p>
<p>Defending ourselves, that&#8217;s for when we&#8217;ve got money to spare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrmcdonald</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131295</link>
		<dc:creator>jrmcdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131295</guid>
		<description>Jimmy? Is that really Jimmy Carter talking? Maybe Maddie Albright has a new sock puppet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy? Is that really Jimmy Carter talking? Maybe Maddie Albright has a new sock puppet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131280</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131280</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it strange that the forebearance of missles and tanks would be exactly what the Russians and chicoms would suggest if they were able to make policy for the U.S.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it strange that the forebearance of missles and tanks would be exactly what the Russians and chicoms would suggest if they were able to make policy for the U.S.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131263</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131263</guid>
		<description>A scatalogical reference in your very first post - bravo!  Welcome aboard...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A scatalogical reference in your very first post &#8211; bravo!  Welcome aboard&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131256</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131256</guid>
		<description>Welcome to the ZONE ,Twilight. Don&#039;t bite the gubbamint cheez if you get my drift! Please feel free to call me LD. We are all casual here unless you are a drive by troll. We throw gubbamint cheez at them!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the ZONE ,Twilight. Don&#8217;t bite the gubbamint cheez if you get my drift! Please feel free to call me LD. We are all casual here unless you are a drive by troll. We throw gubbamint cheez at them!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caligirl9</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131238</link>
		<dc:creator>caligirl9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131238</guid>
		<description>The government rum is right next to the government cheese ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government rum is right next to the government cheese &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1sttofight</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131226</link>
		<dc:creator>1sttofight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131226</guid>
		<description>What frigging rum? Where is it?

BTW, I just love it when trolls like flession try to act intelligent. They are so easy to spot.

Like shooting fish in a pipe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What frigging rum? Where is it?</p>
<p>BTW, I just love it when trolls like flession try to act intelligent. They are so easy to spot.</p>
<p>Like shooting fish in a pipe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flession</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131222</link>
		<dc:creator>Flession</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131222</guid>
		<description>Welcome to the website. You&#039;ll note the taxpayer subsidized rum in the corner, ready for your required shots to read said articles. Feel free to use it (and use it often) whenever you wish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the website. You&#8217;ll note the taxpayer subsidized rum in the corner, ready for your required shots to read said articles. Feel free to use it (and use it often) whenever you wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMG</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131221</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131221</guid>
		<description>The more the merrier.  Welcome aboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more the merrier.  Welcome aboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jobeth</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131217</link>
		<dc:creator>jobeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131217</guid>
		<description>Hi Twilight

glad to see there is another one of us. 

Welcome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Twilight</p>
<p>glad to see there is another one of us. </p>
<p>Welcome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1sttofight</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131215</link>
		<dc:creator>1sttofight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131215</guid>
		<description>Welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwilightZoned</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131214</link>
		<dc:creator>TwilightZoned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131214</guid>
		<description>First, let me say I stumbled over this gem of a site and was pleasantly surprised to find like minded people.  I hope my contributions will be up to par with this intelligent crowd.  Second, Liberal Demise, I laughed so hard...monkey dodo..couldn&#039;t agree more!  Eventually, the feces will hit the propelling apparatus.  By then it may be too late to turn things around.  Sing it with me, Dodo...dodo...(Just couldn&#039;t resist!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, let me say I stumbled over this gem of a site and was pleasantly surprised to find like minded people.  I hope my contributions will be up to par with this intelligent crowd.  Second, Liberal Demise, I laughed so hard&#8230;monkey dodo..couldn&#8217;t agree more!  Eventually, the feces will hit the propelling apparatus.  By then it may be too late to turn things around.  Sing it with me, Dodo&#8230;dodo&#8230;(Just couldn&#8217;t resist!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UndercoverInLA</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131210</link>
		<dc:creator>UndercoverInLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/reuters-risks-of-obama-space-weapons-ban#comment-131210</guid>
		<description>Uh, I got bad news, Odie44...today may be that day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, I got bad news, Odie44&#8230;today may be that day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
