Comments on: The NYT’s Latest Smear Of Cindy McCain http://sweetness-light.com/archive/the-latest-nyt-smear-of-cindy-mccain Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:10:23 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: platypus http://sweetness-light.com/archive/the-latest-nyt-smear-of-cindy-mccain#comment-121505 platypus Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:22:11 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/the-latest-nyt-smear-of-cindy-mccain#comment-121505 Actually, this article by the NY Times is good for both McCains. It clearly has nothing new to add to their known history, and consequently is clearly seen as a rehash. In short, it is the NY Tomes solidifying its bona fides with its lunatic supporters on the left, should the unthinkable happen and The One fails to close the deal on November 4th. If I were McCain, I would draw direct attention to this article as vindication of the Straight Talk Express aspect of the campaign - there's no hidden dirt on this candidate. What about the other candidate? Well, we just don't know because he won't tell and the Times won't ask. Should we find out now or find out later? Should we run the risk of another tainted presidency, when we have a fully vetted candidate named John McCain? Actually, this article by the NY Times is good for both McCains. It clearly has nothing new to add to their known history, and consequently is clearly seen as a rehash.

In short, it is the NY Tomes solidifying its bona fides with its lunatic supporters on the left, should the unthinkable happen and The One fails to close the deal on November 4th.

If I were McCain, I would draw direct attention to this article as vindication of the Straight Talk Express aspect of the campaign – there’s no hidden dirt on this candidate.

What about the other candidate? Well, we just don’t know because he won’t tell and the Times won’t ask.

Should we find out now or find out later? Should we run the risk of another tainted presidency, when we have a fully vetted candidate named John McCain?

]]> By: artboyusa http://sweetness-light.com/archive/the-latest-nyt-smear-of-cindy-mccain#comment-121493 artboyusa Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:54:01 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/the-latest-nyt-smear-of-cindy-mccain#comment-121493 "…and the piece tearing apart Michelle Obama will be coming when….WHEN????" You said it Janny...sound of tumbleweeds blowing past, coyotes howling in the distance...followed by silence. “…and the piece tearing apart Michelle Obama will be coming when….WHEN????” You said it Janny…sound of tumbleweeds blowing past, coyotes howling in the distance…followed by silence.

]]> By: GuppyNblue http://sweetness-light.com/archive/the-latest-nyt-smear-of-cindy-mccain#comment-121454 GuppyNblue Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:28:06 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/the-latest-nyt-smear-of-cindy-mccain#comment-121454 That NY Times article read like a teen gossip magazine. “Those close to Mrs. McCain say she aspires to be like another blonde”. Who are "those close to Mrs. McCain" and what does being a blonde have to do with anything? And then they go on recycling old news. BTW the link seems to have moved to members only page. That NY Times article read like a teen gossip magazine. “Those close to Mrs. McCain say she aspires to be like another blonde”. Who are “those close to Mrs. McCain” and what does being a blonde have to do with anything? And then they go on recycling old news.

BTW the link seems to have moved to members only page.

]]> By: JannyMae http://sweetness-light.com/archive/the-latest-nyt-smear-of-cindy-mccain#comment-121452 JannyMae Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:21:25 +0000 http://sweetness-light.com/archive/the-latest-nyt-smear-of-cindy-mccain#comment-121452 ...and the piece tearing apart Michelle Obama will be coming when....WHEN???? **chirp-chirp** This is truly disgusting. I'm glad McCain struck back. If there is anyone left who doesn't, "see," this bias, they never will. …and the piece tearing apart Michelle Obama will be coming when….WHEN????

**chirp-chirp**

This is truly disgusting. I’m glad McCain struck back. If there is anyone left who doesn’t, “see,” this bias, they never will.

]]>