I suppose, too, that exercise will be banned. After all, not only do athletes have to eat more, as does Mr. Phelps, but they no doubt shower more (wasted water!), use more deodorant, wear out shoes more quickly (petroleum products!), and basically are wasting time when they could be Saving the Planet or joining BO’s domestic militia.

Oh, and to those who mentioned race, should we be promoting white skin, over black or brown skin, as it reflects all those global warming rays from the sun?

These people are nuts.

I’m translating it to “Crap and Tirade”

Seems appropriate.

For instance…Eskimos…short thick bodies. They need to keep the heat in. Africans and desert dwellers tend to be sometimes taller and lankier. They need to release more heat into the atmosphere…OOPs…a flaw in their theory?

Food availability has a lot to do with it for sure, but the tendency to be short and thick or tall and lanky has a lot to do with where that race of people come from.

Bet they never considered the very “evolution theory” they keep jamming down our kids in school. My opinion it has to do with what our maker knows our needs will be.

Besides…I can make a sure bet that no matter how much “Co2 emissions” a fat person produces, It can’t match the Co2 emissions of both ends of Rosie O’Donnell, Michael Moore and Al Gore. Not to mention all the Co2 emissions from their traveling to tell we shouldn’t travel!

Lord…if these dimwits would just shut up we would all have enough “greenhouse credits” that would supply the world for 110 years!

The world would be a happier place. Then folks wouldn’t need to eat too much trying to cope with their stupid “theories”

What about an environmental study about the effects of chemical contraceptives on waterways and water species? What about THAT environmental impact?

I read they hooked up a hose to AlToad and measured the output of gaseous waste during 1 minute.

Science isn’t for wimps anymore.

Well, the chief global warming acolyte Al Gore is not that trim himself to begin with

But this….providing our Taxer in Chief an additional way to tax us is just to much. I’m just wondering if he will incorporate thie tax into his new Universal Health program or Cap and Trade – I’m betting on both.

How does a “scientist” logically come to the conclusion that a “fat” person’s emissions are one “tonne” more than a thin person? Lock up a fat person and measure their, ahem, emissions?

How far will “science” go to “prove” their global warming crap? Sure, it’s preferable to be of a normal, desirable weight. First it was cows and cars, now it’s fat people to be blamed for something that nature does with no help from humans!

This is the kind of study that would be produced at UC Bezerkley or Santa Cruz, a study looking for the results it wants and then published those results as fact. On the bright side, it wasn’t funded by OUR tax dollars.

Yet.