« | »

Surge Was Recommended By Iraq Study Group

From the omniscient Iraq Study Group Report:

Security and Military Forces

1 A Military Strategy for Iraq

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1207/csmimg/p10b.jpg2 There is no action the American military can take that, by itself, can bring about success in Iraq. But there are actions that the U.S. and Iraqi governments, working together, can and should take to increase the probability of avoiding disaster there, and increase the chance of success.

3 The Iraqi government should accelerate the urgently needed national reconciliation program to which it has already committed. And it should accelerate assuming responsibility for Iraqi security by increasing the number and quality of Iraqi Army brigades. As the Iraqi Army increases in size and capability, the Iraqi government should be able to take real responsibility for governance.

4 While this process is under way, and to facilitate it, the United States should significantly increase the number of U.S. military personnel, including combat troops, imbedded in and supporting Iraqi Army units. As these actions proceed, we could begin to move combat forces out of Iraq. The primary mission of U.S. forces in Iraq should evolve to one of supporting the Iraqi army, which would take over primary responsibility for combat operations. We should continue to maintain support forces, rapid-reaction forces, special operations forces, intelligence units, search-and-rescue units, and force protection units…

11 Because of the importance of Iraq to our regional security goals and to our ongoing fight against al Qaeda, we considered proposals to make a substantial increase (100,000 to 200,000) in the number of U.S. troops in Iraq. We rejected this course because we do not believe that the needed levels are available for a sustained deployment. Further, adding more American troops could conceivably worsen those aspects of the security problem that are fed by the view that the U.S. presence is intended to be a long-term “occupation.” We could, however, support a shortterm redeployment or surge of American combat forces to stabilize Baghdad, or to speed up the training and equipping mission, if the U.S. commander in Iraq determines that such steps would be effective.

And, if one can believe the New York Times, that is exactly the plan:

Troops Sent in Surge to Have Limited Role, Bush Aide Says

JOHN O’NEIL
Published: January 10, 2007

President Bush will announce tonight that the additional American troops he plans to send to Baghdad will act only in support of Iraqi forces, and that they are being sent only because the Iraqi government has promised a “fundamental” change in policy, a top White House official said this morning…

Funny how the media ignores the fact that President Bush is actually following a suggestion from the Solons of the Iraq Study Group.

In fact, they claim just the opposite — that he is ignoring their suggestions.

This article was posted by Steve on Wednesday, January 10th, 2007. Comments are currently closed.

7 Responses to “Surge Was Recommended By Iraq Study Group”

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.


« Front Page | To Top
« | »