« | »

NYT Doesn’t Want Saddam To Be Hanged

From "the paper of treason," the New York Times:

The Rush to Hang Saddam Hussein

December 29, 2006

The important question was never really about whether Saddam Hussein was guilty of crimes against humanity. The public record is bulging with the lengthy litany of his vile and unforgivable atrocities: genocidal assaults against the Kurds; aggressive wars against Iran and Kuwait; use of internationally banned weapons like nerve gas; systematic torture of countless thousands of political prisoners.

What really mattered was whether an Iraq freed from his death grip could hold him accountable in a way that nurtured hope for a better future. A carefully conducted, scrupulously fair trial could have helped undo some of the damage inflicted by his rule. It could have set a precedent for the rule of law in a country scarred by decades of arbitrary vindictiveness. It could have fostered a new national unity in an Iraq long manipulated through its religious and ethnic divisions.

It could have, but it didn’t. After a flawed, politicized and divisive trial, Mr. Hussein was handed his sentence: death by hanging. This week, in a cursory 15-minute proceeding, an appeals court upheld that sentence and ordered that it be carried out posthaste. Most Iraqis are now so preoccupied with shielding their families from looming civil war that they seem to have little emotion left to spend on Mr. Hussein or, more important, on their own fading dreams of a new and better Iraq.

What might have been a watershed now seems another lost opportunity. After nearly four years of war and thousands of American and Iraqi deaths, it is ever harder to be sure whether anything fundamental has changed for the better in Iraq.

This week began with a story of British and Iraqi soldiers storming a police station that hid a secret dungeon in Basra. More than 100 men, many of them viciously tortured, were rescued from almost certain execution. It might have been a story from the final days of Baathist rule in March 2003, when British and American troops entered Basra believing they were liberating the subjugated Shiite south. But it was December 2006, and the wretched men being liberated were prisoners of the new Iraqi Shiite authorities.

Toppling Saddam Hussein did not automatically create a new and better Iraq. Executing him won’t either.

The Times is just concerned that there won’t be enough time to whip up the "Arab street" and get some more of our troops killed.

Toppling Saddam Hussein did not automatically create a new and better Iraq. Executing him won’t either

Gosh what insight.

But maybe the Iraqis intend to execute Saddam because it is the right thing to do?

Of course concepts such as the rule of law and simple justice are foreign to the New York Times.

This article was posted by Steve on Friday, December 29th, 2006. Comments are currently closed.

7 Responses to “NYT Doesn’t Want Saddam To Be Hanged”

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.

« Front Page | To Top
« | »