Comments on: Dems Update US House ‘Decorum Rules’ http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:56:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Reality Bytes http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161779 Reality Bytes Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:52:31 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161779 How to stand up to Libs in Congress: The “Otter Defense” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1Y80ue92Ao How to stand up to Libs in Congress: The “Otter Defense”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1Y80ue92Ao

]]> By: Reality Bytes http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161778 Reality Bytes Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:50:54 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161778 How to stand up to Libs in Congress: The "Otto Defense" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1Y80ue92Ao Hey, isn't that Al Gore? Hasn't changed a bit. How to stand up to Libs in Congress: The “Otto Defense”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1Y80ue92Ao

Hey, isn’t that Al Gore? Hasn’t changed a bit.

]]> By: Liberals Demise http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161670 Liberals Demise Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:20:07 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161670 When a Republican sits in the WH they will change the format to suit their whim. Liberals Demise says the prez is a two faced lying jerk with no knowledge of running a Lemonade stand much less a Community Organization! As for ACORN ........................"T-I-M-B-E-R!!" When a Republican sits in the WH they will change the format to suit their whim.
Liberals Demise says the prez is a two faced lying jerk with no knowledge of running a Lemonade stand much less a Community Organization!

As for ACORN ……………………”T-I-M-B-E-R!!”

]]> By: canary http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161652 canary Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:29:12 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161652 These rules were adopted from the old UK in reference in to treating Kings. These rules were adopted from the old UK in reference in to treating Kings.

]]> By: TwilightZoned http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161633 TwilightZoned Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:45:33 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161633 Good one!!! Good one!!!

]]> By: TwilightZoned http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161632 TwilightZoned Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:41:01 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161632 TwilightZoned says: The president is a jackass. If it's acceptable for him to use, the term is acceptable. After all, he IS the president. Think I'll e-mail Joe. TwilightZoned says:

The president is a jackass.

If it’s acceptable for him to use, the term is acceptable. After all, he IS the president. Think I’ll e-mail Joe.

]]> By: Confucius http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161589 Confucius Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:22:47 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161589 Who knew a Democrat could do comedy? No one is going to read these rules. They don't even read their own legislation! Who knew a Democrat could do comedy?

No one is going to read these rules. They don’t even read their own legislation!

]]> By: proreason http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161588 proreason Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:19:07 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161588 Proreason says: the President ia a “liar.” the President ia a “hypocrite.” the President’s actiois are “cowardly.” the President is “intellectually dishonest.” the President is continually “giving aid and comfort to the enemy.” But I disagree there is “sexual misconduct on the President’s part.” by this President with ThunderButt. But I'm not so sure about his conduct with Drooling Barney and Rahm the Impaler But for a person deliberately trying to destroy a country and ruin the lives of hundreds of millioins of people, these things are hardly worth mentioning. Proreason says:

the President ia a “liar.”
the President ia a “hypocrite.”
the President’s actiois are “cowardly.”
the President is “intellectually dishonest.”
the President is continually “giving aid and comfort to the enemy.”

But I disagree there is “sexual misconduct on the President’s part.” by this President with ThunderButt. But I’m not so sure about his conduct with Drooling Barney and Rahm the Impaler

But for a person deliberately trying to destroy a country and ruin the lives of hundreds of millioins of people, these things are hardly worth mentioning.

]]> By: Rusty Shackleford http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161582 Rusty Shackleford Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:57:47 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/rules-of-decorum-debate-in-the-house#comment-161582 It bears repeating that when rep Joe Wilson pointed out that Blammo was lying, the house was not officially in session. Therefore the rules do not strictly apply. And again, he wasn't being disrespectful at all. When someone necessarily points out that the ongoing bloviating by a president is a lie...then I think he's upholding his sworn duty to the Constitution of the United States. The one thing that works against the democrats is that they will have to now abide by the same rules when there's a republican in the white house again. Wonder how that'll work out for them.... It bears repeating that when rep Joe Wilson pointed out that Blammo was lying, the house was not officially in session. Therefore the rules do not strictly apply. And again, he wasn’t being disrespectful at all. When someone necessarily points out that the ongoing bloviating by a president is a lie…then I think he’s upholding his sworn duty to the Constitution of the United States.

The one thing that works against the democrats is that they will have to now abide by the same rules when there’s a republican in the white house again. Wonder how that’ll work out for them….

]]>