« Hillary Gets Women’s History Wrong - Again | Home | Afghan Claims Torture In ‘Blasphemy’ Case »

Wright On Cindy Sheehan, Joe Wilson, Et Al

From the three year anniversary edition of 9/11 (September 11, 2005) of Trinity’s Trumpet newsletter (pdf file): 

Why Bush Ducked Cindy Sheehan!

While I had time to reflect during the last week of August, I wondered if the month would end without George Bush having had the common decency to meet with Cindy Sheehan and answer the basic question she was asking. All of the media attention that kept being given to “Camp Casey” kept the public’s attention away from what the real issues were. The real issues had nothing to do with what the media was talking about.

The media kept focusing in on the hundreds and thousands of persons who joined in with Cindy Sheehan in trying to find out what “noble cause” her son, Casey, died for. Cindy’s protest outside of George Bush’s Crawford, Texas, home mushroomed into a demonstration of hundreds of thousands as more than 1,627 solidarity vigils were held throughout the country.

The demonstrations and the solidarity vigils were not the real issues, however. The real issues were as follows: Why didn’t George Bush simply sit down with Cindy Sheehan and answer her questions? Cindy said her main question was and still is, “What noble cause did my son die for?”

Mr. Bush could not answer that question, however, because there is no answer that would not cause even more embarrassment than the public attention which she drew. There was no noble cause that Cindy’s son died fighting for. Mr. Bush knows that. Mr. Bush also knows what the real goals of the war in Iraq were. Those goals were laid out in Paul Wolfowitz’s study draft, Pentagon Defense Planning Guide, in 1992.

Those goals were also played out in the neoconservative manifest of “The Project For A New American Century: Rebuilding American Defenses” in September 2000.

Long before 9/11/01, the “neocons” in this country proclaimed that the United States should exercise its role as the world’s only superpower by insuring access to the massive Middle East petroleum reserves. To accomplish that goal, the “neocons” said that the United States would need to invade Iraq and establish permanent military bases there! If Mr. Bush were to sit down and talk with Cindy Sheehan he would have to say to her that her son died to further that agenda. Her son died to help spread United States hegemony throughout the Middle East. George Bush could not possibly do that, however, without facing immediate impeachment.

Instead of telling the truth, what Mr. Bush has done was to justify the war in Iraq by first saying that it was to find and destroy weapons of mass destruction and avoid seeing a “mushroom cloud” in the sky over America (a big crock!).

In spite of the weapons inspectors’ warnings that Iraq had no such weapons, Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney, Mr. Rumsfield, Mr. Bolton, Colin Powell and Condolezza Rice lied about chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. Mr. Bush even used the “smoking gun” claim in his State of the Union Address (I should say “Siege of the Nation Address”).

Mr. Bush stated publicly that Iraq sought to purchase uranium from Niger. That was also a lie (another crock!) because people like Ambassador Joe Wilson who had traveled to Niger to investigate that allegation had reported back to Vice President Cheney that it never happened.

To pay Mr. Wilson back for his betrayal of the neocon agenda, somebody in the Bush club “outed” Mr. Wilson’s wife as a covert CIA operative, thereby putting her life and his in mortal danger.

The National Security Council did not think Iraq was a threat to international peace. The United Nations Security Council held firm - in spite of Mr. Bush’s badgering and threats. They refused to sanction the war in Iraq.

Mr. Bush cannot say to Cindy Sheehan that he thumbed his nose at the United Nations and invaded anyhow! His “coalition forces” took over another people’s country. They combed Iraq looking for those weapons of mass destruction; but they were nowhere to be found - just as the weapons inspectors said! Faced with the need to explain to the American public why over 1800 of our youth are dead in Iraq, Mr. Bush changed the subject from looking for weapons of mass destruction to “saving the Iraqis from Saddam’s torture chambers.”

The pictures coming out of AbuGhraib Prison, however, showed images of United States military personnel torturing Iraqis. Mr. Bush had to stop talking about Saddam Hussein’s torture then.

To further try to justify his illegal war based on a pack of lies where the Downing Street Memos stated that the so-called “evidence” was being fixed, shaped, cooked or tampered with “to fit the policy,” Mr. Bush then said we were “bringing democracy to the Iraqi people.” The facts say something other than that, however.

The August 15th deadline for Iraqis to agree on a new constitution came and went. The infighting between the Shia, the Sunnis and the Kurds over federalism caused the Bush Administration to finally admit that, “We will have some form of Islamic Republic.” What happened to the “democratic” Iraq he talked about?

Mr. Bush cannot tell Cindy Sheehan that 1100 Iraqi civilians were brought into the Baghdad morgue in the month of July. The medical journal, The Lancet, concluded in October of last year that at least 100,000 Iraqi civilians have died in the first 18 months of Bush’s invasion of Iraq. Mr. Bush can’t talk to Cindy Sheehan. He couldn’t talk to her in August because she would have demanded that we withdraw from Iraq now.

Do you want to know why Mr. Bush has no intention of pulling out of Iraq any time soon? It is because the United States is building the largest CIA station in the world in Baghdad. It is also because Halliburton (Mr. Cheney’s company) is busily constructing 1400 US military bases in Iraq. As stated above, those plans were laid out in 1992 and in 2000 (long before 9/11/01).

There is no noble cause for Cindy Sheehan’s son to have died. There is only greed, there is only a grab for money and for oil and there is only “business as usual” on the agenda.

This is an unsigned “editorial,” but it appears on the Pastor’s Page and does not seem to have been lifted from another source without credit. (As Mr. Wright is sometimes wont to do.)

It is almost certainly from the Reverend Doctor’s learned hand. Indeed, it bears all of this signature tropes.

Can you even count the number of blatant and dangerous lies in this single screed? Isn’t there something in the Ten Commandments about bearing false witness?

But that seems to be Mr. Wright’s goal in practically every page of the Trumpet and many (if not most) of his so-called sermons.

It would seem that Mr. Wright and his ilk (Ms. Sheehan, Mr. Plame, et al) intend to corrupt the public language to such an extent that there is no chance for reasoned debate.

He is a well-poisoner.

But of course the $64,000 question is how much of Mr. Obama’s mind has he poisoned?

Unfortunately, one suspects Mr. Wright’s “spiritual protégé” believes every word of this disgusting screed.

Related Articles:

  Print Email

6 Responses to “Wright On Cindy Sheehan, Joe Wilson, Et Al”

  1. oceancountynjconservative

    From the PDF
    “The Living Theological Heritage of
    the United Church of Christ is a seven-volume
    work, which traces the awesomely diverse and
    powerful history and heritage, theologically, of
    the United Church of Christ from the 1600s up
    until the year 2005! The project of collating
    and collecting the documents (550
    documents!) that make up this theological
    resource started back in the 1980s. It was just
    completed and your church, Trinity United
    Church of Christ, is included. Our Mission
    Statement and our Black Value System are
    found on page 666 of volume seven!

    page 666 ! Apropos to all the DNC talking points the MENTOR spews in this diatribe.

  2. SG

    ““The Living Theological Heritage of the United Church of Christ is a seven-volume work”

    This is another preposterous mendacity from Wright and his crowd that warrants exposure.

    They claim that the UCC has been directly involved in every civil right issue back to Moses.

    In truth their denomination was started in 1957:

    United Church of Christ - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U....._of_Christ

  3. platypus

    Our Mission Statement and our Black Value System are
    found on page 666 of volume seven!

    page 666 ! Apropos to all the DNC talking points the MENTOR spews in this diatribe.

    oceancountynjconservative

    *********************
    To paraphrase B.J. Clinton: “It’s the race, stupid.”

    The racist Dynamic Duo of Sharpton & Jackson is now The Three Musketeers.

    Welcome to the change campaign. The change is invisible but what difference does that make? Vote the change candidate and let’s see what happens.

    Oh, wait, I’m sorry. I keep getting the two of them confused. The candidate is married to Michelle and she’s nothing like the pastor.

    Gimme my ballot quick before my mind gets lost again.

  4. wardmama4

    You know this points to the very question re: Barry and Rev Wright - Interactions, relationships, facts, and the driving force behind a person’s stance on an issue - is vitally important for a Presidential candidate. To quote Jonah Goldberg -’ “We pick presidents for their judgment and values. Anything that gives us a clue as to what those might be is not only fair game, it is the game.” ‘- And it is time that the left be held accountable for their values, beliefs, relationships and statements before being elected to office.

    President Bush did not meet with Mother Sheehan for a number of reasons - including the vital one that they had already met - so exactly why did she not ask that question then? Oh contraire my friend, it is not because she didn’t know it could be done, she met Delores Kesterson at Ft. Lewis who came armed with her anti-warmongering ‘facts’ and pictures of her son - which President Bush patiently listened to in private (not to upset nor ‘offend’ any of the other families) - so Ms Sheehan knew from June 2004 (just 2 months after the death of her son) that the President would listen to those against the war. . .And lest we allow it to be forgotten, Ms Sheehan started her ‘quest’ for an answer, only after having been approached by the John Kerry campaign - facts that the left conveniently leave out (again and again). . .Just llke Plame not being covert by the testimony to the Senate of the person who wrote the criteria of a covert CIA agent . . .just a little fact left out of the whole ’story’. And we all know (since this gem was printed in 2005) that most of the ‘facts’ spouted by Sheehan, Plame, Wright et al - have been disproven or are just distortions of the real facts - otherwise President Bush would have already been impeached. Sorry, mention Mother Sheehan and I get distracted and digress. . .

    So, here is my point - when are Americans going to bother to admit that those who spread these lies and mistatements have just as much of an agenda and desire to grab power (possbily more) as the people they are condeming? And if President Bush’s relationships with Rumsfeld, PNAC, Rove etc are ‘nefarious’ isn’t it just as possible that Barry’s relationships with Wright, Ayers, Rezko etc just might be as ‘nefarious’? And if President Bush’s relationships are fair game, aren’t Barry’s?

    Isn’t that what true equality is about - holding yourself up to the exact same standard that you hold everyone else up to?

  5. m072592

    Correct me if I’m wrong…because I was in middle school when it happened…lol…but wasn’t “Ambassador” Wilson’s wife basically a secretary who worked for the CIA…she wasn’t really a covert operative…right? I’m sure that’s missing the broad point of what this article is talking about, just curious

  6. SG

    You are substantially correct, M072592. Ms. Plame had not been working as a covert agent in the five years previous to when her husband outed her to the press to enhance the credibility of his invented charges against Bush.

    Which is why, despite his partisan zeal, Mr. Fitzpatrick never brought charges against anyone under the The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982.

    Here are some of the pieces we have posted here on Valerie and Mr. Plame, which should give you some help with the back story:

    Valerie Plame OR Joe Wilson - Google Search
    http://www.google.com/custom?d.....#038;hl=en


Leave a Reply

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.


« Front Page | To Top
« Hillary Gets Women’s History Wrong - Again | Afghan Claims Torture In ‘Blasphemy’ Case »