<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selected News Items For Jun 13 &#8211; Jun 19</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:00:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Shackleford</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151492</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Shackleford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151492</guid>
		<description>&quot;Republicans questioned her participation in it.&quot;

Yup, that&#039;s &quot;pressure&quot; alright.  Any time a republican asks anyone a question, it&#039;s tantamount to waterboarding.  *WHEW*...glad she made it out alive.

(sarcasm, in case one wondered)

&quot;she didn’t want questions about it to “distract anyone from my qualifications and record.”

Can&#039;t be distracted by what isn&#039;t there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Republicans questioned her participation in it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yup, that&#8217;s &#8220;pressure&#8221; alright.  Any time a republican asks anyone a question, it&#8217;s tantamount to waterboarding.  *WHEW*&#8230;glad she made it out alive.</p>
<p>(sarcasm, in case one wondered)</p>
<p>&#8220;she didn’t want questions about it to “distract anyone from my qualifications and record.”</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t be distracted by what isn&#8217;t there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Shackleford</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151491</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Shackleford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151491</guid>
		<description>You mean to tell me that a village in Kenya is about to lose ANOTHER idiot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean to tell me that a village in Kenya is about to lose ANOTHER idiot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymoose</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151490</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151490</guid>
		<description>banhgheadontable......bangheadontable....bangheadontable........

Well, I can see what the next &quot;big thing&quot; will be, is telling people you&#039;re a community organizer.  It worked for Obamba, why not his distantly connected half brother?  

Nobody knows who George is, he hasn&#039;t done anything significant, but piddling stuff like that didn&#039;t stop Obama from becoming president, so George is bound to have a best seller on his hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>banhgheadontable&#8230;&#8230;bangheadontable&#8230;.bangheadontable&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Well, I can see what the next &#8220;big thing&#8221; will be, is telling people you&#8217;re a community organizer.  It worked for Obamba, why not his distantly connected half brother?  </p>
<p>Nobody knows who George is, he hasn&#8217;t done anything significant, but piddling stuff like that didn&#8217;t stop Obama from becoming president, so George is bound to have a best seller on his hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151484</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151484</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t Obama&#039;s brother George the one arrested in a UK airport for sexual assualt on a teenage girl,  then recently caught with a fake name and  passport at another Internationl airport trying to make a trip to the U.S.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t Obama&#8217;s brother George the one arrested in a UK airport for sexual assualt on a teenage girl,  then recently caught with a fake name and  passport at another Internationl airport trying to make a trip to the U.S.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caligirl9</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151483</link>
		<dc:creator>caligirl9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151483</guid>
		<description>Oh yes! I have had my raging Dem friends tell me I’m a closet Dem! But I’m not—I can’t stand the philosophy of tax and spend (irresponsibly) nor can I abide the concept of welfare—taking care of able-bodied people who have made poor life decisions and now expect us to make up for their mistakes by sending them a check every month. A program for this, a program for that—and none of them work!!!! 

I did question my Republican-ness with the Terri Schiavo thing. I was so angry that the government came to a standstill over the very private decision her husband had made. I nearly re-registered, but then decided even when disagreeing with that one issue, I am still more of a Republican than anything else. 

Honestly, a Republican candidate’s stand on abortion or gay rights isn’t enough to turn me off or on. For me, being a Republican means being responsible for myself, and in turn, I can help make my country better. I feel politicians MUST justify the expense of every dime they spend. Personally I’d love to be able to check a box at tax time that directs my funds to things I believe in—a strong, competent and well-outfitted defense, taking care of our veterans, repairing and maintaining infrastructure that benefit many people (none of this special interest crap!), securing the borders, funding medical research. I’m not for giving money to special interest crap like ACORN or the National Endowment for the Arts (if it’s not self-supporting, do we really need it?).  I’m really not for socialized medicine either … having worked in health care, I am POSITIVE that government has NO PLACE deciding things for doctors and nurses! There is already too much meddling. 

In my mind, being a Republican means being responsible. My belief in fiscal responsibility is what makes me a Republican. I am not hands-off enough to be a Libertarian—I like having the police around and since I’m not a criminal, I appreciate their visibility. 

I could never be a politician because I did inhale in the 1970s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes! I have had my raging Dem friends tell me I’m a closet Dem! But I’m not—I can’t stand the philosophy of tax and spend (irresponsibly) nor can I abide the concept of welfare—taking care of able-bodied people who have made poor life decisions and now expect us to make up for their mistakes by sending them a check every month. A program for this, a program for that—and none of them work!!!! </p>
<p>I did question my Republican-ness with the Terri Schiavo thing. I was so angry that the government came to a standstill over the very private decision her husband had made. I nearly re-registered, but then decided even when disagreeing with that one issue, I am still more of a Republican than anything else. </p>
<p>Honestly, a Republican candidate’s stand on abortion or gay rights isn’t enough to turn me off or on. For me, being a Republican means being responsible for myself, and in turn, I can help make my country better. I feel politicians MUST justify the expense of every dime they spend. Personally I’d love to be able to check a box at tax time that directs my funds to things I believe in—a strong, competent and well-outfitted defense, taking care of our veterans, repairing and maintaining infrastructure that benefit many people (none of this special interest crap!), securing the borders, funding medical research. I’m not for giving money to special interest crap like ACORN or the National Endowment for the Arts (if it’s not self-supporting, do we really need it?).  I’m really not for socialized medicine either … having worked in health care, I am POSITIVE that government has NO PLACE deciding things for doctors and nurses! There is already too much meddling. </p>
<p>In my mind, being a Republican means being responsible. My belief in fiscal responsibility is what makes me a Republican. I am not hands-off enough to be a Libertarian—I like having the police around and since I’m not a criminal, I appreciate their visibility. </p>
<p>I could never be a politician because I did inhale in the 1970s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bronzeprofessor</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151481</link>
		<dc:creator>bronzeprofessor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151481</guid>
		<description>&quot;Yep, I believe our party needs to stop trying to legislate things that are very personal—though I must say I am not a fan of second trimester or later abortions for the convenience of the woman! I know there are life-threatening complications of pregnancy (eclampsia is one; the curative treatment for that is delivery, though there are control methods that need to be tried and are often successful) that sometimes have to be remedied in this way, but I have a very strong opinion on how I’d handle it if it were me in that situation, or if I were the nurse in that situation (compassion is the key, carving up fetuses is wrong).

I’m a law and order type (you’ll really read some interesting stuff by little old me at the Trials and Tribulations blog), and I very much believe that the federal government does need to be involved in some things (defense, roads and highways and other infrastructure) but not others (education—the needs from state-to-state are so different, there is no way a one size fits all approach works here. Best left to the individual states). Also, government is not the teat that nourishes the deadbeats! 

I certainly don’t take abortion lightly but I also know there is a higher power and ultimately He will let each of us know which of our actions in this life are truly heinous enough to keep us out of Heaven.&quot;

I&#039;m curious to hear if you have a hard time being &#039;moderate.&#039; I have the good fortune of being a rank-and-file Republican. The Repubs got gross &amp; slimy and profligate about spending -- which was why I (confession!) voted for Gore and Kerry after seeing how much spending was promised in W&#039;s 2000 campaign -- but in terms of what they are supposed to stand for, I&#039;m almost embarrassed by how perfectly partisan I am. I took a questionnaire and the results indicated that I was more right-wing than 99.4% of the United States population! I&#039;m pro-life, pro-gun, etc, etc. I just don&#039;t mind very much if gays who are already living together feel the need to have a wedding. I also do simple math and figure out that if all the women who got abortions chose to have them, a large number would need to find homes to adopt their babies, and then you have millions of male-male and female-female couples who make loads of money and want to raise kids. So why not save babies from abortion by relaxing about the gay stuff? Other than that one issue, though, I always end up in line with the party platform.

It seems like being moderate would be harder because people like me must put so much pressure on you and lay such terrible guilt trips to get you to be what we consider &#039;loyal.&#039; Do you ever feel like defecting to the (ahem) &quot;other&quot; party (which shall remain nameless)? 

[I held my nose and voted against George Bush twice, simply because I hated his irresponsible spending. Now after having seen the Democratic regime in action, I realize how good Bush was compared to others!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yep, I believe our party needs to stop trying to legislate things that are very personal—though I must say I am not a fan of second trimester or later abortions for the convenience of the woman! I know there are life-threatening complications of pregnancy (eclampsia is one; the curative treatment for that is delivery, though there are control methods that need to be tried and are often successful) that sometimes have to be remedied in this way, but I have a very strong opinion on how I’d handle it if it were me in that situation, or if I were the nurse in that situation (compassion is the key, carving up fetuses is wrong).</p>
<p>I’m a law and order type (you’ll really read some interesting stuff by little old me at the Trials and Tribulations blog), and I very much believe that the federal government does need to be involved in some things (defense, roads and highways and other infrastructure) but not others (education—the needs from state-to-state are so different, there is no way a one size fits all approach works here. Best left to the individual states). Also, government is not the teat that nourishes the deadbeats! </p>
<p>I certainly don’t take abortion lightly but I also know there is a higher power and ultimately He will let each of us know which of our actions in this life are truly heinous enough to keep us out of Heaven.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious to hear if you have a hard time being &#8216;moderate.&#8217; I have the good fortune of being a rank-and-file Republican. The Repubs got gross &amp; slimy and profligate about spending &#8212; which was why I (confession!) voted for Gore and Kerry after seeing how much spending was promised in W&#8217;s 2000 campaign &#8212; but in terms of what they are supposed to stand for, I&#8217;m almost embarrassed by how perfectly partisan I am. I took a questionnaire and the results indicated that I was more right-wing than 99.4% of the United States population! I&#8217;m pro-life, pro-gun, etc, etc. I just don&#8217;t mind very much if gays who are already living together feel the need to have a wedding. I also do simple math and figure out that if all the women who got abortions chose to have them, a large number would need to find homes to adopt their babies, and then you have millions of male-male and female-female couples who make loads of money and want to raise kids. So why not save babies from abortion by relaxing about the gay stuff? Other than that one issue, though, I always end up in line with the party platform.</p>
<p>It seems like being moderate would be harder because people like me must put so much pressure on you and lay such terrible guilt trips to get you to be what we consider &#8216;loyal.&#8217; Do you ever feel like defecting to the (ahem) &#8220;other&#8221; party (which shall remain nameless)? </p>
<p>[I held my nose and voted against George Bush twice, simply because I hated his irresponsible spending. Now after having seen the Democratic regime in action, I realize how good Bush was compared to others!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caligirl9</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151478</link>
		<dc:creator>caligirl9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151478</guid>
		<description>Yep, I believe our party needs to stop trying to legislate things that are very personal—though I must say I am not a fan of second trimester or later abortions for the convenience of the woman! I know there are life-threatening complications of pregnancy (eclampsia is one; the curative treatment for that is delivery, though there are control methods that need to be tried and are often successful) that sometimes have to be remedied in this way, but I have a very strong opinion on how I&#039;d handle it if it were me in that situation, or if I were the nurse in that situation (compassion is the key, carving up fetuses is wrong).

I’m a law and order type (you’ll really read some interesting stuff by little old me at the Trials and Tribulations blog), and I very much believe that the federal government does need to be involved in some things (defense, roads and highways and other infrastructure) but not others (education—the needs from state-to-state are so different, there is no way a one size fits all approach works here. Best left to the individual states). Also, government is not the teat that nourishes the deadbeats!  

I certainly don’t take abortion lightly but I also know there is a higher power and ultimately He will let each of us know which of our actions in this life are truly heinous enough to keep us out of Heaven. 

I don’t believe anyone chooses to be homosexual either. I grew up around several young men who later came out—I knew they were tormented by having to date girls long before they really understood what was happening to them and who they were. Being gay or lesbian is a difficult path, and I have yet to meet a homosexual who has tried to recruit me.

I cannot say the same things about Democrats LOL

I agree with your thoughts on McCain and Palin. Face it, those two are &quot;just plain folk&quot; like all of us here. No special handling, just hard work and dedication to this country. Never a sense of &quot;what&#039;s in it for me?&quot; from either candidate. But that message certainly was lost ... 

Thanks for stopping by my blog. I am a bit random and ADD in my thoughts …</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I believe our party needs to stop trying to legislate things that are very personal—though I must say I am not a fan of second trimester or later abortions for the convenience of the woman! I know there are life-threatening complications of pregnancy (eclampsia is one; the curative treatment for that is delivery, though there are control methods that need to be tried and are often successful) that sometimes have to be remedied in this way, but I have a very strong opinion on how I&#8217;d handle it if it were me in that situation, or if I were the nurse in that situation (compassion is the key, carving up fetuses is wrong).</p>
<p>I’m a law and order type (you’ll really read some interesting stuff by little old me at the Trials and Tribulations blog), and I very much believe that the federal government does need to be involved in some things (defense, roads and highways and other infrastructure) but not others (education—the needs from state-to-state are so different, there is no way a one size fits all approach works here. Best left to the individual states). Also, government is not the teat that nourishes the deadbeats!  </p>
<p>I certainly don’t take abortion lightly but I also know there is a higher power and ultimately He will let each of us know which of our actions in this life are truly heinous enough to keep us out of Heaven. </p>
<p>I don’t believe anyone chooses to be homosexual either. I grew up around several young men who later came out—I knew they were tormented by having to date girls long before they really understood what was happening to them and who they were. Being gay or lesbian is a difficult path, and I have yet to meet a homosexual who has tried to recruit me.</p>
<p>I cannot say the same things about Democrats LOL</p>
<p>I agree with your thoughts on McCain and Palin. Face it, those two are &#8220;just plain folk&#8221; like all of us here. No special handling, just hard work and dedication to this country. Never a sense of &#8220;what&#8217;s in it for me?&#8221; from either candidate. But that message certainly was lost &#8230; </p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by my blog. I am a bit random and ADD in my thoughts …</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bronzeprofessor</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151472</link>
		<dc:creator>bronzeprofessor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151472</guid>
		<description>Hi, I just saw your blog post on Tom Campbell! He sounds like a good bet! I didn&#039;t realize you were pro-gay rights. That&#039;s the one issue where I&#039;m liberal; I support marriage equality.  Though the anti-Prop-8 mobs drove me crazy. I consider gays &amp; lesbians similar to Latinos in one regard: They&#039;re groups with right-wing values that got caught up in the socialist left&#039;s identity politics. Most GLBTs I know want low taxes, fiscal restraint, small government, a strong defense to go after Islamic extremist homophobes. They also seem to love men &amp; women in uniform, which kinda sorta turns into a support for the police &amp; military. Gayborhoods always seem like the most ideally Republican places to live, too -- clean, safe, generally well behaved, full of small business owners, and charities that run on private donations. 

I&#039;ve been saying for a long time that all REpubs need to do, to build a permanent majority, is stay true to their basic principles but go easy on wedge issues like gay marriage; i.e., don&#039;t pander to groups like gays &amp; Latinos, but don&#039;t overtly alienate them either, and they&#039;ll come into the tent because they are conservatives at hear.

I think if McCain &amp; Palin had been more aggressive and exposed Obama&#039;s basic views on budget, defense, and family values more explicitly, while showing how moderate they were on gay rights and Latino issues, they could have won the election. But these are all lessons for the next cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I just saw your blog post on Tom Campbell! He sounds like a good bet! I didn&#8217;t realize you were pro-gay rights. That&#8217;s the one issue where I&#8217;m liberal; I support marriage equality.  Though the anti-Prop-8 mobs drove me crazy. I consider gays &amp; lesbians similar to Latinos in one regard: They&#8217;re groups with right-wing values that got caught up in the socialist left&#8217;s identity politics. Most GLBTs I know want low taxes, fiscal restraint, small government, a strong defense to go after Islamic extremist homophobes. They also seem to love men &amp; women in uniform, which kinda sorta turns into a support for the police &amp; military. Gayborhoods always seem like the most ideally Republican places to live, too &#8212; clean, safe, generally well behaved, full of small business owners, and charities that run on private donations. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been saying for a long time that all REpubs need to do, to build a permanent majority, is stay true to their basic principles but go easy on wedge issues like gay marriage; i.e., don&#8217;t pander to groups like gays &amp; Latinos, but don&#8217;t overtly alienate them either, and they&#8217;ll come into the tent because they are conservatives at hear.</p>
<p>I think if McCain &amp; Palin had been more aggressive and exposed Obama&#8217;s basic views on budget, defense, and family values more explicitly, while showing how moderate they were on gay rights and Latino issues, they could have won the election. But these are all lessons for the next cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caligirl9</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151467</link>
		<dc:creator>caligirl9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151467</guid>
		<description>We just did start a buzz about Ms. Sanchez. I&#039;ll make sure to write about her on my blog. Just did a little pro-Campbell piece, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just did start a buzz about Ms. Sanchez. I&#8217;ll make sure to write about her on my blog. Just did a little pro-Campbell piece, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bronzeprofessor</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151464</link>
		<dc:creator>bronzeprofessor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151464</guid>
		<description>Caligirl9, Thanks for the info on Tom Campbell. Yes, Leslie Sanchez is Republican first, Latina second. If you have a chance to read her book, you&#039;ll like it. She basically points out that Hispanics lose out when we go after Democrats who pander to us. In her book she shows that most Hispanics agree with conservatives on border issues, because they suffer disproportionately from social ills that result from too many illegal immigrants in a community.

Most Hispanics, as Sanchez points out, support border security and oppose amnesty, but they don&#039;t like being held up as scapegoats either. Sanchez is good b/c she shows how the democrats blow a few comments from Repubs like Tancredo out of proportion.

I will check out Tom Campbell. I didn&#039;t think of trying to encourage Leslie Sanchez to run for Lt. Governor. I wonder how people can start a buzz about them. Good thinking!

About Latino politics, you&#039;re right, that too many Hispanic (usually Democrats) public figures try to figure out a way to get our votes by appealing to us as Hispanics, instead of speaking to us as people. On that I agree with Rush Limbaugh. There will always be some La Raza kooks who project their own issues onto white people and blame &quot;gringos&quot; for everything. When they show up in my classes, I take a few months to slowly wear away at them until they learn to let go of their anger and understand that white people face all the issues they face, except for racism. It&#039;s a hard process but I do my best. I&#039;m up against the overwhelming tide in the academy, though, of people inciting Latino students into racial extremism because it boosts enrollments and in some cases fattens their scholarship funds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caligirl9, Thanks for the info on Tom Campbell. Yes, Leslie Sanchez is Republican first, Latina second. If you have a chance to read her book, you&#8217;ll like it. She basically points out that Hispanics lose out when we go after Democrats who pander to us. In her book she shows that most Hispanics agree with conservatives on border issues, because they suffer disproportionately from social ills that result from too many illegal immigrants in a community.</p>
<p>Most Hispanics, as Sanchez points out, support border security and oppose amnesty, but they don&#8217;t like being held up as scapegoats either. Sanchez is good b/c she shows how the democrats blow a few comments from Repubs like Tancredo out of proportion.</p>
<p>I will check out Tom Campbell. I didn&#8217;t think of trying to encourage Leslie Sanchez to run for Lt. Governor. I wonder how people can start a buzz about them. Good thinking!</p>
<p>About Latino politics, you&#8217;re right, that too many Hispanic (usually Democrats) public figures try to figure out a way to get our votes by appealing to us as Hispanics, instead of speaking to us as people. On that I agree with Rush Limbaugh. There will always be some La Raza kooks who project their own issues onto white people and blame &#8220;gringos&#8221; for everything. When they show up in my classes, I take a few months to slowly wear away at them until they learn to let go of their anger and understand that white people face all the issues they face, except for racism. It&#8217;s a hard process but I do my best. I&#8217;m up against the overwhelming tide in the academy, though, of people inciting Latino students into racial extremism because it boosts enrollments and in some cases fattens their scholarship funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caligirl9</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151462</link>
		<dc:creator>caligirl9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151462</guid>
		<description>BP, I signed up for updates from Tom Campbell&#039;s campaign and received a reply regarding my concerns about the southern border of our state. 
He is very simpatico with my views regarding services to illegals—medical care for contagious diseases (TB, for example) and school for the kids. No driver&#039;s licenses, no other &quot;benefits.&quot; 
I appreciated his candor and have no reservations supporting his campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP, I signed up for updates from Tom Campbell&#8217;s campaign and received a reply regarding my concerns about the southern border of our state.<br />
He is very simpatico with my views regarding services to illegals—medical care for contagious diseases (TB, for example) and school for the kids. No driver&#8217;s licenses, no other &#8220;benefits.&#8221;<br />
I appreciated his candor and have no reservations supporting his campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caligirl9</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151406</link>
		<dc:creator>caligirl9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151406</guid>
		<description>BP, I admit that I am not a political animal, especially living up here in dem/lib land. 

Leslie Sanchez looks like she could be a very intriguing candidate for Lt. Governor, and hopefully she would pursue the governorship eventually. Her work on the border security and immigration legislation certainly is an asset in the political climate of this state. 

Not meaning to sound like a bigot, but I can easily support a candidate such as Ms. Sanchez whose attitude is she wants to serve the people—not only “her” people. Nothing bugs me more than a Hispanic candidate (or person in a leadership role) saying “I am going to help people like &lt;b&gt;me.” I worked for one of those—she hired a less qualified Latina for a full-time public relations position simply because she chooses to keep Latinas around her—white people are the devil! Even though she’s American-born, she identifies herself as Salvadoran, and calls El Salvador “home.”

I mentor a young woman who came to this country at the age of 11 months. Her visa expired, though she did not understand what that meant until she was 15 or 16, when she learned she could not earn a driver’s license or legally hold a job because she could not get a social security number. Nothing unique in her story. Oh, her Spanish sucks. If she found herself in Mexico, she’d be an instant victim. 

When I met her, she’d just survived a fight against lymphoma. She’s in school to become an baccalaureate-prepared RN. If you ask her what she wants to do with her future, she will tell you she wants to give back, to help families and children who went through the same battle as she did. She scoffs at the notion of helping “people like her” only. For her, people are all people. She’s not a LaRaza kook. She doesn&#039;t want California to become North Mexico!

She attended community college through AB540, the only one in her family to do so. She understood how limited her life was living in the shadows, but she did nothing to draw attention to herself. She has never possessed or used fake documents. She did not drive just in case she got stopped. She refused to conceive and bear an anchor baby or marry a U.S. citizen in order to stay. A great member of the community all around.

She’s now received her green card, her life is on track, and I’m happy to help her in any way I am able, emotionally and financially when I can.

I know another young woman, same age, same circumstances, who has false documents (and a job) and drove everywhere without a license. She will tell you that her future goals include “helping people like me (here illegally).” She bugs. 

So I’m not against any Latino/a getting into politics as long as it’s about public service, and remembering that public is of many colors, religions, and nations of origin. Leslie Sanchez certainly fits the bill, doesn’t she? And it seems she has the stomach for politics, too. 

Bill Campbell was in my neck of the woods yesterday. Here’s parts of an article from my local cat box liner, the &lt;i&gt;SJ Mercury&lt;/i&gt;.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Can Tom Campbell upset billionaires running for California governor?&lt;/b&gt;

He was once Silicon Valley&#039;s Golden Boy — David Packard&#039;s hand-picked political star, a tenured Stanford law professor at age 34, a valley congressman by 36. In the decade he served in Congress, he earned the &quot;maverick&quot; label before John McCain made it cool.

But for all of Tom Campbell&#039;s brains, integrity and fancy degrees, does he have any chance of becoming California&#039;s next governor?

Many political scientists say it&#039;s clearly an uphill battle for Campbell, who&#039;s running against two Silicon Valley billionaires — former eBay CEO Meg Whitman and state insurance commissioner Steve Poizner — in next June&#039;s Republican primary. Though Campbell has polled surprisingly well so far, pundits say Whitman and Poizner could end up spending $100 million between them in the battle to succeed Arnold Schwarzenegger.

But, most political experts are quick to say, history also says the 56-year-old Campbell could win — particularly since the GOP primary is shaping up to be a three-way, all-Silicon-Valley contest between candidates of similar political views.
All define themselves as social moderates and fiscal conservatives: pro-choice, pro-education reform and unabashedly pro-business…

One possible scenario that would work in Campbell&#039;s favor goes something like this:

The political views of Whitman and Poizner are not widely known. So they may be tempted to inch further and further to the political right to capture as many hard-core conservatives as possible. In doing so, however, they&#039;ll risk alienating the increasingly large number of independents who will be able to vote in either the Democratic or Republican primary.

…Campbell, who was Schwarzenegger&#039;s finance director in 2004-05, also has employed a potentially risky strategy by outlining on his Web site (www.campbell.org) exactly how he&#039;d close the state&#039;s $24 billion deficit.
Perhaps the most unusual piece is a temporary 32-cent gas hike; he&#039;d use the money to prevent the firing of teachers, an increase in class sizes and elimination of community college courses.

… Campbell is no doubt influenced by the fact that he has managed to survive in politics despite some unpopular decisions.

The most noteworthy example was when Campbell — liked by many Democrats for his pro-gun-control, pro-gay-rights views — voted in 1999 to impeach President Bill Clinton in the Monica Lewinsky scandal. He did so despite opposition in his heavily Democratic district. A constitutional scholar, Campbell argued that if Clinton lied under oath to a federal grand jury, he deserved to be impeached.

A Field Poll released in early March showed Whitman ahead 21 percent among GOP voters. Campbell trailed slightly with 18 percent, and Poizner was far behind with 7 percent. A Capitol Weekly poll released earlier this month, however, showed Campbell ahead with 17 percent among likely primary voters; Whitman polled 10 percent, Poizner 7 percent…

http://www.mercurynews.com/topstories/ci_12651814 &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I know Campbell’s pro-choice, pro-gay rights views may not be popular with most everyone here. But California is a strange place, and for Campbell to have any chance, he must be a bit socially moderate. Honestly, right now what we need is a good fiscal conservative in office, period. 

And face it, pretty much any Republican is a far better option than mayors Newsom, Villagrosa or (former SF mayor) Senator DiFi.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP, I admit that I am not a political animal, especially living up here in dem/lib land. </p>
<p>Leslie Sanchez looks like she could be a very intriguing candidate for Lt. Governor, and hopefully she would pursue the governorship eventually. Her work on the border security and immigration legislation certainly is an asset in the political climate of this state. </p>
<p>Not meaning to sound like a bigot, but I can easily support a candidate such as Ms. Sanchez whose attitude is she wants to serve the people—not only “her” people. Nothing bugs me more than a Hispanic candidate (or person in a leadership role) saying “I am going to help people like <b>me.” I worked for one of those—she hired a less qualified Latina for a full-time public relations position simply because she chooses to keep Latinas around her—white people are the devil! Even though she’s American-born, she identifies herself as Salvadoran, and calls El Salvador “home.”</p>
<p>I mentor a young woman who came to this country at the age of 11 months. Her visa expired, though she did not understand what that meant until she was 15 or 16, when she learned she could not earn a driver’s license or legally hold a job because she could not get a social security number. Nothing unique in her story. Oh, her Spanish sucks. If she found herself in Mexico, she’d be an instant victim. </p>
<p>When I met her, she’d just survived a fight against lymphoma. She’s in school to become an baccalaureate-prepared RN. If you ask her what she wants to do with her future, she will tell you she wants to give back, to help families and children who went through the same battle as she did. She scoffs at the notion of helping “people like her” only. For her, people are all people. She’s not a LaRaza kook. She doesn&#8217;t want California to become North Mexico!</p>
<p>She attended community college through AB540, the only one in her family to do so. She understood how limited her life was living in the shadows, but she did nothing to draw attention to herself. She has never possessed or used fake documents. She did not drive just in case she got stopped. She refused to conceive and bear an anchor baby or marry a U.S. citizen in order to stay. A great member of the community all around.</p>
<p>She’s now received her green card, her life is on track, and I’m happy to help her in any way I am able, emotionally and financially when I can.</p>
<p>I know another young woman, same age, same circumstances, who has false documents (and a job) and drove everywhere without a license. She will tell you that her future goals include “helping people like me (here illegally).” She bugs. </p>
<p>So I’m not against any Latino/a getting into politics as long as it’s about public service, and remembering that public is of many colors, religions, and nations of origin. Leslie Sanchez certainly fits the bill, doesn’t she? And it seems she has the stomach for politics, too. </p>
<p>Bill Campbell was in my neck of the woods yesterday. Here’s parts of an article from my local cat box liner, the <i>SJ Mercury</i>.</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Can Tom Campbell upset billionaires running for California governor?</b></p>
<p>He was once Silicon Valley&#8217;s Golden Boy — David Packard&#8217;s hand-picked political star, a tenured Stanford law professor at age 34, a valley congressman by 36. In the decade he served in Congress, he earned the &#8220;maverick&#8221; label before John McCain made it cool.</p>
<p>But for all of Tom Campbell&#8217;s brains, integrity and fancy degrees, does he have any chance of becoming California&#8217;s next governor?</p>
<p>Many political scientists say it&#8217;s clearly an uphill battle for Campbell, who&#8217;s running against two Silicon Valley billionaires — former eBay CEO Meg Whitman and state insurance commissioner Steve Poizner — in next June&#8217;s Republican primary. Though Campbell has polled surprisingly well so far, pundits say Whitman and Poizner could end up spending $100 million between them in the battle to succeed Arnold Schwarzenegger.</p>
<p>But, most political experts are quick to say, history also says the 56-year-old Campbell could win — particularly since the GOP primary is shaping up to be a three-way, all-Silicon-Valley contest between candidates of similar political views.<br />
All define themselves as social moderates and fiscal conservatives: pro-choice, pro-education reform and unabashedly pro-business…</p>
<p>One possible scenario that would work in Campbell&#8217;s favor goes something like this:</p>
<p>The political views of Whitman and Poizner are not widely known. So they may be tempted to inch further and further to the political right to capture as many hard-core conservatives as possible. In doing so, however, they&#8217;ll risk alienating the increasingly large number of independents who will be able to vote in either the Democratic or Republican primary.</p>
<p>…Campbell, who was Schwarzenegger&#8217;s finance director in 2004-05, also has employed a potentially risky strategy by outlining on his Web site (www.campbell.org) exactly how he&#8217;d close the state&#8217;s $24 billion deficit.<br />
Perhaps the most unusual piece is a temporary 32-cent gas hike; he&#8217;d use the money to prevent the firing of teachers, an increase in class sizes and elimination of community college courses.</p>
<p>… Campbell is no doubt influenced by the fact that he has managed to survive in politics despite some unpopular decisions.</p>
<p>The most noteworthy example was when Campbell — liked by many Democrats for his pro-gun-control, pro-gay-rights views — voted in 1999 to impeach President Bill Clinton in the Monica Lewinsky scandal. He did so despite opposition in his heavily Democratic district. A constitutional scholar, Campbell argued that if Clinton lied under oath to a federal grand jury, he deserved to be impeached.</p>
<p>A Field Poll released in early March showed Whitman ahead 21 percent among GOP voters. Campbell trailed slightly with 18 percent, and Poizner was far behind with 7 percent. A Capitol Weekly poll released earlier this month, however, showed Campbell ahead with 17 percent among likely primary voters; Whitman polled 10 percent, Poizner 7 percent…</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/topstories/ci_12651814" rel="nofollow">http://www.mercurynews.com/topstories/ci_12651814</a> </p></blockquote>
<p>I know Campbell’s pro-choice, pro-gay rights views may not be popular with most everyone here. But California is a strange place, and for Campbell to have any chance, he must be a bit socially moderate. Honestly, right now what we need is a good fiscal conservative in office, period. </p>
<p>And face it, pretty much any Republican is a far better option than mayors Newsom, Villagrosa or (former SF mayor) Senator DiFi.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bronzeprofessor</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151370</link>
		<dc:creator>bronzeprofessor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151370</guid>
		<description>Oh God, she&#039;s an Obama clone -- the chip on her shoulder, the Ivy degrees, the syrupy autobiographical narratives, and now the fake repudiations. Is she going to say she doesn&#039;t know what the ladies in the Belizean Grove said, because she belonged to it for 20 years but didn&#039;t pay attention?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh God, she&#8217;s an Obama clone &#8212; the chip on her shoulder, the Ivy degrees, the syrupy autobiographical narratives, and now the fake repudiations. Is she going to say she doesn&#8217;t know what the ladies in the Belizean Grove said, because she belonged to it for 20 years but didn&#8217;t pay attention?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bronzeprofessor</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151369</link>
		<dc:creator>bronzeprofessor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151369</guid>
		<description>Madison is a university town, and the university that&#039;s there is ridiculously left-wing. But I can scout it for you fairly soon, because Mrs. Lopez, aka La Boss (my wife) just got a tenure-track job at nearby Oshkosh, and we&#039;re doomed to being a commuter couple until I find work in Milwaukee or she finds work in LA...

But the thing that bugs me about this writer&#039;s tone above, is this: Who said greed is good? Who anointed David Brooks as a mainstream conservative? Who do you know that endorses a breezy lifestyle of carefree affluence and reckless consumerism? 

Leftists construct the ultimate Straw Men, the Straw Man on Steroids -- this compendium of everything rotten about themselves, which they project outward through fantasy. Someone I know from UW Madison had coffee with me back in January and gave me this basic shtick above, saying, &quot;we&#039;ve had decades of the Republican &#039;greed is good&#039; attitude and now we need a change.&quot; And I say, &quot;huh&quot;? His wealthy Marin County mom helps him out with rent on an apartment overlooking the Pacific Ocean, and he&#039;s jaunted around the world several times over without ever feeling the need to secure a full-time job. Supposedly he&#039;s writing books. Meanwhile, I&#039;ve supported a family of three on one professor&#039;s salary and I live in a tiny 2-BR in the middle of the porn capital of America, the San Fernando Valley. Yet he&#039;s the Dem and I&#039;m the Republican; he&#039;s wasted thousands upon thousands of dollars, while I walk to work to save money on gas, even in LA.

This whole narrative is so darn phony! The outrage over other people profligate spending is just some neurotic atonement for their own softness of spirit, laziness, and cupidity. If they could just concede that they feel bad about their *own* spending disasters, it wouldn&#039;t be so bad. But inevitably they project contradictory evils onto conservatives: In their fantasy world, we&#039;re both fanatically Christian yet we&#039;re the ones driving air-conditioned SUVs with gun racks on our way to enjoy an overpriced lobster at Sizzler&#039;s, a lap dance, and open house for a new gated community of McMansions. 

So now, in their fantasy world, we have to pay for them to get out of this mess. Only, we can&#039;t, because they have more stuff than we do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Madison is a university town, and the university that&#8217;s there is ridiculously left-wing. But I can scout it for you fairly soon, because Mrs. Lopez, aka La Boss (my wife) just got a tenure-track job at nearby Oshkosh, and we&#8217;re doomed to being a commuter couple until I find work in Milwaukee or she finds work in LA&#8230;</p>
<p>But the thing that bugs me about this writer&#8217;s tone above, is this: Who said greed is good? Who anointed David Brooks as a mainstream conservative? Who do you know that endorses a breezy lifestyle of carefree affluence and reckless consumerism? </p>
<p>Leftists construct the ultimate Straw Men, the Straw Man on Steroids &#8212; this compendium of everything rotten about themselves, which they project outward through fantasy. Someone I know from UW Madison had coffee with me back in January and gave me this basic shtick above, saying, &#8220;we&#8217;ve had decades of the Republican &#8216;greed is good&#8217; attitude and now we need a change.&#8221; And I say, &#8220;huh&#8221;? His wealthy Marin County mom helps him out with rent on an apartment overlooking the Pacific Ocean, and he&#8217;s jaunted around the world several times over without ever feeling the need to secure a full-time job. Supposedly he&#8217;s writing books. Meanwhile, I&#8217;ve supported a family of three on one professor&#8217;s salary and I live in a tiny 2-BR in the middle of the porn capital of America, the San Fernando Valley. Yet he&#8217;s the Dem and I&#8217;m the Republican; he&#8217;s wasted thousands upon thousands of dollars, while I walk to work to save money on gas, even in LA.</p>
<p>This whole narrative is so darn phony! The outrage over other people profligate spending is just some neurotic atonement for their own softness of spirit, laziness, and cupidity. If they could just concede that they feel bad about their *own* spending disasters, it wouldn&#8217;t be so bad. But inevitably they project contradictory evils onto conservatives: In their fantasy world, we&#8217;re both fanatically Christian yet we&#8217;re the ones driving air-conditioned SUVs with gun racks on our way to enjoy an overpriced lobster at Sizzler&#8217;s, a lap dance, and open house for a new gated community of McMansions. </p>
<p>So now, in their fantasy world, we have to pay for them to get out of this mess. Only, we can&#8217;t, because they have more stuff than we do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bronzeprofessor</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151368</link>
		<dc:creator>bronzeprofessor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151368</guid>
		<description>Hanson&#039;s a great columnist. I&#039;m reading his book Who Killed Homer? which isn&#039;t as good as I thought it was going to be, given how well he writes online. He also has a few books on California and immigration that seem a bit too far afield from his expertise in Classics. But I&#039;m being too tough on his books; the truth is he&#039;s a fantastic writer. It&#039;s just that his forte, I think, is the 1500-word essay full of pithy wisdom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hanson&#8217;s a great columnist. I&#8217;m reading his book Who Killed Homer? which isn&#8217;t as good as I thought it was going to be, given how well he writes online. He also has a few books on California and immigration that seem a bit too far afield from his expertise in Classics. But I&#8217;m being too tough on his books; the truth is he&#8217;s a fantastic writer. It&#8217;s just that his forte, I think, is the 1500-word essay full of pithy wisdom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bronzeprofessor</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151367</link>
		<dc:creator>bronzeprofessor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151367</guid>
		<description>What do you know about Chuck DeVore? His name came up somewhere. Are there any Latino Republicans who have survived the gauntlet enough to be nominated. At this point I&#039;m not above crass ethnic exploitation if it means getting rid of the Feinstein-Boxer axis of lameness. I think Leslie Sanchez lives in Northern California or has some ties there. She&#039;s a writer/researcher, but she always looks so together on CNN. I&#039;d give a few hundred bucks if someone set up a PAC for her to run in Cali. She&#039;s smart and her book, LOS REPUBLICANOS, is the most on-the-money treatment of the relationship between Republicans and ethnic politics I&#039;ve seen yet. Anything, anything, but another 6 years of a Feinstein clone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you know about Chuck DeVore? His name came up somewhere. Are there any Latino Republicans who have survived the gauntlet enough to be nominated. At this point I&#8217;m not above crass ethnic exploitation if it means getting rid of the Feinstein-Boxer axis of lameness. I think Leslie Sanchez lives in Northern California or has some ties there. She&#8217;s a writer/researcher, but she always looks so together on CNN. I&#8217;d give a few hundred bucks if someone set up a PAC for her to run in Cali. She&#8217;s smart and her book, LOS REPUBLICANOS, is the most on-the-money treatment of the relationship between Republicans and ethnic politics I&#8217;ve seen yet. Anything, anything, but another 6 years of a Feinstein clone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caligirl9</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151366</link>
		<dc:creator>caligirl9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151366</guid>
		<description>Yep, there&#039;s a person who sticks to her convictions! 
Don&#039;t worry, there is plenty of other stuff to distract anyone from her qualifications and record!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, there&#8217;s a person who sticks to her convictions!<br />
Don&#8217;t worry, there is plenty of other stuff to distract anyone from her qualifications and record!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caligirl9</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151365</link>
		<dc:creator>caligirl9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151365</guid>
		<description>Why should I care and why would I buy any of these books?
*crickets chirping*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should I care and why would I buy any of these books?<br />
*crickets chirping*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eagle334th</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151362</link>
		<dc:creator>Eagle334th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/selected-news-for-week-jun-13-jun-19#comment-151362</guid>
		<description>From the AP:

&lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;b&gt; Obama Half Brother Working on Book&lt;/b&gt;


Another Obama relative has a book deal.

A memoir by George Obama, the president&#039;s half brother and a resident of Huruma, Kenya, will be published by Simon &amp; Schuster in January 2010. George Obama, 27, shares the same father with his famous, older half sibling, although George and Barack Obama — 20 years apart in age — did not grow up together and did not meet as children.

George is the youngest of the senior Obama&#039;s seven children and was born six months before his father died.

Little is known about George Obama. The book, tentatively titled &quot;Homeland&quot; and to be written with author-journalist Damien Lewis, will tell of George Obama&#039;s fall into crime and poverty as a teenager and his eventual embrace of community organizing — a passion shared by the president — and of advocacy for the poor, an identification so strong that he chooses to live among them.

&quot;Even had George Obama not been our President&#039;s half brother, his story is moving and inspirational,&quot; David Rosenthal, Simon &amp; Schuster publisher and executive vice president, said in a statement Sunday. &quot;It is an object lesson in survival, selflessness and courage.&quot;


...

Other Obama relatives are working on books, including a half sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng; and the brother of first lady Michelle Obama, Craig Robinson. Duke University Press is releasing the doctoral dissertation of the president&#039;s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995.

...


http://news.aol.com/article/obama-half-brother-book/526552  &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the AP:</p>
<blockquote><p> <b> Obama Half Brother Working on Book</b></p>
<p>Another Obama relative has a book deal.</p>
<p>A memoir by George Obama, the president&#8217;s half brother and a resident of Huruma, Kenya, will be published by Simon &amp; Schuster in January 2010. George Obama, 27, shares the same father with his famous, older half sibling, although George and Barack Obama — 20 years apart in age — did not grow up together and did not meet as children.</p>
<p>George is the youngest of the senior Obama&#8217;s seven children and was born six months before his father died.</p>
<p>Little is known about George Obama. The book, tentatively titled &#8220;Homeland&#8221; and to be written with author-journalist Damien Lewis, will tell of George Obama&#8217;s fall into crime and poverty as a teenager and his eventual embrace of community organizing — a passion shared by the president — and of advocacy for the poor, an identification so strong that he chooses to live among them.</p>
<p>&#8220;Even had George Obama not been our President&#8217;s half brother, his story is moving and inspirational,&#8221; David Rosenthal, Simon &amp; Schuster publisher and executive vice president, said in a statement Sunday. &#8220;It is an object lesson in survival, selflessness and courage.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Other Obama relatives are working on books, including a half sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng; and the brother of first lady Michelle Obama, Craig Robinson. Duke University Press is releasing the doctoral dissertation of the president&#8217;s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://news.aol.com/article/obama-half-brother-book/526552" rel="nofollow">http://news.aol.com/article/ob.....ook/526552</a>  </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
