<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Reverses Sotomayor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jobeth</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152502</link>
		<dc:creator>jobeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152502</guid>
		<description>&quot;Forrest Gump &quot;

I&#039;ve heard of him...brilliant man! ;-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Forrest Gump &#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard of him&#8230;brilliant man! ;-D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152468</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152468</guid>
		<description>A Great Man once said, &quot;Stupid is as Stupid does!!&quot;
Forrest Gump from his upcoming Best Seller, &quot;Momma says .....&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Great Man once said, &#8220;Stupid is as Stupid does!!&#8221;<br />
Forrest Gump from his upcoming Best Seller, &#8220;Momma says &#8230;..&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MinnesotaRush</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152466</link>
		<dc:creator>MinnesotaRush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152466</guid>
		<description>greasywrench said ..

&quot;Of course those (and most) tests were/are biased. Tests are supposed to discriminate…. against the unprepared, ignorant, and the stupid. Can anyone think of a better reason for a test?&quot;

Is it too late for a test for the Presidency? It certainly seems o-blah-blah is indeed unprepared, ignorant, and stupid.

(gotta come up with a test for the voters, too) (bye, bye ACORN)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>greasywrench said ..</p>
<p>&#8220;Of course those (and most) tests were/are biased. Tests are supposed to discriminate…. against the unprepared, ignorant, and the stupid. Can anyone think of a better reason for a test?&#8221;</p>
<p>Is it too late for a test for the Presidency? It certainly seems o-blah-blah is indeed unprepared, ignorant, and stupid.</p>
<p>(gotta come up with a test for the voters, too) (bye, bye ACORN)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jobeth</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152409</link>
		<dc:creator>jobeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152409</guid>
		<description>Greasywrench...I see your point! :-)  And I completely I agree with you, however I don&#039;t see that as cultural bias. That is just rightfully weeding out the stupid or uninformed. Of course they claim that as cultural bias.

They are saying they can&#039;t learn because they come from a &quot;poor&quot; or deprived background.  They want the test to better reflect THEIR experiences in life...not the one we use (or should use) now as a goal...not one that holds up the betterment of thought and ideas as a goal.  

Can you see one of those questions?

 Q- &quot;Yo!  Bro!  Did yo see DA bro hoes take DA “deck,”? ( a glassine envelope of a white powdery substance.)  (FYI...copied this sentence from somewhere else...I&#039;m not that street savy...LOL)

Yep...she might get that one right where you and I would fail that test.  That&#039;s fair...right?  &gt; :- I (sarc)

I would be so embarrassed to know I got in a university slot or a professional job even though I didn&#039;t have the intelligence to be there.

If I did get one under those conditions, I surely wouldn&#039;t be bragging about it like Sotomayor.  That alone says volumes about her smarts.

What she and others who get affirmative action helps are saying is that they admit they aren&#039;t very smart and can&#039;t make it without a &quot;handicap allowance&quot; (as in golf).  

As I said...maybe...maybe a child can be culturally deprived, but somehow, by the time they get to be an adult, surly they can&#039;t (I know..they do anyway) expect to be spoon fed due to &quot;cultural bias&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greasywrench&#8230;I see your point! :-)  And I completely I agree with you, however I don&#8217;t see that as cultural bias. That is just rightfully weeding out the stupid or uninformed. Of course they claim that as cultural bias.</p>
<p>They are saying they can&#8217;t learn because they come from a &#8220;poor&#8221; or deprived background.  They want the test to better reflect THEIR experiences in life&#8230;not the one we use (or should use) now as a goal&#8230;not one that holds up the betterment of thought and ideas as a goal.  </p>
<p>Can you see one of those questions?</p>
<p> Q- &#8220;Yo!  Bro!  Did yo see DA bro hoes take DA “deck,”? ( a glassine envelope of a white powdery substance.)  (FYI&#8230;copied this sentence from somewhere else&#8230;I&#8217;m not that street savy&#8230;LOL)</p>
<p>Yep&#8230;she might get that one right where you and I would fail that test.  That&#8217;s fair&#8230;right?  &gt; :- I (sarc)</p>
<p>I would be so embarrassed to know I got in a university slot or a professional job even though I didn&#8217;t have the intelligence to be there.</p>
<p>If I did get one under those conditions, I surely wouldn&#8217;t be bragging about it like Sotomayor.  That alone says volumes about her smarts.</p>
<p>What she and others who get affirmative action helps are saying is that they admit they aren&#8217;t very smart and can&#8217;t make it without a &#8220;handicap allowance&#8221; (as in golf).  </p>
<p>As I said&#8230;maybe&#8230;maybe a child can be culturally deprived, but somehow, by the time they get to be an adult, surly they can&#8217;t (I know..they do anyway) expect to be spoon fed due to &#8220;cultural bias&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badcrow</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152403</link>
		<dc:creator>badcrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152403</guid>
		<description>A couple of observations...

First, this should have never gotten past the first court case which should have been decided for the NH Firemen instantly and unanimously.  That this issue went further is a scary testament to how deeply Americans are invested in wrong-headed ideas.

Second, the idea of &quot;biased&quot; testing is questionable.  Tests of any form are &quot;biased&quot; by definition.  All tests are tilted in favor of the testee who has accumulated the knowledge needed to correctly answer the questions.  In other words, tests are designed to measure your knowledge of certain information.  If you KNOW the information the test &quot;favors&quot; you.  If you don&#039;t know what is required, then you can&#039;t score adequately.  What does race, culture or backround have to do with accumulating the knowledge necessary to answer questions that measure your knowledge?  The answer is NONE.  2+2=4 for both whites and minorities.  Pearl Harbor was bombed on Dec.7 no matter what race you are.  Questions related to Fire Fighting also have distinct and correct answers which have nothing to do with the ethnicity of the test taker.  Because Fire Dept. Jobs are so dangerous, it&#039;s reasonable to assume that candidates for command that have not accumulated the required knowledge measured by objective testing are absolutely UNQUALIFIED for command and are dangerous both to the public and those under their command.
&quot;Cultural&quot; biases in testing could exist, say if the test was given in Swahili and a few of the testees did not have command of that tounge, however it could also be said that even that &quot;command&quot; is prerequisite knowledge that is required....
Finding reasonable examples of cultural biases is possible, though off-hand, I&#039;m having a hard time thinking of one.  But in general the concept has been expanded and inflated well beyond it&#039;s actual effects on testing....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of observations&#8230;</p>
<p>First, this should have never gotten past the first court case which should have been decided for the NH Firemen instantly and unanimously.  That this issue went further is a scary testament to how deeply Americans are invested in wrong-headed ideas.</p>
<p>Second, the idea of &#8220;biased&#8221; testing is questionable.  Tests of any form are &#8220;biased&#8221; by definition.  All tests are tilted in favor of the testee who has accumulated the knowledge needed to correctly answer the questions.  In other words, tests are designed to measure your knowledge of certain information.  If you KNOW the information the test &#8220;favors&#8221; you.  If you don&#8217;t know what is required, then you can&#8217;t score adequately.  What does race, culture or backround have to do with accumulating the knowledge necessary to answer questions that measure your knowledge?  The answer is NONE.  2+2=4 for both whites and minorities.  Pearl Harbor was bombed on Dec.7 no matter what race you are.  Questions related to Fire Fighting also have distinct and correct answers which have nothing to do with the ethnicity of the test taker.  Because Fire Dept. Jobs are so dangerous, it&#8217;s reasonable to assume that candidates for command that have not accumulated the required knowledge measured by objective testing are absolutely UNQUALIFIED for command and are dangerous both to the public and those under their command.<br />
&#8220;Cultural&#8221; biases in testing could exist, say if the test was given in Swahili and a few of the testees did not have command of that tounge, however it could also be said that even that &#8220;command&#8221; is prerequisite knowledge that is required&#8230;.<br />
Finding reasonable examples of cultural biases is possible, though off-hand, I&#8217;m having a hard time thinking of one.  But in general the concept has been expanded and inflated well beyond it&#8217;s actual effects on testing&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152396</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152396</guid>
		<description>I love it when we all &quot;PLAY&quot; like adults here!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it when we all &#8220;PLAY&#8221; like adults here!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wardmama4</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152392</link>
		<dc:creator>wardmama4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152392</guid>
		<description>Not only that HR - but where do people like me fit in - raised completely utterly (supposedly rich) conservative, religious white - but I&#039;m not completely white? I could &#039;pass&#039; for a minority, if I wanted to - many people have told me, don&#039;t mail that resume - go in - you&#039;ll get that job in a heartbeat. But is that fair to the other applicants?

I still struggle with filling out these &#039;racial&#039; questions - as 1/2 of my background is a great big ? mark and it does appear to be a very big part of who I am. 

And I&#039;ve have known a &#039;black&#039; family - that is whiter than I will ever be - and I know personally the horrible struggle they had as the &#039;black&#039; community did not want to accept them - even though more than 3/4 of their genetics (which is higher than The One&#039;s (tm)) is black. Is that &#039;fair&#039; and &#039;justice&#039; and of course the Liberal&#039;s favorite word - tolerant?

But that is what the Liberal&#039;s want - chaos, anger, hate, divisiveness, anarchy - so that indeed when the next John Brown incident in America happens - they can step in and take away all of our &lt;b&gt;Rights&lt;/b&gt; in one single swoop. 

And then we will be Iran - run by a puppet dictator who is controlled by unknown forces bent on World Domination. 

Hitler would be so proud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only that HR &#8211; but where do people like me fit in &#8211; raised completely utterly (supposedly rich) conservative, religious white &#8211; but I&#8217;m not completely white? I could &#8216;pass&#8217; for a minority, if I wanted to &#8211; many people have told me, don&#8217;t mail that resume &#8211; go in &#8211; you&#8217;ll get that job in a heartbeat. But is that fair to the other applicants?</p>
<p>I still struggle with filling out these &#8216;racial&#8217; questions &#8211; as 1/2 of my background is a great big ? mark and it does appear to be a very big part of who I am. </p>
<p>And I&#8217;ve have known a &#8216;black&#8217; family &#8211; that is whiter than I will ever be &#8211; and I know personally the horrible struggle they had as the &#8216;black&#8217; community did not want to accept them &#8211; even though more than 3/4 of their genetics (which is higher than The One&#8217;s &#8482;) is black. Is that &#8216;fair&#8217; and &#8216;justice&#8217; and of course the Liberal&#8217;s favorite word &#8211; tolerant?</p>
<p>But that is what the Liberal&#8217;s want &#8211; chaos, anger, hate, divisiveness, anarchy &#8211; so that indeed when the next John Brown incident in America happens &#8211; they can step in and take away all of our <b>Rights</b> in one single swoop. </p>
<p>And then we will be Iran &#8211; run by a puppet dictator who is controlled by unknown forces bent on World Domination. </p>
<p>Hitler would be so proud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greasywrench</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152391</link>
		<dc:creator>greasywrench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152391</guid>
		<description>Of course those (and most) tests were/are biased. Tests are supposed to discriminate.... against the unprepared, ignorant, and the stupid. Can anyone think of a better reason for a test?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course those (and most) tests were/are biased. Tests are supposed to discriminate&#8230;. against the unprepared, ignorant, and the stupid. Can anyone think of a better reason for a test?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wardmama4</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152389</link>
		<dc:creator>wardmama4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152389</guid>
		<description>I must apologize - I did jump on the first part (let&#039;s play Suppose for a minute) and did not catch the end. My problem not yours.
I must remember to read an entire post - twice - to get the real gist of it before commenting. 

And yes, you and I are on the same page - just from different angles. Again, my apologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must apologize &#8211; I did jump on the first part (let&#8217;s play Suppose for a minute) and did not catch the end. My problem not yours.<br />
I must remember to read an entire post &#8211; twice &#8211; to get the real gist of it before commenting. </p>
<p>And yes, you and I are on the same page &#8211; just from different angles. Again, my apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbie</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152386</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152386</guid>
		<description>Dear Georgfelis - you make the same point as Wardmama4 - it&#039;s just written in a slightly different way.  Yes, Georgfelis, there would have been claims of discrimination.  Why is it that discrimination is not easily identified?  Because we&#039;ve had many, many years that discrimination only occurs only to &#039;minorities&#039;  (I know that&#039;s a very simplistic, quick answer.  Others here can give far more learned responses incorporating culture, biases, history etc etc.  But it&#039;s the same bottmo line.)

 And, Georgfelis, the only rules I know of on this blog is to use proper punctuation and avoid vulgarities and violent language. I think, however, SG should add a rule about reading and understanding someone&#039;s comments before jumping on the commenter.  Georgfelis - &#039;Play suppose&#039; all you want - it&#039;s called being &#039;hypothetical&#039; and we all engage in it.  Your points are as welcome here as anyone else.  Unless there&#039;s a special &#039;subcommittee&#039; of self-assigned censors here??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Georgfelis &#8211; you make the same point as Wardmama4 &#8211; it&#8217;s just written in a slightly different way.  Yes, Georgfelis, there would have been claims of discrimination.  Why is it that discrimination is not easily identified?  Because we&#8217;ve had many, many years that discrimination only occurs only to &#8216;minorities&#8217;  (I know that&#8217;s a very simplistic, quick answer.  Others here can give far more learned responses incorporating culture, biases, history etc etc.  But it&#8217;s the same bottmo line.)</p>
<p> And, Georgfelis, the only rules I know of on this blog is to use proper punctuation and avoid vulgarities and violent language. I think, however, SG should add a rule about reading and understanding someone&#8217;s comments before jumping on the commenter.  Georgfelis &#8211; &#8216;Play suppose&#8217; all you want &#8211; it&#8217;s called being &#8216;hypothetical&#8217; and we all engage in it.  Your points are as welcome here as anyone else.  Unless there&#8217;s a special &#8216;subcommittee&#8217; of self-assigned censors here??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georgfelis</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152385</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgfelis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152385</guid>
		<description>Wardmama4, thank you for proving my point so eloquently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wardmama4, thank you for proving my point so eloquently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wardmama4</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152381</link>
		<dc:creator>wardmama4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152381</guid>
		<description>Your supposition is a fantasy, as the City would not even hesitate for a nanosecond not to promote and publish in every single msm outlet that hey, look here at how &#039;fair&#039; and &#039;just&#039; our test was and how &#039;smart&#039; our black firefighters are. (And how dumb our white firefighters are).

And it does not matter at all - discrimination is discrimination. It does not matter who is discriminated against and who is doing the discriminating.

And until that attitude is ingrained into each and every mind in America - we will continue to see people (mostly minorities) complaining that the tests are racially biased and whites being marginalized and discriminated against to favor someone - not on their character, not on their education, not on their skills and talents - but rather on their color.

And that is discrimination any way you, ahem, color it.

BTW - &lt;blockquote&gt;Lets play “Suppose” for a minute.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Games are for children. Grow up before you participate in debate, discussion and serious civil and social matters in America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your supposition is a fantasy, as the City would not even hesitate for a nanosecond not to promote and publish in every single msm outlet that hey, look here at how &#8216;fair&#8217; and &#8216;just&#8217; our test was and how &#8216;smart&#8217; our black firefighters are. (And how dumb our white firefighters are).</p>
<p>And it does not matter at all &#8211; discrimination is discrimination. It does not matter who is discriminated against and who is doing the discriminating.</p>
<p>And until that attitude is ingrained into each and every mind in America &#8211; we will continue to see people (mostly minorities) complaining that the tests are racially biased and whites being marginalized and discriminated against to favor someone &#8211; not on their character, not on their education, not on their skills and talents &#8211; but rather on their color.</p>
<p>And that is discrimination any way you, ahem, color it.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211;<br />
<blockquote>Lets play “Suppose” for a minute.</p></blockquote>
<p> Games are for children. Grow up before you participate in debate, discussion and serious civil and social matters in America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152374</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152374</guid>
		<description>JoeBeth, I agree with you.  Also, another thing is the courts write what ever they want as to how they came to a decision. They use formatted outdated rulings themselves. They keep earlier rulings in their data-base, that have been overturned, or actually won in the Supreme Court. The system is so corrupt. The main objective and goal of judges is to squash a case and dismiss a case. They are all made to have to be appealed and appealed, knowing the claiments have limited funds, yet the federal govt has the U.S. Attorney General and unlimited rescourses and total control. 
It&#039;s all so corrupt, and Obama&#039;s main purpose in choosing Sotomayor is he wants someone to change the constitution. 
He want a yes wo-man. He wants a puppet in the Supreme Court. Obama wants total control, and she will be the one to do it. It didn&#039;t surprise me when Obama said no testing would be done. It would be interesting to know her grade on the bar exam. In Obama&#039;s eyes, he considers himself the one to run the world. There is no one he admires but himself. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JoeBeth, I agree with you.  Also, another thing is the courts write what ever they want as to how they came to a decision. They use formatted outdated rulings themselves. They keep earlier rulings in their data-base, that have been overturned, or actually won in the Supreme Court. The system is so corrupt. The main objective and goal of judges is to squash a case and dismiss a case. They are all made to have to be appealed and appealed, knowing the claiments have limited funds, yet the federal govt has the U.S. Attorney General and unlimited rescourses and total control.<br />
It&#8217;s all so corrupt, and Obama&#8217;s main purpose in choosing Sotomayor is he wants someone to change the constitution.<br />
He want a yes wo-man. He wants a puppet in the Supreme Court. Obama wants total control, and she will be the one to do it. It didn&#8217;t surprise me when Obama said no testing would be done. It would be interesting to know her grade on the bar exam. In Obama&#8217;s eyes, he considers himself the one to run the world. There is no one he admires but himself. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152367</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152367</guid>
		<description>At a young age she attended the private Blessed Sacrament School. (reports are her brother also attended) (then there&#039;s her only child with a set of encyclopeidia&#039;s story, she then went   

She went to a private Catholic &quot;Cardinal Spellman High School&quot;academically rigorous parochial school. It was segregated when she attended. 

Sounds too familiar, from another whiner pretending to grow up impoverished. snif. Quick to pull out the ole race card they wear on their shoulders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a young age she attended the private Blessed Sacrament School. (reports are her brother also attended) (then there&#8217;s her only child with a set of encyclopeidia&#8217;s story, she then went   </p>
<p>She went to a private Catholic &#8220;Cardinal Spellman High School&#8221;academically rigorous parochial school. It was segregated when she attended. </p>
<p>Sounds too familiar, from another whiner pretending to grow up impoverished. snif. Quick to pull out the ole race card they wear on their shoulders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Roark</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152366</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Roark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152366</guid>
		<description>White men my age were born into a country that told us to stand in the back of the hiring line, simply because of the color of our skin.  Our nation of women, blacks, and other minorities laughed at me as I said, &quot;this isn&#039;t fair&quot; on a few occasions in my life.  &quot;Now you know how we feel&quot;, they derisively replied.  The only problem is that the discrimination against me is federally mandated--minority discrimination isn&#039;t.

Indeed, I don&#039;t know how they feel.  They&#039;ve never had laws against them and a nation of courts and judges like Sotomayor who couldn&#039;t see racism when it came to my people.  If there is such a thing as discrimination against hiring blacks, the employer who commits it is met with immmediate litigation by breathless courts waiting to hear such cases.

Forty years of punnishing me has left me with a bad attitude, for I didn&#039;t do anything to deserve it.  When Leahy defends Sotomayor&#039;s unsigned support of the further killing of Frank Ricci&#039;s dreams to do better for his family, he further drives the knife into all of our white backs.

Leahy is begging the next John Brown incident in America to asemble the disenfranchised with knives and rage in their hearts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White men my age were born into a country that told us to stand in the back of the hiring line, simply because of the color of our skin.  Our nation of women, blacks, and other minorities laughed at me as I said, &#8220;this isn&#8217;t fair&#8221; on a few occasions in my life.  &#8220;Now you know how we feel&#8221;, they derisively replied.  The only problem is that the discrimination against me is federally mandated&#8211;minority discrimination isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Indeed, I don&#8217;t know how they feel.  They&#8217;ve never had laws against them and a nation of courts and judges like Sotomayor who couldn&#8217;t see racism when it came to my people.  If there is such a thing as discrimination against hiring blacks, the employer who commits it is met with immmediate litigation by breathless courts waiting to hear such cases.</p>
<p>Forty years of punnishing me has left me with a bad attitude, for I didn&#8217;t do anything to deserve it.  When Leahy defends Sotomayor&#8217;s unsigned support of the further killing of Frank Ricci&#8217;s dreams to do better for his family, he further drives the knife into all of our white backs.</p>
<p>Leahy is begging the next John Brown incident in America to asemble the disenfranchised with knives and rage in their hearts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152365</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/supreme-court-reverses-sotomayor#comment-152365</guid>
		<description>&quot;I heard that “Red Sonya” (I like that handle) was bitching about the tests at law school because they were not sympathetic to minorities. What a load of crap!!! They are law exams and I always thought that justice was blind or maybe in this case color blind.&quot;

Sotomayor – ‘Affirmative Action Baby’ &#124; Sweetness &amp; Light
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/sotomayor-affirmative-action-baby

And you can view the clip in the article at the top of this thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I heard that “Red Sonya” (I like that handle) was bitching about the tests at law school because they were not sympathetic to minorities. What a load of crap!!! They are law exams and I always thought that justice was blind or maybe in this case color blind.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sotomayor – ‘Affirmative Action Baby’ | Sweetness &#038; Light<br />
<a href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/sotomayor-affirmative-action-baby" rel="nofollow">http://sweetness-light.com/arc.....ction-baby</a></p>
<p>And you can view the clip in the article at the top of this thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

