<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Won&#8217;t Use Force To Inspect NK Ships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georgfelis</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-151058</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgfelis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-151058</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m willing to give him the benifit of the doubt on this one.  In any &quot;Ramping up&quot; of sanctions, the first step is to request inspections.  Second step to demand inspections backed up by threats.  Third step is to demand inspections backed up by force.  Fourth step is to start sinking ships.

So its a start.  But I&#039;ll be willing to bet five bucks we don&#039;t go to the third step in the sequence.  (I keep hearing &quot;Hans Blix, Hans Blix&quot; from Team America in the background...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m willing to give him the benifit of the doubt on this one.  In any &#8220;Ramping up&#8221; of sanctions, the first step is to request inspections.  Second step to demand inspections backed up by threats.  Third step is to demand inspections backed up by force.  Fourth step is to start sinking ships.</p>
<p>So its a start.  But I&#8217;ll be willing to bet five bucks we don&#8217;t go to the third step in the sequence.  (I keep hearing &#8220;Hans Blix, Hans Blix&#8221; from Team America in the background&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Shackleford</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150979</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Shackleford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150979</guid>
		<description>It is doubtful that the MSM will remove Barry&#039;s organ from their mouth long enough to even report on it.  And if they do, it will have a curious spin on it to somehow make it Bush&#039;s fault. 

MSM:  Mr President, we understand that you have expressed strong misgivings about the latest events where 8,000 Americans died as a result of a man-made-disaster. 

Blammo:  Yes, and.....let me say thisssssss........uhhhhhhhhhh........were it not for the previousssss administration&#039;ssssss  uhhhhhhh.......  existenssssssssssssss........uhhhhhhh.................thisssssss event would have been more easily controlled by me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is doubtful that the MSM will remove Barry&#8217;s organ from their mouth long enough to even report on it.  And if they do, it will have a curious spin on it to somehow make it Bush&#8217;s fault. </p>
<p>MSM:  Mr President, we understand that you have expressed strong misgivings about the latest events where 8,000 Americans died as a result of a man-made-disaster. </p>
<p>Blammo:  Yes, and&#8230;..let me say thisssssss&#8230;&#8230;..uhhhhhhhhhh&#8230;&#8230;..were it not for the previousssss administration&#8217;ssssss  uhhhhhhh&#8230;&#8230;.  existenssssssssssssss&#8230;&#8230;..uhhhhhhh&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..thisssssss event would have been more easily controlled by me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurkin_no_mo</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150946</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurkin_no_mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150946</guid>
		<description>RB, good ideas.  But first our Repulican party needs to get busy and nominate a real conservative Republican to run agains the &quot;I Won&quot;. We can make Obummer the next Carter, providing ACORN and dem poll watchers don&#039;t let a bunch of dead folks vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RB, good ideas.  But first our Repulican party needs to get busy and nominate a real conservative Republican to run agains the &#8220;I Won&#8221;. We can make Obummer the next Carter, providing ACORN and dem poll watchers don&#8217;t let a bunch of dead folks vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Bytes</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150908</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150908</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s Official Theme Song should be &quot;Why Can&#039;t We Be Friends&quot; by War. I think it would be cool with a video too. You know, maybe an opening of the World Trade Center on fire. Cut to Obama saying Iran should have nuclear power. Richard Pearle&#039;s funeral, Cut to Obama bowing at King Fahd&#039;s feet. Nuclear areal bursts, cut to Kim Il Jong, then Biden saying &quot;mark my words, in six months, this new president will be tested.&quot; Let&#039;s see, Oh, yeah, how about some American Soldiers charred remains, oh and dead marines being dragged through the streets of Mohgadeshu (I don&#039;t give a damn if it&#039;s not spelled right!). 

I&#039;m attaching a link so you can hear it for yourself and imagine. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJTBPdVpdMc

Oh &amp; this would be soo cool. As the vid fades, Reagan says&quot; &quot;We begin bombing in five minutes.&quot; 

Gives me goose bumps!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s Official Theme Song should be &#8220;Why Can&#8217;t We Be Friends&#8221; by War. I think it would be cool with a video too. You know, maybe an opening of the World Trade Center on fire. Cut to Obama saying Iran should have nuclear power. Richard Pearle&#8217;s funeral, Cut to Obama bowing at King Fahd&#8217;s feet. Nuclear areal bursts, cut to Kim Il Jong, then Biden saying &#8220;mark my words, in six months, this new president will be tested.&#8221; Let&#8217;s see, Oh, yeah, how about some American Soldiers charred remains, oh and dead marines being dragged through the streets of Mohgadeshu (I don&#8217;t give a damn if it&#8217;s not spelled right!). </p>
<p>I&#8217;m attaching a link so you can hear it for yourself and imagine. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJTBPdVpdMc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJTBPdVpdMc</a></p>
<p>Oh &amp; this would be soo cool. As the vid fades, Reagan says&#8221; &#8220;We begin bombing in five minutes.&#8221; </p>
<p>Gives me goose bumps!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right of the People</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150899</link>
		<dc:creator>Right of the People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150899</guid>
		<description>&quot;I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!&quot; Screamed Barry as he ran around the room, his ears flapping.  &quot;By the way, did you hear?  I won!  Yes I did.  Want to see my cool airplane?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!  I won!&#8221; Screamed Barry as he ran around the room, his ears flapping.  &#8220;By the way, did you hear?  I won!  Yes I did.  Want to see my cool airplane?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150875</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150875</guid>
		<description>&quot;They can’t possibly all be subversives, can they?&quot;

They have stewed in the warm cesspool of the education system / media propaganda / power-mad political process for 40 to 70 years.

Yes, the leaders are all subversives.   They are ardent believers is one-world&#039;ism, fascism, socialism, government power and their own infinite wisdom.   They have been brainwashed since they were children, and their success in pursueing those goals simply reinforces their confidence in thier god-like wisdom.

And they are all toadies to boot.   Toadying has made them all gazillionaires.  What&#039;s not to like.

Explain what is happening any other way, if you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They can’t possibly all be subversives, can they?&#8221;</p>
<p>They have stewed in the warm cesspool of the education system / media propaganda / power-mad political process for 40 to 70 years.</p>
<p>Yes, the leaders are all subversives.   They are ardent believers is one-world&#8217;ism, fascism, socialism, government power and their own infinite wisdom.   They have been brainwashed since they were children, and their success in pursueing those goals simply reinforces their confidence in thier god-like wisdom.</p>
<p>And they are all toadies to boot.   Toadying has made them all gazillionaires.  What&#8217;s not to like.</p>
<p>Explain what is happening any other way, if you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMG</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150869</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150869</guid>
		<description>.....&quot;it’s indicative of an agenda, not thoughtlessness......&quot;

Sadly, I fear you&#039;re right, pro.  But what baffles me the most is that the whole gaggle of ne&#039;er-do-wells all feel the same way.  Is there not one of them that is having a twinge of guilt at selling this country down the river?  Are they all traitors?  They can&#039;t possibly all be subversives, can they?  Aren&#039;t at least a couple of them feeling betrayed by now?  I just can&#039;t believe they&#039;re all willing dupes without the will to rebel.  For a while I thought Panetta had come to his senses concerning Pelosi.  Then he goes and shoots his mouth off about Cheney.  He almost found himself but instead sold his soul to that soulless party.  For that, he should roast in hell!  But are all of them that way?  That&#039;s hard to believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;..&#8221;it’s indicative of an agenda, not thoughtlessness&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Sadly, I fear you&#8217;re right, pro.  But what baffles me the most is that the whole gaggle of ne&#8217;er-do-wells all feel the same way.  Is there not one of them that is having a twinge of guilt at selling this country down the river?  Are they all traitors?  They can&#8217;t possibly all be subversives, can they?  Aren&#8217;t at least a couple of them feeling betrayed by now?  I just can&#8217;t believe they&#8217;re all willing dupes without the will to rebel.  For a while I thought Panetta had come to his senses concerning Pelosi.  Then he goes and shoots his mouth off about Cheney.  He almost found himself but instead sold his soul to that soulless party.  For that, he should roast in hell!  But are all of them that way?  That&#8217;s hard to believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150859</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150859</guid>
		<description>Barry will then have his comrades run up his &quot;MISSION ACCOMPLISHED&quot; banner on the front of the &quot;Peoples&#039; House&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry will then have his comrades run up his &#8220;MISSION ACCOMPLISHED&#8221; banner on the front of the &#8220;Peoples&#8217; House&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150858</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150858</guid>
		<description>Their actions are completely deliberate, John.   

If they had the well-being of the country in mind, it might be an issue of critical thinking.

But when you see consistency of action across a wide range of issues.......it&#039;s indicative of an agenda, not thoughtlessness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their actions are completely deliberate, John.   </p>
<p>If they had the well-being of the country in mind, it might be an issue of critical thinking.</p>
<p>But when you see consistency of action across a wide range of issues&#8230;&#8230;.it&#8217;s indicative of an agenda, not thoughtlessness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMG</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150857</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150857</guid>
		<description>.....&quot;The officials said that they believed that China, once a close cold war ally, would also enforce the new sanctions.....&quot;

How comforting.  These officials BELIEVE that China would enforce the sanctions.  Just like administration officials GUESSED wrong on the unemployment numbers.

Can&#039;t we send these children to their rooms for a &quot;time out&quot; for being so stupid?  There isn&#039;t ONE CRITICAL THINKER in the whole of Obama&#039;s administration.  Not one!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;..&#8221;The officials said that they believed that China, once a close cold war ally, would also enforce the new sanctions&#8230;..&#8221;</p>
<p>How comforting.  These officials BELIEVE that China would enforce the sanctions.  Just like administration officials GUESSED wrong on the unemployment numbers.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t we send these children to their rooms for a &#8220;time out&#8221; for being so stupid?  There isn&#8217;t ONE CRITICAL THINKER in the whole of Obama&#8217;s administration.  Not one!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150856</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150856</guid>
		<description>The world won&#039;t like Obamy if he forceably boards ships.

So it will never happen, no matter how grave the threat to the US and our allies.

After all, he already rules this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world won&#8217;t like Obamy if he forceably boards ships.</p>
<p>So it will never happen, no matter how grave the threat to the US and our allies.</p>
<p>After all, he already rules this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tranquil.night</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150853</link>
		<dc:creator>tranquil.night</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150853</guid>
		<description>Well, we pretty much know who to blame already when terrorists set off a chain of NorCom nukes across cities of the West.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we pretty much know who to blame already when terrorists set off a chain of NorCom nukes across cities of the West.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petronius</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150852</link>
		<dc:creator>Petronius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150852</guid>
		<description>Steve:  &quot;We should also tell the captain’s mother.&quot;

Yes, perhaps, but only after reading the mother her Miranda rights.

I gather that the White House determined that inspection of these North Korean vessels would be an unconstitutional search and seizure?

That reminds me.  Has Hillary put North Korea back on the terror list yet?  Or is that still hung up in legal review?  Somebody please tell DOJ to get a move on.  We&#039;ll all feel a lot safer when they put North Korea on the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve:  &#8220;We should also tell the captain’s mother.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, perhaps, but only after reading the mother her Miranda rights.</p>
<p>I gather that the White House determined that inspection of these North Korean vessels would be an unconstitutional search and seizure?</p>
<p>That reminds me.  Has Hillary put North Korea back on the terror list yet?  Or is that still hung up in legal review?  Somebody please tell DOJ to get a move on.  We&#8217;ll all feel a lot safer when they put North Korea on the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Roark</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150849</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Roark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/us-will-not-forcibly-inspect-nk-ships#comment-150849</guid>
		<description>So, if we believe a N.K. ship &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; carrying nuclear weapons, we&#039;ll track the ship instead of boarding it, and when it arrives at whatever country was buying nuclear weapons from them, &lt;em&gt;Washington will press for the inspections they refused at sea&lt;/em&gt;.  I see.  

That is what you call &quot;strong leadership&quot;, eh?  What happens when Iran or some other Arab nation refuses the Almighty Obama&#039;s &quot;pressing&quot; to invade their harbor and inspect one of their friendly shipping vessels?

Barry is effectively castrating our military, mission by mission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if we believe a N.K. ship <em>is</em> carrying nuclear weapons, we&#8217;ll track the ship instead of boarding it, and when it arrives at whatever country was buying nuclear weapons from them, <em>Washington will press for the inspections they refused at sea</em>.  I see.  </p>
<p>That is what you call &#8220;strong leadership&#8221;, eh?  What happens when Iran or some other Arab nation refuses the Almighty Obama&#8217;s &#8220;pressing&#8221; to invade their harbor and inspect one of their friendly shipping vessels?</p>
<p>Barry is effectively castrating our military, mission by mission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

