Shocker: Obama Reverses Self On NASA
From the Orlando Sentinel and YouTube:
Obama says he will protect NASA jobs, budget
Robert Block | Sentinel Staff Writer
August 3, 2008TITUSVILLE - In a dramatic reversal of policy, Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama on Saturday told supporters on the Space Coast he no longer favors slashing NASA’s budget, declaring that the United States “cannot cede our leadership in space.”
Though he said nothing specific about sending astronauts to the moon or Mars — the central focus of NASA’s plans and key to the hopes of many space supporters — Obama was more supportive of the agency than he had ever been publicly…
The Illinois senator promised he would work to add one more space-shuttle flight beyond 2010, the shuttle program’s scheduled end. He said he wanted to ensure thousands of contract workers didn’t lose their jobs. “We cannot afford to lose their expertise,” he said.
NASA has said up to 6,400 KSC workers will be laid off when the shuttle stops flying, though that total will be offset some by Constellation jobs.
Until Saturday, Obama had said he wanted to delay the Constellation man-on-the-moon program for five years to free up money for education programs. His change indicates he considers NASA’s future an important election issue, especially along the critical Interstate 4 corridor…
Obama volunteered his shift in position during a question-and-answer session.
“I know it’s still being reported that we were talking about delaying some aspects of the Constellation program to pay for our early-education program,” he said. “I told my staff we’re going to find an entirely different offset, because we’ve got to make sure that the money going into NASA for basic research and development continues to go there. That has been a top priority for us.”
That position had been “reported” on Obama’s official campaign Web site until it was removed Saturday…
Obama had indicated he would revise his space policy…
Obama also distanced himself slightly from a bipartisan Senate plan to open offshore oil drilling to help finance a $20 billion program to wean the nation off petroleum energy. The plan would allow drilling within 50 miles of Florida’s coast, which is now protected by a 125-mile ban.
Obama had endorsed the plan Friday, only to hear Nelson demand that the 125-mile limit be retained.
On Saturday, Obama was more circumspect:
“The one thing that I’ve said consistently when it comes to the Florida coastline is that as dependent as this state is on tourism . . . we’ve got to proceed with extreme caution when it comes to anything that has an impact on that extraordinary treasure.”
Of course he doesn’t mean one word he says.
He is just pandering for votes in Florida.
Once he is elected (or even out of earshot of Floridians) he will go back to singing his old tune.
This is what he means by “change.” That Mr. Obama can change his position on a dime, depending on which group of potential voters he is courting.
In case anyone has forgotten, here is Mr. Obama vowing to fund “No Child Left Behind” by cutting NASA and specifically its central “Constellation Program,” way back in November 20, 2007:
As the article notes, all mention of Mr. Obama’s plans to delay and thereby effectively kill the Constellation Program has just been carefully airbrushed from his campaign’s website.
But luckily there we can still find past copies of his landmark pronouncement on education (pdf file), “Barack Obama’s Plan For Lifetime Success Through Education,” where he makes this sacred pledge:
But that was then, and this is now:
(Click images to enlarge.)
It’s almost as if we can’t believe a word he says.
Related Articles:
- Obama Slams 'Cheney' Bill - He Voted For
- Obama Spins His Offshore Drilling Shift
- Shocker: Obama Blames 'Gym Reporter'
- Obama Reneges On Vow To African School
- Poor Obama Needs More Time To Think
- Obama Blames Troop Snub On Pentagon
- Obama's Lesson From His First Iraq Trip
- Obama Re-writes Vow To Meet With Iran
- Obama Claims To Back Israel Staunchly
- Obama On The Surge - Some Video Clips
- Obama Demands A Surge In Afghanistan
- NASA Map Shows Worst Carbon Emitters
- Obama Purges Critique Of Surge From Site
- Obama: We Have To Win Afghanistan War
- Obama's 'Empathy' For The 9/11 Terrorists
- Obama Flip Flops On His Iraq War Flip Flop
- Obama Now Wrapping Himself In The Flag
- Obama Also Lied About McCain Lobbyist Cash
- Obama Has His Very Own 'Presidential Seal'
- Obama Lied, Public Campaign Financing Dies
- Obama Flip-Flops On 'United Jerusalem' Vow
- Buried: No Evidence Of Drunk NASA Astronauts
- Sabotage? Astronauts Flying Drunk? At NASA?
- NASA Head Regrets Telling Truth About GW
6 Responses to “Shocker: Obama Reverses Self On NASA”
Leave a Reply
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.





August 3rd, 2008 at 1:18 pm
I am going to sue for Whiplash.
August 3rd, 2008 at 1:48 pm
People stupid enough to believe anything he says deserve to suffer the repercussions. Since the war in Iraq is being fought entirely on borrowed money, ending it doesn’t produce one nickel of revenue, it only lessens the deficit. Remember how the democrats swooped in like vultures to spend the “peace dividend”–more money we didn’t have–proving once again that they don’t want to save anything, they only want to spend it on something else instead.
What brazen liars, every flea-bitten one of them. If I should EVER vote for another democrat again, for anything, each and every one of you may kick my sorry ass.
August 3rd, 2008 at 2:30 pm
BO needs a nickname. How about “backtrack”?
I’m with you 1st, I think I’m getting dizzy with all of BO’s spinning and “changing”. :-)
August 3rd, 2008 at 2:35 pm
Things Obama says that you can bet on:
1) He will raise taxes. On everyone. Every chance he gets.
2) He will cut and run from Iraq.
3) He will work like the dickens to inaugurate government-controlled health care.
4) He has very little sympathy with or understanding of those of us who cling to our guns and our religion.
5) He really doesn’t like this country very much. (All right, he’s never said that last one explicitly, but he still says it quite often.)
August 3rd, 2008 at 2:56 pm
It is truly laughable…
Clintonian in fact.
Yet, what can one expect from a Liberal Senator.
Again, on that note…
“Once he is elected (or even out of earshot of Floridians) he will go back to singing his old tune.”
You see, that sentence can easily be applied to John McCain as well.
That is the problem, two Liberal Populist career Politicians from the Senate…
McCain is already flipping on Taxation, and loves Global Warming alarmism, including Al Gore.
As much as one criticizes Obama for pandering for votes, it only reminds all about the alternative named the Maverick, who has made a career on ‘blowing with the winds’ and ‘placating populist - MSM perception’.
August 3rd, 2008 at 3:44 pm
NASA is one of the few government expenditures that actually provides a return on investment, e.g., technology, science. NASA should be fully funded before a bunch of guilt-and-giveaway social programs. NASA’s budget is less than 1% of the total federal budget. What a bargain…