Spitzer To Make ‘Gay Marriages’ Top Priority
From the New York Post:
SPITZ VOWS TO PUSH FOR GAY MARRIAGES
By FREDRIC U. DICKER State Editor
November 16, 2007 — ALBANY - Gov. Spitzer said at a private fund-raiser that he wants a Democratic-controlled state Senate to legalize gay marriage - a highly divisive and controversial issue - as one of its first priorities in 2009, a witness to the remarks told The Post.
Spitzer, a gay-marriage proponent, pledged to help Democrats next November win the three Senate seats they need to gain the majority.
“One of the first things we’re going to do when [Senate Minority Leader] Malcolm Smith is [majority] leader is gay marriage,” the witness recounted Spitzer as telling some 60 people who paid up to $10,000 each to attend the event in Greenwich Village Wednesday night.
“Everybody applauded when he said that,” said the witness, who was among senators, Democratic activists and lobbyists at a fund-raising event for the Senate Democratic Committee. It was held in the library of the elegant West 13th Street home of HBO’s “Oz” creator Tom Fantana.
Two other witnesses, including an elected official, said they couldn’t recall Spitzer’s exact language, but added that the governor suggested a Democratic-controlled state Senate would follow the state Assembly’s action this year in passing, for the first time ever, a gay-marriage bill.
Spitzer spokeswoman Christine Anderson denied the governor said a Democratic-controlled Senate would make gay marriage a top priority. She said his reference to the Assembly passing a gay-marriage bill “was the line greeted with applause.”
While Spitzer’s remarks to public and private gatherings are often recorded, Anderson said there was no recording from the event…
During his election campaign last fall Spitzer repeatedly endorsed gay marriage, but said its adoption wasn’t one of his top priorities…
He doesn’t seem to be able to stop himself.
Maybe Hillary needs to do an intervention.
Related Articles:
- Hillary "Best Equipped" To Push Gay Rights
- Time Says Hillary Is A "Pragmatic Moderate"
- New Gay Protection Law Called "A Betrayal"
- NYT Says Old Age Hits Homosexuals Hardest
- Homosexuals Mock 'Last Supper' In Sex Ad
- MD Court Upholds Homosexual Marriage Ban
- What's On Before, After Dem "Gay Debate"
- ACLU Gets Homosexuals Conjugal Prison Visits
- Hillary Clinton Backslides On Her "Gay Pride"
- Meehan, Frank Want Homosexuals In Military
- Hillary To Gays: Bush Puts Nixon To Shame
- GLAAD: Studds An Education For Congress
- Dean Will Go To The Mat For 'Gay Marriages'
5 Responses to “Spitzer To Make ‘Gay Marriages’ Top Priority”
Leave a Reply
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.




November 16th, 2007 at 3:14 pm
Of course he can’t stop himself. He’s a lib. Libs don’t give a damn about what the majority of the country wants.
Noone would have ever had to tell me that Spitzer is a democrat. Just looking at his creepy mug tells me he is a democrat. Have you noticed that many libs have that degenerate creep to them?
November 16th, 2007 at 11:58 pm
So, since he couldn’t get away with illegal driver’s licenses, he’ll try to shove the next best thing for destroying the social fabric of America down our collective throats….gay marriage. This man may only be a governor of NY, but he is dangerous. And if Hillary should ever be elected POTUS, I suspect this prick would be her AG. Now that is really scary and dangerous.
November 17th, 2007 at 1:11 am
Never take your eye off leftists, they’re always hatching plans to destroy western society with their schemes. Seldom allow them anything ground, because it only encourages them.
November 17th, 2007 at 1:22 am
What makes anyone think that any of this will matter?
If Hillary is elected I’m sure gay marriage will be legalized at the federal level by passage of an anti-discrimination policy that simply will deny federal monies to any state that does not legalize it.
This same move was used to lower the supposedly state-decided BAC level nationwide to 0.08 or below.
November 17th, 2007 at 1:28 am
So I suppose the Statue of Liberty will stop being known as “Lady Liberty” and will hence forth be reffered to as “Alternative Lifestyle Liberty”? Or “Transgendered Liberty”? Face it, without being able to look under the robes… how do we know for sure?