<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Times Notes New &#8216;Get Drunk&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Bytes</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125396</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125396</guid>
		<description>I propose a toast (borrowed - again - from Pop&#039;s Lion Club mantra)

Not Above You - Not Below You - But With You.

(1stto - you&#039;re on to the secret - super charged cold - no ice - don&#039;t forget to inhale while sipping in order to avoid running too rich a mix of fuel/air - I hear it can kill a man).

And for Obama: If Americans can drag Clinton&#039;s fat ass kicking and screaming while passing 75% of he Contract with America, I hope we&#039;ll continue said efforts with Obama - a kind of reversed take on &quot;Only Nixon Can Go To China&quot; syndrome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I propose a toast (borrowed &#8211; again &#8211; from Pop&#8217;s Lion Club mantra)</p>
<p>Not Above You &#8211; Not Below You &#8211; But With You.</p>
<p>(1stto &#8211; you&#8217;re on to the secret &#8211; super charged cold &#8211; no ice &#8211; don&#8217;t forget to inhale while sipping in order to avoid running too rich a mix of fuel/air &#8211; I hear it can kill a man).</p>
<p>And for Obama: If Americans can drag Clinton&#8217;s fat ass kicking and screaming while passing 75% of he Contract with America, I hope we&#8217;ll continue said efforts with Obama &#8211; a kind of reversed take on &#8220;Only Nixon Can Go To China&#8221; syndrome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1sttofight</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125283</link>
		<dc:creator>1sttofight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125283</guid>
		<description>I used to keep my Bourbon in the freezer, maybe I will start back doing that. It did seem to have more kick when I was doing that.  It never froze but it would get thicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to keep my Bourbon in the freezer, maybe I will start back doing that. It did seem to have more kick when I was doing that.  It never froze but it would get thicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125282</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125282</guid>
		<description>Right On Billk !! Did you know that the RBtini is the same recipie as a Morton/Thyochol booster rocket for the Shuttle? Semper Fi, Phil and pass the olives&#039; if you please sir!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right On Billk !! Did you know that the RBtini is the same recipie as a Morton/Thyochol booster rocket for the Shuttle? Semper Fi, Phil and pass the olives&#8217; if you please sir!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillK</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125243</link>
		<dc:creator>BillK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125243</guid>
		<description>Phil,

I disagree that the &quot;Gang of 14&quot; compromise was &lt;b&gt;responsible&lt;/b&gt; for Roberts and Alito.

The Republicans in the Senate have run screaming from the mere mention of &quot;filibuster&quot; where they should have forced the Democrats to do it the old fashioned style where Dems have to get up and keep speaking to keep it going.  But no, can&#039;t do that, we&#039;ve parties to attend.

I don&#039;t care what McCain &lt;i&gt;tried&lt;/i&gt; to explain, he introduced an amnesty bill, &lt;b&gt;period&lt;/b&gt;.  Saying that laws should be enforced differently is in no way an excuse for effectively pardoning thousands of criminals.

So in short, McCain would have been better for the country than Obama, but by no means would he have been better for the country than, say, Sarah Palin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>I disagree that the &#8220;Gang of 14&#8243; compromise was <b>responsible</b> for Roberts and Alito.</p>
<p>The Republicans in the Senate have run screaming from the mere mention of &#8220;filibuster&#8221; where they should have forced the Democrats to do it the old fashioned style where Dems have to get up and keep speaking to keep it going.  But no, can&#8217;t do that, we&#8217;ve parties to attend.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care what McCain <i>tried</i> to explain, he introduced an amnesty bill, <b>period</b>.  Saying that laws should be enforced differently is in no way an excuse for effectively pardoning thousands of criminals.</p>
<p>So in short, McCain would have been better for the country than Obama, but by no means would he have been better for the country than, say, Sarah Palin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Byler</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125238</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Byler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125238</guid>
		<description>Response:  I appreciate humor, and when my sons and I sit down to drink, we really do so with gusto.  You all would appreciate our company.  But I still think you are way too hard on McCain.  He is more of a conservative than Bush on some subjects (e.g., Government spending), and he knows military matters, national security and foreign affairs better than anyone else in government in Washington D.C..  When Col. Oliver North endorsed McCain, Col. North recited the many times McCain was in Iraq, and Col. North personally saw McCain&#039;s devotion to the troops there.  McCain was advocating what became known as the surge in Iraq long before it was implemented because McCain was personally going to Iraq to assess the situation, determined that we would not lose another war; and McCain led successful efforts against the Democrats in 2007 who were trying to inflict defeat on us.  Never doubt McCain&#039;s devotion to the military and to the country.  He meant it when he said he would rather lose an election than lose a war.  &quot;Country First&quot; was not just a slogan.  

Gang of 14?  Schumer was threatening a fillibuster over judicial nominations.  The &quot;Gang of 14&quot; compromise, however, got Roberts and Alito on the U.S. Supreme Court and a number of conservatives on the U.S. Courts of Appeals while preserving the Senate fillibuster.  That preservation looks mightly fine right now with a left wing Democrat President and a liberal Democrat majority in the Senate that looks like it will fall just short of 60.  Also, Chuckie Schumer has complained that the Democrats got snookered by the compromise, which is prima facie evidence that it was a good thing.    

McCain did vote once against the initial Bush tax cuts, but thereafter voted for renewal of those tax cuts; and the one time McCain voted against, a review of the voting done by the Wall Street Journal confirmed McCain&#039;s position that he would have voted for the Bush tax cut the first time had the spending restrictions not been stripped from the bill.  Got any problem with insisting on spendiing restrictions in connection with a tax cut?  I don&#039;t.  McCain has been a fiscal hawk concerning spending.  One place where Bush goofed badly was in too much spending that McCain to his credit was trying to stop.  

Immigration?  Yeah, I know.  But McCain rightly tried to explain that the problem went back to the Reagan years when Reagan signed the last immigration reform bill, and the law enforcement provisions were not enforced thereafter.  McCain&#039;s intention was that the reform bill&#039;s pretty tough law enforcement provisions be enforced.

All in all, McCain was certainly not a doctrinaire conservative all the time, but he was plenty conservative -- the exceptions are not that many (check his ACU ratings). So, in no way can McCain be seen as at all even close to the Democrats much less Obama, who is an opportunist and who when he can will try to implement his socialist convictions with the help of Clintonistas.  The country would be in good hands with McCain.  I have a very, very bad feeling about what the country is going to be dealing with three years from now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response:  I appreciate humor, and when my sons and I sit down to drink, we really do so with gusto.  You all would appreciate our company.  But I still think you are way too hard on McCain.  He is more of a conservative than Bush on some subjects (e.g., Government spending), and he knows military matters, national security and foreign affairs better than anyone else in government in Washington D.C..  When Col. Oliver North endorsed McCain, Col. North recited the many times McCain was in Iraq, and Col. North personally saw McCain&#8217;s devotion to the troops there.  McCain was advocating what became known as the surge in Iraq long before it was implemented because McCain was personally going to Iraq to assess the situation, determined that we would not lose another war; and McCain led successful efforts against the Democrats in 2007 who were trying to inflict defeat on us.  Never doubt McCain&#8217;s devotion to the military and to the country.  He meant it when he said he would rather lose an election than lose a war.  &#8220;Country First&#8221; was not just a slogan.  </p>
<p>Gang of 14?  Schumer was threatening a fillibuster over judicial nominations.  The &#8220;Gang of 14&#8243; compromise, however, got Roberts and Alito on the U.S. Supreme Court and a number of conservatives on the U.S. Courts of Appeals while preserving the Senate fillibuster.  That preservation looks mightly fine right now with a left wing Democrat President and a liberal Democrat majority in the Senate that looks like it will fall just short of 60.  Also, Chuckie Schumer has complained that the Democrats got snookered by the compromise, which is prima facie evidence that it was a good thing.    </p>
<p>McCain did vote once against the initial Bush tax cuts, but thereafter voted for renewal of those tax cuts; and the one time McCain voted against, a review of the voting done by the Wall Street Journal confirmed McCain&#8217;s position that he would have voted for the Bush tax cut the first time had the spending restrictions not been stripped from the bill.  Got any problem with insisting on spendiing restrictions in connection with a tax cut?  I don&#8217;t.  McCain has been a fiscal hawk concerning spending.  One place where Bush goofed badly was in too much spending that McCain to his credit was trying to stop.  </p>
<p>Immigration?  Yeah, I know.  But McCain rightly tried to explain that the problem went back to the Reagan years when Reagan signed the last immigration reform bill, and the law enforcement provisions were not enforced thereafter.  McCain&#8217;s intention was that the reform bill&#8217;s pretty tough law enforcement provisions be enforced.</p>
<p>All in all, McCain was certainly not a doctrinaire conservative all the time, but he was plenty conservative &#8212; the exceptions are not that many (check his ACU ratings). So, in no way can McCain be seen as at all even close to the Democrats much less Obama, who is an opportunist and who when he can will try to implement his socialist convictions with the help of Clintonistas.  The country would be in good hands with McCain.  I have a very, very bad feeling about what the country is going to be dealing with three years from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125234</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125234</guid>
		<description>RB - willing to try your recipe during our next &#039;oil crisis&#039;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RB &#8211; willing to try your recipe during our next &#8216;oil crisis&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wardmama4</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125230</link>
		<dc:creator>wardmama4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125230</guid>
		<description>No 1st - I have not bought the &lt;i&gt;historic&lt;/i&gt; plate yet - and yes I&#039;ve seen it advertised ad naseum on WGN - which is why God created the MUTE button!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No 1st &#8211; I have not bought the <i>historic</i> plate yet &#8211; and yes I&#8217;ve seen it advertised ad naseum on WGN &#8211; which is why God created the MUTE button!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1sttofight</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125229</link>
		<dc:creator>1sttofight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125229</guid>
		<description>Candy is Dandy, But Liquor is Quicker. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Candy is Dandy, But Liquor is Quicker. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Bytes</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125228</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125228</guid>
		<description>Trust me. It&#039;s worth it.  (fyi - the recipe predates cable by 30 years - what else did they have to do?)

Legend has it Colenel&#039;s Ferrari runs on less octane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust me. It&#8217;s worth it.  (fyi &#8211; the recipe predates cable by 30 years &#8211; what else did they have to do?)</p>
<p>Legend has it Colenel&#8217;s Ferrari runs on less octane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1sttofight</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125226</link>
		<dc:creator>1sttofight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125226</guid>
		<description>12 hours???
You have got to be kidding.

A lot of humping in 12 hours.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>12 hours???<br />
You have got to be kidding.</p>
<p>A lot of humping in 12 hours.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Bytes</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125224</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125224</guid>
		<description>An RBtini!

1 - qrt crystal pitcher (preferably Danish Modern or Swedish)
1 - matching stirrer
20 oz - Dry Gin (Beefeater - NO EXCEPTIONS!)
2 oz - Noilly Prat Original French Dry Vermouth
Pour ingredients into pitcher - NO ICE!!!
Place in freezer in early morning &amp; allow to chill 12 hrs (just in time for 6:00pm cocktails
Pour into 10 oz martini glass (don&#039;t bother chilling - it won&#039;t matter)

Sip delicately in slurping fashion in order to injest the required oxygen for proper fuel/air mix (or you&#039;lll die or go blind perhaps both but you&#039;ll will go with a smile)

This my friends is my Dad&#039;s famous 10/1 martini. Legend has it I was conceived using said recipe. You might call it...

May I suggest another web site address: www.getdrunkandHICCUPforthebest.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An RBtini!</p>
<p>1 &#8211; qrt crystal pitcher (preferably Danish Modern or Swedish)<br />
1 &#8211; matching stirrer<br />
20 oz &#8211; Dry Gin (Beefeater &#8211; NO EXCEPTIONS!)<br />
2 oz &#8211; Noilly Prat Original French Dry Vermouth<br />
Pour ingredients into pitcher &#8211; NO ICE!!!<br />
Place in freezer in early morning &amp; allow to chill 12 hrs (just in time for 6:00pm cocktails<br />
Pour into 10 oz martini glass (don&#8217;t bother chilling &#8211; it won&#8217;t matter)</p>
<p>Sip delicately in slurping fashion in order to injest the required oxygen for proper fuel/air mix (or you&#8217;lll die or go blind perhaps both but you&#8217;ll will go with a smile)</p>
<p>This my friends is my Dad&#8217;s famous 10/1 martini. Legend has it I was conceived using said recipe. You might call it&#8230;</p>
<p>May I suggest another web site address: <a href="http://www.getdrunkandHICCUPforthebest.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.getdrunkandHICCUPforthebest.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1sttofight</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125211</link>
		<dc:creator>1sttofight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125211</guid>
		<description>wardmama4 
Have you bought the HISTORIC Obama  HNIC plate being advertised every 5 minutes on TV yet?

Call now, Supplies are limited.  Make a great xmas gift.
Gees...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wardmama4<br />
Have you bought the HISTORIC Obama  HNIC plate being advertised every 5 minutes on TV yet?</p>
<p>Call now, Supplies are limited.  Make a great xmas gift.<br />
Gees&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wardmama4</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125205</link>
		<dc:creator>wardmama4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125205</guid>
		<description>Man I must have been even busier than I thought to have missed this one.

Yeah, Phil - I voted for McAmnesty but I have to agree with BillK - McAmnesty is not conservative in many meanings/definitions of the word.

And I agree with proreason - the site names are a political joke. If we can&#039;t laugh at the insane hypocrisy and stupidity that all those on the &#039;other&#039; side are about to do unto America, we are then becoming them. Look at their hostility, anger and outright vile spewings - The GDAVFM and GDAHFTB are simple jokes. Look at how the msm is already jumping through hoops to make The One&#039;s (tm) administration look positive and don&#039;t forget &lt;i&gt;historic&lt;&lt;/i&gt; [damn even my local rag is offering the chance at owning a piece of the &lt;i&gt;historic&lt;/i&gt; (gag me with a spoon, please) front page &lt;i&gt;historic&lt;/i&gt; announcement of B. Hussein Obama&#039;s &lt;i&gt;historic&lt;/i&gt; win]. 

I am &lt;i&gt;historically&lt;/i&gt; underwhelmed.

Will now go over to check out Get Drunk And Hope for the Best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man I must have been even busier than I thought to have missed this one.</p>
<p>Yeah, Phil &#8211; I voted for McAmnesty but I have to agree with BillK &#8211; McAmnesty is not conservative in many meanings/definitions of the word.</p>
<p>And I agree with proreason &#8211; the site names are a political joke. If we can&#8217;t laugh at the insane hypocrisy and stupidity that all those on the &#8216;other&#8217; side are about to do unto America, we are then becoming them. Look at their hostility, anger and outright vile spewings &#8211; The GDAVFM and GDAHFTB are simple jokes. Look at how the msm is already jumping through hoops to make The One&#8217;s &#8482; administration look positive and don&#8217;t forget <i>historic&lt;</i> [damn even my local rag is offering the chance at owning a piece of the <i>historic</i> (gag me with a spoon, please) front page <i>historic</i> announcement of B. Hussein Obama's <i>historic</i> win]. </p>
<p>I am <i>historically</i> underwhelmed.</p>
<p>Will now go over to check out Get Drunk And Hope for the Best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125200</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125200</guid>
		<description>Phil,

The name of the web-site is a joke, not political advice.  The whole purpose of SG&#039;s sites is to point out the incredible irony of the 2-faced media in this country.

Everybody who posts on these sites admires families like yours and want the best for the country.

Sometimes when horrible things happen, a little humor can help.

Now, time for a chaser</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>The name of the web-site is a joke, not political advice.  The whole purpose of SG&#8217;s sites is to point out the incredible irony of the 2-faced media in this country.</p>
<p>Everybody who posts on these sites admires families like yours and want the best for the country.</p>
<p>Sometimes when horrible things happen, a little humor can help.</p>
<p>Now, time for a chaser</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125187</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125187</guid>
		<description>Hey Phil, what if I was plannin&#039; on being drunk for the next four years anyhoo?

Now where&#039;d I put my celery seed... (Can&#039;t make a real Bloody Mary without it, ya know.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Phil, what if I was plannin&#8217; on being drunk for the next four years anyhoo?</p>
<p>Now where&#8217;d I put my celery seed&#8230; (Can&#8217;t make a real Bloody Mary without it, ya know.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125186</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/washington-times-notes-new-get-drunk#comment-125186</guid>
		<description>Excuse me while this Marine pops the top on another beer while he cleans his weapons of &quot;HOME&quot; security. BBBURRRPPP!! AAAHHH.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me while this Marine pops the top on another beer while he cleans his weapons of &#8220;HOME&#8221; security. BBBURRRPPP!! AAAHHH&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

