<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush May Tap $700B Bailout For Big Three</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GuppyNblue</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-127028</link>
		<dc:creator>GuppyNblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-127028</guid>
		<description>&quot;Reagan would go before the American people &amp; let them know that those in Congress were giving Fannie &amp; Freddie cover&quot;

Sooooo true. I don&#039;t know how we expect anything from the GOP today when they&#039;re either too chickensh*t or invested to speak the truth. I&#039;ve said it before, if you&#039;re not you&#039;re willing to identify the problem then you can&#039;t possibly fix it. If thats politically unappealing and even cost votes, so be it. We do the right thing because it&#039;s the right thing. When did we accept this concept that being a politician is a career and they&#039;re allowed to compromise the nation to keep their jobs? 

The truth is that tax cuts are the most direct approach to stimulating an economy. Letting people have more of &lt;b&gt;their money&lt;/b&gt; to spend is better than giving billions to banks and hoping they will &lt;b&gt;lend it to us with interest&lt;/b&gt;. 

(Just a personal note: I can&#039;t stand politicians at all. Whenever I have the opportunity to meat one - I pass. But I had genuine feelings for Ronald Reagan and believe he had the same for us).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Reagan would go before the American people &amp; let them know that those in Congress were giving Fannie &amp; Freddie cover&#8221;</p>
<p>Sooooo true. I don&#8217;t know how we expect anything from the GOP today when they&#8217;re either too chickensh*t or invested to speak the truth. I&#8217;ve said it before, if you&#8217;re not you&#8217;re willing to identify the problem then you can&#8217;t possibly fix it. If thats politically unappealing and even cost votes, so be it. We do the right thing because it&#8217;s the right thing. When did we accept this concept that being a politician is a career and they&#8217;re allowed to compromise the nation to keep their jobs? </p>
<p>The truth is that tax cuts are the most direct approach to stimulating an economy. Letting people have more of <b>their money</b> to spend is better than giving billions to banks and hoping they will <b>lend it to us with interest</b>. </p>
<p>(Just a personal note: I can&#8217;t stand politicians at all. Whenever I have the opportunity to meat one &#8211; I pass. But I had genuine feelings for Ronald Reagan and believe he had the same for us).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheehanjihad</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-127022</link>
		<dc:creator>sheehanjihad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-127022</guid>
		<description>Obama sounds like that Billy Mays character on television hawking .25 cent items for &quot;ONLY 19.95!!&quot; plus &quot;shipping and handling&quot;.    And you get another one for absolutely free!!!! (just pay shipping and handling for that one too)  What they dont tell you is that the &quot;shipping and handling&quot; covers the entire cost of the item you are buying.  Advertising, manufacturing, shipping, freight, postage, labor, everything!  The 19.95 is pure profit.  Obama has a similar plan....everything he offers will be &quot;Absolutely FREE!!&quot;  and we, the taxpayers, are going to pay the &quot;shipping and handling&quot; on his bullshit bailout plan.

Like Billy Mays....Obama is a huckster of the umpteenth degree.  He knows a sucker when he sees it, and he also knows how to pull the wool over the eyes of some of the most ignorant people ever to live in this country.  Unlike Billy Mays though, I have to pay for &quot;Moonbeam&#039;s&quot; &quot;shipping and handling&quot;for her government giveaways... and I dont even get the first one, or the second one, I get nothing.  But yet, I am going to have to pay for it. All of it.  Obama&#039;s inauguration will play like a giant infomercial...a straight faced carnival barker fleecing the public out of every last cent he can.  And he is going to get away with it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama sounds like that Billy Mays character on television hawking .25 cent items for &#8220;ONLY 19.95!!&#8221; plus &#8220;shipping and handling&#8221;.    And you get another one for absolutely free!!!! (just pay shipping and handling for that one too)  What they dont tell you is that the &#8220;shipping and handling&#8221; covers the entire cost of the item you are buying.  Advertising, manufacturing, shipping, freight, postage, labor, everything!  The 19.95 is pure profit.  Obama has a similar plan&#8230;.everything he offers will be &#8220;Absolutely FREE!!&#8221;  and we, the taxpayers, are going to pay the &#8220;shipping and handling&#8221; on his bullshit bailout plan.</p>
<p>Like Billy Mays&#8230;.Obama is a huckster of the umpteenth degree.  He knows a sucker when he sees it, and he also knows how to pull the wool over the eyes of some of the most ignorant people ever to live in this country.  Unlike Billy Mays though, I have to pay for &#8220;Moonbeam&#8217;s&#8221; &#8220;shipping and handling&#8221;for her government giveaways&#8230; and I dont even get the first one, or the second one, I get nothing.  But yet, I am going to have to pay for it. All of it.  Obama&#8217;s inauguration will play like a giant infomercial&#8230;a straight faced carnival barker fleecing the public out of every last cent he can.  And he is going to get away with it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-127020</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-127020</guid>
		<description>And from NRO today, Thursday, Dec 18, 2008.......

Bailout Update: Rumors and Real Costs   [Henry Payne]      (under Planet Gore blog)

&quot;The real cost of getting the “Detroit Two” through 2009 is somewhere in the ballpark of $60 to $125 billion. &quot;...Henry Paine

note.....&quot;through 2009&quot; only</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And from NRO today, Thursday, Dec 18, 2008&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Bailout Update: Rumors and Real Costs   [Henry Payne]      (under Planet Gore blog)</p>
<p>&#8220;The real cost of getting the “Detroit Two” through 2009 is somewhere in the ballpark of $60 to $125 billion. &#8220;&#8230;Henry Paine</p>
<p>note&#8230;..&#8221;through 2009&#8243; only</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Bytes</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126708</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126708</guid>
		<description>SG - Does this sound like Reagan?!

1.  Reagan would go before the American people &amp; let them know that those in Congress were giving Fannie &amp; Freddie cover &amp; we wouldn&#039;t be in this mess in the first place &amp; don&#039;t deserve their vote. 

2.  If somehow we still managed our way into recession, he would go to the source of the problem - he would tell the American people that their pensions could be saved if only Congress would eliminate capital gains taxes, which he would explain is like forcing movie goers to pay admission  twice - once on the way in &amp; again on the way out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SG &#8211; Does this sound like Reagan?!</p>
<p>1.  Reagan would go before the American people &amp; let them know that those in Congress were giving Fannie &amp; Freddie cover &amp; we wouldn&#8217;t be in this mess in the first place &amp; don&#8217;t deserve their vote. </p>
<p>2.  If somehow we still managed our way into recession, he would go to the source of the problem &#8211; he would tell the American people that their pensions could be saved if only Congress would eliminate capital gains taxes, which he would explain is like forcing movie goers to pay admission  twice &#8211; once on the way in &amp; again on the way out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurkin_no_mo</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126678</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurkin_no_mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126678</guid>
		<description>Hmmm....WWRD?  (What would Reagan do?)  (THE RON.... not his offsprings)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;.WWRD?  (What would Reagan do?)  (THE RON&#8230;. not his offsprings)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Bytes</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126624</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Bytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126624</guid>
		<description>Psst! W. Come here. I wanna tell you somethin&#039;.

&quot;IT AIN&#039;T THE SELLIN! IT&#039;S THE BUYIN&#039;! NO BODY&#039;S BUYING ANYTHING! GOT IT?!!! AND THEY AIN&#039;T GONNA BUY ANYTHING BECAUSE OBAMANUT SAYS HE&#039;S GONNA RAISE TAXES***!!!!&quot;

(YES I&#039;M YELLING, SG!)

***According to DNC talking points. Raising taxes during the Obama administration is not really raising taxes. It&#039;s simply putting taxes back where they were before Bush came into office, which is a tactic I suggest we keep in mind when gas goes back up to $4.00. E.G.

&quot;Gas hasn&#039;t gone up. It simply is back to the level that it was when we started talking about alternative energy.&quot;

Brace yourself folks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Psst! W. Come here. I wanna tell you somethin&#8217;.</p>
<p>&#8220;IT AIN&#8217;T THE SELLIN! IT&#8217;S THE BUYIN&#8217;! NO BODY&#8217;S BUYING ANYTHING! GOT IT?!!! AND THEY AIN&#8217;T GONNA BUY ANYTHING BECAUSE OBAMANUT SAYS HE&#8217;S GONNA RAISE TAXES***!!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>(YES I&#8217;M YELLING, SG!)</p>
<p>***According to DNC talking points. Raising taxes during the Obama administration is not really raising taxes. It&#8217;s simply putting taxes back where they were before Bush came into office, which is a tactic I suggest we keep in mind when gas goes back up to $4.00. E.G.</p>
<p>&#8220;Gas hasn&#8217;t gone up. It simply is back to the level that it was when we started talking about alternative energy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Brace yourself folks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126622</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126622</guid>
		<description>GM sales are off 40% from Nov 2007.  They lost a little money that quarter but not much. 

Last November&#039;s annualized sales were $188B.  If the 40% drop holds for a year, they will have a $75B shortfall over the next 12 months.

What in the current economy would make sales go up?  The product cycle is years.  Unemployment is headed over 10%.  People&#039;s savings have been obliterated.   Americans like foreign cars better.  Cars last longer now. The infamous Volt has 0 chance to succeed.  Even the French have concluded electric cars are not viable.

Without a major restructuring, therefore, the 1-year cost to keep GM alone afloat, without layoffs will be in the neighborhood of 75B.   Consider it welfare.

A total bailout, if it were possible, could easily cost taxpayers a lot more than 150 Billion.

The only viable option is a form of bankruptcy where the Big 3 have the oportunity to align their costs with the market.  Call it a bailout if you will, but it has to happen.

The government bailout being discussed is Welfare for the UAW.  Pure and simple.   And the welfare could last for years, and will increase the federal budget by at least 10% for years.

Who thinks the UAW would use that welfare wisely?

Better to get the pain over with now, and limit the taxpayers&#039; burden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM sales are off 40% from Nov 2007.  They lost a little money that quarter but not much. </p>
<p>Last November&#8217;s annualized sales were $188B.  If the 40% drop holds for a year, they will have a $75B shortfall over the next 12 months.</p>
<p>What in the current economy would make sales go up?  The product cycle is years.  Unemployment is headed over 10%.  People&#8217;s savings have been obliterated.   Americans like foreign cars better.  Cars last longer now. The infamous Volt has 0 chance to succeed.  Even the French have concluded electric cars are not viable.</p>
<p>Without a major restructuring, therefore, the 1-year cost to keep GM alone afloat, without layoffs will be in the neighborhood of 75B.   Consider it welfare.</p>
<p>A total bailout, if it were possible, could easily cost taxpayers a lot more than 150 Billion.</p>
<p>The only viable option is a form of bankruptcy where the Big 3 have the oportunity to align their costs with the market.  Call it a bailout if you will, but it has to happen.</p>
<p>The government bailout being discussed is Welfare for the UAW.  Pure and simple.   And the welfare could last for years, and will increase the federal budget by at least 10% for years.</p>
<p>Who thinks the UAW would use that welfare wisely?</p>
<p>Better to get the pain over with now, and limit the taxpayers&#8217; burden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U NO HOO</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126601</link>
		<dc:creator>U NO HOO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126601</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why is it that I feel the need for a cigarette if the $$$$ goes the the BIG 3 ??&quot;

Cars don&#039;t have cigarette lighters anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why is it that I feel the need for a cigarette if the $$$$ goes the the BIG 3 ??&#8221;</p>
<p>Cars don&#8217;t have cigarette lighters anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Byler</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126600</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Byler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 04:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126600</guid>
		<description>McCain voted against the auto bailout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain voted against the auto bailout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126591</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126591</guid>
		<description>Bailout math......simplified.

In round figures, your trustoworthy federal government has been collecting about 1 Trillion annually recently in Income Tax receipts.   Therefore, 700M constitutes about a 70% one-time increase in Income Tax requirements.

So if you have been paying about 20K annually, the 700B tab means that somehow, you are going to be paying an additional 14K at some point, because 20K * 70%  14K.

Now Obamy will be putting the printing press on overtime soon, and will be &quot;delaying&quot; the collection of the necessary funds through all sorts of tricks.   But printing money will just increase inflation and the hit to you on average will be about the same if you measure purchasing power instead of tax dollars.  And if the collections are &quot;delayed&quot; your children will pay the tab, plus intereste.

And don&#039;t forget, estimates of the total &quot;cost&quot; of the bailouts is now over 4 Trillion, or about 6 times the 700B that is mentioned in this article.

But having your share of the government&#039;s debt increase by about 4 times what you pay in one year&#039;s income tax shouldn&#039;t bother you, now that you have a government you know is looking out for your best interests.   Barney Fife, Obamy, Rahm the Impaler, the Hildabeast, Slow Joe, Chris Dudd and Charlie Rangel are there for you full-time, up to 2 hours a day, up to 100 days a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bailout math&#8230;&#8230;simplified.</p>
<p>In round figures, your trustoworthy federal government has been collecting about 1 Trillion annually recently in Income Tax receipts.   Therefore, 700M constitutes about a 70% one-time increase in Income Tax requirements.</p>
<p>So if you have been paying about 20K annually, the 700B tab means that somehow, you are going to be paying an additional 14K at some point, because 20K * 70%  14K.</p>
<p>Now Obamy will be putting the printing press on overtime soon, and will be &#8220;delaying&#8221; the collection of the necessary funds through all sorts of tricks.   But printing money will just increase inflation and the hit to you on average will be about the same if you measure purchasing power instead of tax dollars.  And if the collections are &#8220;delayed&#8221; your children will pay the tab, plus intereste.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t forget, estimates of the total &#8220;cost&#8221; of the bailouts is now over 4 Trillion, or about 6 times the 700B that is mentioned in this article.</p>
<p>But having your share of the government&#8217;s debt increase by about 4 times what you pay in one year&#8217;s income tax shouldn&#8217;t bother you, now that you have a government you know is looking out for your best interests.   Barney Fife, Obamy, Rahm the Impaler, the Hildabeast, Slow Joe, Chris Dudd and Charlie Rangel are there for you full-time, up to 2 hours a day, up to 100 days a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 12 Gauge Rage</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126587</link>
		<dc:creator>12 Gauge Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126587</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t want to take a ton of money from the government if it were possible because then I would feel forever indebted to them. A government powerful enough to give you everything you need is powerful enough to take away everything you have. Or everything you hold dear and sacred. This is something that diehard socialists consistently fail to grasp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t want to take a ton of money from the government if it were possible because then I would feel forever indebted to them. A government powerful enough to give you everything you need is powerful enough to take away everything you have. Or everything you hold dear and sacred. This is something that diehard socialists consistently fail to grasp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126584</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126584</guid>
		<description>BDS finally got to W.  He&#039;s got Stockholm Syndrome now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BDS finally got to W.  He&#8217;s got Stockholm Syndrome now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEZ</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126582</link>
		<dc:creator>DEZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126582</guid>
		<description>No worries Liberals Demise, other than the math gaff, you were spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries Liberals Demise, other than the math gaff, you were spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberals Demise</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126581</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberals Demise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126581</guid>
		<description>DEZ.......I&#039;m drinkin&#039; a RB (RealityBytes) martini. Torpedo juice or a flame throwers&#039; bite is more like it!
Trigger finger typist with glass held on high and not the mathmationist I should be....it is still a shiite less moola than they want to GIVE to the Losers of Great Corporations!! FAR LESS THAN 700 BILLION $$$$$ and we don&#039;t gotta kiss and make nice!! Why is it that I feel the need for a cigarette if the $$$$ goes the the BIG 3 ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DEZ&#8230;&#8230;.I&#8217;m drinkin&#8217; a RB (RealityBytes) martini. Torpedo juice or a flame throwers&#8217; bite is more like it!<br />
Trigger finger typist with glass held on high and not the mathmationist I should be&#8230;.it is still a shiite less moola than they want to GIVE to the Losers of Great Corporations!! FAR LESS THAN 700 BILLION $$$$$ and we don&#8217;t gotta kiss and make nice!! Why is it that I feel the need for a cigarette if the $$$$ goes the the BIG 3 ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheehanjihad</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126580</link>
		<dc:creator>sheehanjihad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126580</guid>
		<description>Uh, yeah  That would be one dollar to each taxpayer.....wait, that&#039;s more than we would get after Jan 20th!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, yeah  That would be one dollar to each taxpayer&#8230;..wait, that&#8217;s more than we would get after Jan 20th!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEZ</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126579</link>
		<dc:creator>DEZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wh-may-use-700b-bailout-for-automakers#comment-126579</guid>
		<description>&quot;One million to each taxpayer=300 million.&quot;

Ummm, might wanna redo the math.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One million to each taxpayer=300 million.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ummm, might wanna redo the math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

