<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why&#8217;s Google Just Checking Some Sites?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:10:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barbie</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132225</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132225</guid>
		<description>Dear Colonel,  I&#039;ve always taken it for granted that the gov does indeed generally monitor everything - it doesn&#039;t bother me.  I&#039;ve nothing to hide.  But as Mr. and Mrs. JohnMG have pointed out, it could be used for retribution. I long ago stopped going to lib blogs and leaving my opinion.  But I COULD just be a paranoid loon...  Time and experience will tell  :)  If my next entry is from someplace down along Guantanamo way, well, you know why the Libs wanted it empty and how they will fill it up.  HAH (just being facetious)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Colonel,  I&#8217;ve always taken it for granted that the gov does indeed generally monitor everything &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t bother me.  I&#8217;ve nothing to hide.  But as Mr. and Mrs. JohnMG have pointed out, it could be used for retribution. I long ago stopped going to lib blogs and leaving my opinion.  But I COULD just be a paranoid loon&#8230;  Time and experience will tell  :)  If my next entry is from someplace down along Guantanamo way, well, you know why the Libs wanted it empty and how they will fill it up.  HAH (just being facetious)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheehanjihad</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132222</link>
		<dc:creator>sheehanjihad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132222</guid>
		<description>Our only real defense is in mutual support.  Take solace in the fact that all over the country, small groups of like minded individuals are taking steps to be uh, &quot;ready to meet the challenge&quot; and will do so without having to communicate with other geographical areas and be subject to eavesdropping by the government.

The beauty of the conservative base is that they can and will act on their own because the goal is the same with all of them.  Instead of facing a herd of elephants which are essentially huge targets and easy to eliminate, the left is going to be tasked with trying to eliminate &quot;driver ants&quot;...and while they can step on hundreds, and even thousands, they will not be able to cope with millions....

So while it is reasonably suspect that all of &quot;us&quot; are being monitored, especially those of us who flat dont give a damn due to well emplaced contingency plans, when they actually try to stifle this dissent....it will be likened to hitting a hornet&#039;s nest with a stick.  The great part about this is, &quot;they&quot; dont think it can happen.  I hope they are as ignorant about this as they are about Iran and Islam.  Everyone...every last one of these self absorbed loons will have to attone for their sedition....

And the prevailing thought of the day will be echoing Madame La&#039; Farge&#039;s famous solution to those who seek to rule by force....&quot;off with their heads&quot;.  A Marine buddy of mine said it best....&quot; I hope I live long enough to die for my country&quot;.  That dedication to regaining the freedoms that are being eroded is what separates &quot;us&quot; from &quot;them&quot;.  They have no idea what will result once they wake the sleeping giant of the Real 
America.  

They will be lulled into a sense of complacency by their own hubris and self absorbed sense of entitlement.  You can kill a man, but you can never kill his ideals.  Wait and see!!

 (yeah, for those of you who are keeping track and tracking dissenters, you have me confused with someone who really gives a sh*t.  Think about it.  Lmao, you have no clue!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our only real defense is in mutual support.  Take solace in the fact that all over the country, small groups of like minded individuals are taking steps to be uh, &#8220;ready to meet the challenge&#8221; and will do so without having to communicate with other geographical areas and be subject to eavesdropping by the government.</p>
<p>The beauty of the conservative base is that they can and will act on their own because the goal is the same with all of them.  Instead of facing a herd of elephants which are essentially huge targets and easy to eliminate, the left is going to be tasked with trying to eliminate &#8220;driver ants&#8221;&#8230;and while they can step on hundreds, and even thousands, they will not be able to cope with millions&#8230;.</p>
<p>So while it is reasonably suspect that all of &#8220;us&#8221; are being monitored, especially those of us who flat dont give a damn due to well emplaced contingency plans, when they actually try to stifle this dissent&#8230;.it will be likened to hitting a hornet&#8217;s nest with a stick.  The great part about this is, &#8220;they&#8221; dont think it can happen.  I hope they are as ignorant about this as they are about Iran and Islam.  Everyone&#8230;every last one of these self absorbed loons will have to attone for their sedition&#8230;.</p>
<p>And the prevailing thought of the day will be echoing Madame La&#8217; Farge&#8217;s famous solution to those who seek to rule by force&#8230;.&#8221;off with their heads&#8221;.  A Marine buddy of mine said it best&#8230;.&#8221; I hope I live long enough to die for my country&#8221;.  That dedication to regaining the freedoms that are being eroded is what separates &#8220;us&#8221; from &#8220;them&#8221;.  They have no idea what will result once they wake the sleeping giant of the Real<br />
America.  </p>
<p>They will be lulled into a sense of complacency by their own hubris and self absorbed sense of entitlement.  You can kill a man, but you can never kill his ideals.  Wait and see!!</p>
<p> (yeah, for those of you who are keeping track and tracking dissenters, you have me confused with someone who really gives a sh*t.  Think about it.  Lmao, you have no clue!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colonel1961</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132214</link>
		<dc:creator>Colonel1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132214</guid>
		<description>As an adjunct to what JMG said: a good way to conduct your life is to know that anything you say in person, on the phone (land-line or cell); anything you type, any keystroke, on an e-mail, on a blog, is easily identifiable and can be monitored.  There are no exceptions unless you have state-of-the-art encryption - and even then, I wouldn&#039;t bet more than a few cents on that...

Nothing to be paranoid about, per se, just know that our Government (and others) likes to listen and read and analyze.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an adjunct to what JMG said: a good way to conduct your life is to know that anything you say in person, on the phone (land-line or cell); anything you type, any keystroke, on an e-mail, on a blog, is easily identifiable and can be monitored.  There are no exceptions unless you have state-of-the-art encryption &#8211; and even then, I wouldn&#8217;t bet more than a few cents on that&#8230;</p>
<p>Nothing to be paranoid about, per se, just know that our Government (and others) likes to listen and read and analyze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMG</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132204</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132204</guid>
		<description>My wife and I had this discussion yesterday, Barbie.  She feels that exacting retribution is easy when electronic backtracking is so easy to accomplish.  My position is that it makes little difference what medium is used to convey (our) the message.  Even snail-mail is subject to eavesdropping and then censorship.  Dissenting opinions via that medium (even anonymous ones) are simply a matter of tracking and then isolating ZIP-codes, then address numbers by numerical grids, then identity via voter-registration records, then screening incoming mail for subject-content......face it.  We have no privacy, nor are we protected from the prying eyes of an unscrupulous intrusive government.  Our only real defense is in mutual support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I had this discussion yesterday, Barbie.  She feels that exacting retribution is easy when electronic backtracking is so easy to accomplish.  My position is that it makes little difference what medium is used to convey (our) the message.  Even snail-mail is subject to eavesdropping and then censorship.  Dissenting opinions via that medium (even anonymous ones) are simply a matter of tracking and then isolating ZIP-codes, then address numbers by numerical grids, then identity via voter-registration records, then screening incoming mail for subject-content&#8230;&#8230;face it.  We have no privacy, nor are we protected from the prying eyes of an unscrupulous intrusive government.  Our only real defense is in mutual support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbie</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132199</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132199</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s healthy and wise to be skeptical about the search engine&#039;s monitoring activities and intentions.  Eric Schmidt, Google&#039;s CEO, is the Chief Technical Officer (I believe that&#039;s the title) for Obama (he&#039;s always on Fox tv, fawning  all over the Messiah). The Dems are plotting the return of the Fairness Doctrine, anyone who would do that would have no trouble suppressing other free speech rights (BTW, who feels comfortable with emailing protests to their far left Dem senators or emailing a protest to the new White House admin??   Not I...)  .  True, this particular incident might not be related.  Google - the internet privacy lads -  had no problem with censorship in China (although they are sufficiently contrite now)  And let&#039;s not forget - Google&#039;s motto is &#039;Don&#039;t Be Evil&#039; -  well we all know that means don&#039;t be conservative and don&#039;t &#039;write&#039; conservative.  There&#039;s probably a barrage of monitoring going on we do not know about. That&#039;s my opinion and I think I&#039;ve given some decent reasons to back it up. p.s.  Honey, Rush is just the beginning...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s healthy and wise to be skeptical about the search engine&#8217;s monitoring activities and intentions.  Eric Schmidt, Google&#8217;s CEO, is the Chief Technical Officer (I believe that&#8217;s the title) for Obama (he&#8217;s always on Fox tv, fawning  all over the Messiah). The Dems are plotting the return of the Fairness Doctrine, anyone who would do that would have no trouble suppressing other free speech rights (BTW, who feels comfortable with emailing protests to their far left Dem senators or emailing a protest to the new White House admin??   Not I&#8230;)  .  True, this particular incident might not be related.  Google &#8211; the internet privacy lads &#8211;  had no problem with censorship in China (although they are sufficiently contrite now)  And let&#8217;s not forget &#8211; Google&#8217;s motto is &#8216;Don&#8217;t Be Evil&#8217; &#8211;  well we all know that means don&#8217;t be conservative and don&#8217;t &#8216;write&#8217; conservative.  There&#8217;s probably a barrage of monitoring going on we do not know about. That&#8217;s my opinion and I think I&#8217;ve given some decent reasons to back it up. p.s.  Honey, Rush is just the beginning&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: locomotivebreath1901</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132195</link>
		<dc:creator>locomotivebreath1901</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132195</guid>
		<description>Goggling &#039;Harvard or Oxford universities with malicious code warnings&#039; have not turned up anything,  but I keep searching for that irony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goggling &#8216;Harvard or Oxford universities with malicious code warnings&#8217; have not turned up anything,  but I keep searching for that irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pinandpuller</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132187</link>
		<dc:creator>pinandpuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132187</guid>
		<description>I just use Dogpile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just use Dogpile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrmcdonald</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132172</link>
		<dc:creator>jrmcdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132172</guid>
		<description>What exactly are the criteria? Whatever they say it is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly are the criteria? Whatever they say it is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132166</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132166</guid>
		<description>Thank goodness we have a powerful 4th estate to protect against the leftist kook nutcases taking over the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank goodness we have a powerful 4th estate to protect against the leftist kook nutcases taking over the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U NO HOO</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132164</link>
		<dc:creator>U NO HOO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132164</guid>
		<description>I used to get warned about Sweetness &amp; Light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to get warned about Sweetness &amp; Light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caligirl9</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132162</link>
		<dc:creator>caligirl9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132162</guid>
		<description>Most everyone here in the Bay Area is a leftist kook nutcase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most everyone here in the Bay Area is a leftist kook nutcase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132160</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132160</guid>
		<description>The google boys are noted lefty nuts.   Like most that achieve wealth beyond anybody&#039;s dreams, they have turned into either Socialists, or more likely, have turned into aristocrats determined to solidify their position on top of the food chain.  Competition, and people who support competition, formerly their friends, have now become their enemies.

This is the common pattern.  If you don&#039;t believe it, review the ranks of the lefty money men and the tactics they use to preserve their wealth (i&#039;m specifically thinking of a fine gentleman named Bill Gates).

Based on Soros and his minions, nothing is beyond them.

Maybe this incident is an innocent mistake, but the google boys are capable of far worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The google boys are noted lefty nuts.   Like most that achieve wealth beyond anybody&#8217;s dreams, they have turned into either Socialists, or more likely, have turned into aristocrats determined to solidify their position on top of the food chain.  Competition, and people who support competition, formerly their friends, have now become their enemies.</p>
<p>This is the common pattern.  If you don&#8217;t believe it, review the ranks of the lefty money men and the tactics they use to preserve their wealth (i&#8217;m specifically thinking of a fine gentleman named Bill Gates).</p>
<p>Based on Soros and his minions, nothing is beyond them.</p>
<p>Maybe this incident is an innocent mistake, but the google boys are capable of far worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confucius</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132156</link>
		<dc:creator>Confucius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132156</guid>
		<description>I dunno.  I smell a vast left-wing conspiracy.  I bet it&#039;s the Democrat Attack Machine Now (DAMN) at work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno.  I smell a vast left-wing conspiracy.  I bet it&#8217;s the Democrat Attack Machine Now (DAMN) at work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BelchSpeak</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132151</link>
		<dc:creator>BelchSpeak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132151</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t know why you would look for a conspiracy about this.  The simplest explanation is the easiest-  google integrates the stopbadware.org site&#039;s known bad software list and sites that deliver malware.  As a big mistake, Google tagged every site that ended in a &quot;/&quot; as bad.  You can check out Google&#039;s official explanation here:
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/this-site-may-harm-your-computer-on.html

&lt;blockquote&gt;Unfortunately (and here&#039;s the human error), the URL of &#039;/&#039; was mistakenly checked in as a value to the file and &#039;/&#039; expands to all URLs&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am no fanboy of Google, especially because of the way they help china censor the internet for its users.  But this was a simple mistake, and no malice or censorship against rightwing blogs were intended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t know why you would look for a conspiracy about this.  The simplest explanation is the easiest-  google integrates the stopbadware.org site&#8217;s known bad software list and sites that deliver malware.  As a big mistake, Google tagged every site that ended in a &#8220;/&#8221; as bad.  You can check out Google&#8217;s official explanation here:<br />
<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/this-site-may-harm-your-computer-on.html" rel="nofollow">http://googleblog.blogspot.com.....er-on.html</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Unfortunately (and here&#8217;s the human error), the URL of &#8216;/&#8217; was mistakenly checked in as a value to the file and &#8216;/&#8217; expands to all URLs</p></blockquote>
<p>I am no fanboy of Google, especially because of the way they help china censor the internet for its users.  But this was a simple mistake, and no malice or censorship against rightwing blogs were intended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confucius</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132147</link>
		<dc:creator>Confucius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/which-sites-is-google-monitoring-why#comment-132147</guid>
		<description>This is malicious website profiling.  The DOJ should investigate Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is malicious website profiling.  The DOJ should investigate Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
