<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Crt Stays Chrysler Sale &#8211; Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:55:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BannedbytheTaliban</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149909</link>
		<dc:creator>BannedbytheTaliban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149909</guid>
		<description>This may indeed be the tipping point that will turn the tide against Obama.  He will either be seceded power by the SCOTUS to circumvent the laws or will have to act in spite of the SCOTUS ruling.  However there is precedent for this.  During the Jackson administration, the Congress passed the Indian Removal Act that was declared unconstitutional by the Marshall court.  Jackson went ahead with the removal, the Trail of Tears, and he said of the ruling &quot;Marshall made the decision, now let him enforce it.&quot; 

Jackson may be the only prior POTUS with as much ego as Obama, but even he falls short.  These are interesting times in which we live.  America will never be the same after this administration.  Hopefully the people will pull their heads out of Obama’s butt and wake up before it gets too bad.

And if he does go over the court ruling, IMPEACH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may indeed be the tipping point that will turn the tide against Obama.  He will either be seceded power by the SCOTUS to circumvent the laws or will have to act in spite of the SCOTUS ruling.  However there is precedent for this.  During the Jackson administration, the Congress passed the Indian Removal Act that was declared unconstitutional by the Marshall court.  Jackson went ahead with the removal, the Trail of Tears, and he said of the ruling &#8220;Marshall made the decision, now let him enforce it.&#8221; </p>
<p>Jackson may be the only prior POTUS with as much ego as Obama, but even he falls short.  These are interesting times in which we live.  America will never be the same after this administration.  Hopefully the people will pull their heads out of Obama’s butt and wake up before it gets too bad.</p>
<p>And if he does go over the court ruling, IMPEACH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wardmama4</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149902</link>
		<dc:creator>wardmama4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149902</guid>
		<description>But you guys - all your points make the &lt;b&gt;real&lt;/b&gt; point - yes Ginsberg (et al) is liberal - but voting against this lawsuit - &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;will make the Supreme Court irrelevant&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.  

By giving Teleprompter Precedent &lt;b&gt;the power to ignore the _____ (ok, pick one 4th - without due process, 10th States over Federal Government) Constitution/Amendment and of course (hypocrite thy name is Democrat) the &#039;Rule of Law&#039;, they would effectively make themselves a &lt;b&gt;moot and extinct institution&lt;/b&gt;. 

And they have an out - whether they use Contract Law, the secured debts v unsecured debt or go into the various ways this &#039;deal&#039; violates the Constitution - the Supreme Court can stand with what is Right and win one for We The People.

Hey, we all knew The One (tm) was going to over reach and fall flat on his face - we just didn&#039;t expect it to be this fast.

I found it particularly noxious as to how even FNC went to the &#039;the Indiana pension groups do not want the unsecured debt holders to be paid&#039; - NOT. The Groups in this lawsuit simply want the &#039;Rule&#039; of Law to be followed and to be paid first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you guys &#8211; all your points make the <b>real</b> point &#8211; yes Ginsberg (et al) is liberal &#8211; but voting against this lawsuit &#8211; <b><i>will make the Supreme Court irrelevant</i></b>.  </p>
<p>By giving Teleprompter Precedent <b>the power to ignore the _____ (ok, pick one 4th &#8211; without due process, 10th States over Federal Government) Constitution/Amendment and of course (hypocrite thy name is Democrat) the &#8216;Rule of Law&#8217;, they would effectively make themselves a </b><b>moot and extinct institution</b>. </p>
<p>And they have an out &#8211; whether they use Contract Law, the secured debts v unsecured debt or go into the various ways this &#8216;deal&#8217; violates the Constitution &#8211; the Supreme Court can stand with what is Right and win one for We The People.</p>
<p>Hey, we all knew The One &#8482; was going to over reach and fall flat on his face &#8211; we just didn&#8217;t expect it to be this fast.</p>
<p>I found it particularly noxious as to how even FNC went to the &#8216;the Indiana pension groups do not want the unsecured debt holders to be paid&#8217; &#8211; NOT. The Groups in this lawsuit simply want the &#8216;Rule&#8217; of Law to be followed and to be paid first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catie</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149900</link>
		<dc:creator>catie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149900</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m somewhat surprised by this when one thinks about her ruling in the eminent domain case a few years ago.  I was also watching Beck yesterday afternoon and saw the Judge&#039;s explanation.  I am somewhat hopeful but . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m somewhat surprised by this when one thinks about her ruling in the eminent domain case a few years ago.  I was also watching Beck yesterday afternoon and saw the Judge&#8217;s explanation.  I am somewhat hopeful but . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149885</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149885</guid>
		<description>I saw this militant commerical,  iron fist punching out from the tube, communist themed, power, etc. and low and behold it was a new GM commercial. They said they will only be making and carrying a few models now, all hybrids, built better and will save the world. Phew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this militant commerical,  iron fist punching out from the tube, communist themed, power, etc. and low and behold it was a new GM commercial. They said they will only be making and carrying a few models now, all hybrids, built better and will save the world. Phew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U NO HOO</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149852</link>
		<dc:creator>U NO HOO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149852</guid>
		<description>Appears that Fiat will be elected rather than selected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appears that Fiat will be elected rather than selected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwilightZoned</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149851</link>
		<dc:creator>TwilightZoned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149851</guid>
		<description>I would hope Ginsberg has some scruples, but if BHO&#039;s turning his back on Isreal is what it took then so be it.  Glenn Beck had Judge Napolitano on tonight discussing this and he suggested the other supreme court judges have been watching this situation carefully and asked to be consulted.  Let&#039;s hope he&#039;s correct.  If they act, which I believe they will, a precedence will be set putting an end to this type of shenanigans by BHO and his cronies.  Hallelujah the Constitution may save us yet!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hope Ginsberg has some scruples, but if BHO&#8217;s turning his back on Isreal is what it took then so be it.  Glenn Beck had Judge Napolitano on tonight discussing this and he suggested the other supreme court judges have been watching this situation carefully and asked to be consulted.  Let&#8217;s hope he&#8217;s correct.  If they act, which I believe they will, a precedence will be set putting an end to this type of shenanigans by BHO and his cronies.  Hallelujah the Constitution may save us yet!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odie44</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149841</link>
		<dc:creator>Odie44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149841</guid>
		<description>Does anyone think Bambi&#039;s treatment of Isreal has anything to do with Ginsberg&#039;s &quot;inner voice&quot;???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone think Bambi&#8217;s treatment of Isreal has anything to do with Ginsberg&#8217;s &#8220;inner voice&#8221;???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curvyred</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149684</link>
		<dc:creator>curvyred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149684</guid>
		<description>Yes, aren&#039;t these the &quot;evil rich people&quot; (school teachers, firefighters and other fund holders) that he already demonized and marginalized. His fan boys and girls ate it up with abandon. 

I really hope this comes to a reasonable outcome and that the SCOTUS follows the letter of the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, aren&#8217;t these the &#8220;evil rich people&#8221; (school teachers, firefighters and other fund holders) that he already demonized and marginalized. His fan boys and girls ate it up with abandon. </p>
<p>I really hope this comes to a reasonable outcome and that the SCOTUS follows the letter of the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwilightZoned</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149679</link>
		<dc:creator>TwilightZoned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149679</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ginsburg could act on her own or could refer the matter to the full court. A stay from the full court would require the votes of five of the nine Supreme Court members.&quot;

And this is THE key.  If she acts on her own...my gut tells me this is dead in the water.  Referring it to the full court would most likely provide a win and she knows it.  The irony is if this same situation had happened under a Republican controlled congress Ginsburg likely would have jumped all over this as unlawful.  Let&#039;s ALL pray Ginsburg has some ethics.  Absolutely, MR, this IS a defining point moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ginsburg could act on her own or could refer the matter to the full court. A stay from the full court would require the votes of five of the nine Supreme Court members.&#8221;</p>
<p>And this is THE key.  If she acts on her own&#8230;my gut tells me this is dead in the water.  Referring it to the full court would most likely provide a win and she knows it.  The irony is if this same situation had happened under a Republican controlled congress Ginsburg likely would have jumped all over this as unlawful.  Let&#8217;s ALL pray Ginsburg has some ethics.  Absolutely, MR, this IS a defining point moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149677</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149677</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right MR.

This will be a defining moment.

We know Roberts, Thomas, Scalia and Alito are solid.

Is there just one of the libwit SCOTUS&#039;s who believes in the constitution and the rule of law.....and not The Moron&#039;s lib-service rule of law.

The knee-breakers will be out in force on this one.  No unaccompanied jogging please for the distinguished 9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right MR.</p>
<p>This will be a defining moment.</p>
<p>We know Roberts, Thomas, Scalia and Alito are solid.</p>
<p>Is there just one of the libwit SCOTUS&#8217;s who believes in the constitution and the rule of law&#8230;..and not The Moron&#8217;s lib-service rule of law.</p>
<p>The knee-breakers will be out in force on this one.  No unaccompanied jogging please for the distinguished 9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tranquil.night</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149671</link>
		<dc:creator>tranquil.night</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149671</guid>
		<description>Well you have to wonder what some of our intellectual warriors up in the SCOTUS have been thinking as they&#039;ve watched these past six months.  Obviously Big O is going to try and marginalize or demonize any opposition, or underscore the necessity of the deal for how many jobs it will save and blahblah.  I pray they&#039;ll enact the stay.  Little is worse than abandoning the fight for such a core and essential American standard (and alot of people&#039;s investments!), even though we know the government is probably going to win this one for now.

Nobody I know will engage in politics anymore either, even if they have a general idea of how serious everything is.  Even my conservative parents don&#039;t want the details anymore since it will just get them angry.  My only real other options is to come home to S&amp;L to pursue the truth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well you have to wonder what some of our intellectual warriors up in the SCOTUS have been thinking as they&#8217;ve watched these past six months.  Obviously Big O is going to try and marginalize or demonize any opposition, or underscore the necessity of the deal for how many jobs it will save and blahblah.  I pray they&#8217;ll enact the stay.  Little is worse than abandoning the fight for such a core and essential American standard (and alot of people&#8217;s investments!), even though we know the government is probably going to win this one for now.</p>
<p>Nobody I know will engage in politics anymore either, even if they have a general idea of how serious everything is.  Even my conservative parents don&#8217;t want the details anymore since it will just get them angry.  My only real other options is to come home to S&amp;L to pursue the truth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jobeth</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149662</link>
		<dc:creator>jobeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149662</guid>
		<description>Well said!!!!  I&#039;m truly praying about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said!!!!  I&#8217;m truly praying about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MinnesotaRush</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149658</link>
		<dc:creator>MinnesotaRush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-asked-to-block-chrysler-deal#comment-149658</guid>
		<description>GOD BLESS THESE FOLKS!!!

Finally .. somebody threw a road block (or at least a speed bump) into this purposeful mangling of the &quot;rule of law&quot; by the o-blah-blah gang!

I&#039;m convinced that many to most folks simply are not &quot;engaging&quot; with all this stuff that&#039;s going on and even considering the short, mid, and long term rammifications - for whatever reasons. They may not understand it, they may not want to understand it or get involved, and/or they simply don&#039;t care.

These two paragraphs are HUGE and very revealing of the problem(s) and illustrative of the dangerous nature of allowing these things to go on.

&quot;The pension funds, which hold about $42 million of Chrysler’s $6.9 billion in secured loans, have argued the sale unlawfully rewarded unsecured creditors such as the union ahead of secured lenders and that Chrysler was pursuing an illegal reorganization plan through a sham sale.&quot;
&quot;The public is watching and needs to see that, particularly, when the system is under stress, the rule of law will be honored and an independent judiciary will properly scrutinize the actions of the massively powerful executive branch,&quot; the lawyers said.&quot;

This .. is a turning point action .. a defining point moment.

If this request gets glossed over or brushed aside, it will strongly suggest/indicate (you pick) that the executive branch is now capable and willing to ignore and circumvent the other 2 branches of our government. That .. equates to the evolution of our government into a dictatorship. Chicago thug politics.

These folks have a very legitimate request for the Court. This needs to be watched closely and supported. We may have come to another potential tripwire in this malay that is o-blah-blah and his administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOD BLESS THESE FOLKS!!!</p>
<p>Finally .. somebody threw a road block (or at least a speed bump) into this purposeful mangling of the &#8220;rule of law&#8221; by the o-blah-blah gang!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m convinced that many to most folks simply are not &#8220;engaging&#8221; with all this stuff that&#8217;s going on and even considering the short, mid, and long term rammifications &#8211; for whatever reasons. They may not understand it, they may not want to understand it or get involved, and/or they simply don&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>These two paragraphs are HUGE and very revealing of the problem(s) and illustrative of the dangerous nature of allowing these things to go on.</p>
<p>&#8220;The pension funds, which hold about $42 million of Chrysler’s $6.9 billion in secured loans, have argued the sale unlawfully rewarded unsecured creditors such as the union ahead of secured lenders and that Chrysler was pursuing an illegal reorganization plan through a sham sale.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;The public is watching and needs to see that, particularly, when the system is under stress, the rule of law will be honored and an independent judiciary will properly scrutinize the actions of the massively powerful executive branch,&#8221; the lawyers said.&#8221;</p>
<p>This .. is a turning point action .. a defining point moment.</p>
<p>If this request gets glossed over or brushed aside, it will strongly suggest/indicate (you pick) that the executive branch is now capable and willing to ignore and circumvent the other 2 branches of our government. That .. equates to the evolution of our government into a dictatorship. Chicago thug politics.</p>
<p>These folks have a very legitimate request for the Court. This needs to be watched closely and supported. We may have come to another potential tripwire in this malay that is o-blah-blah and his administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

