« | »

Van Jones: US Was Apartheid Regime

From Mr. Van Jones pronouncements at the Berkeley Conference on Spiritual Activism two years ago, via Google video:

"We forget sometimes that the people who poured out their blood on the ground in this country, to turn an apartheid regime into a struggling, fledgling democracy, the so-called civil rights workers, when they went to face the dogs, when they went to face the fire hoses, when they sat shivering in cold jail cells soaked in blood, when they faced lynch mobs, when they found their children shot down in the street, they didn’t march at laundromats , they didn’t march at high school gymnasiums."

Yessir, Mr. Van Jones is definitely a blood-brother of Mr. Wright and our President.

This article was posted by Steve on Friday, September 4th, 2009. Comments are currently closed.

9 Responses to “Van Jones: US Was Apartheid Regime”

  1. Reality Bytes says:

    America today reminds me of United Flight 93. Terrorists have taken over the cockpit & are headed towards the capital & a fiery display of “because we can”.

    Thank God there are Americans who are willing to take a stand; to “take the plane back.” For the passengers of Flight 93, they armed themselves with nothing more than a serving cart & boiled water. They took their plane back. They paid the ultimate sacrifice for the sake of what’s right & for the sake of our country.

    Today, millions of Americans are taking our country back for the sake of America; because it’s right.

    “Let’s Roll!”

  2. VMAN says:

    How soon these tools forget that the very party that caused the separation of races is the very one that they bow down to. All I have to say to this useless waste of skin is that if you want to be equal, fine, I have no problem with that. Anything else is unacceptable and DON’T push me.

  3. proreason says:

    So far, there has been 0 mention of Mr. Jones in the Slimes, WaPro, and the NBCCBSCNNABC TV propaganda machines.

    Fortunately, Jake Tapper is poking around it, so this thug is bound to fall in a day or two.

    He may quietly disappear in the Friday night flush.

  4. Liberals Demise says:

    pro…..this turd is way to big to flush. He will just swirl around the top and stink to high heaven.

    Toss another one under the Obamy campaign bus!!

  5. Anonymoose says:

    Just keeping talking…….one of the comments on Fox recently was how the other networks weren’t covering this guy….probably because they know how big a detriment he’s going to be. Look the other way, nothing to see here.

    Is it just me or has anyone else noticed Fox has been flooded the last few days with liberals spamming the boards; I guess they decided to go all out to “convince” us.

    As for Van, DON’T STOP, please! I thought Michelle would single handedly bring down the Obamacracy, but Van is doing just fine on his own……

  6. Onlyness says:

    I’m rather confused by your implication that the US wasn’t an example of apartheid. Given that the UN Convention on Apartheid defines it (in part) as:

    “…policies and practices of racial segregation and discrimination … for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them:
    1. Denial to a member or members of a racial group or groups of the right to life and liberty of person
    1. By murder of members of a racial group or groups;
    2. By the infliction upon the members of a racial group or groups of serious bodily or mental harm, by the infringement of their freedom or dignity, or by subjecting them to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;
    3. By arbitrary arrest and illegal imprisonment of the members of a racial group or groups

    Any measures including legislative measures, designed to divide the population along racial lines by the creation of separate reserves and ghettos for the members of a racial group or groups, the prohibition of mixed marriages among members of various racial groups

    Exploitation of the labour of the members of a racial group or groups, in particular by submitting them to forced labour”

    I don’t understand how you could possibly find his assertion to be incorrect. Please explain?

    • Rusty Shackleford says:

      George W—


      Go poke at some other blog.

    • Liberals Make Great Speedbumps says:

      “I don’t understand how you could possibly find his assertion to be incorrect. Please explain?”

      Hi George W,
      It’s pretty obvious that there’s a lot you don’t understand.

« Front Page | To Top
« | »