What’s So Historical About Hillary For Prez?

This article was posted by Steve Gilbert on Monday, January 22nd, 2007 at 3:40 pm. You can leave a response.

23 Responses to “What’s So Historical About Hillary For Prez?”

1. chandra_l
   January 22nd, 2007 at 5:50 pm

   What is historical? How about the fact that this is the first time a cuckold (well, a female version) will try for the office?

2. SG
   January 22nd, 2007 at 6:12 pm

   Sorry, Chandra, I edited my post after your comment.

   Surely, Carol Mosely Braun would qualify as a cuckoo. As would Patsy Mink (1972) and Patsy Schroeder (1988).

3. Warmonger Infidel
   January 22nd, 2007 at 6:19 pm

   “Including the highly esteemed Carol Moseley Braun in 2004.”

   Geez SG…..do you have to throw out one of those zingers to cause spontaneous choking on whatever is in your mouth every day? First the pic of Snaggo, then the Dutch sculpture, then shilbillarys bust and now this. For shame.

4. SG
   January 22nd, 2007 at 6:22 pm

   It has been a rough few days, hasn’t it?

5. Warmonger Infidel
   January 22nd, 2007 at 6:24 pm

   More than you can imagine SG……but we will press on.

6. 1sttofight
   January 22nd, 2007 at 6:28 pm

   Massive doses of Viagra will never revive my wilted stalk. ;)

7. Warmonger Infidel
   January 22nd, 2007 at 6:34 pm

   Try the orange pill…..much better than the blue one 1st.

8. sheehanjihad
   January 22nd, 2007 at 6:40 pm

   The reason this is historic is that Hillary is guaranteed the presidency by the media,, and she has done one of those point to center field and then hit the ball there home run things….she is going to be president if it kills all of us. There will be no democrat left standing once this lawn mower with balls cuts them down.

9. RD
   January 22nd, 2007 at 6:43 pm

   Hillary is probably the first woman in history who expected to be rewarded for over looking infidelity with a promise of ” stick with me and I’ll make you’The First Woman President of the U.S’.” It used to be that all a “bought wife” needed to overlook her husband’s indiscretions was a mink coat or a 3 carat diamond ring and then when fake furs and diamonds came in even a non-wealthy man could play (hey, if you’re going to cheat you might as well go all the way-who knows?). Now the cost of infidelity has gone over the top and very few men can make or deliver on such a promise. Now, we have Mrs. Bill Clinton running as a wronged woman, who stuck by her husband like a cockleburr through betrayal and lies and public humiliation and the voters of the U.S. are expected to reward the little woman for her hurt, humiliation, loyalty, and cover-ups with the Presidency of the U.S. Pathetic! She is the ultimate control freak.(Imo)

10. sheehanjihad
    January 22nd, 2007 at 6:49 pm

    RD…a play on your words, if you please: she is a freak, looking for the ultimate control. She will use a scorched earth policy….holding members of congress hostage, and holding entire states hostage with her back room politics….because while bill was experimenting with a talking cigar humidor, Hillary was shoring up her back room political skills, and loading hundreds of people into that oh so sought after “OWE ME” slot that smarmadukes like her use to gain power. Pelosi is scared of her….and that tambourine skinned weasle isnt scared of many people….but Hillary is on a mission, and she will stop at nothing short of murder to get it. she is focused, and she has tons and tons and tons of money. Soros is afraid of her!! He is backing richardson, he can control richardson…but Hillary is walking on water now….and wont be stopped.

11. SG
    January 22nd, 2007 at 6:53 pm

    “Now, we have Mrs. Bill Clinton running as a wronged woman, who stuck by her husband like a cockleburr through betrayal and lies and public humiliation and the voters of the U.S. are expected to reward the little woman for her hurt, humiliation, loyalty, and cover-ups with the Presidency of the U.S. Pathetic! She is the ultimate control freak.”

    And of course she’s the ultimate victim.

    Great points, RD.

12. SG
    January 22nd, 2007 at 7:11 pm

    “The reason this is historic is that Hillary is guaranteed the presidency by the media…”

    What amazes me is that I have yet to see one media report questioning her background or experience for the job.

    Even Obama has more legislative background than Hillary. (He was a state Senator for eight years.)

    Hillary has never had a real job in her life. I don’t believe she ever litigated a case while she was at the Rose Law firm. (She probably wouldn’t even know how to get to their offices in a car.)

    I guess the media feels that if you are in the White House then you know how to do the job — and by osmosis — you have the qualifications and judgment to make the calls of national importance.

    What tough calls has Hillary ever made? Which pantsuit to wear? How to wear her hair this week?

    Where has she ever shown good judgment? Her healthcare taskforce?

    Where is her discernment? She claims she believed Bill had never had an affair until he finally admitted his fling with Monica after the DNA evidence came out.

    (Of course she is lying. But still.)

    The whole thing is so preposterous. The world is a complex and dangerous place. And to “give” someone the Presidency because she is a woman is just suicidal.

    And that’s even after putting aside her assinine ultra-left Wellesley radical politics.

13. Warmonger Infidel
    January 22nd, 2007 at 7:45 pm

    Hey Vertigo……what makes you think she has an even chance of actually winning? A lot of people in her own party don’t think so. And who gives a crap if she’s the first “First Lady” (and I use that term loosely with her) to run. As far as I’m concerned, a vote for shillary is a vote for billary. It will just give him another term in office.

14. doingwhatican
    January 22nd, 2007 at 7:45 pm

    The phony, conniving, haughty, vengeful harridan believes this is to be hers by birthright and/or because of her sufferance.

    That drumbeat you hear from all the usual media whores will haunt us.

    Smoke and mirrors. And, alas, smoke and ash.

    By the way, I believe I’ve lost weight. I’ve not been able to keep a thing down since her “pronouncement”.

15. Warmonger Infidel
    January 22nd, 2007 at 7:50 pm

    Oh SG…how wrong you are about her….

    “Hillary has never had a real job in her life.”
    She gutted salmon in Alaska after her senior year at Wellesley. I’m surprised some Alaskan didn’t gut her while she was there spewing her liberal bullshit.

    “I guess the media feels that if you are in the White House then you know how to do the job — and by osmosis ”
    Wouldn’t that be by “injection” in her case?

16. Warmonger Infidel
    January 22nd, 2007 at 7:52 pm

    dwic….drink ALE….it’ll put the poundage back on ya….

17. robinboyd
    January 22nd, 2007 at 8:40 pm

    I stayed home from work sick today - can’t figure out if it’s the flu or just a severe case of hillaryitis. BUT I heard Bob Beckel say this AM on Fox News that he did not think Hill would get the nomination. The anchor person just kinda laughed but Beckel went on to say that he was not joking.

18. Warmonger Infidel
    January 22nd, 2007 at 8:48 pm

    Just saw a news clip/photo op of the shill somewhere today on the campaign trail (oh I forgot…..she is only exploring the possiblility of running) at a podium holding the hands of somebody’s little children….uh….black children. I guess those that escape the left’s abortion mills are fit to act as campaign props.

    And while I’m at it….why does osmama obama call himself black? Wouldn’t he be an afro-american-american? Or salt and peppa…..or…well you get the idea. I guess if billary can be the first black president, osama obama can be the second. It’s only fair isn’t it?

19. 1sttofight
    January 22nd, 2007 at 8:55 pm

    They used to be Called MULATTO’S.

20. Specter
    January 23rd, 2007 at 7:33 am

    Good Gawwwwd….she’s going to use the “plantation theme” again?

    Shame on her. But then again, the Divisive Dems always play class, race, and money as issues in elections. Gawwwd forbid that they actually try to unite the country.

21. patricko
    January 23rd, 2007 at 10:13 am

    I’m not worried. The people who hate her the most are the far lefties. The fact that they will not be running against W this time changes their entire approach to the nomination process. No need to pick a consensus “winner” like 2004. This time they’ll actually be able to vote for who they like best. And it won’t be Hillary. Fear of selecting a radical who is polarizing and destined to loose will do her in just like Howard Dean in 2004. The first time she shows some promise in an early primary, the Dems will rush in droves for either Obamba or Edwards just to shut her up, and out.

22. wardmama4
    January 23rd, 2007 at 11:30 am

    Actually patricko - there are a lot of Dems and others not interested in a Hildabeast nomination (and not just the ‘vast rightwing conspiracy’ ) use words like dynasty, impeached President and Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky as reminders for starters with those around you who tout her ‘right or eligibility’ to the WH.

    Here is a site that while it makes me laugh, does give one pause to think for a moment.

    http://www.etherzone.com/body.html

    What we also need to track is - those who throw in early, what percentage end up going on to win - doubt it’s high at all - gives anyone and everyone a chance to find their weakness, ’skeleton in the closet’ or ‘coverup’ to destroy them.

    And I wonder if that is not the real purpose of the blackgodboy and uberfeminazi’s announcements - their demise can be chalked up to entering too early while the dnc pushes a stealth candidate that might just make these two look good in the end.

23. Warmonger Infidel
    January 23rd, 2007 at 1:40 pm

    I heard an interesting analysis about campaigning with billshillary yesterday that makes a lot of sense. If they campaign together for her, he will overshawdow her at the podium. If they split into two campaign trails, billary campaigning alone will be the focus rather than shillary. Either way, it’s a lose/lose proposition. I personally don’t think she will get the nomination, and if she does, is not electable, but who knows what the people in this country will do. Who would have thunk the population would forget about 9/11 in less than 5 years.

Leave a Reply

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.