<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saturday CPAC – Ann, Rush… And S&amp;L</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:09:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136880</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136880</guid>
		<description>Thanks, AF! 

(Especially for the &quot;manly&quot; part.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, AF! </p>
<p>(Especially for the &#8220;manly&#8221; part.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albertafriend</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136877</link>
		<dc:creator>Albertafriend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136877</guid>
		<description>Steve, I am thrilled that you got this award and that we finally were able to see you. I have to admit you look a lot different than what I imagined but also a lot more what I would call &quot;manly&quot;  and I would love to meet you in person. I love this blog so much for all the great discoveries that have been made over the years since comrade c first parked herself in a Crawford ditch and though I don&#039;t post a lot you can be sure I read here just about every day and I am never disappointed by what I find. I tried to post this yesterday but for some strange reason my password was being rejected but today it wasn&#039;t. Hurrah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I am thrilled that you got this award and that we finally were able to see you. I have to admit you look a lot different than what I imagined but also a lot more what I would call &#8220;manly&#8221;  and I would love to meet you in person. I love this blog so much for all the great discoveries that have been made over the years since comrade c first parked herself in a Crawford ditch and though I don&#8217;t post a lot you can be sure I read here just about every day and I am never disappointed by what I find. I tried to post this yesterday but for some strange reason my password was being rejected but today it wasn&#8217;t. Hurrah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillK</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136808</link>
		<dc:creator>BillK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136808</guid>
		<description>Yes, but the fact that Mitt was #1 is disconcerting.

Though perhaps not as much so as the fact that Ron Paul was #3.

Mitt&#039;s just a RINO; Paul&#039;s seemingly insane (at least at times.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but the fact that Mitt was #1 is disconcerting.</p>
<p>Though perhaps not as much so as the fact that Ron Paul was #3.</p>
<p>Mitt&#8217;s just a RINO; Paul&#8217;s seemingly insane (at least at times.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaliforniaBear</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136801</link>
		<dc:creator>CaliforniaBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136801</guid>
		<description>Steve, congrats.  I haven&#039;t been reading this blog nearly as long as most of the people on here, but I am extremely glad you won that award.  There are so many wonderful people on this blog that contribute so much and help me to get a great understanding on what is going on in politics.

I have to say that I grew up in a family that was mostly conservative, but my sister pulled away from that and now her and her husband are very liberal and very open about it.  We have had to close some of our communications with them because their liberal views and attacked on our conservatism has been unbearable.  Being able to be on this site and enjoy being surrounded by those who feel the same way I do has been wonderful.  So, I would like to thank you, Steve, and all others who contribute to this site that make it so inspiring and so enjoyable to read.  You certainly help to keep conservatism alive.

Thank you all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, congrats.  I haven&#8217;t been reading this blog nearly as long as most of the people on here, but I am extremely glad you won that award.  There are so many wonderful people on this blog that contribute so much and help me to get a great understanding on what is going on in politics.</p>
<p>I have to say that I grew up in a family that was mostly conservative, but my sister pulled away from that and now her and her husband are very liberal and very open about it.  We have had to close some of our communications with them because their liberal views and attacked on our conservatism has been unbearable.  Being able to be on this site and enjoy being surrounded by those who feel the same way I do has been wonderful.  So, I would like to thank you, Steve, and all others who contribute to this site that make it so inspiring and so enjoyable to read.  You certainly help to keep conservatism alive.</p>
<p>Thank you all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136791</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136791</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;m reliably informed that Saturday was the only day C-SPAN didn&#039;t do live gavel to gavel coverage. Instead, they kept replaying Friday&#039;s CPAC.
 
C-SPAN eventually replayed Rush Limbaugh&#039;s speech around midnight Saturday night. But probably only because they looked like idiots having coverage of Congressman speaking to 50 people, but not showing him -- when virtually every other station carried him live.  
 
But it also means that Ann&#039;s address and my historic remarks were the ONLY speeches not covered by C-SPAN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;m reliably informed that Saturday was the only day C-SPAN didn&#8217;t do live gavel to gavel coverage. Instead, they kept replaying Friday&#8217;s CPAC.</p>
<p>C-SPAN eventually replayed Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s speech around midnight Saturday night. But probably only because they looked like idiots having coverage of Congressman speaking to 50 people, but not showing him &#8212; when virtually every other station carried him live.  </p>
<p>But it also means that Ann&#8217;s address and my historic remarks were the ONLY speeches not covered by C-SPAN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wardmama4</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136770</link>
		<dc:creator>wardmama4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136770</guid>
		<description>Ok, I admit up front that I am &lt;b&gt;gloating&lt;/b&gt; and going to &lt;i&gt;rub it in (a bit)&lt;/i&gt;.

I shook Steve&#039;s hand!!!!!! Yes I was there (he followed Ann - who in their right mind would miss Ann?!?). Wait, that came out sounding worse than I meant it. I was intending all along to be at Steve&#039;s award ceremony (and I&#039;ve got the highllighted agenda to prove it). And it turned out to be just by happenstance that I exited my door as Steve exited his. 

Let me tell you - CPAC was so great strangely, more inspired and electric than last year (I think Romney&#039;s dropping out - bombed the whole &#039;zen&#039; of CPAC last year). Anyway - it was a blast - even the waiting in lines that are awful (and probably an indication of the dole lines The One (tm) will create).

Ann was great - bummer - the line for her book signing was so long we did not even come close. And Rush&#039;s speech was awesome. We were in room 3 of like 3 or 4 rooms filled to SRO capacity.

For those looking for perfection in conservatives or the R party - it is a shame that you feel it must be all or nothing. I feel disappointed at how both Bush&#039;s let down the R&#039;s but more importantly the Cs. And you are wrong - Reagan did take the fight (be it a verbal battle) to the Russians and they bit at it. Ego (which is what most petty dictators, thugs and liberals are full of) can be exploited. And they bit - of course the USSR is rising again - the free world is under attack daily from so many fronts. But - when one sees the alternative - it could most definately be worse. Look at how &lt;b&gt;we allow the msm and Dems&lt;/b&gt; treat our most Conservative, upright Candidates - can you now understand why a number move to the middle?!? 

I am now off to do exactly what I complained that you should do - blast them (those who claim to be on the R/C side) for taking apart a real Conservative. Fox&#039;s Sunday AM group hashed Rush with vapid, stupid and completely wrong (head of the GOP) trash talk. 

If you only complain here - this is what you get. And yes I do know how weak and wishy washy so very many politicians get - remember when they do vote right - &lt;b&gt;say thank you and that you support them&lt;/b&gt; they need to hear positive encouragement too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I admit up front that I am <b>gloating</b> and going to <i>rub it in (a bit)</i>.</p>
<p>I shook Steve&#8217;s hand!!!!!! Yes I was there (he followed Ann &#8211; who in their right mind would miss Ann?!?). Wait, that came out sounding worse than I meant it. I was intending all along to be at Steve&#8217;s award ceremony (and I&#8217;ve got the highllighted agenda to prove it). And it turned out to be just by happenstance that I exited my door as Steve exited his. </p>
<p>Let me tell you &#8211; CPAC was so great strangely, more inspired and electric than last year (I think Romney&#8217;s dropping out &#8211; bombed the whole &#8216;zen&#8217; of CPAC last year). Anyway &#8211; it was a blast &#8211; even the waiting in lines that are awful (and probably an indication of the dole lines The One &#8482; will create).</p>
<p>Ann was great &#8211; bummer &#8211; the line for her book signing was so long we did not even come close. And Rush&#8217;s speech was awesome. We were in room 3 of like 3 or 4 rooms filled to SRO capacity.</p>
<p>For those looking for perfection in conservatives or the R party &#8211; it is a shame that you feel it must be all or nothing. I feel disappointed at how both Bush&#8217;s let down the R&#8217;s but more importantly the Cs. And you are wrong &#8211; Reagan did take the fight (be it a verbal battle) to the Russians and they bit at it. Ego (which is what most petty dictators, thugs and liberals are full of) can be exploited. And they bit &#8211; of course the USSR is rising again &#8211; the free world is under attack daily from so many fronts. But &#8211; when one sees the alternative &#8211; it could most definately be worse. Look at how <b>we allow the msm and Dems</b> treat our most Conservative, upright Candidates &#8211; can you now understand why a number move to the middle?!? </p>
<p>I am now off to do exactly what I complained that you should do &#8211; blast them (those who claim to be on the R/C side) for taking apart a real Conservative. Fox&#8217;s Sunday AM group hashed Rush with vapid, stupid and completely wrong (head of the GOP) trash talk. </p>
<p>If you only complain here &#8211; this is what you get. And yes I do know how weak and wishy washy so very many politicians get &#8211; remember when they do vote right &#8211; <b>say thank you and that you support them</b> they need to hear positive encouragement too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Morone</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136762</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Morone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 06:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136762</guid>
		<description>Ann Coulter&#039;s speech, censored by C-SPAN, can be seen here:
http://transsylvaniaphoenix.blogspot.com/2009/03/coulter-brings-down-house-at-cpac.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann Coulter&#8217;s speech, censored by C-SPAN, can be seen here:<br />
<a href="http://transsylvaniaphoenix.blogspot.com/2009/03/coulter-brings-down-house-at-cpac.html" rel="nofollow">http://transsylvaniaphoenix.bl.....-cpac.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136698</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 22:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136698</guid>
		<description>Like it or not, the U.S. has a 2-party system, and it isn&#039;t likely to change.

Libertarians have a lot of passion that would be put to better use working for a party that has a chance.

3rd parties have arisen before and overcome one of the dominant ones, but the Libertarians have been around a long time with no traction.  If a highly popular Republican broke off, that would represent a chance for a major new party.  Sometimes, I wish that would happen, but Ron Paul isn&#039;t charasmatic enough.  But even if someone like Palin or Newt broke off, it would still be a long, long shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like it or not, the U.S. has a 2-party system, and it isn&#8217;t likely to change.</p>
<p>Libertarians have a lot of passion that would be put to better use working for a party that has a chance.</p>
<p>3rd parties have arisen before and overcome one of the dominant ones, but the Libertarians have been around a long time with no traction.  If a highly popular Republican broke off, that would represent a chance for a major new party.  Sometimes, I wish that would happen, but Ron Paul isn&#8217;t charasmatic enough.  But even if someone like Palin or Newt broke off, it would still be a long, long shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Roark</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136696</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Roark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 22:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136696</guid>
		<description>I was a Libertarian for a few election cycles before voting for my first R presidential candidate in &#039;04.  I held my nose and did it again this time around.  Mine was more a protest vote against communism of a worser case than a vote for McCain.

Philosophically, I&#039;m a Libertarian, but on a practical level, I can turn to my lunkhead cousin, the GOP, if the case seems dire enough.  

It sure has been dire a lot, lately.

My only caveat is that I&#039;m a realistic Libertarian, not a utopian Libertarian.  IMO, the difference, largely, between the two is that utopian Libertarian starts from a position of wanting anarchy.  That means more than a small federal government--it means &lt;em&gt;no&lt;/em&gt; gov&#039;t.  at all.  That&#039;s a nice dream, of course:  all peoples on the planet acting out their baser impulses to any degree, and no police, militia, or even a fire chief would ever come for help.  No authority, you see.  

I&#039;ve met idiots who actually promote that kind of lunacy, but it was usually on a college campus.

Besides the anarchy of their utopia, they also call for no borders to our country, no standing army, and no draft in times of emergency, because they see their Libertarian utopia without compromise, and, &lt;em&gt;by god, some damn gov&#039;t telling me I have to fight in a war is against my Libertarian principles.&lt;/em&gt;

Well, as I said earlier, I count myself as a Libertarian-voting-Republican these days. A realistic Libertarian, of course.  A Constitutional patriot, that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a Libertarian for a few election cycles before voting for my first R presidential candidate in &#8216;04.  I held my nose and did it again this time around.  Mine was more a protest vote against communism of a worser case than a vote for McCain.</p>
<p>Philosophically, I&#8217;m a Libertarian, but on a practical level, I can turn to my lunkhead cousin, the GOP, if the case seems dire enough.  </p>
<p>It sure has been dire a lot, lately.</p>
<p>My only caveat is that I&#8217;m a realistic Libertarian, not a utopian Libertarian.  IMO, the difference, largely, between the two is that utopian Libertarian starts from a position of wanting anarchy.  That means more than a small federal government&#8211;it means <em>no</em> gov&#8217;t.  at all.  That&#8217;s a nice dream, of course:  all peoples on the planet acting out their baser impulses to any degree, and no police, militia, or even a fire chief would ever come for help.  No authority, you see.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve met idiots who actually promote that kind of lunacy, but it was usually on a college campus.</p>
<p>Besides the anarchy of their utopia, they also call for no borders to our country, no standing army, and no draft in times of emergency, because they see their Libertarian utopia without compromise, and, <em>by god, some damn gov&#8217;t telling me I have to fight in a war is against my Libertarian principles.</em></p>
<p>Well, as I said earlier, I count myself as a Libertarian-voting-Republican these days. A realistic Libertarian, of course.  A Constitutional patriot, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U NO HOO</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136689</link>
		<dc:creator>U NO HOO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136689</guid>
		<description>PS, you don&#039;t HAVE to use drugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS, you don&#8217;t HAVE to use drugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U NO HOO</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136688</link>
		<dc:creator>U NO HOO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136688</guid>
		<description>Look where Ron Paul came in.

He ran as a Libertarian in 1988.

Vote Libertarian.

Enough said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look where Ron Paul came in.</p>
<p>He ran as a Libertarian in 1988.</p>
<p>Vote Libertarian.</p>
<p>Enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TickTock</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136685</link>
		<dc:creator>TickTock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136685</guid>
		<description>Congrats, Steve. We need more Americans like you to stand up and tell the truth to the folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats, Steve. We need more Americans like you to stand up and tell the truth to the folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Roark</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136682</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Roark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 19:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136682</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;you will earn my trust&lt;/em&gt;   Who gives a damn about earning the trust of Brad?  Grow a pair, Brad, and quit whinning.  Lead by example or STFU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>you will earn my trust</em>   Who gives a damn about earning the trust of Brad?  Grow a pair, Brad, and quit whinning.  Lead by example or STFU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheehanjihad</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136667</link>
		<dc:creator>sheehanjihad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136667</guid>
		<description>mmmph! mmmmph mmmph!!!  mmmmmph!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmmph! mmmmph mmmph!!!  mmmmmph!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lipstick on a PIAPS</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136660</link>
		<dc:creator>Lipstick on a PIAPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/saturday-cpac-2009-live-stream#comment-136660</guid>
		<description>Jack you sound like a seminar liberal. As a matter of fact I believe you are. The Republican Party kept you safe for the last 8 years to live to criticise today. You think Obama and the Democrats are going to be even half so concerned? Go over to the other side with your defeatism, you will be among friends there! LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack you sound like a seminar liberal. As a matter of fact I believe you are. The Republican Party kept you safe for the last 8 years to live to criticise today. You think Obama and the Democrats are going to be even half so concerned? Go over to the other side with your defeatism, you will be among friends there! LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
