« | »

UK Schools Ban Kids From Having Best Friends

From the UK’s The Sun:

Schools ban children making best friends

By HARRY HAWKINS | 19, March 2012

TEACHERS are banning schoolkids from having best pals — so they don’t get upset by fall-outs.

Instead, the primary pupils are being encouraged to play in large groups.

Educational psychologist Gaynor Sbuttoni said the policy has been used at schools in Kingston, South West London, and Surrey.

She added: “I have noticed that teachers tell children they shouldn’t have a best friend and that everyone should play together.

“They are doing it because they want to save the child the pain of splitting up from their best friend. But it is natural for some children to want a best friend. If they break up, they have to feel the pain because they’re learning to deal with it.”

Besides, After all, any such emotional attachments must be reserved ‘the state.’

Russell Hobby, of the National Association of Head Teachers, confirmed some schools were adopting best-friend bans.

He said: “I don’t think it is widespread but it is clearly happening. It seems bizarre.

“I don’t see how you can stop people from forming close friendships. We make and lose friends throughout our lives.” The Campaign for Real Education, which wants more parental choice in state education, said the “ridiculous” policy was robbing children of their childhood.

Spokesman Chris McGovern added: “Children take things very seriously and if you tell them they can’t have a best friend it can be seriously damaging to them. They need to learn about relationships.”

Does this ban cover imaginary friends, as well? And more importantly, what about ‘gay friends’? And what about imaginary gay friends?

This article was posted by Steve Gilbert on Wednesday, March 20th, 2013. Comments are currently closed.

3 Responses to “UK Schools Ban Kids From Having Best Friends”

  1. canary

    One best friend is better than having all the friends in the world. So my grandma always said.

  2. mr_bill

    These people really need to stop “saving people” from unpleasant life experiences. Splitting up with a friend isn’t fun, but it teaches people a lot: how to cope, how to make better decisions, life goes on after a bad experience, how to reconcile with a friend after a serious disagreement, etc. These are valuable life-skills. These schools are doing a dis-service to the kids by robbing them of these learning opportunities. Besides, I think everybody should have a best friend. I’m grown and I have one.

  3. canary

    NY Parents furious their children’s data being shared globally

    New York Daily News: New York parents furious at program, inBloom, that compiles private student information for companies that contract with it to create teaching tools

    By Corinne Lestch AND Ben Chapman

    In an unprecedented move, education officials will hand over personal student data to a new private company to create a national database for businesses that contract with public schools.

    Donna Lieberman, executive director for the New York Civil Liberties Union, slammed the city for failing to disclose the plan to the public or offer parents a chance to opt out.

    Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new.....z2O7gDzsLq
    http://www.nydailynews.com/new.....-1.1287990

    Please go to Parental Rights Org and sign the petition.
    (NOTE: States are using different monikers such as P-20 for this “UN” program Bill Gates is supporting endangering our children).

    ParentalRights.org – March 20, 2013

    National Database of School Children Launched

    Last week the SXSWedu Technology Conference in Austin, Texas, featured a new project that has many educational technology companies very excited – and that has many parents angry and deeply concerned. The project is called inBloom – a massive national database of personal information on public school students – and it is already up and running. Largely funded by the pro-internationalist Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the $100 million project contains information on millions of children to date.

    So far, at least 9 states are using or planning to use the system: Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New York, and North Carolina.

    But parents in New York are furious that their child’s information is being shared with private companies “to create a national database for businesses that contract with public schools,” according to the New York Daily News.

    Data being stored includes identifying information such as name, address, and social security number, along with school grades, attendance, and even information on hobbies, interests, and attitudes toward school.

    School boards and education materials producers are very excited. Product Manager Jeffrey Olen of CompassLearning, an education software company, told Reuters, “This is going to be a huge win for us.” And Brandon Williams, a director at the Illinois State Board of Education, told them, “We look at personalized learning as the next big leap forward in education.”

    But parents are equally “excited” – and deeply concerned – about all of that data being collected about their child and stored in a massive database with nationwide access by anyone with whom the school system would like to share it. And that’s saying nothing of hackers who might get at it illegally.

    The Electronic Privacy Law Center in Washington is suing the U.S. Department of Education over this issue. Their administrative counsel, Khaliah Barnes, told the Daily News, “It’s a lot of smoke and mirrors. What happens if a company using the data is compromised? What happens if the company goes out of business? We don’t know the answers.”

    Donna Lieberman of the New York Civil Liberties Union is also concerned. “Turning massive amounts of personal data about public school students to a private corporation without any public input is profoundly disturbing and irresponsible,” she told the Daily News. Her organization has blasted the state for not giving parents any notice of the plan or the opportunity to opt their child out of the program.

    But the committee that oversees implementation of the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) would be proud. They routinely include the following in their Concluding Observations to a nation’s periodic report on CRC implementation: “The Committee reiterates its recommendation for the State party to set up a national and comprehensive data collection system and to analyse the data collected as a basis for consistently assessing progress achieved in the realization of child rights and to help design policies and programmes to strengthen the implementation of the Convention.”i

    With inBloom building a comprehensive national database to track students from Kindergarten through high school, much of that work will already be done in the United States.

    Those who believe there is no need for a Parental Rights Amendment tend to fall into one of two groups. Either they believe the government would never really threaten the right of fit parents to direct the upbringing of their child, or they believe the government would make better decisions than most parents. Secretly shipping personal and educational data on millions of school students to a private corporation seems like an excellent way to prove both of these groups wrong. Far more important, it leaves the identities, reputations, privacy, and future of our children at stake.

    Action Items

    1. Sign the petition. If you haven’t already done so, please visit parentalrights.org/petition to sign up in support of the Parental Rights Amendment. (If you received this email directly from ParentalRights.org, you are already signed up.) The Amendment will codify in the U.S. Constitution the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children; it would also prevent ratification of such intrusive treaties as the United Nations’ CRC.

    2. Pass this email to as many friends and family as you can who might be concerned over this privacy violation in the public schools of America. While you’re at it, encourage them to sign the petition and join the fight to protect children by empowering their parents.

    3. Sign up to volunteer. If you’d like to be more actively involved in your region, whether it is to pass a statute or resolution in your state, or just to help spread the word where you live, please fill out our volunteer form. Done that already? Email David@parentalrights.org.

    4. Make a generous donation to ParentalRights.org to support our ongoing efforts to halt threats such as these. Or, if you love liberty and have not yet received Michael Farris’s DVD series Constitutional Literacy, you might want to donate during a special offer period coming this Friday.*

    Together we can empower parents, and empowered parents can halt the invasion of their children’s privacy. Thank you for teaming with us to protect our children by preserving parental rights.

    Sincerely,

    Michael Ramey
    Director of Communications & Research

    i. Committee on the Rights of the Child, Concluding Observations, Sixty-first session, Sept. – Oct. 2012. This (or in 2 cases a similar) injunction occurs in all seven reports from the session: Albania (paragraph 18), Andorra (para. 18), Austria (19), Bosnia & Herzegovina (18), Canada (21), Liberia (20), and Namibia (19).

    * Because ParentalRights.org is a 501(c)(4) lobbying organization, we regret that donations cannot be deductible for income tax purposes.


« Front Page | To Top
« | »