Washington Post To Start ‘Fact Checking’
From those masters of prevarication at the Washington Post:
[The Fact Checker]
Wednesday, September 19, 2007; Page A06
A presidential campaign is a war of words, not all of them completely accurate, and trying to sort truth from half-truth has traditionally been our job. But the claims and counterclaims of the 2008 candidates now flow, tsunami-like, on blogs, video, talk radio and e-mail.
To help our readers stay on top of this information, we introduce The Fact Checker, the place to go for impartial refereeing of campaign rhetoric.
The Fact Checker will examine controversial claims and statements involving important national issues, including the war in Iraq, immigration, health care, social issues, the economy and the records of the various candidates. It will appear in The Post and at washingtonpost.com.
When we come across a statement at variance with the facts, as best we can establish them, we will point it out. When we find that something is subject to several interpretations, we will also point that out. And whenever possible, we will make a judgment, symbolized by the figure in folklore — and Walt Disney movies — most associated with something less than the truth: Pinocchio.
Our official Pinocchio rating will rate candidates’ statements on a scale of one to four.
On occasion it may not be possible to render a snap judgment because the issue is complex or there are strong arguments on both sides. In such cases, we will withhold our judgment until we can gather more facts.
We will use this column and our companion Web site feature to try to shed as much light as possible on factual controversies that are not easily resolved.
All judgments are subject to debate, second-guessing and criticism from our readers and interested parties — including the campaigns — and will be revised if fresh evidence emerges.
We invite you to continue the discussion on the Web, and to suggest subjects to fact-check, at http://www.washingtonpost.com/factchecker. Significant new fact-check items will also be posted on The Trail, our daily diary of Campaign 2008.
Jiminy Cricket, what a laugh riot.
The adage “physician heal thyself” leaps to mind.
For instance:
And whenever possible, we will make a judgment, symbolized by the figure in folklore — and Walt Disney movies…
The Walt Disney company has thus far produced only one Pinocchio movie.
Going out on a limb and assuming that the rest of the “facts” in this article are accurate, we are awarding this article three (out of a possible five) Pinocchios:
Which, sadly, is a better rating than most Post stories would get.
Related Articles:
- WP Lies To Cover For Democrat/MoveOn Ad
- WP: Global Warming Is Killing Off The Bees
- WP: Romney "Milks" Troop Support "Gimmick"
- WaPo Lied - Iraq Al Qaeda Wants To Attack US
- WaPo: US Is Deporting Liberians To A War Zone
- WaPo: Wal-Mart Hicks Defeated Amnesty Bill
- WP: Congress Nearly As Unpopular As Bush
- WaPo Says Not Enough Illegal Aliens In Texas
- WP: Nobody Cares About New Clinton Books
- WaPo: Ft Dix Plot "Shatters" Terrorist Stereotypes
- The Wash Post Celebrates Murtha, Code Pink
- WaPo Says Iraq's Al-Qaeda Is No Danger To US
- WaPo Reporter, Spy Author... Lewis Libby Juror?
- WP: Iraq 'Temporary Marriages' Are Bush's Fault
- WP Says Voting Rights Act Is Being "Twisted"
- WaPo Demands Free Legal Aid For Illegal Aliens
- WP Leaks Photos From Haditha Report
- Schoolbooks Turn Pinocchio, Tom Sawyer Muslim
- Washington Post Explains Hillary's "Mystique"
- WP: McCarthy Is A Non-Political Whistleblower
- Dana Priest's Pulitzer Prize Winning Agit-Prop
- Washington Post: Republicans Hate Black People
- W-Post Closes Own Blog To Block Anti-Dem Facts
- WaPo: "It's Not Looting, It's Hunter-Gathering"
12 Responses to “Washington Post To Start ‘Fact Checking’”
Leave a Reply
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.



September 19th, 2007 at 1:50 pm
Washington Post checking up on Political “facts”? I guess they are going for the Pulitzer Prize, for HUMOR! This rag couldn’t lie straight in bed.
September 19th, 2007 at 2:01 pm
Did anyone hear about the Belgium guy who took out an article on ebay for people to bid on Belgium. How funny would it be to make an add that says “for sale: Democratic party”
then have some smart ass comments like, “previous owners, moveon.org. , communist USSR, and whoever has money” I think that they would start getting the drift.
September 19th, 2007 at 3:55 pm
Ah the msm is in a quandry - to admit that they lie, to keep pretending they don’t lie or to lie somewhere inbetween. They apparently chose to imply that only Pols lie (sometimes).
Gotta love the internet - catching the lies and the liars who tell them in nanoseconds. And at the same time making the msm obsolete.
Ain’t America Grand?
September 19th, 2007 at 4:00 pm
ATLien…what a hilarious idea, I love it. Seriously, someone should do it!
SG…you are being too kind. I would have given the Washington Post only one pinocchio. (Would a 1/2 Pinocchio be too gross?)
September 19th, 2007 at 9:22 pm
Can anyone find a graphic of the mohammedan Pinocchio after he converted to islam? I think that would be most appropriate for Pinocchio ratings, especially if the New York Times is ever rated.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articl.....59,00.html
September 19th, 2007 at 10:09 pm
OMG, studmuffin. I had never read that article. They can’t have Pinocchio and I really am upset about Tom Sawyer. I hope someone finds a picture of the islamic pinocchio……..I’ve got to see this.
September 19th, 2007 at 11:32 pm
Maybe we could photoshop him into a burqa.
September 19th, 2007 at 11:48 pm
Well, I guess better late than never that they are checking facts.
September 20th, 2007 at 12:13 am
Yeah, we posted about that too, SM:
Schoolbooks Make Pinocchio, Tom Sawyer Muslim | Sweetness & Light
http://sweetness-light.com/arc.....yer-muslim
September 20th, 2007 at 12:14 am
“Well, I guess better late than never that they are checking facts.”
But only Republican candidates’ facts. Not their own.
September 20th, 2007 at 11:20 am
“But only Republican candidates’ facts. Not their own.”
But of course. Our media makes the North Korean media look independent.
September 20th, 2007 at 4:55 pm
It is a said state of affairs in the modern media world when a news outlet actually doing fact checking is considered news.