<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Terrorist Leads Victory Parade In Swat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/terrorist-leads-victory-parade-in-swat/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/terrorist-leads-victory-parade-in-swat</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliNerd</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/terrorist-leads-victory-parade-in-swat#comment-134724</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliNerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/terrorist-leads-victory-parade-in-swat#comment-134724</guid>
		<description>Do you think either side will keep up their end of the deal? I think it is was a necessary agreement for eventually having peace in this part of the world, but do you this they will follow through? I am not sure, but am interested to keep following the story as it unfolds. I saw a very unique video taking about the same topic, but I couldn&#039;t believe the perspectives they gave. BBC, France 24, Outlook India, Tehran Times and more. Very appealing and affecting for those who enjoy expansive news coverage.

http://www.newsy.com/videos/islamic_law_enforced_in_pakistan/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think either side will keep up their end of the deal? I think it is was a necessary agreement for eventually having peace in this part of the world, but do you this they will follow through? I am not sure, but am interested to keep following the story as it unfolds. I saw a very unique video taking about the same topic, but I couldn&#8217;t believe the perspectives they gave. BBC, France 24, Outlook India, Tehran Times and more. Very appealing and affecting for those who enjoy expansive news coverage.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newsy.com/videos/islamic_law_enforced_in_pakistan/" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsy.com/videos/is....._pakistan/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/terrorist-leads-victory-parade-in-swat#comment-134716</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/terrorist-leads-victory-parade-in-swat#comment-134716</guid>
		<description>Someone tell me ....&quot;Where were are PREDITORS when we REALLY needed them? 
HHMMMmmmm?
Talk about a target rich enviroment!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone tell me &#8230;.&#8221;Where were are PREDITORS when we REALLY needed them?<br />
HHMMMmmmm?<br />
Talk about a target rich enviroment!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/terrorist-leads-victory-parade-in-swat#comment-134649</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/terrorist-leads-victory-parade-in-swat#comment-134649</guid>
		<description>A troubling bit of news, if true, from the UK&#039;s Telegraph:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;US privately backs Pakistan&#039;s &#039;Sharia law for peace&#039; deal with Taliban&lt;/b&gt;

American officials have privately backed Pakistan&#039;s &quot;Sharia law for peace&quot; deal with Taliban militants in the Swat Valley despite publicly criticising it as a &quot;negative development&quot;. 

By Dean Nelson, Javed Siddiq in Islamabad and Emal Khan in Peshawar
17 Feb 2009

The deal, under which Sharia law will be introduced in the Malakhand and Kohistan districts of Pakistan&#039;s North West Frontier Province if Taliban militants end their armed campaign in the Swat Valley, has been met with alarm by Nato chiefs and British and American officials.

Nato fears the deal would create a new &quot;safe haven&quot; for extremists, said a spokesman on Tuesday night, while a statement from Britain&#039;s High Commission in Islamabad said: &quot;Previous peace deals have not provided a comprehensive and long-term solution to Swat&#039;s problems. We need to be confident that they will end violence, not create space for further violence.&quot;

President Barack Obama&#039;s special envoy to Pakistan and Afghanistan voiced the greatest concern about the strength of Taliban militants in Swat as he ended his first visit to the region since taking up his post.

&quot;I talked to people from Swat and they were, frankly, quite terrified. Swat has really deeply affected the people of Pakistan, not just in Peshawar but in Lahore and Islamabad,&quot; he said, while a Defence Department official described the deal as a &quot;negative development&quot;.

On Tuesday night however, US officials in Islamabad privately backed the deal as an attempt to drive a wedge between Swat&#039;s Taliban, which is focused on its demand for Sharia law, and the al-Qaeda-linked Taliban led by Baitullah Mehsud, the notorious commander who controls much of North and South Waziristan and other tribal areas along the Afghan border.

While they expressed fears that the deal might yet be sabotaged by some Swat Taliban militants who support al-Qaeda, they said that if successful, the deal would break up the alliance between the two groups, which has caused alarm throughout Pakistan and in Washington...

http://tinyurl.com/bwvtv6 &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A troubling bit of news, if true, from the UK&#8217;s Telegraph:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>US privately backs Pakistan&#8217;s &#8216;Sharia law for peace&#8217; deal with Taliban</b></p>
<p>American officials have privately backed Pakistan&#8217;s &#8220;Sharia law for peace&#8221; deal with Taliban militants in the Swat Valley despite publicly criticising it as a &#8220;negative development&#8221;. </p>
<p>By Dean Nelson, Javed Siddiq in Islamabad and Emal Khan in Peshawar<br />
17 Feb 2009</p>
<p>The deal, under which Sharia law will be introduced in the Malakhand and Kohistan districts of Pakistan&#8217;s North West Frontier Province if Taliban militants end their armed campaign in the Swat Valley, has been met with alarm by Nato chiefs and British and American officials.</p>
<p>Nato fears the deal would create a new &#8220;safe haven&#8221; for extremists, said a spokesman on Tuesday night, while a statement from Britain&#8217;s High Commission in Islamabad said: &#8220;Previous peace deals have not provided a comprehensive and long-term solution to Swat&#8217;s problems. We need to be confident that they will end violence, not create space for further violence.&#8221;</p>
<p>President Barack Obama&#8217;s special envoy to Pakistan and Afghanistan voiced the greatest concern about the strength of Taliban militants in Swat as he ended his first visit to the region since taking up his post.</p>
<p>&#8220;I talked to people from Swat and they were, frankly, quite terrified. Swat has really deeply affected the people of Pakistan, not just in Peshawar but in Lahore and Islamabad,&#8221; he said, while a Defence Department official described the deal as a &#8220;negative development&#8221;.</p>
<p>On Tuesday night however, US officials in Islamabad privately backed the deal as an attempt to drive a wedge between Swat&#8217;s Taliban, which is focused on its demand for Sharia law, and the al-Qaeda-linked Taliban led by Baitullah Mehsud, the notorious commander who controls much of North and South Waziristan and other tribal areas along the Afghan border.</p>
<p>While they expressed fears that the deal might yet be sabotaged by some Swat Taliban militants who support al-Qaeda, they said that if successful, the deal would break up the alliance between the two groups, which has caused alarm throughout Pakistan and in Washington&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/bwvtv6" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/bwvtv6</a> </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beautyofreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/terrorist-leads-victory-parade-in-swat#comment-134626</link>
		<dc:creator>beautyofreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/terrorist-leads-victory-parade-in-swat#comment-134626</guid>
		<description>I wonder when the Taliban will get control of Pakistani nukes and the other regions. 

It&#039;s just a matter of time. One capitulation leads to another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder when the Taliban will get control of Pakistani nukes and the other regions. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just a matter of time. One capitulation leads to another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: locomotivebreath1901</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/terrorist-leads-victory-parade-in-swat#comment-134609</link>
		<dc:creator>locomotivebreath1901</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/terrorist-leads-victory-parade-in-swat#comment-134609</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Al-Reuters&lt;/b&gt;

Fixed that for ya....

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Al-Reuters</b></p>
<p>Fixed that for ya&#8230;.</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/terrorist-leads-victory-parade-in-swat#comment-134576</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/terrorist-leads-victory-parade-in-swat#comment-134576</guid>
		<description>SG:  &quot;Mind you, the man is not a terrorist.&quot;

ok, ok.   He&#039;s a &quot;so-called&quot; terrorist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SG:  &#8220;Mind you, the man is not a terrorist.&#8221;</p>
<p>ok, ok.   He&#8217;s a &#8220;so-called&#8221; terrorist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

