« | »

Shocker: Muslims Did Russian Bombings!

From those tireless protectors of the faith at the Associated Press:

Chechen rebels say responsible for Moscow bombings

March 31, 2010

MOSCOW (AP) — A Chechen militant leader has claimed responsibility for twin suicide bombings on Moscow’s subway that killed 39 and wounded scores of others.

Doku Umarov, who leads Islamic militants in Chechnya and nearby regions of Russia’s North Caucasus, says in a statement posted on a pro-rebel Web site that the attacks were an act of revenge for the killing of civilians by Russian security forces.

Umarov’s statement posted Wednesday said the attacks on Russian cities will continue.

Russian authorities have said that the bombings, the first terror attacks in Moscow in six years, were carried out by militants from North Caucasus…

What a stunning development.

Luckily, our watchdog media manfully resisted making any such suggestions, hitherto. After all, they didn’t want to prejudice the Russian authorities or their readers.

In fact, we had somehow gotten the distinct impression that these (now) bombings were done by militant ‘Christians’ from Michigan.

Weird, huh?

This article was posted by Steve on Wednesday, March 31st, 2010. Comments are currently closed.

6 Responses to “Shocker: Muslims Did Russian Bombings!”

  1. beautyofreason says:

    The man who orchestrated the Beslan school massacre of many children referred to himself as “slave of Allah” and wore a green head band with Islamic verse. Other terrorists from that region have been known to say “for Allah” before engaging in murder, I suppose to remind the average infidel that Islam is one reason for the crime.

    So why is it considered wrong to point out the connection? Why does it make a person a bigot to acknowledge the stewing hate, the complete loathing that some Muslims feel for non-Muslim peoples in any country? Even our ally, Saudi Arabia hates religious freedom.

    So why is the mainstream media insistent on politically correctness? Frustrated.

    • Rusty Shackleford says:

      I realize your questions are rhetorical B of R, but…

      Only white anglo males are capable of any bigotry…or…in some cases, “unliberated” white females.

      Everyone else is a victim of the oppression slated upon them by the aforementioned two types.

      Don’t believe me? Go to Iran where all Euro-types are treated “equally”.

      Go to Botswana where all whites are treated “equally”

      etc etc.

      And, just for kicks, go to China and see what kinds of looks you get from the locals because you’re “different”.

      Yes, only white anglo males and “unliberated” white females are capable of bigotry.

      I’ll never forget my female arabic teacher beating me over the head with my study book when I was seven living in North Africa.

      I was certainly treated “equally” then.

      They can all go pound sand. Literally…as far as I’m concerned. A lot will have to change before I accept them in my nation, my home, my world, if you will.

  2. proreason says:

    Isolated incidents.

    Probably won’t happen again.

  3. Reality Bytes says:

    Excerpts from Obama’s call to Putin:

    “Uh, hello, Vlad?! Hey! uhh how’s it goin’?”

    “Now hold on! hold on there.”

    “What? Hey, maybe we can sublet Guantanamo to you.”

    “What’s that? No need? Hey, you’re not gonna waterboard these guys are ya Vlad?”

    “Oh, that’s good. What’s that? What do ya mean the prisoner has to have a pulse for waterboarding to work?”

    “Now hold on, hold, uhh hello…..”

  4. mr_bill says:

    Anybody wanna lay bets on whether or not Russia goes back to Afghanistan for round two?

    Is the enemy of my enemy my friend…politics make strange bedfellows

  5. NoNeoCommies says:

    It’s a good thing for Russia that their government is so flexible.
    The same people that won’t let us go after Iran for exporting terrorism is ready to get medieval on the people that attack them.

« Front Page | To Top
« | »