<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Swimmers Told To Wear Burkinis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wirenut</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158514</link>
		<dc:creator>wirenut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158514</guid>
		<description>LD, I&#039;m telling you, I know those rippling biceps and dimpled chin anywhere. It&#039;s Ventura for sure. If it wasn&#039;t for my keen eye and cat-like reflexes, our full bodied tater sack speedos would be chafing a little higher. A word to the Brits, start making your life preservers out of SPAM. I don&#039;t know if it floats, but the religion of peace wants no part of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LD, I&#8217;m telling you, I know those rippling biceps and dimpled chin anywhere. It&#8217;s Ventura for sure. If it wasn&#8217;t for my keen eye and cat-like reflexes, our full bodied tater sack speedos would be chafing a little higher. A word to the Brits, start making your life preservers out of SPAM. I don&#8217;t know if it floats, but the religion of peace wants no part of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right of the People</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158494</link>
		<dc:creator>Right of the People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158494</guid>
		<description>Poster girl for birth control if I ever saw one.  The broke the ugly stick on that one for true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poster girl for birth control if I ever saw one.  The broke the ugly stick on that one for true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158461</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158461</guid>
		<description>S&amp;Ler&#039;s are missing the boat on this one.  Wise up!!!

Think about it.  Would John Edwards be the father of an illegitimate baby if women in public were dressed in burlap bags at all times.

Of course not!!

He would be getting his rocks off with other effete males like himself who can&#039;t possible produce babies or have abortions.

And that&#039;s not even the best part.

The best part is we would have fewer of John Edwards genes floating around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S&amp;Ler&#8217;s are missing the boat on this one.  Wise up!!!</p>
<p>Think about it.  Would John Edwards be the father of an illegitimate baby if women in public were dressed in burlap bags at all times.</p>
<p>Of course not!!</p>
<p>He would be getting his rocks off with other effete males like himself who can&#8217;t possible produce babies or have abortions.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s not even the best part.</p>
<p>The best part is we would have fewer of John Edwards genes floating around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158460</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158460</guid>
		<description>I wondered what ever happened to the woman who played the evil sister in  the movie, &quot;Willow&quot;.

Now we know!!

(good one, wirenut!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered what ever happened to the woman who played the evil sister in  the movie, &#8220;Willow&#8221;.</p>
<p>Now we know!!</p>
<p>(good one, wirenut!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wirenut</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158439</link>
		<dc:creator>wirenut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158439</guid>
		<description>LD, I think the &quot;pic&quot; was of Jesse Ventura in frogman garb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LD, I think the &#8220;pic&#8221; was of Jesse Ventura in frogman garb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158434</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158434</guid>
		<description>After viewing that pic of the swimsuit model ......... I now know why they cover the face with cloth. My next question is &quot;HOW&quot; can she ever procreate with a face that sunk a thousand ships? You&#039;d think that Islam would allow open drunkenness if she is the one to represent Burkinis as a fashion statement!!
OMG!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After viewing that pic of the swimsuit model &#8230;&#8230;&#8230; I now know why they cover the face with cloth. My next question is &#8220;HOW&#8221; can she ever procreate with a face that sunk a thousand ships? You&#8217;d think that Islam would allow open drunkenness if she is the one to represent Burkinis as a fashion statement!!<br />
OMG!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Shackleford</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158428</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Shackleford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158428</guid>
		<description>Steve, how DARE you post such a pornographic picture.  I can see her face!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, how DARE you post such a pornographic picture.  I can see her face!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 12 Gauge Rage</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158423</link>
		<dc:creator>12 Gauge Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158423</guid>
		<description>More outrageous news from the land of my fathers. Unbelievable. You have to wonder if it&#039;s true, that only the soccer thugs can save England from going under.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More outrageous news from the land of my fathers. Unbelievable. You have to wonder if it&#8217;s true, that only the soccer thugs can save England from going under.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canary</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158420</link>
		<dc:creator>canary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158420</guid>
		<description>Let the muslims build their own swimming pools. No wonder UK gripes more about the Afganistan war than anyone. When they are allowing legal muslim beating in public, performing genital operations on young girls, they might as well.  We aren&#039;t too far behind.  Tony Blair will be able to say you told you so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let the muslims build their own swimming pools. No wonder UK gripes more about the Afganistan war than anyone. When they are allowing legal muslim beating in public, performing genital operations on young girls, they might as well.  We aren&#8217;t too far behind.  Tony Blair will be able to say you told you so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pinandpuller</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158416</link>
		<dc:creator>pinandpuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158416</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s a Scotsman to do?  Time to sharpen up the old Claymore.

I guess that in Catholic Churches Jesus better start covering up too-He&#039;s showing too much skin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s a Scotsman to do?  Time to sharpen up the old Claymore.</p>
<p>I guess that in Catholic Churches Jesus better start covering up too-He&#8217;s showing too much skin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beautyofreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158407</link>
		<dc:creator>beautyofreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/uk-swimmers-are-told-to-wear-burkinis#comment-158407</guid>
		<description>Gee, it would almost lead one to believe that multiculturalism and bending over backwards for Islamic groups is disenfranchising non-Muslim citizens of their freedom in a public place. Oh...

What&#039;s next, taxpayer funded police courses that dress female officers in burqas and niqabs (full face covered in black cloth ) to promote &quot;cultural awareness?&quot; Yep, they did that. 

Ok....how about mandating headscarves for female police who enter mosques? Again, the British government tried to pull the crap - and added a optional hijab to the uniform. 

How about banning American and European conservatives who are critical of radical Islam from entering Britain while allowing in Islamic supremacists? Already did it (see Geert Wilders, Michael Savage, etc).

 How about allowing 85 shariah courts to operate an alternate system of justice outside of British law? (one case: woman in full burqa had to prove to an imam that she was being beaten in order to secure an Islamic divorce). Yep, they pulled that $*#&amp; too. 

Don&#039;t be surprised if Britain goes Islamic in 50 years, if only to appear tolerant to its adversaries before it dies a slow death from government coddling. Liberalism typically means bashing whichever Western group (and their values) happen to be the dominant force in the country, replacing the vacuum with whatever new (or ancient) anti-West philosophy comes along. The tolerance, multiculturalism, world-mindedness, whatever is just surface glitz.

 In the liberal mind everyone is a victim, except conservatives in a majority group. Only groups may be threatened - individuals are only as important as the racial / gender / religious group they adhere to. Islam is the new victim in the liberal utopia now that gays, women, and third world communist countries have been exploited by the left as &quot;victims&quot; by the West. Prepare for academia to create courses teaching the &quot;anatomy of the Western hegemony in the Middle East&quot; or &quot;Islamic sustenance: powerful archetypes of women in ancient Mecca&quot; blah blah blah. I  can already imagine the academics leeching onto this next great field of oratory dribble, now that feminist theory has left a dry taste in their mouths. A few months ago I visited an online board where an Egyptian Islamic male defend female genital mutilation by claiming that &quot;traditional Western views placing sexual emphasis on the clitoris&quot; were incorrect. Ugh. Waiting for some similar Islamo-fascist defenses in liberal dressing to hit the classrooms...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, it would almost lead one to believe that multiculturalism and bending over backwards for Islamic groups is disenfranchising non-Muslim citizens of their freedom in a public place. Oh&#8230;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s next, taxpayer funded police courses that dress female officers in burqas and niqabs (full face covered in black cloth ) to promote &#8220;cultural awareness?&#8221; Yep, they did that. </p>
<p>Ok&#8230;.how about mandating headscarves for female police who enter mosques? Again, the British government tried to pull the crap &#8211; and added a optional hijab to the uniform. </p>
<p>How about banning American and European conservatives who are critical of radical Islam from entering Britain while allowing in Islamic supremacists? Already did it (see Geert Wilders, Michael Savage, etc).</p>
<p> How about allowing 85 shariah courts to operate an alternate system of justice outside of British law? (one case: woman in full burqa had to prove to an imam that she was being beaten in order to secure an Islamic divorce). Yep, they pulled that $*#&amp; too. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be surprised if Britain goes Islamic in 50 years, if only to appear tolerant to its adversaries before it dies a slow death from government coddling. Liberalism typically means bashing whichever Western group (and their values) happen to be the dominant force in the country, replacing the vacuum with whatever new (or ancient) anti-West philosophy comes along. The tolerance, multiculturalism, world-mindedness, whatever is just surface glitz.</p>
<p> In the liberal mind everyone is a victim, except conservatives in a majority group. Only groups may be threatened &#8211; individuals are only as important as the racial / gender / religious group they adhere to. Islam is the new victim in the liberal utopia now that gays, women, and third world communist countries have been exploited by the left as &#8220;victims&#8221; by the West. Prepare for academia to create courses teaching the &#8220;anatomy of the Western hegemony in the Middle East&#8221; or &#8220;Islamic sustenance: powerful archetypes of women in ancient Mecca&#8221; blah blah blah. I  can already imagine the academics leeching onto this next great field of oratory dribble, now that feminist theory has left a dry taste in their mouths. A few months ago I visited an online board where an Egyptian Islamic male defend female genital mutilation by claiming that &#8220;traditional Western views placing sexual emphasis on the clitoris&#8221; were incorrect. Ugh. Waiting for some similar Islamo-fascist defenses in liberal dressing to hit the classrooms&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

