The Great William F. Buckley, Jr. Has Died
From a relieved New York Times:
William F. Buckley Jr. in his office at the National Review in 1965.
William F. Buckley Jr. Is Dead at 82
William F. Buckley Jr., who marshaled polysyllabic exuberance, famously arched eyebrows and a refined, perspicacious mind to elevate conservatism to the center of American political discourse, died Wednesday at his home in Stamford, Conn.
Mr Buckley, 82, suffered from diabetes and emphysema, his son Christopher said, although the exact cause of death was not immediately known. He was found at his desk in the study of his home, his son said. “He might have been working on a column,” Mr. Buckley said.
Mr. Buckley’s winningly capricious personality, replete with ten-dollar words and a darting tongue writers loved to compare with an anteater’s, hosted one of television’s longest-running programs, “Firing Line,” and founded and shepherded the influential conservative magazine, National Review.
He also found time to write more than 45 books, ranging from sailing odysseys to spy novels to celebrations of his own dashing daily life, and edit five more.
The more than 4.5 million words of his 5,600 biweekly newspaper columns, “On the Right,” would fill 45 more medium-sized books.
Mr. Buckley’s greatest achievement was making conservatism — not just electoral Republicanism, but conservatism as a system of ideas — respectable in liberal post-World War II America. He mobilized the young enthusiasts who helped nominate Barry Goldwater in 1964, and saw his dreams fulfilled when Reagan and the Bushes captured the Oval Office.
To Mr. Buckley’s enormous delight, Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., the historian, termed him “the scourge of liberalism.”
In remarks at National Review’s 30th anniversary in 1985, President Reagan joked that he picked up his first issue of the magazine in a plain brown wrapper and still anxiously awaited his biweekly edition — “without the wrapper.”
“You didn’t just part the Red Sea — you rolled it back, dried it up and left exposed, for all the world to see, the naked desert that is statism,” Mr. Reagan said.
“And then, as if that weren’t enough,” the president continued, “you gave the world something different, something in its weariness it desperately needed, the sound of laughter and the sight of the rich, green uplands of freedom.”
The liberal advance had begun with the New Deal, and so accelerated in the next generation that Lionel Trilling, one of America’s leading intellectuals, wrote in 1950: “In the United States at this time liberalism is not only the dominant but even the sole intellectual tradition. For it is the plain fact that there are no conservative or reactionary ideas in general circulation.”
Mr. Buckley declared war on this liberal order, beginning with his blistering assault on Yale as a traitorous den of atheistic collectivism immediately after his graduation (with honors) from the university.
“All great biblical stories begin with Genesis,” George Will wrote in the National Review in 1980. “And before there was Ronald Reagan, there was Barry Goldwater, and before there was Barry Goldwater there was National Review, and before there was National Review there was Bill Buckley with a spark in his mind, and the spark in 1980 has become a conflagration.”
Mr. Buckley weaved [sic] the tapestry of what became the new American conservatism from libertarian writers like Max Eastman, free market economists like Milton Friedman, traditionalist scholars like Russell Kirk and anti-Communist writers like Whittaker Chambers. But the persuasiveness of his argument hinged not on these perhaps arcane sources, but on his own tightly argued case for a conservatism based on the national interest and a higher morality.
His most receptive audience became young conservatives first energized by Barry Goldwater’s emergence at the Republican convention in 1960 as the right-wing alternative to Nixon. Some met in Sept., 1960, at Mr. Buckley’s Connecticut estate to form Young Americans for Freedom. Their numbers — and influence — grew…
Many of varied political stripes came to see his life as something of an art form — from racing through city streets on a motorcycle to a quixotic campaign for mayor of New York in 1965 to startling opinions like favoring the decriminalization of marijuana. He was often described as liberals’ favorite conservative, particularly after suavely hosting an adaptation of Evelyn Waugh’s “Brideshead Revisited” on public television in 1982…
Mr. Buckley’s vocabulary, sparkling with phrases from distant eras and described in newspaper and magazine profiles as sesquipedalian (characterized by the use of long words) became the stuff of legend. Less kind commentators called him “pleonastic” (use of more words than necessary)…
William Francis Buckley Jr., was born in Manhattan on Nov. 24, 1925, the sixth of the 10 children of Aloise Steiner Buckley and William Frank Buckley Jr. (According to “William F. Buckley, Jr., Patron Saint of the Conservatives,” a biography written by John B. Judis, Mr. Buckley’s sister Patricia said he was christened Francis instead of Frank because there was no saint named Frank. Later, in “Who’s Who” entries and elsewhere, he used Frank.)
The elder Mr. Buckley made a fortune in the oil fields of Mexico, and educated his children with personal tutors at Great Elm, the family estate in Sharon, Conn. They also attended exclusive Roman Catholic schools in England and France.
Young William absorbed his family’s conservatism along with its deep Catholicism. At 6, he wrote the King of England demanding he repay his country’s war debt. At 14, he followed his brothers to the Millbrook School, a preparatory school 15 miles across the New York state line from Sharon.
In his spare time at Millbrook, young Bill typed schoolmates’ papers for them, charging $1 a paper, with a 25-cent surcharge for correcting the grammar.
He did not neglect politics, showing up uninvited to a faculty meeting to complain about a teacher abridging his right to free speech and ardently opposing United States’ involvement in World War II. His father wrote him to suggest he “learn to be more moderate in the expression of your views.”
He graduated from Millbrook in 1943, then spent a half a year at the University of Mexico studying Spanish, which had been his first language. He served in the Army from 1944 to 1946, and managed to make second lieutenant after first putting colleagues off with his mannerisms.
“I think the army experience did something to Bill,” his sister, Patricia, told Mr. Judis. “He got to understand people more.”
Mr. Buckley then entered Yale where he studied political science, economics and history; established himself as a fearsome debater; was elected chairman of the Yale Daily News, and joined Skull and Bones, the most prestigious secret society.
As a senior, he was given the honor of delivering the speech for Yale’s Alumni Day celebration, but was replaced after the university’s administration objected to his strong attacks on the university. He responded by writing his critique in the book that brought him to national attention, in part because he gave the publisher, Regnery, $10,000 to advertise it.
Published in 1951, “God and Man at Yale: The Superstitions of ‘Academic Freedom,’” charged the powers at Yale with having an atheistic and collectivist bent and called for the firing of faculty members who advocated values not in accord with those that the institution should be upholding — which was to say, his own…
After a year in the Central Intelligence Agency in Mexico City (his case officer was E. Howard Hunt, who went on to win celebrity for his part in the Watergate break-in), Mr. Buckley went to work for the American Mercury magazine, but resigned after spotting anti-Semitic tendencies in the magazine.
Over the next few years, Mr. Buckley worked as a freelance writer and lecturer, and wrote a second book with L. Brent Bozell, his brother-in-law. Published in 1954, “McCarthy and His Enemies” was a sturdy defense of the senator from Wisconsin who was then in the throes of his campaign against communists, liberals and the Democratic Party.
In 1955, Mr. Buckley started National Review as voice for “the disciples of truth, who defend the organic moral order” with a $100,000 gift from his father. The first issue, which came out in November, claimed the publication “stands athwart history yelling Stop.” …
Circulation increased from 16,000 in 1957 to 125,000 at the time of Goldwater’s candidacy in 1964, and leveled off to around 100,000 in 1980. It is now 155,000. The magazine has always had to be subsidized by readers’ donations…
Mr. Buckley’s personal visibility was magnified by his “Firing Line” program which ran from 1966 to 1999. First carried on WOR-TV and then on the Public Broadcasting Service, it became the longest running show hosted by a single host — beating out Johnny Carson by three years. He led the conservative team in 1,504 debates on topics like “Resolved: The women’s movement has been disastrous.”
There were exchanges on foreign policy with the likes of Norman Thomas; feminism with Germaine Greer and race relations with James Baldwin. Not a few viewers thought Mr. Buckley’s toothy grin before he scored a point resembled nothing so much as a switchblade.
To New York City politician Mark Green, he purred, “You’ve been on the show close to 100 times over the years. Tell me, Mark, have you learned anything yet.” …
At age 50, Mr. Buckley added two pursuits to his repertoire — he took up the harpsichord and became novelist. Some 10 of the novels are spy tales starring Blackford Oakes, who fights for the American way and bedded the Queen of England in the first book.
Others of his books included a historical novel with Elvis Presley as a significant character, another starring Fidel Castro, a reasoned critique of anti-Semitism, and journals that more than succeeded dramatizing a life of taste and wealth — his own…
Mr. Buckley’s spirit of fun was apparent in his 1965 campaign for mayor of New York on the ticket of the Conservative Party. When asked what he would do if he won, he answered, “Demand a recount.” He got 13.4 percent of the vote…
Unlike his brother James who served as a United States senator from New York, Mr. Buckley generally avoided official government posts. He did serve from 1969 to 1972 as a presidential appointee to the National Advisory Commission on Information, and as a member of the United States delegation to the United Nations in 1973…
In his last years, as honors like the Presidential Medal of Freedom came his way, Mr. Buckley gradually loosened his grip on his intellectual empire. In 1998, he ended his frenetic schedule of public speeches (some 70 a year over 40 years, he once estimated). In 1999, he stopped “Firing Line,” and in 2004, he relinquished his voting stock in National Review. He wrote his last spy novel the 11th in his series), sold his sailboat and stopped playing the harpsichord publicly.
But he began a new historical novel and kept up his columns, including one on the “bewitching power” of “The Sopranos” television series. He commanded wide attention by criticizing the Iraq war as a failure.
On April 15, 2007, his wife, the former Patricia Alden Austin Taylor, who had carved out a formidable reputation as a socialite and philanthropist but considered her role as a homemaker, mother and wife most important, died. Mr. and Mrs. Buckley called each other “Ducky.” …
In the end it was Mr. Buckley’s graceful, often self-deprecating wit that endeared him to others. In his spy novel “Who’s on First,” he described the possible impact of his National Review through his character Boris Bolgin.
“‘Do you ever read the National Review, Jozsef?’ asks Boris Bolgin, the chief of KGB counter intelligence for Western Europe, ‘it is edited by this young bourgeois fanatic.’”
So many, including myself, were first introduced to conservatism by this extraordinary man.
In that, Mr. Buckley did more good for this country than most of our putative political leaders ever have. His brilliant mind and distinctive voice will be sorely missed.
But thankfully his ideas will live on in his writings and the generations he has and will continue to inspire.
18 Responses to “The Great William F. Buckley, Jr. Has Died”
Leave a Reply
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.






February 27th, 2008 at 12:27 pm
Back in my college days I read that he always traveled with a bottle of vodka and a jar of peanut butter and became an instant fan. RIP, WFB.
February 27th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
Back in 1984, I worked as an intern for the Chamber of Commerce, and had the opportunity to meet this great man who was there shooting his show Firing Line. At the time I was getting paid to be a production assistant and my job was to walk Mr. Buckley and his guests (Jack Kemp, Michael Kinsley) onto the set. The green room was very quiet as Mr. Buckley was engrossed in reading something, while Kemp and Kinsley were chatting quietly in the corner.
When it came time for shooting I was just a little scared to interrupt him as his eyes were buzzing down the page and he was throwing pages off as he read them: “Mr. Buckley?”
He looked up from his papers and made eye contact with me which really startled me as I knew I was in the presence of a great intellect. Slowly that trademark sly grin came over his face and he said “it’s time?”
Me: uh, yes sir, sorry to disturb you sir.
Mr. Buckley: “Not at all Mr. . . ” I told him my name. “A pleasure to meet you Mr. G. Tell me are you voting for Reagan or Mondale?”
Me: Voting for President Reagan, sir. My father and his friends have been National Review subscribers for years.
Mr. Buckley to Kinsley: You see, Michael, there’s at least one conservative student in the District!”
February 27th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
Mr. Buckley was a shining light for me as a young man. Not only was there an absence of conservative thinkers but of any intellectually minded people at all. In the old neighborhood the average person was more interested in gossiping or discussing their Bigfoot sightings. When I would check books out from the bookmobile, I had to hide them to avoid ridicule. I’m thankful that I found some of Buckley’s writings back then and will always be grateful for the introduction to J.S. Bach as well.
RIP big guy. Eighty-two years is a good life.
February 27th, 2008 at 1:48 pm
Over the years, I’ve dropped my subscriptions to a number of publications. These days, and, I imagine forever more, I still read two faithfully - one of them being National Review. R.I.P.
February 27th, 2008 at 2:45 pm
Buckley was so influential it’s hard to overstate it. Modern conservatism in America simply would not exist had he not lived, at least in an intellectual, non-reactive form.
I’ll never forget this supremely suave, sophisticated man telling Gore Vidal he would “sock his goddamn face” during the 1968 Democrat convention coverage on television. In high school at the time, it inspired me to find out more about him, then start reading National Review. I’ve enjoyed his writing ever since.
In pace requiescat!
February 27th, 2008 at 3:05 pm
I was always a big fan of Mr. Buckley - reading NR regularly - until he advocated we abandon the war on drugs because it wasn’t working and we couldn’t win.
Shocked at Buckley’s slide to the left on the issue, that’s when I stopped reading Buckley’s writing and moved away from NR about the same time. :-(
February 27th, 2008 at 4:33 pm
Bill won my admiration with God and Man at Yale and kept it with his good humor, intelligence and ability to show that conservatism isn’t an ideology for idiots. The high level of discussion on S&L is a testament to his positive influence.
In Pace Requiescat, Bill. Thank you for what you did.
February 27th, 2008 at 4:57 pm
notsoyoungjim; What a heartwarming personal anecdote. I have admired WFB for many years, first coming to read his work at the suggestion of my own father. My dad was only 8th grade educated yet he schooled himself politically by reading, first history, then history in the making. He told me at an early age, “Read this man’s (Buckley’s) articles, he has more common sense than half the politicians in Washington”. Dad was right. The world is a better place because of Buckley’s influence. May he rest in God’s presence.
February 27th, 2008 at 5:07 pm
“The world is a better place because of Buckley’s influence. May he rest in God’s presence.”
Amen to that!
Same experience arb, although National Review is the only publication that I continue to subscribe to.
February 27th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
“I’ll never forget this supremely suave, sophisticated man telling Gore Vidal he would “sock his goddamn face” during the 1968 Democrat convention coverage on television. In high school at the time, it inspired me to find out more about him, then start reading National Review. I’ve enjoyed his writing ever since.”
You can relive the moment here:
William F Buckley Called Gore Vidal A “Queer” | Sweetness & Light
http://sweetness-light.com/arc.....idal-queer
Also, Ann Coulter’s upcoming column will feature a follow-up quote from WFB about that, which I had never heard before.
February 27th, 2008 at 5:55 pm
I noted that in their article cover WFB’s death, the Huffington Post never opened up the comment section. That would be because they instinctively know what disgusting and outrageous comments their regular readers would be likely to post, and even they would have been offended.
February 27th, 2008 at 7:14 pm
I just read Ann’s latest article. She is as usual cutting and right on point. I like no nonsense ladies like her and Mrs. 1st.
February 27th, 2008 at 10:47 pm
I met Buckley at a a pre-debate dinner when he was about to mop the floor with JKG.
I asked him about an article that he’d recently had published in Playboy and he said, “That magazine claims some, um, er, 10 miiiiiillion readers and you are the very FIRST person who has ever commented on one of my articles. What a pleasure to meet you!”
Later, the roving photographer came by and Buckley had a drink in his hand, so he put his arm around me to hold the drink behind my back. (I still have that picture, of course. Can’t say that I could find a wedding picture of my ex wife and I, but I still have my picture with Buckley!) He told me he’d met Eleanor Roosevelt and she’d done the same thing to him because she didn’t want to be photographed with a drink in her hand.
In addition to all of his great political and sailing writing, (My next boat will be similar to the one he sailed the Atlantic in and I have decided to name it “Paid Cash”. Which is why it’s my next boat and not my current one. LOL) his Blackford Oakes novels are some of the better in that genre.
May he rest in peace. I will miss him.
February 28th, 2008 at 12:10 am
I was fourteen during the 68 Convention in Chicago and remember watching the debates with Gore Vidal. Though at that age I was (Maybe I still am) politically naive, I remember the huge impression Buckley made on me. Rest In Peace WFB. You had the balls to speak out loud in a time of very liberal politics. IMHO history is on your side. Thanks for the memories. Who’s gonna fill your shoes?
February 28th, 2008 at 12:36 am
BillK wrote:
I was always a big fan of Mr. Buckley - reading NR regularly - until he advocated we abandon the war on drugs because it wasn’t working and we couldn’t win.
Shocked at Buckley’s slide to the left on the issue, that’s when I stopped reading Buckley’s writing and moved away from NR about the same time. :-(
Being a libertarian I would agree with Mr. Buckley on the question of the war on drugs. On the other hand, the whole reason that the war is being waged isn’t because drugs are dangerous to the individual or lead to other crimes. Recreational drug use saps societies of the desire to excel. Morphine, Heroin, Methamphetamine, and Cocaine have been on the market for years and can be produced for pennies a dose. People would be able to afford these as easily as cigarettes and beer, and more easily than the latest antihypertensive or diabetes drug. The problem is that if these drugs were freely available without a prescription nothing would get done. Everything would work exactly like the legislative branch of our government. People would only work long enough to get the money for the next fix. The normal workplace would resemble congress–people wouldn’t come to work until Tuesday and they would leave for the weekend early on Thursday. The work would be sloppy and would never be completely done. The workers would promise to do great things whenever they needed to protect their access to money for the next fix. As soon as they got what they needed to get that next fix you wouldn’t be able to get them to do anything until they needed some more money from you. Tax revenues would fall, politicians wouldn’t be able to deliver favors and revolution would ensue in short order. Drug laws are fascist but appear to be a necessary evil as every society from purely capitalist to purely communist has resorted to draconian penalties in order to enforce them. I’m not sure where the anarchists would weigh in, but I bet if they were in power recreational drugs would still be banned.
February 28th, 2008 at 1:26 am
WFB lived the Libertarian core of Conservativism. God rest his sybaritic soul.
February 28th, 2008 at 2:28 am
Of course, the loving and caring left is now chiming in.
From a blog associated with madison.com, the official web site of Madison (WI) Newspapers, Inc:
The degree of hate among the left is truly staggering.
February 28th, 2008 at 6:48 am
“You can relive the moment here: William F Buckley Called Gore Vidal A “Queer” | Sweetness & Light”
SG, thanks for posting that — it was great to see it again after all these years. As I recall, both Vidal and Buckley had a quasi-continuation of this “feud” in Esquire magazine over the months subsequent to the convention. Didn’t resolve anything, of course, but it apparently deepened their mutual antipathy.