Please help support S&L by visiting our worthy advertisers.

« The Hive - The First Obama/McCain Debate | Home | Watch Dems Defend Fannie/Freddie Scam »

Selected News For Week Sep 27 - Oct 3

This thread is for the busy bees of S&L to post news items themselves.

In order to make the articles as readable as possible, please try to stick to the format described in the first of these weekly editions here.

Of course articles that fit under the topic of a recent thread should be posted there. As always, remember to excerpt heavily and to provide a link to the original source.

Related Articles:

  Print Email

60 Responses to “Selected News For Week Sep 27 - Oct 3”

  1. Exeter

    Rush talked about this same issue today. From the Gateway Pundit:

    Missouri Sheriffs & Top Prosecutors Form Obama “Truth Squads” & Threaten Libel Charges Against Obama Critics

    More Hope and Change for Missouri…
    St. Louis and Missouri Democrat sheriffs and top prosecutors are planning to go after anyone who makes false statements against Obama during his campaign. This is so one sided I can’t even begin to describe how wrong this agenda is.

    It’s one thing if they want to keep the campaign fair for both sides, but they clearly only want to enforce the issue for the Obama Camp.

    KMOV has a video report on the Obama “Truth Squads”.

    St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce and St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch are threatening to bring libel charges against those who speak out falsely against Barack Obama.

    KMOV aired a story last night, that stated that St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch and St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, both Obama supporters, are threatening to bring criminal libel charges against anyone who levels what turns out to be false criticisms of their chosen candidate for President.

    St. Louis C of CC Blog has more on the Obama Truth Squads.
    Hat Tip Kat

    ** Here you go Truth Squad… Sue me first!
    Barack Obama Attacked White People!

    From his audio-book dreams of my father, Barack Obama was moved to tears when he heard his racist anti-American pastor blame whitey for all of the world’s pain and ills.
    In fact, he was so moved by this filth that he included the story in his book Dreams of My Father.

    Here Barack Obama lashes out at the white man’s greed:
    (34 seconds) (video on website)

    In Obama’s own words:

    “It is this world, a world where cruise ships throw away more food in a day than most residents of Port-au-Prince see in a year, where white folks’ greed runs a world in need, apartheid in one hemisphere, apathy in another hemisphere… That’s the world! On which hope sits!”
    “White folk’s greed runs a world in need”…

    Sue me!

    http://gatewaypundit.blogspot......-form.html

    There is also a link on this page from Glen Reynolds that elaborates on the NRA-radio issue we at S&L have already discussed in another thread.

  2. sheehanjihad

    Oh hell no! Truth squads my arse! Brownshirts with legal standing is all. Hey! Truth dorks! get your filing done early! Barak Obama dresses in a pirate costume and flits about the wharves in Baltimore on the third Sunday of each month, throwing discarded MacDonald’s cups at passersby and demanding they lower their own taxes by the end of business the next day!

    Yeah! I saw him! He signed an autograph, and took videos of himself crooning 40s show tunes in Kenyan to a group of sleeping alligators at the reptile exhibit at the zoo too! he was promising a gazelle in every pot if they would just vote for him! Sue me you bastards! I couldnt come up with any better lies than your vaunted hero does out of hand every day.

    the difference is, I dont want to be President, and I can say any damn thing I want protected under the first amendment, and you need to adjust your kneepads and scoot after another ambulance. You dirt bags are the main reason most liberals become lawyers. You have to force your agenda on an unwilling populace. Now go suck a blowtorch, you loser shit birds.

  3. Exeter

    You’re a national treasure, SJ.

  4. PoliticalJules

    This is a great example of what our country would be if BO became president. I mean, after seeing this, is there any doubt that we would become a Socialist/Communist nation under BO?

    Hey comrad, the government tells you what can or cannot be shown on TV. Especially if it is against the government.

    In China, speaking against the government (even on TV) will get you thrown in jail or worse. Seems like law enforcement in Missouri like that policy…

  5. BillK

    In case Palin thinks she has family problems. :-)

    From the London Daily Mail:

    Revealed: Radical cleric Bakri’s pole-dancer daughter

    By Michael Seamark and Emily Andrews

    As the daughter of firebrand cleric Omar Bakri Mohammed, Yasmin Fostok might be expected to share his fanatical beliefs.

    But the radical Muslim’s daughter has ditched his extreme interpretation of Islam - as well as most of her clothing.

    The busty blonde has been revealed as a topless, tattooed pole dancer.

    The 26-year-old single mother has been displaying her charms in London clubs and touring as a ‘podium’ dancer with a troupe called Ibiza Untouched.

    Hundreds of youngsters go wild over the daughter of the preacher of hate who rants against Western ‘depravity’.

    Yasmin shrugged off the secret life that her father would abhor. ‘I don’t agree with his views - I just get on with my life and that’s it,’ she said.

    Perhaps predictably Bakri, now exiled to Lebanon, dismissed the news as a ‘ fabrication’ and described it as an attack on him and Islam.

    The more you put pressure on me, the stronger I become. Islam will conquer Britain,’ he said.

    ‘I have not seen my daughter for nine years, but because she is a member of my family people want to make things up about her.

    ‘You are going to pay a heavy price. You can read it any way you like. The time is now.’

    Bakri, who said the British people brought the 7/7 outrages on themselves and praised the ‘ magnificent’ September 11 hijackers, raised his six children on benefits totalling £300,000, and his daughter is following suit.

    She lives with her three-year-old son in a ground-floor flat in Catford, South East London. Her rent and council tax are paid by the state and she receives child benefit and income support.

    She grew up a devout Muslim and in her teens wore a veil. She left school in Enfield at 16 after her parents arranged a marriage to a Turk but the couple separated.

    She told The Sun: ‘I’ve done pole dancing, but I like to keep it quiet.

    I don’t normally do topless work, but I’m willing to go topless if the venue is right.

    She said she did not get on with her father. ‘His views are nothing to do with me,’ she added. ‘I am an adult, my own person. I do my business and he does his.’

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....ghter.html

    Proving once again, no matter who you are, you can’t quite control the behavior of your children…

  6. BillK

    Biden goes off his rocker in Wisconsin and (gasp!) invokes 9/11!

    From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s “Cudahy Now” site:

    UPDATE: Biden pledges firefighter support

    By Larry Sandler

    Cudahy - Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Biden today invoked the imagery of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in delivering a strong message of support for firefighters and police officers while campaigning at a firehouse here.

    Biden said that if a dirty bomb went off at tonight’s Milwaukee Brewers game, “Who are they going to call? It ain’t going to be my son in Iraq. It’s going to be you.

    Biden called Republican presidential nominee John McCain a brave man who would give his own life to protect people from a terrorist attack but who had voted in Senate against funding for local firefighters and police officers because of Republican ideology.

    I’m sick and tired of this neo-conservative malarkey that somehow the federal government doesn’t have a responsibility to this local fire hall, to this local police department,” Biden told a group of firefighters.

    Biden said that if he and Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama were elected, they would ensure firefighters and police have the resources necessary to protect Americans.

    http://www.cudahynow.com/watch.....p;id=46733

    No, you and Obama would make sure terrorists get whatever they ask for as we cower in fear of an attack.

    Funny, I don’t recall McCain voting to reduce DHS funding.

    On the other hand, I’d like to see what other pork barrel funding was involved in the bill McCain voted against.

    In case anyone wants to read the truth on the matter:

    http://www.johnmccain.com/firs.....upport.htm

  7. BillK

    From the (Denver) Rocky Mountain News:

    Peace activist shies away from militancy

    By James B. Meadow

    The elfin firebrand in the pink tiara who took to the streets with a pink bullhorn and found that the streets can be really hard when you get knocked down onto them is nervously laughing at the other end of the phone line because she’s a little surprised at the question she’s been asked.

    “Do I feel like a celebrity because of what happened? No, not really, not at all,” says Alicia Forrest, the 24-year-old member of Code Pink who became a cause celebre for police brutality and the darling of You Tube in August thanks to a Rocky Mountain News video of her being knocked to the ground by a policeman and subsequently hauled away and arrested during the Democratic National Convention.

    She’s definitely a “cyber-lebrity,” with over a million hits on the video.

    “I mean, it didn’t change my life,” says the fashion designer-turned-activist who now intends to return to fashion design while staying active in the peace movement. “I’m still standing up for what I believe in and speaking out.”

    Which is both true and sort of misleading. Yes, she’s still speaking out. But, yes, she has changed somewhat.

    Even as a scheduled Oct. 15 disposition hearing to discuss the criminal interference charges against her looms, Forrest is making plans to temporarily relocate to Alaska with her boyfriend. No, it’s not to do battle with Sarah Palin on her home turf, but, rather, to get into “some graphic design stuff and embroidery” while continuing to work for peace in a less confrontational way.

    “I want to inform people in local communities instead of alienating them by screaming,” says Forrest, a native of a teeny Courtside, Ariz., who splits her time living there and Los Angeles. …

    http://www.rockymountainnews.c.....militancy/

    Uh, if that’s what she really believes, she sort of affiliated herself with the wrong group, don’t you think?

    Code Pink “informing” instead of alienating by screaming?

    You know, because they’re so silent when trying to disrupt the RNC, or sessions of Congress, or…

  8. JohnMG

    BillK; …..”instead of alienating by screaming……”

    Oh, I get it now. Instead of screaming “Ow, ow, ow, that hurts. Stop it! Stop it! Why are you taking me away? Ow, ow, ow, I have my rig…..mpf, mpf, mpf…….”

    I see!

  9. RightWinger

    Barney Frank had just a little bit more of a connection to Fannie Mae in the past.

    From the “Business and Media Institute” on Sept 24.
    ______________________________________________________

    The news media have covered the relationship in the past, but there have been no mentions since 2005, according to Nexis and despite the collapse of Fannie Mae. The July 3, 1998, Reliable Source column in The Washington Post reported Frank, who is openly gay, had a relationship with Herb Moses, an executive for the now-government controlled Fannie Mae. The column revealed the two had split up at the time but also said Frank was referring to Moses as his “spouse.” Another Washington Post report said Frank called Moses his “lover” and that the two were “still friends” after the breakup.

    Frank was and remains a stalwart defender of Fannie Mae, which is now under FBI investigation along with its sister organization Freddie Mac, American International Group Inc. (NYSE:AIG) and Lehman Brothers (NYSE:LEH) – all recently participants in government bailouts. But Frank has derailed efforts to regulate the institution, as well as denying it posed any financial risk. Frank’s office has been unresponsive to efforts by the Business & Media Institute to comment on these potential conflicts of interest.

    While the relationship reportedly ended 10 years ago, Frank was serving on the House Banking Committee the entire 10 years they were together. The committee is the primary House body which along with the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) has jurisdiction over the government-sponsored enterprises.

    He has served on the committee since becoming a congressman in 1981 and became the ranking Democrat on the committee in 2003. He became chairman of the committee, now called the House Financial Services Committee, in 2007.

    Moses was the assistant director for product initiatives at Fannie Mae and had been at the forefront of relaxing lending restrictions at the company for rural customers, according to the Feb. 23, 1998, issue of National Mortgage News (NMN).

    “Herb Moses, who helped develop many of Fannie Mae’s affordable housing and home improvement lending programs, has left the mortgage industry,” Darryl Hicks wrote for NMN. “Mr. Moses - whose last day was Feb. 13 - spent the past seven years at Fannie Mae, most recently as director of housing initiatives. Over the course of time, he played an instrumental role in developing the company’s Title One and 203(k) home improvement lending programs.”

    ____________________________________________________________

    http://businessandmedia.org/ar.....45932.aspx

    So besides the contributions, Frank seems to have had quite the “emotional” attachment to Fannie Mae as well.

  10. Have we done to ourselves what Osama bin Laden could not?

    Shock Forced Treas. Secretary Paulson’s Hand.

    For at least a month, Mr. Paulson and Treasury officials had discussed the option of jump-starting markets by having the government absorb the rotten assets — mainly financial instruments tied to subprime mortgages — at the heart of the crisis. The concept, dubbed Balance Sheet Relief, was seen at Treasury as a blunt instrument, something to be used in only the direst of circumstances.

    One day later, Mr. Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke sped to Congress to seek approval for the biggest government intervention in financial markets since the 1930s. In a private meeting with lawmakers, according to a person present, one asked what would happen if the bill failed.

    “If it doesn’t pass, then heaven help us all,” responded Mr. Paulson, according to several people familiar with the matter.

    The magnitude of this problem will ripple through World markets for years. And the face of American capitalism has been horribly disfigured. Is it really just a house of cards easily blown down by such a small percentage of ‘toxic’ investments?

    Obviously.

    Sort of. Because those charged with guarding the hen house from the fox sought their own windfall rather than doing their duty. For years.

    And there are those in the World, not our friends, who are watching very closely.

    To the islamo-fascists, the Twin Towers symbolized the collapse of the great satan’s financial power. It didn’t work, and only served to strengthen our resolve against an external enemy. But this latest devastation is a self-inflicted revelation.

    We have almost accomplished, through our own myopic malfeasance & criminal culpability, what OBL could only fantasize about in his wildest ‘great satan’ dreams.

    The cartoon character ‘Pogo’ was prescient: We have seen the enemy, and he is us.

    It would be interesting to juxtapose the current financial market foundations in the Islamic world against those in the West, and see who is superior right now; who has the power to leverage; who has the power to manipulate and possibly topple, the other.

    And don’t think it hasn’t crossed the minds of the islamo-fascists. They’re gloating. And waiting. And devising new ways to incorporate new tools - those of financial folly & digital disaster - into their arsenal against the West.

    “We have seen the enemy”….. let’s not aid & abet them.

  11. Exeter

    Hmm. Something on Michelle Malkin’s site just caught my attention. The link took me to NewsBusters, which in turn took me to DeHavelle.com. It casts a new light on Obama’s transparent one-upmanship.

    Barack Obama’s Bracelet
    September 27th, 2008 at 8:58 pm
    » by Level_Head in: Politics

    Barack Obama’s bracelet is apparently not being worn with permission from the parents, and what he’s saying about it seems not to be true. The mother is no Cindy Sheehan.

    This, in a fair world, should come back to bit him: During the debate on September 26, 2008, Barack Obama attempted to counter John McCain’s bracelet story. This was portrayed as “new” — but it is not: Senator Obama has been telling HIS bracelet story since the bracelet was given to him in February of 2008. (Even so, Senator Obama had to read the name from the bracelet during the debate.)

    But there’s a difference: Senator Obama is apparently doing this against the parents’ will. He was specifically asked, according to Staff Sgt. Brian Jopek (Ryan’s father) to stop telling this story and to take the bracelet off.

    Mrs. Jopek was an Obama supporter (at least in March of this year) and doesn’t want to sabotage the campaign, so she refused to give interviews. But I found an old radio interview with the father Brian Jopek (who served in Iraq and is now apparently serving at the Guantanamo base):

    BRIAN JOPEK: Whatever is decided, we need to make sure that it benefits the American servicemen, and also the Iraqis.

    We don’t wanna go back in there in ten years, at a greater cost and more lives.

    I sure hope that, whoever is elected, Democrat or Republican, that they look at the big picture and don’t just pull up stakes — or “pop smoke” as we say in the military, because of the political atmosphere.”

    Regarding Barack Obama: According to the father, Tracy Jopek wrote to the Senator: “She had asked him not to wear the bracelet.”

    The WPR host — clearly anti-war (and quoting Lancet numbers of deaths) suggested that Obama had not worn it recently. This was months ago.

    Here’s the clincher — Barack Obama is using the bracelet to support a position that his father (and Ryan Jopek himself) clearly do not subscribe to, and at the time even the mother that gave him the bracelet didn’t want it used in the media (that comment was made here) and asked him to take it off.

    Brian and Tracy Jopek are now divorced. I don’t know what her current thoughts are. But this interview on WPR, from March 20, was interesting. The quotes here are from about 10 to 14 minutes in.

    Here’s the WPR page containing the “Iraq War 5th Anniversary” interview from March 20:

    http://www.dehavelle.com/2008/.....-bracelet/

    Obama’s lie is so egregious, it deserves the adverb, ‘DASTARDLY’.

  12. U NO HOO

    Can’t we allow dead soldiers to rest in peace?

    I’m not talking about S&Lers, just politicians who wear “The Bracelet.” Remember Seinfeld’s Kramer?

    I don’t wear a bracelet, I am sorry for those that died and hope no more die, but we have to win, if DC politicians will allow us and Walter Cronkite types will go away. Well, I can hope for change.

  13. texaspsue

    “Obama “Truth Squads”

    This makes me so POed that I can’t even see straight! Is this what happened when Hitler came into power? No one saw it coming? Everyone just kept talking about what a great Leader that he was and didn’t see the warnings? The media spread the propaganda and the citizens ate it up ? The citizens kept reassuring each other, “but, he will save the the planet, the people and the poor.” Exactly. (Wait a minute, I don’t think I am talking about Hitler at all, I just got confused.)

    I just don’t get it. Could it really be that 50% of Americans have fallen for this garbage? We are in very, very scary times.

    SJ, Brownshirts indeed! Thanks for telling it like it is, you never let us down. :-)

  14. texaspsue

    Fox news has a copy of the first proposed Bill:

    http://www.foxnews.com/project....._Draft.pdf

    House Republican Whip Roy Blunt’s office provides this side-by-side comparison of Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s original Wall Street bailout proposal with the final compromise agreed to over the weekend by congressional and Treasury negotiators:

    http://www.dcexaminer.com/opin.....l#comments

    gateway pundit has a video:

    UPDATE: The House GOP members just gave their press conference on the bailout plan. Minority Leader John Boehner gave John McCain credit for inserting himself into the process and giving the GOP House members a voice on the bailout bill.

    Best line of the day goes to Republican Leader John Boehner on John McCain:

    http://gatewaypundit.blogspot......html#links

    This Bill is worrisome. We have to wonder who they will end up appointing to the “Financial Stability Oversight Board”. It is, supposedly, to be comprised of half Dems. and half Reps. but, when was the last time that you could trust the word of the Democrats? This could be a disaster….. I’m just saying.

  15. BillK

    Why yes, Iraq war veterans are speaking out and of course, these vets represent the entire military:

    From the ultra-liberal (Madison, WI) Capital Times:

    ‘Please listen,’ say veterans of Iraq war

    By Shawn Doherty

    Nearly a dozen Iraqi war veterans gathered in Madison Saturday to tell war stories. These were not tales of honor and glory.

    There were descriptions of a macho military culture that cracked jokes about gays and called Iraqis “rag heads” and “towel heads.” There were accounts of an army that sent soldiers into battle with broken equipment and insufficient training. They told of trucks that ran over young children and soldiers who played cruel games with prisoners and panicked and shot civilians. There were stories of commanders indifferent to their troops’ medical and mental suffering.

    I joined an institution that I thought stood for honor, but instead it stood for intolerance,” recalled Martin Smith, who told how his comrades would cheer as they watched Iraqis eviscerated during violent training videos. Smith, an Illinois resident, served in the Marine Corps from 1997 to 2002, when he was discharged with a Navy Achievement medal.

    A sparse audience of only 200 attended the Memorial Union Theater event, which was coordinated by the Iraq Veterans Against the War. IVAW is a national organization with 1,200 members in 48 states. Over the past year, IVAW has held a handful of similar panels across the country in an effort to mobilize opposition to the war. Several of the veterans on the panels said that they hoped their stories about the reality of war and the difficulties of coming home again would correct the official accounts of events overseas.

    Eric Hughes was in college in January 2003 when he got a call that he needed to report to duty in 72 hours with the Illinois National Guard. It took his caravan 48 hours to get up to Fort McCoy in Wisconsin, he said, partly because 12 trucks broke down on the way.
    “That’s what they were sending us over with,” he said.

    John Knox claimed that once he and the other Marines in his unit were in the chaos of battle, all normal rules disappeared. Especially after March 31, 2004, when four U.S. contractors were killed and dragged through the streets of Fallujah.

    “Before then our rules of engagement were pretty strict,” said Knox, who served as a truck driver in the Marine Corps between 2001 and 2006. “But after that the line became very blurry. We could shoot someone who was coming at us with a shovel. We could shoot them if they were coming carrying a cell phone. If you felt a threat, you could pull the trigger. Shoot them dead. Everything became a hostile act.

    Knox, now a student at UW-Oshkosh, described a “game” his fellow Marines played with detainees. During the day, he said, they would leave the Iraqis out in the hot desert sun without water. Finally at night they would give the prisoners some water. Knox spoke of the guilt he now feels remembering that time.

    “I didn’t say anything, so I’m just as guilty for letting it happen,” he said.

    Many of the veterans described similar feelings of helplessness and guilt.

    I dehumanized people. I oppressed people. And I allowed them to die,” said Benjamin Thompson, who served in the U.S. Army Reserve between 1999 and 2007. Thompson, now a student in Ohio, gave a mesmerizing description of what it was like to be in charge of prisoners at Abu Ghraib.

    “Some of them spoke English and were very good friends of mine,” he said. “We had to explain to them that we didn’t hate them. And we didn’t know how to make things better.

    Thompson said that speaking out is his way of keeping a vow he made to some of his prisoners.

    “I made a promise that I would talk about this. People don’t know what really happened over there,” he said. …

    http://www.madison.com/tct/news/stories/306861

    Our soldiers are really ruthless killers, racists and homophobes.

    Our troops shot civilians. You know, as opposed to looking for the uniforms all al Qaeda members normally wear.

    Thanks for that update.

    Nice to see a group that averages 25 members in each state (1200 members across 48 states) can get press coverage.

    A “civilian” coming towards you carrying a cell phone could be considered “hostile.”

    The fact that that is how most IEDs are triggered has nothing to do with that. Nope, it’s just hate against Iraqis with phones.

    Imagine that, after Fallujah, or soldiers were allowed to fire in self-defense. Can’t have that.

    “We don’t hate you.”

    Of course the converse isn’t true, but you know, why bother reporting that?

  16. BillK

    Holy #$#@.

    Could Palin be more or less right and Couric wrong, thanks to an update?

    From The Weekly Standard:

    TWS Exclusive: Kissinger Unhappy About Obama

    Henry Kissinger believes Barack Obama misstated his views on diplomacy with US adversaries and is not happy about being mischaracterized.

    He says: “Senator McCain is right. I would not recommend the next President of the United States engage in talks with Iran at the Presidential level. My views on this issue are entirely compatible with the views of my friend Senator John McCain. We do not agree on everything, but we do agree that any negotiations with Iran must be geared to reality.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/.....unhapp.asp

  17. Diane

    Knox, now a student at UW-Oshkosh, described a “game” his fellow Marines played with detainees. During the day, he said, they would leave the Iraqis out in the hot desert sun without water. Finally at night they would give the prisoners some water. Knox spoke of the guilt he now feels remembering that time.

    I could swear I’ve seen this movie before. Didn’t it star John Kerry, back during the Vietnam war? And then a remake starring Jesse MacBeth? You’d think they’d at least file the serial numbers off before recycling this yet again.

  18. BillK

    Our daily Palin hit piece, from the Los Angeles Times:

    Some on the right are joining a chorus of criticism over Sarah Palin

    John McCain’s running mate and his sharp reactions to the nation’s economic crisis have led several prominent conservative columnists to slam the senator as reckless and strident.

    By James Rainey

    While John McCain and his aides have railed against the “liberal mainstream media” in recent weeks, some of the most searing attacks against the Republican presidential nominee have come from conservative intellectuals.

    McCain’s surprise vice presidential pick, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, and his sharp reactions to the continuing economic storm have led several prominent columnists on the right to slam the Arizona senator as more reckless than bold, more strident than forceful.

    Those opinion leaders, in turn, have triggered a backlash from other commentators, who have dubbed the critics elitists and risen to the defense of a woman they see as the Republican Party’s new populist star.

    The spirited debate may have reached its apogee last week, with George F. Will issuing McCain a harsh dressing-down.

    “Under the pressure of the financial crisis, one presidential candidate is behaving like a flustered rookie playing in a league too high,” Will began his syndicated column, which is carried in more than 450 newspapers. “It is not Barack Obama.”

    The conservative elder accused McCain of “characteristically substituting vehemence for coherence” and of attacking his Democratic rival as a big spender, rather than mounting a philosophical challenge to the largest government bailout of business in American history.

    Will mocked the Republican standard-bearer as a veritable Queen of Hearts (a la “Alice in Wonderland”) for demanding the head of Christopher Cox, a former Republican congressman who is chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    The Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist argued that such impulsiveness sows doubts about McCain’s ability to apply “calm reflection and clear principles” to important decisions. He ended his broadside by all but declaring McCain unfit for the Oval Office.

    “It is arguable that, because of his inexperience, Obama is not ready for the presidency,” Will wrote. “It is arguable that McCain, because of his boiling moralism and bottomless reservoir of certitudes, is not suited to the presidency. Unreadiness can be corrected, although perhaps at great cost, by experience. Can a dismaying temperament be fixed?

    The dismay expressed by Will and other columnists, including David Brooks of the New York Times, who at times is a McCain cheerleader, arises primarily over McCain’s selection of Palin.

    After the 2000 presidential race, Brooks acknowledged that he was even “more worshipful” of McCain than a generally enamored press corps. But in this election cycle, he acknowledged admiration for Obama, before souring somewhat.

    He added his voice this month to the chorus of those concerned about Palin’s inexperience.

    Palin, Brooks argued, “has not been engaged in national issues, does not have a repertoire of historic patterns and, like President Bush, seems to compensate for her lack of experience with brashness and excessive decisiveness.” …

    http://www.latimes.com/news/po.....0078.story

    Personally I stopped listening to Will and Brooks as alleged conservatives long ago.

    I don’t disagree that McCain is not exactly my favorite candidate, but Palin as an example of his ineffective decision making?

    Lots of other fun comments from miscellaneous “conservatives” they’ve dug up that hate Palin, e.g.:

    Writing in the National Review on Friday, Kathleen Parker expressed a similar view but with much less restraint. She said Palin’s recent television interviews amounted to content-light “filibusters.” The syndicated columnist suggested that the governor — “Who Is Clearly Out of Her League” — should quit the Republican ticket to “save McCain, her party, and the country she loves.”

    Voters typically focus almost exclusively on the presidential candidates, and even weak vice presidential nominees seldom drag down a national ticket.

    But David Frum, a former Bush speechwriter, is among conservatives who have worried that the Palin pick weakens one of McCain’s best arguments: that he has superior experience and is better prepared to protect America.

    “How serious can [McCain] be,” Frum wrote even before Palin appeared at the GOP convention, “if he would place such a neophyte second in line to the presidency?”

    Charles Krauthammer and Ross Douthat, two other conservative stalwarts, have also doubted Palin’s readiness to lead.

    Watch this space, as it’s likely you’ll never see the LA Times quote any of these people again… unless they continue to make comments decrying the GOP candidates.

    Note how they don’t mention the many, many conservatives I’ve spoken to who are only going to the polls because of Palin…

  19. BillK

    Here we go again; from the Los Angeles Times:

    Palin treads carefully between fundamentalist beliefs and public policy

    Her faith views are strong and sometimes controversial. Her aides say she seeks to share but not impose her faith; her critics say she has ‘a fine-tuned sense of how far to push.’

    By Stephen Braun

    ANCHORAGE — Soon after Sarah Palin was elected mayor of the foothill town of Wasilla, Alaska, she startled a local music teacher by insisting in casual conversation that men and dinosaurs coexisted on an Earth created 6,000 years ago — about 65 million years after scientists say most dinosaurs became extinct — the teacher said.

    After conducting a college band and watching Palin deliver a commencement address to a small group of home-schooled students in June 1997, Wasilla resident Philip Munger said, he asked the young mayor about her religious beliefs.

    Palin told him that “dinosaurs and humans walked the Earth at the same time,” Munger said. When he asked her about prehistoric fossils and tracks dating back millions of years, Palin said “she had seen pictures of human footprints inside the tracks,” recalled Munger, who teaches music at the University of Alaska in Anchorage and has regularly criticized Palin in recent years on his liberal political blog, called Progressive Alaska.

    The idea of a “young Earth” — that God created the Earth about 6,000 years ago, and dinosaurs and humans coexisted early on — is a popular strain of creationism.

    Though in her race for governor she called for faith-based “intelligent design” to be taught along with evolution in Alaska’s schools, Gov. Palin has not sought to require it, state educators say.

    As governor and in her formative role as mayor of Wasilla, Palin has trod carefully between her evangelical faith and public policy on issues such as abortion and library books. At times she has retreated when her moves have sparked controversy or proved politically impractical.

    She has harnessed the political muscle of social conservatives and antiabortion groups, yet she did not push hard for a special legislative session on abortion, and she did not challenge a court ruling that allowed health insurance for same-sex partners of state workers.

    Palin has attended a number of prayer sessions with pastors and has quietly sought their guidance, but she is often mum on matters of faith in high-profile public forums.

    Her aides say Palin’s caution at the intersection of religion and governance is a studied effort to share her beliefs without forcing them on Alaska.

    “She’s obviously an intensively religious person,” said Bill McAllister, Palin’s chief spokesman as governor. “She understands that she’s the governor and not preacher in chief. Religion informs her decisions, but she is not out to impose her views on Alaska.”

    McAllister said that he never heard Palin make such remarks about dinosaurs and that Palin preferred not to discuss her views on evolution publicly.

    “I’ve never had a conversation like that with her or been apprised of anything like that,” McAllister said. He added that “the only bigotry that’s still safe is against Christians who believe in their faith.”As governor and in her formative role as mayor of Wasilla, Palin has trod carefully between her evangelical faith and public policy on issues such as abortion and library books. At times she has retreated when her moves have sparked controversy or proved politically impractical.

    She has harnessed the political muscle of social conservatives and antiabortion groups, yet she did not push hard for a special legislative session on abortion, and she did not challenge a court ruling that allowed health insurance for same-sex partners of state workers.

    Palin has attended a number of prayer sessions with pastors and has quietly sought their guidance, but she is often mum on matters of faith in high-profile public forums.

    Her aides say Palin’s caution at the intersection of religion and governance is a studied effort to share her beliefs without forcing them on Alaska.

    “She’s obviously an intensively religious person,” said Bill McAllister, Palin’s chief spokesman as governor. “She understands that she’s the governor and not preacher in chief. Religion informs her decisions, but she is not out to impose her views on Alaska.”

    McAllister said that he never heard Palin make such remarks about dinosaurs and that Palin preferred not to discuss her views on evolution publicly.

    “I’ve never had a conversation like that with her or been apprised of anything like that,” McAllister said. He added that “the only bigotry that’s still safe is against Christians who believe in their faith.”

    http://www.latimes.com/news/po.....3718.story

    How does one refute the “recollections” of a self-described liberal College teacher who’s been running an anti-Palin site for years?

  20. BillK

    From the TV Newser blog, no favoritism at all:

    Obama Campaign Wants You To Watch CNN Tonight

    You know that text message the Obama campaign sent out to announce their VP pick? Well, the campaign is still sending out texts to many of those who subscribed, including HuffPo’s Danny Shea. Here’s one they sent out this afternoon:

    Watch Barack debate John McCain tonight at 9pm Eastern on CNN. Also, remind friends to register to vote at VoteForChange.com. Please forward this message.

    Um. A campaign asking voters to watch on a specific network? Could you imagine if the McCain campaign had asked voters to watch Fox News? And shouldn’t the Obama campaign say “watch on MSNBC” since that network is supposedly ‘in the tank’ for the candidate? Or is the campaign in the tank for CNN?

    Anyway, Shea asked the Obama campaign about it. An Obama staffer said it was “shorter than saying ‘on cable news,’” and that they were “not trying to make news.” Nice try. …

    http://www.mediabistro.com/tvn....._95788.asp

    Not at all surprising to any of us.

  21. BannedbytheTaliban

    Marine sues Murtha for Hadithah comments

    By Ramesh Santanam - The Associated Press
    Posted : Sunday Sep 28, 2008 15:54:41 EDT

    PITTSBURGH — A former Marine lance corporal sued Rep. John Murtha for slander Thursday, saying the Pennsylvania Democrat damaged his reputation by saying Marines killed women and children “in cold blood” in Hadithah, Iraq, in November 2005.

    The federal lawsuit claims Murtha violated Justin Sharratt’s rights to due process and presumption of innocence with comments on various news shows in May 2006. Sharratt, who was honorably discharged last year, said he received hate e-mails and has been called “baby killer” when he has gone out in Canonsburg, about 15 miles south of Pittsburgh.

    “Sharratt, in being labeled repeatedly by Murtha as a ‘cold-blooded murderer,’ and by Murtha outrageously claiming that the Hadithah incident was comparable to the infamous (My Lai) massacre of Vietnam, has suffered permanent, irreversible damage to his reputation,” the lawsuit states. American service members killed as many as 504 Vietnamese villagers in the My Lai massacre….

    ….Murtha has served in the House since 1974 and is known for bringing money and jobs, especially in the defense industries, to his district in rural Pennsylvania.

    He faces Republican William T. Russell, a career soldier who left the Army two years short of retirement, in the November election. Russell has run campaign ads criticizing Murtha for his comments about Hadithah.

    Geary said the statute of limitations, not Murtha’s re-election campaign, dictated when the lawsuit was filed.

    Geary called Murtha’s comments “outrageous” in light of a current campaign flier that reads, “Honoring Our Troops and Veterans is a Top Priority for John Murtha.”

    http://www.marinecorpstimes.co.....it_092508/

    I hope both Russell and Sharratt win.

  22. BillK

    Can you believe this partisan cr*p is still ongoing?

    No, I’m not talking about the bailout bill.

    From a delighted AP:

    Prosecutor Named to Probe U.S. Attorneys’ Firings

    WASHINGTON — Attorney General Michael Mukasey appointed a prosecutor Monday to pursue possible criminal charges against Republicans who were involved in the controversial firings of U.S. attorneys.

    His move follows the leading recommendation of a Justice Department investigation that harshly criticized Bush administration officials, members of Congress and their aides for the ousters, which were seen by many as politically motivated.

    Results of the investigation were made public Monday. The report singled out the removal of U.S. Attorney David Iglesias of New Mexico as the most troubling.

    Republican political figures in New Mexico, including Sen. Pete Domenici and Rep. Heather Wilson, had complained about Iglesias’ handling of voter fraud and public corruption cases, and that led to his firing, the report said.

    Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine and Office of Professional Responsibility director Marshall Jarrett said that a prosecutor was needed because “serious allegations involving potential criminal conduct have not been fully investigated or resolved.”

    Potential crimes described in their report include lying to investigators, obstruction of justice and wire fraud.

    Mukasey named Nora Dannehy, a career prosecutor, to direct the probe.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,429741,00.html

    Once again, how is firing people who serve at the pleasure of the President possibly a crime?

    Further, when will Janet Reno be indicted for firing them all?

    What’s that? Never?

    Perhaps the only thing more surprising about this is it wasn’t announced November 1.

    I can’t believe Mukasey in this, I really can’t.

  23. BillK

    From a hopeful AP:

    Analysis: House vote against bailout wounds McCain

    By Charles Babington

    The house always wins, gamblers are warned, and the U.S. House made John McCain pay Monday for his politically risky, high-profile involvement in a financial rescue plan that came crashing down, mainly at the hands of his fellow Republicans.

    The bill’s defeat can hardly be blamed on the GOP presidential nominee, and it’s possible that a revised measure might succeed. But by his own actions last week, McCain tied himself far more tightly to the failed bill than did his Democratic opponent, Barack Obama.

    McCain argues that action is better than inaction in times of crises. His efforts, however, were aimed squarely at House Republicans, the group mainly responsible for the bill’s demise, which triggered a record drop of nearly 800 points in the stock market, the most ever for a single day.

    If Congress’ impasse leads to a credit crisis, “it’s not going to be good for McCain,” said veteran Republican consultant John Feehery.

    Another prominent Republican strategist, who would talk only on background to avoid antagonizing associates, said the vote was trouble for McCain.

    As recently as Monday morning, only minutes before the House’s stunning vote, McCain suggested that his call for a White House summit meeting Thursday, and his visit with unhappy House Republicans that preceded it, had helped clear the way for the bill’s passage.

    “I went to Washington last week to make sure that the taxpayers of Ohio and across this great country were not left footing the bill for mistakes made on Wall Street and in Washington,” he told a crowd in Columbus, Ohio. “Some people have criticized my decision, but I will never, ever be a president who sits on the sidelines when this country faces a crisis.”

    On NBC’s “Meet the Press” Sunday, top adviser Steve Schmidt said McCain managed “to help bring all of the parties to the table, including the House Republicans, whose votes were needed to pass this.”

    The comment suggested that McCain took responsibility for rounding up the needed GOP votes, “and that was probably a stupid thing for him to promise to do,” said Democratic adviser Jennifer Palmieri.

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/.....635D82.DTL

    Yep, even though he tied himself less to it than Obama, and at least some of those watching noticed Pelosi promising passage and then the bill being defeated by Democrats, this will hurt McCain.

    Sad thing is, the AP is probably right.

    Of course the AP also does the analysis that would get Fox News branded a bunch of racists:

    Obama gave the legislative package tepid support Sunday. If several Democratic-backed additions stayed in it, he said on CBS’”Face the Nation,”"my inclination would be to vote for it, understanding I’m not happy about it.”

    On Monday, many of the House Democrats who opposed the bill were blacks, who rank among Obama’s strongest supporters. Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., was one. “I do not believe that we have explored or exhausted all possible options to directly ease the pressure on financial markets without causing an undue burden to taxpayers,” he said.

  24. BillK

    Our daily Palin hit piece, this time from the San Francisco Chronicle:

    Palin: McCain campaign’s end-run around media

    By Joe Garofoli

    The McCain campaign is attempting to do something unheard of in the modern political era. It is not just running against the mainstream media, it is running around it.

    This strategy is not so much expressed in McCain campaign manager Steve Schmidt’s declaration last week that the New York Times is “150 percent in the tank” for Democratic Sen. Barack Obama or the media-bashing by several speakers at this month’s Republican National Convention. It’s more about the GOP’s continued sheltering of its vice presidential nominee, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

    She has yet to hold a major press conference 32 days after McCain announced her as his running mate - and that’s not changing anytime soon. McCain spokesman Michael Goldfarb said Palin will do at least one news conference before election day. That could mean that the person who could potentially lead the free world will have done one national press conference before being sworn into office.

    The Democratic vice presidential nominee, Joe Biden, has given more than 89 national and local interviews over roughly the same period of time.

    Other than TV interviews with CBS anchor Katie Couric, ABC anchor Charlie Gibson and conservative Fox News commentator Sean Hannity, Palin hasn’t engaged the press. The effort to shield her is so intense that when she met with foreign leaders in New York last week, the campaign initially would only allow photographers near her.

    “I don’t think the campaign is doing her any favors by not letting her answer any questions,” said PBS political editor Judy Woodruff, who has covered politics for 30 years for CNN and PBS. “If she’s elected vice president of the United States and were she to succeed to the presidency, she needs that interchange with journalists. The American people have a right to know what does she know and how does she think.”

    “The media needs to continue to say, every day, until she has a news conference, ‘When is she going to have a news conference? Why isn’t she having one?’ I just find it astounding,” Woodruff said. “I think the media has a responsibility to continue to point out that this is unlike any presidential or vice presidential candidate in memory. She has been more bottled up.”

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/.....1374LU.DTL

    Once again presenting the point - how dare Palin go directly to the people and try to bypass us, the media, as the gatekeepers to the American public.

    Reagan did some of that, which is why they hated him until he died.

    Frankly Palin needs to hold up a big middle finger to the press, or at least say flat out “You’re trying to destroy me, why should I talk to you?”

    Of course who does the reporter get to comment on this?

    The real loser in this game of hide-the-candidate: voters. Palin was not well-known outside of conservative circles before the campaign chose her. Polls, including one taken by the Pew Research Center, taken over the past few days show that Palin’s approval rating has dropped since she was nominated.

    “The lack of access is potentially damaging in the eyes of the voter, because they are trying to get to know the candidate,” said Paul Dimock, associate director of the nonpartisan Pew Research Center for People and the Press. Palin is especially vulnerable because voters know McCain, Obama and Biden better, he said.

    Only the San Francisco Chronicle could call the extremely far left Pew Center “nonpartisan.”

    They’re nonpartisan in the same way Code Pink, MoveOn.org and Daily Kos are nonpartisan.

    Of course they’re hopeful anyone undecided won’t know that, and of course the Chron’s core reader will agree that Pew is just as balanced as ABC, CBS and NBC, let alone MSNBC…

  25. BillK

    From a totally PO’ed AP:

    Consumer confidence unexpectedly improves in Sept.

    By Anne D’Innocenzio

    NEW YORK (AP) — Americans’ confidence in the economy unexpectedly improved in September, but the reading still hovered near a 16-year low and does not fully reflect the financial meltdown that has rocked Wall Street and Main Street in recent days.

    The Conference Board said Tuesday that its Consumer Confidence Index is now at 59.8, up from a revised 58.5 in August. Economists surveyed by Thomson/IFR expected a reading of 55.5.

    The level remains about half of what it was a year ago and near the lowest since the index registered 54.6 in October 1992 when the economy was coming out of a recession.

    The cutoff date for responses to the survey was September 23 and doesn’t capture Monday’s stock market plunge that wiped away $1.2 trillion in the value of retirement funds, mutual funds and individual stock holdings.

    The Presentation Index, which measures shoppers’ current assessment of the economy, decreased to 58.8 from 65.0 in September. The Expectations Index, which measures consumers’ outlook for the next six months, however, increased to 60.5 from 54.1 in August.

    Consumer spending represents about two-third of all economic activity.

    September’s increase in the Consumer Confidence Index was due solely to an improvement in the short-term outlook,” said Lynn Franco, director of The Conference Board Consumer Research Center, in a statement. “However, these results did not capture all of the tumultuous events in the financial sector this month, and until the dust settles a bit more, we will not know the full impact on consumers’ expectations.” …

    http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080930/economy.html

    Needless to say, Pelosi and friends will now have to work even harder to convince the American public that they’re doomed and that only Democrats can save them from the mess they themselves created…

  26. BillK

    How do we pay for the bailout?

    Why, legalize pot and tax it!

    From the (Madison) Wisconsin State Journal:

    Legalizing, taxing pot urged to raise cash

    By Chris Rickert

    President Bush and the two leading presidential contenders were urging lawmakers to take one for the good of the country Tuesday and pass a highly unpopular Wall Street bailout package.

    Some drug-reform advocates, meanwhile, were suggesting that a better way out of the current financial mess would be to toke one for the country.

    Society could get a great deal of funding by bringing cannabis into our society,” said Gary Storck, co-founder of the Madison chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

    More specifically, legalizing and taxing marijuana and industrial hemp could open up a lucrative revenue stream and help offset a $700 billion taxpayer outlay to save the country’s financial system.

    “Why not look at it?” said Storck, who likens the idea to President Roosevelt’s support for ending prohibition during the Depression. “We need the money. How else are we going to get it?”

    The possible fiscal boon of legalizing marijuana has long been an argument put forth by NORML and like-minded groups, who point to studies showing that the government could be billions of dollars to the good if it taxed the plant and ended its marijuana-related law enforcement efforts.

    Bruce Mirken, director of communications with the Washington, D.C.-based Marijuana Policy Project, said legalization and regulation could mean between $10 billion and $40 billion a year to state and federal budgets.

    “The bottom line is we have a very large industry in this country … that is entirely untaxed and unregulated,” he said.

    Storck and Mirken said there was no organized effort by pro-marijuana groups to lobby for legalization as a way out of the current fiscal crisis, but Storck said he will be talking up the fiscal benefits of legalization at this weekend’s Harvest Festival in Madison. …

    http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/local/307261

    Why not legalize and tax cocaine, heroin and prostitution while we’re at it?

    After all, they’re “entirely untaxed and unregulated” activities in our economy as well, right?

  27. BillK

    The AP gets to mention their favorite President again, FDR:

    McCain, Obama call for greater bank security

    By Steven R. Hurst

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain worked to cool the partisan heat of the financial crisis, with both calling for Congress to regroup and act quickly to prevent a feared financial collapse and foster confidence in the banking system.

    The stock market embraced the new tenor, rocketing upward nearly 500 points on Tuesday, but nearly frozen credit markets - where businesses turn to raise money - showed no sign of a thaw.

    Not since Franklin D. Roosevelt was voted into the White House in the depths of the 1930s Great Depression have presidential hopefuls found themselves in such uncertain economic times and under so much pressure to assure voters they are best able to prevent a feared financial meltdown.

    Republican McCain and Democrat Obama both said Tuesday that politicians needed to set aside politics to save the financial system.

    Together, they backed a call to raise the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. guarantee on bank accounts from a limit of $100,000 to $250,000.

    FDIC Chairwoman Sheila Bair took up the proposal Tuesday afternoon, asking Congress for authority for an unspecified increase in insurance limits. She said most banks remained sound but contended that increasing the insurance cap would help ease the crisis of confidence.

    The Dow Jones industrial average shot up 485 points, reclaiming nearly two-thirds of its staggering 778-point nosedive a day earlier.

    The country’s already reeling financial sector showed signs of coming unglued Monday when the House, contrary to expectations, rejected a $700 billion Bush administration rescue plan. President Bush had sent the measure to Capitol Hill 11 days earlier, declaring fast action essential.

    After a raucous session in which Republican and Democratic lawmakers tried to blame one another for the rejection, it appeared the House would go back into session late Thursday or Friday to take another run at the bailout plan.

    The Senate was scheduled to vote on the plan Wednesday evening, and McCain, Obama and his running mate, Sen. Joe Biden, were returning to Washington for the vote.

    Obama warned it would be “catastrophic” if a deal isn’t reached soon and said Congress should work on the bill it rejected.

    “Given the progress we have made, I believe we are unlikely to succeed if we start from scratch or reopen negotiations about the core elements of the agreement,” the Illinois senator said in a statement. “But in order to pass this plan, we must do more.”

    McCain, whose own Republicans were largely responsible for sinking the bill, acknowledged that lawmakers had failed to convince voters that the deal was urgent.

    Both said the time for blame had passed and action was needed urgently.

    http://customwire.ap.org/dynam.....CANDIDATES

    You’ve got to love spin. Of course the jump in the Dow was due to their call for a new bailout, not to the failure of the existing bailout legislation.

    A banking collapse is “feared.” By whom, other than the Press, who have been stating it over and over like a mantra, along with images of the Great Depression and FDR?

    Why, we need a New Deal! We need a new National Recovery Administration to set salaries and prices!

    It would be a catastrophe if no bailout agreement is reached - after all, stocks might continue to go back up!

    I have no doubt many sectors of Wall Street want to see the bailout occur - but I wonder what the true hit to the economy would be if businesses had to go back to paying as they went rather than devoting all future sales to paying off the loans they’ve taken out?

    What if you once again needed 20% down and a mortgage that would comprise no more than 30% of your debt load to be approved? 10% down in case of a HUD loan that required you to pay for government mandated mortgage insurance in case you defaulted?

    Isn’t it amazing that while the press is decrying the “crash in home prices,” the mayor of Los Angeles among others is studying a plan to spend billions of dollars to ensure the availability of “affordable housing” and no one seems to connect the dots.

    I spend more of my time of late wondering if it’s not so much of a snow job on the part of Democrats as the fact that a majority of Americans may, in fact, have become that economically stupid and welcome socialization of the economy - banks, health care, pharmaceuticals, and who knows what else - as the right thing to do.

    As long as they get bailed out - from credit card debt, from foreclosure, from variable rate mortgages that can, by definition, go up as well as down. From whatever.

    Because you know, it’s not my fault.

  28. BillK

    Hmmm, I didn’t think anything could get a NYC art exhibit pulled unless it favorably reflected on Republicans.

    From Fox News:

    New York Museum Cancels Terror Exhibition After Controversy

    A controversial art exhibition that includes disturbing images of Iraq bombings and Baghdad’s notorious Abu Ghraib prison is looking for a new home after it was yanked from a major New York City art museum over concerns that it glorified terror.

    “The Dialectics of Terror” — formerly called “The Aesthetics of Terror” — was scheduled to open at the Chelsea Art Museum in November. On Friday, however, the museum issued a press release saying the show would not go on and that its curator had quit for “personal reasons.”

    Josh Azzarella’s “Untitled #23 (Lynndied)” displays a well-known photograph of former Army reservist Lynndie England, who was convicted of abusing prisoners at Abu Ghraib in Iraq. But Azzarella’s work alters the image. In the original photograph, England points at the genitals of naked prisoners with one hand while giving a thumbs-up with the other, a cigarette hanging from her mouth.

    Azzarella’s work removes the prisoners, leaving England posing and pointing in front of an empty wall.

    Another work in the exhibit is Romanian artist Cristi Pogacean’s “The Abduction from the Seraglio.” Named for Mozart’s opera by the same name, it is an oriental rug with images from Al Jazeera Television of four Romanian journalists captured in Baghdad.

    Curator Manon Slome canceled the exhibition and resigned her position after disagreeing with Dorothea Keeser, the museum’s founder and president, over what was and was not art, Slome told FOXNews.com. The two had jointly approved the exhibition catalog proof, according to the museum’s press release.

    “There were some irreconcilable differences of opinion,” said Slome. “I really didn’t want this level of controversy. I would like this level of attention to the show and not for what happened to it.”

    Without going into detail, she said the museum was concerned that focusing on terrorism would glorify it.

    Slome is now shopping for a place to carry the exhibition.

    I tremendously care about this show and I would love to find a museum that will take it on,” she said.

    Coco Fusco, a video artist whose work was to be included, said she didn’t support the cancellation, but it may work out in the show’s favor.

    “Some of the most famous artworks of the past 40 years have been censored in some way — and quite often the artists who made them end up having brilliant careers as a result of the institutional repression,” Fusco wrote in an e-mail. …

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,430584,00.html

    Of course once again ignoring the fact that only a government entity can truly censor; all other decisions are business decisions and/or drive by aesthetics. Rights the intelligentsia would like to deny private citizens.

    After all, once all galleries are owned by the state, the state cannot censor, as it’s “Freedom of Speech,”

    There is a method to their madness.

  29. BillK

    From Fox News:

    Unlike Clinton, Biden Gets Pass for Saying He Was ‘Shot At’ in Iraq

    When Hillary Clinton told a tall tale about “landing under sniper fire” in Bosnia, she was accused of “inflating her war experience” by Barack Obama’s campaign — but the campaign has been silent about Joe Biden telling his own questionable story about being “shot at” in Iraq.

    By Bill Sammon

    When Hillary Clinton told a tall tale about “landing under sniper fire” in Bosnia, she was accused of “inflating her war experience” by rival Democrat Barack Obama’s campaign.

    But the campaign has been silent about Obama’s running mate, Joe Biden, telling his own questionable story about being “shot at” in Iraq.

    “Let’s start telling the truth,” Biden said during a presidential primary debate sponsored by YouTube last year. “Number one, you take all the troops out - you better have helicopters ready to take those 3,000 civilians inside the Green Zone, where I have been seven times and shot at. You better make sure you have protection for them, or let them die.”

    But when questioned about the episode afterward by the Hill newspaper, Biden backpedaled from his claim of being “shot at” and instead allowed: “I was near where a shot landed.

    The senior senator from Delaware went on to say that some sort of projectile “landed” outside a building in the Green Zone where he and another senator had spent the night during a visit in December 2005. The lawmakers were shaving in the morning when they felt the building shake, Biden said.

    “No one got up and ran from the room-it wasn’t that kind of thing,” he told the Hill. “It’s not like I had someone holding a gun to my head.”

    The rest of the press ignored the flap at the time because Biden was viewed as having little chance of ending up on the Democratic presidential ticket. But even after Biden was selected to be Obama’s running mate last month, his claim to have been “shot at” drew no scrutiny from the same reporters who had savaged Clinton for making a similar claim that turned out to be false.

    FOX News has been asking the Obama campaign for details of the alleged shooting in Iraq ever since Biden was tapped to be vice president. Biden campaign spokesman David Wade promised an answer last week, but failed to provide one.

    Meanwhile, the gaffe-prone Biden has again raised eyebrows with another story about his exploits in war zones - this time in Afghanistan. Biden said he will grill Republican rival Sarah Palin in Thursday’s vice presidential debate about “the superhighway of terror between Pakistan and Afghanistan where my helicopter was forced down.”

    “If you want to know where Al Qaeda lives, you want to know where Bin Laden is, come back to Afghanistan with me,” Biden bragged to the National Guard Association. “Come back to the area where my helicopter was forced down, with a three-star general and three senators at 10,500 feet in the middle of those mountains. I can tell you where they are.

    But it turns out that inclement weather, not terrorists, prompted the chopper to land in an open field during Biden’s visit to Afghanistan in February. Fighter jets kept watch overhead while a convoy of security vehicles was dispatched to retrieve Biden and fellow Senators Chuck Hagel and John Kerry.

    “We were going to send Biden out to fight the Taliban with snowballs, but we didn’t have to,” joked Kerry, a Democrat, to the AP. “Other than getting a little cold, it was fine.”

    http://elections.foxnews.com/2.....shot-iraq/

    I’d say once again it would be great if Palin could work this in Thursday night, but frankly I’m not expecting anything at all from her; I still love what she stands for but her performance at appearances since the RNC have been less than inspiring.

  30. BillK

    Today’s mocking Palin piece, from the AP:

    Palin Says She Represents ‘Joe Six-Pack’

    ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin portrayed herself Tuesday as a champion of everyday people while noting her family’s stock portfolio took a $20,000 hit last week.

    It’s time that normal Joe Six-pack American is finally represented in the position of vice presidency,” the Republican vice presidential candidate told radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt.

    Palin said if she and John McCain win, they will “put government back on the side of the people of Joe Six-pack like me.”

    Palin said she and her husband, Todd, have been affected by the economic downturn.

    “I know what Americans are going through,” she said a day after a record 778-point plunge on Wall Street. “Todd and I, heck, we’re going through that right now even as we speak, which may put me again kind of on the outs of those Washington elite who don’t like the idea of just an everyday, working-class American running for such an office.”

    Palin makes $125,000 yearly as governor, and her husband makes about $90,000 a year combined from his commercial fishing business and his part-time job as a production operator on the North Slope.

    Palin said her husband’s 401(k) retirement account lost probably $20,000 in the last week as the market dropped.

    According to the most recent state financial disclosure forms, filed March 10, 2008, the Palins had about $164,699 in a private investment account and $198,102 in a separate retirement account.

    “The relatively low number of investments that we have, looking at the hit that we’re taking, probably $20,000 last week in his 401(k) plan that was hit. I’m thinking, geez, the rest of America, they’re facing the exact same thing that we are,” she said.
    Palin was asked to clarify why things are tight for her family.

    “It’s just the great financial crisis that America is in, as our savings accounts also, and a 401(k), they’re being hit,” she said.

    She didn’t explain how her savings account was b