<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WP Insists &#8211; Less Healthcare Is Better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:49:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillK</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162808</link>
		<dc:creator>BillK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162808</guid>
		<description>Less &lt;b&gt;health care&lt;/b&gt; is better, but more &lt;b&gt;government&lt;/b&gt; is &lt;b&gt;always&lt;/b&gt; better.

Got it.

Where are the Republican ad makers with this stuff?  Why isn&#039;t this being spouted on TV ads 24/7 the way it would be if it were a Republican health plan and Fox News had said this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less <b>health care</b> is better, but more <b>government</b> is <b>always</b> better.</p>
<p>Got it.</p>
<p>Where are the Republican ad makers with this stuff?  Why isn&#8217;t this being spouted on TV ads 24/7 the way it would be if it were a Republican health plan and Fox News had said this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mae</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162804</link>
		<dc:creator>Mae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162804</guid>
		<description>It must be remembered that everything boils down to whether you would want less for yourself.  Can Ceci Connolly claim this?  If so, she can start today by refusing health care for herself and her family; by purchasing health care for someone who has no insurance and making a commitment to do so for the rest of his/her life; by not deducting any medical expenses from her taxes.  If she will pledge to do these three things today, then, perhaps, she will be believed and commended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be remembered that everything boils down to whether you would want less for yourself.  Can Ceci Connolly claim this?  If so, she can start today by refusing health care for herself and her family; by purchasing health care for someone who has no insurance and making a commitment to do so for the rest of his/her life; by not deducting any medical expenses from her taxes.  If she will pledge to do these three things today, then, perhaps, she will be believed and commended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickB</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162802</link>
		<dc:creator>NickB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162802</guid>
		<description>Their real statement is that YOU MUST give some (most) of YOUR health care that YOU pay for to people who REFUSE to pay for it or want it handed to them free.

The absolute gall of the media never ceases to amaze and disgust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their real statement is that YOU MUST give some (most) of YOUR health care that YOU pay for to people who REFUSE to pay for it or want it handed to them free.</p>
<p>The absolute gall of the media never ceases to amaze and disgust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caligirl9</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162801</link>
		<dc:creator>caligirl9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162801</guid>
		<description>It boggles my mind that tort reform is not being discussed. I&#039;m an advocate of baby steps in any sort of reform. 
People go to the doctor expecting him or her to &quot;DO SOMETHING!!&quot; It&#039;s true that sometimes less is more, and usually those situations are pretty obvious (going to the doc for a cold asking for antibiotics, for example). But until doctors are allowed to use their best judgment and not feel they have to overtreat, there will be no reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It boggles my mind that tort reform is not being discussed. I&#8217;m an advocate of baby steps in any sort of reform.<br />
People go to the doctor expecting him or her to &#8220;DO SOMETHING!!&#8221; It&#8217;s true that sometimes less is more, and usually those situations are pretty obvious (going to the doc for a cold asking for antibiotics, for example). But until doctors are allowed to use their best judgment and not feel they have to overtreat, there will be no reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tater Salad</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162800</link>
		<dc:creator>Tater Salad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162800</guid>
		<description>The real way this should read:   &quot;Less White House will be better&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real way this should read:   &#8220;Less White House will be better&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tater Salad</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162799</link>
		<dc:creator>Tater Salad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162799</guid>
		<description>The White House is true Marxism to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White House is true Marxism to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. Aaron</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162785</link>
		<dc:creator>P. Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162785</guid>
		<description>Imagine if they could deliver less legalese and goverment interference with every medical procedure. Less in that case, may result in more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine if they could deliver less legalese and goverment interference with every medical procedure. Less in that case, may result in more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162777</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162777</guid>
		<description>Petronius,

It&#039;s only madness from the perspective of a person who wants to live a long life.

From the perspective of a power mad Statist, it&#039;s entirely rational.   From that perspective, nothing is more satisfying that having the power of life and death over other human beings.  

Plus, there is the side benefit that once you have that power, you are very difficult to displace.  It took from about 600 AD to Oct 19, 1781 before anybody in the Western world was able to do it.  And it still hasn&#039;t happened anywhere else in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Petronius,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s only madness from the perspective of a person who wants to live a long life.</p>
<p>From the perspective of a power mad Statist, it&#8217;s entirely rational.   From that perspective, nothing is more satisfying that having the power of life and death over other human beings.  </p>
<p>Plus, there is the side benefit that once you have that power, you are very difficult to displace.  It took from about 600 AD to Oct 19, 1781 before anybody in the Western world was able to do it.  And it still hasn&#8217;t happened anywhere else in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proreason</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162776</link>
		<dc:creator>proreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162776</guid>
		<description>&quot;Medical professionals say the fundamental problem in the nation’s health-care system is the widespread misuse and overuse of tests, treatments and drugs that drive up prices, have little value to patients, and can pose serious risks. The question, they say, is not whether there will be rationing, but rather what will be rationed, and when and how.&quot;

So if that&#039;s the fundamental problem, wouldn&#039;t it be a good idea to fix it.

Pass tort reform, and that problem instantly goes away.

But it can&#039;t happen.

If it did, how would Democrats steal enough money to live like princes and rule over us like emperors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Medical professionals say the fundamental problem in the nation’s health-care system is the widespread misuse and overuse of tests, treatments and drugs that drive up prices, have little value to patients, and can pose serious risks. The question, they say, is not whether there will be rationing, but rather what will be rationed, and when and how.&#8221;</p>
<p>So if that&#8217;s the fundamental problem, wouldn&#8217;t it be a good idea to fix it.</p>
<p>Pass tort reform, and that problem instantly goes away.</p>
<p>But it can&#8217;t happen.</p>
<p>If it did, how would Democrats steal enough money to live like princes and rule over us like emperors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petronius</title>
		<link>http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162773</link>
		<dc:creator>Petronius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sweetness-light.com/archive/wp-less-medical-is-better#comment-162773</guid>
		<description>&quot;More is not necessarily better....  In many cases less is better.  ... there is not enough care for some, and too much for others.&quot;

This is madness.  More evidence (as if any more evidence were needed) of the Liberal Death Wish.  Complete and utter madness.

The first principle of practical reason tells us that if something is good we should pursue it, and if it is bad we should avoid it.  The consistent pursuit of what is bad––either for oneself or for others (and especially for those to whom one owes a duty of care)––constitutes the kind of bad behavior that psychiatric clinics are designed to prevent or cure.

Consistently injurious behavior is an indication of serious psychological disorder.  Note that the occasional pursuit of bad or harmful things is normal.  People often make irrational choices.  But to do so repeatedly and consistently, and to insist emphatically upon it, is a sign that the person is mentally deranged.

It may be argued in his defense that this person is being deliberately destructive for personal reasons that seem good to him.  For him, on a subjective level, the destruction feels good.  He takes delight in destruction.  In that case, however, his behavior is still irrational, and his actions are still wrong.  If he persists in such behavior, we would be justified in recognizing that he is a madman, although perhaps we might also call him a criminal.

We may of course argue over what is good and what is bad.  But about some things there is little room to argue.  For example, we may all agree that human life is a basic good.  It is in fact the primary good.  It is good to be alive.  Life is to be preferred to death (for individuals) or to  annihilation (for nations or peoples).  No reasonable and impartial person would seriously dispute this.  This is why we expend precious resources on everything that is useful and advantageous to the preservation of human life––this is why we have medical schools, physicians, nurses, hospitals, medicines, pharmaceutical companies, medical technology and devices, and ambulances.  

It is irrational to want to reduce those life-preserving medical resources.  It is irrational to wish to replace them with a system of equal distribution of a more limited supply of medical resources.  It is irrational because human life is a basic good.  The goal of equal distribution is bad, because it results in unnecessary suffering and death––although perhaps it may seem to be subjectively good to particular individuals who operate on an irrational level––such as people under the delusion of Marxist ideology and other psychopathic criminals.

Madness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;More is not necessarily better&#8230;.  In many cases less is better.  &#8230; there is not enough care for some, and too much for others.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is madness.  More evidence (as if any more evidence were needed) of the Liberal Death Wish.  Complete and utter madness.</p>
<p>The first principle of practical reason tells us that if something is good we should pursue it, and if it is bad we should avoid it.  The consistent pursuit of what is bad––either for oneself or for others (and especially for those to whom one owes a duty of care)––constitutes the kind of bad behavior that psychiatric clinics are designed to prevent or cure.</p>
<p>Consistently injurious behavior is an indication of serious psychological disorder.  Note that the occasional pursuit of bad or harmful things is normal.  People often make irrational choices.  But to do so repeatedly and consistently, and to insist emphatically upon it, is a sign that the person is mentally deranged.</p>
<p>It may be argued in his defense that this person is being deliberately destructive for personal reasons that seem good to him.  For him, on a subjective level, the destruction feels good.  He takes delight in destruction.  In that case, however, his behavior is still irrational, and his actions are still wrong.  If he persists in such behavior, we would be justified in recognizing that he is a madman, although perhaps we might also call him a criminal.</p>
<p>We may of course argue over what is good and what is bad.  But about some things there is little room to argue.  For example, we may all agree that human life is a basic good.  It is in fact the primary good.  It is good to be alive.  Life is to be preferred to death (for individuals) or to  annihilation (for nations or peoples).  No reasonable and impartial person would seriously dispute this.  This is why we expend precious resources on everything that is useful and advantageous to the preservation of human life––this is why we have medical schools, physicians, nurses, hospitals, medicines, pharmaceutical companies, medical technology and devices, and ambulances.  </p>
<p>It is irrational to want to reduce those life-preserving medical resources.  It is irrational to wish to replace them with a system of equal distribution of a more limited supply of medical resources.  It is irrational because human life is a basic good.  The goal of equal distribution is bad, because it results in unnecessary suffering and death––although perhaps it may seem to be subjectively good to particular individuals who operate on an irrational level––such as people under the delusion of Marxist ideology and other psychopathic criminals.</p>
<p>Madness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

