And the United Nations – being the total sack of worthless **** it is, did nothing – except issue resolution after resolution – 17 OF THE THEM – that’s higher than most libs can even count!!!! all resolutions telling Saddam to stop being a big meanie else he’ll get a demerit next to his name… (butllsh*t). BTW, and just how did Saddam Hussein manage to kill without thought or hesitation or conscience all of those Kurds – over 180.000 I believe, in the North? Why, with chemical weapons which I do believe are classed as WMD (would the brain-dead libs ever a ‘thunk’ it). Have you seen any documentaries on what happened to the Kurds? They’re laying around dead like piles of clothing – like slaughtered animals. Many tried to take refuge in cellars but Saddam used an extra special impact high formula (this was not the first time they’d been assaulted) that would seep in and kill men and women and children. Why did he do this? He was testing it. Now I realize you faux libs out there speak how much you care about humanity but we know that’s bull. You like to use that line when it’s convenient but you love to watch innocents being slaughtered so don’t pull that on me.

So come on – you assert there were no WMD – cite your source because I doubt you knew more than the above mentioned people combined. Colin Powell at the time said there was – for one – at the time. But above and beyond even that (and Powell is just a nitwit in my opinion) is the fact the President is SWORN TO PROTECT THE SECURITY OF THIS COUNTRY. And President Bush did – instead of sitting around like that pusillanimous Bill Clinton – who let our men be killed time and time again while he was getting his bj in the Oral Office – President Bush, actually performed his job to the American people – I realize you fruitcake, empty-minded leftists are usually so tanked up on your own chemicals you couldn’t determine the truth (hence a truther is really a misomer and you know you are a ‘truther’ and you know what one is – your own ignorance proves it) but the reality is the President does do something besides get serviced by interns. What a shock. And Bush’s – back by the Congress – took steps to PREVENT ANOTHER 9/11. You see, we can no longer afford to be reactive – Bust was proactive in protecting us; the Bush doctrine reversed the prior eight years of disinterest in protecting this country. BC’s disinterest and non-responsiveness fueled the aggression of militant Islamists like Bin Laden (and our other enemies). Step by step the danger came closer and Clinton did NOTHING. Now try to wrap your ind around this simple concept – President Bush identified a serous lethal threat to our security and supported by intelligence, supported by the majority of Congress and voted on by the Congress (which is the way the constitution works – NO, sweets, you can’t just make it up as you go along – so sad for you) took steps to protect us/ Good, I am glad I actually had a president who protected me and my family instead of sitting around feeling up chicks like Blow J Clinton or like Obama – will desperately be trying to piece a real thought together…

Bush went to war for oil??” He did??? We sure didn’t get much out of it. Just because you left wing opportunistic leeches would suck dry any opportunity doesn’t mean everyone will. You half wits use this same old knee jerk comment yet you have no proof. And I say if GW went to war for oil GOOD -Our country runs on oil and that is a securiry matter just like someone dropping bombs on us. YOu shouldbn’t be calling people stupid or groups of people stupid when you’re unable to even present one iota of evidence or even a coherent argument. Try citing a source. But you can’t. At the root of it is you are just plain angry America protected itself and GW was a MAN and a PRESIDENT who stood up and said NO, he would not allow us to be invaded…

Now you can relax. Obambi and his staff of huggers will insure this country will be struck again. So see, you have something to look forward to. Oh, and don’t give me this garbage you gave GW a chance… YOu’re the type You’ve been kissing Obambi’s rear from the first second you saw him utter his mindless mantra HOPE AND CHANGE. Tell me, great intellect, jbharris – what did Obama ever accomplish that proved he would make a competent president???? Nothing – you don’t know – just like the rest of you Obama dummies don’t have a clue what Obamba’s record was about…

I think what makes me the most disgusted with the anti-war crowd is they just crow and crow about what activists they are – but the only reason is there is free speech in this country. These lefties would shut up like clams in a repressive country where there could be actual repercussions against dissenters. But lefties think they’re such hot sh*T – the reality is you’d be quaking in fear waiting and wanting the U.S. Militaty – the bravest in the world – to come rescure their chicken-sh*t asses.

“Dez, we used to have a congressman and he was as conservative as Bush was.”

Here you set up a straw man argument. Straw man arguments use fallacious logic.

“However, he voted against going to war with Iraq because Iraq did not possess weapons of mass destruction, Iraq was not a threat to us, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 and Iraq had no links to Al-Qaeda.”

Here you continue your straw man argument. You argue that because your congressman believed as he did and voted as he did, that he was right. Just because you believe someone is right does not make him or her right. The underpinnings of your argument are weak, too. You use an old liberal mind trick that works on those who cannot think for themselves: Repeat something often enough, and people will start to believe it. How did you or your congressman know that Iraq was not a threat? Did you read the intelligence reports? You also assume your former congressman was omnipotent when it came to Iraq.

“Even GWB stated later on that Iraq had no links to Al-Qaeda and did not have anything to do with 9/11.”

I do not think GWB said that. As Wikipedia would say, “Citation Needed”. Original source, please.

“So, why did we go over there for?”

We went over there because there were credible threats to the stability of the ENTIRE Middle East region. If Iraq did have WMD, that could set off a chain of events where the whole region could be at war. I am talking about Iraq, Iran, Israel, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and more. It does not matter whether the intelligence for WMD later turned out to be unfounded. Just the chance that Iraq had WMD was reason enough to invade. We also went to secure peace and freedom for the Iraqi people. That is what my wife is doing now.

“Because of the oil.”

Sigh. Think through this. Why in the world would we invade a country for oil when we had enough oil for our use before the war? Gas was a buck and change before the start of the war. Oil was abundant and still is. Sure, maybe in 2050 there will be a war for oil, but this war is not fought for oil.

Look in the mirror, fool! And while we’re on the topic, read and heed;

“It is far better to remain silent and let the world think you are a complete fool than it is to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

I see you haven’t made an appointment with the doctor yet. My apologies in advance. There is no cure for terminally stupid.

I am a Social-Democrat, Dez. There is a big difference between Socialism and Marxism. I am for socialized medicine because there is no reason for any American to be uninsured or have no medical insurance at all.

Iraq had the chemical weapons in the 1980’s. Who sold them to the Iraqis? The Americans did. After Desert Storm, Iraq destroyed all its weapons of mass destruction. Bush just wanted to go over there because he thought Saddam Hussein tried to kill his dad and he had no evidence of this. Also, for the oil is why the U.S. went over there.

I have no idea what a truther is, Dez? Tell me what one is. I want to know.

You people are stupid, you know it. Stupid. You all support a stupid, senseless war that has gotten many men and women killed for nothing. Many more will come home with mental problems and PTSD. And for what? Because of some wild goose chase for something that never existed at the time. There were no weapons of mass destruction and Iraq had no links to Al-Qaeda or any other terrorist group.

You left all mention of blacks from your list of hate groups, and supremacists are in the vast minority of hate compared to the blacks nationwide agreement that white people are responsible for their plight. A liberal always asks if there is some undercurrent to sway the topic of conversation.

You left out blacks totally in your diatribe on hate groups. I thought it odd that the television and media as a whole is full of examples of black hatred because there are stories on it literally every day and night, but very very little on any supremacist groups unless they hold one of their pathetic rallys.

Supremacists have a flawed belief. Black race baiters make a living pushing hatred. And any group that excludes other races has been labeled racist hate filled bigots. So the Black Caucus is a prime example of exclusion by race, thus a beacon of hatred in our own government. and they are small potatoes compared to the other so called “black leaders.” you left them out of your hate groups…..so I didnt.

You say you support Sheila Jackson Lee, Bernadine Dohrm, John Murtha, Charlie Rangel, Al Sharpton and Joe Biden and probably the entire list of others I mentioned, and by proxy you support Farrakhan, for he is supported by the rest on the list. No, I have no problem with that at all. There’s no law against stupid. Ya’ just can’t fix it, is all. Obama and his supporters are gonna prove that shortly.

Also, the Black Caucus in Congress in not a hate group and neither are the community organizers.

Let me ask you a question: Do you have something against Black people? You have no reason to be against them. I am just asking because you claim that the Black Caucus in Congress is a hate group.

Jeremiah Wright never preached hatred of white people. All of you heard a snippet of what he said in church that day. He served this country and he has earned the right to say what he wants. There are white people who attend that church. If he honestly hated white people, do you think that they would attend that church? I do not think so.